logo
How Do You Remove Sitting High Court Judge? Impeachment Process Explained

How Do You Remove Sitting High Court Judge? Impeachment Process Explained

NDTV28-05-2025

New Delhi:
The government is considering impeachment charges against Justice Yashwant Varma, the ex-Delhi High Court judge from whose home burnt bundles of cash were allegedly found in March.
The piles of charred cash - photos of which were shared online - were discovered by firefighters in the smouldering remains of an outhouse attached to his allotted bungalow in central Delhi.
Justice Varma has firmly denied any link to the cash, calling allegations of impropriety against him and members of his family " preposterous", and spoken of a 'conspiracy' against him.
He has also refused to resign, despite a damning report by a three-member judicial panel.
In May, President Droupadi Murmu was advised to begin the impeachment process.
Sources said the impeachment process will likely begin in the second half of July, when Parliament convenes for the monsoon session, unless Justice Varma stands down before then.
READ | Impeachment Motion Likely Against Justice Varma In Cash-At-Home Row
The government is reportedly keen on garnering support from all parties, including the opposition, and is expected to consult them on the first draft of the impeachment motion.
What Is Impeachment?
It is a constitutional mechanism to remove a sitting judge - specifically those from the Supreme Court or a state High Court - from his/her office. Once appointed, judges cannot be removed from office without an order from the President, who, in turn, requires consent from Parliament.
The Constitution does not actually refer to the word ' impeachment ', but the procedure to remove judges is outlined in the Judges Inquiry Act of 1968 and mentioned in two constitutional provisions - Article 124 (for Supreme Court judges) and Article 218 (for those from High Courts).
How Is Impeachment Done?
An impeachment motion can be introduced in either House of Parliament.
At least 50 Rajya Sabha MPs must sign the motion - which is a record of the intention to impeach - for it to proceed further. In the Lok Sabha that number is 100.
Once that threshold is reached, the Chair of the former or the Speaker of the latter, depending on which House admits the motion, will review the available materials.
At this stage s/he may reject the impeachment motion.
If it is passed, then either the speaker or the Chairperson writes to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to nominate a three-member panel to investigate the charges.
Burnt bundles of cash were found at the home of the former Delhi High Court judge.
This panel will consist of either the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court or a top court judge, the Chief Justice of a High Court, and an eminent jurist, who can be nominated by the government.
If this committee finds the charges against the judge to be true, both Houses will vote on removing the judicial officer, starting with the one in which the motion was first introduced.
In each case it must pass by special majority. That is, at least two-thirds of those present and voting must be in favour and these votes must be over half the House's total membership.
Then, and only then, will the President remove the judge - i.e., impeach him/her.
Has Any Judge Been Impeached?
No.
No judge in independent India has been forcibly removed from office. Should Justice Varma not stand down of his own volition, he will have the unfortunate distinction of being the first.
There have, however, been five times impeachment was a possibility.
The first instance was Justice V Ramaswami of the Supreme Court in 1993 and, most recently, an attempt was made to impeach former Chief Justice of India Dipak Mishra in 2018.
In the first case, Justice Ramaswami was accused of financial and administrative irregularities during his time as Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The impeachment, however, failed after MPs from the then-ruling party, the Congress, abstained from voting.
In the last-recorded case, ex-Chief Justice Mishra was accused of administrative misconduct and arbitrary allocation of cases. There were political undertones to the impeachment bid, which failed after the Vice President, then Venkaiah Naidu, rejected the motion.
In-between, there were two separate impeachment bids in 2011 and a fifth in 2015.
The 2015 impeachment was a bid to remove Gujarat High Court judge Justice SB Pardiwala for remarks about reservation for marginalised communities. But the notice was later withdrawn.
In 2011 Justice PD Dinakaran of the Sikkim High Court (previously the Karnataka High Court Chief Justice) and Justice Soumitra Sen of the Calcutta High Court faced impeachment.
The former was accused of judicial misconduct and the latter was found guilty of misappropriating public funds before being appointed a judge.
Both resigned before their respective impeachment processes could be completed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'RJD has non-constitutional ideology, insults Babasaheb Ambedkar': BJP
'RJD has non-constitutional ideology, insults Babasaheb Ambedkar': BJP

India Gazette

time38 minutes ago

  • India Gazette

'RJD has non-constitutional ideology, insults Babasaheb Ambedkar': BJP

New Delhi [India], June 15 (ANI): Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) national spokesperson Shahzad Poonawalla on Sunday accused the RJD of repeatedly insulting Babasaheb Ambedkar and said that the party has a 'non-constitutional ideology'. On RJD chief Lalu Yadav, Poonawala told ANI, 'The insult to Scheduled Castes and Dalits represents the real identity of the RJD and its allies, Congress and the INDI Alliance. The way BR Ambedkar's picture was placed under the feet of Lalu Prasad Yadav and the indecency shown with the image of Ambedkar, this is the original character of RJD' The BJP spokesperson further alleged that the rules of the Constitution are 'not important' for the party. 'RJD has a non-constitutional ideology. For them, the son is very important, not Baba Saheb. 'Jungle raj' and 'Pariwar raj' are important for RJD, but not the rules of the constitution. Again and again, the RJD insults Babasaheb Ambedkar and the people of Scheduled Caste communities...'. Meanwhile, on Saturday, Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav launched a scathing attack on the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), accusing its leaders of having no connection with BR Ambedkar, the Constitution, or reservation policies, while defending his father and RJD supremo Lalu Prasad Yadav. 'These (BJP) people have nothing to do with Baba Saheb, the Constitution, and Reservation. Lalu Yadav has installed many statues of Baba Saheb Ambedkar in Bihar. We are the people who believe in Ambedkar's ideology. The BJP only spread lies,' Tejashwi asserted. 'Lalu Yadav works for 10 hours at the age of 78 and meets people. He is ill, but still they accuse him of such things,' he further highlighted. Speaking to ANI, Bihar Deputy CM Samrat Choudhary said, 'It is clearly visible that Lalu Prasad Yadav is trying to become a king and murder democracy. The way Babasaheb Ambedkar's photo was insulted clearly indicates that Lalu Yadav is trying to insult Babasaheb Ambedkar.' Commenting on the sword used during the cake-cutting, Choudhary added, 'This is criminal mentality. Today, he cut his cake with a sword; when he comes into power, he will cut it with an AK-47.' The controversy erupted after Lalu Prasad Yadav was seen cutting his 78th birthday cake with a sword, drawing criticism from BJP leaders who claimed it symbolised disregard for democratic values and Ambedkar's legacy. These political developments come while the Assembly Elections are expected in Bihar later this year. However, the Election Commission has not announced the official dates. (ANI)

Khalistani extremism tarnishing Canada's image and hindering India ties, warns analyst
Khalistani extremism tarnishing Canada's image and hindering India ties, warns analyst

India Gazette

time38 minutes ago

  • India Gazette

Khalistani extremism tarnishing Canada's image and hindering India ties, warns analyst

New York [US], June 15 (ANI): New York-based expert on Khalistani terrorism, Puneet Sahani, believes that the Khalistani agitation is severely damaging Canada's international reputation. In an interview, he warned that violent rhetoric and incidents -- most recently the harassment of Canadian Journalist Mocha Bezirgan in Vancouver -- are making Canada appear like 'a Pakistan of the West' and raising fears that the country could become 'a future exporter of terrorism.' Sahani urged Ottawa to confront these extremist networks with the same seriousness it applies to other global threats. The analyst also called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi to abandon what he described as a 'soft approach' toward Sikh radicals abroad. He advocated for tougher legal measures, including banning overseas Khalistan-linked organisations and placing their leaders on international no-fly lists. Ahead of PM Modi's travel to Canada for the G7 Summit, Sahani warned that the growing influence of Khalistani extremists in Canada may keep New Delhi and Ottawa diplomatically distant for the foreseeable future. He claimed that pro-Khalistan networks now have 'deep roots in every order of the Canadian state.' Sahani explained that, unlike the original wave of militants who migrated in the 1980s, today's Khalistan movement is increasingly driven by a new generation of activists, many of whom were born and raised in North America. These individuals, he said, are 'even more radicalised' than their predecessors, despite having little or no lived experience of life in Punjab. 'These organisations are indoctrinating young people who have never lived in India, pumping them with hatred of Bharat and Hindus,' he said. 'They are essentially bringing a conflict from the subcontinent onto Canadian soil.' Citing public tributes to slain Khalistani separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar, Sahani said such gestures are clear signs of radical penetration into mainstream Canadian politics. 'They had enough influence to hold a minute of silence in Canada's Parliament,' he noted, calling it evidence that sympathisers hold disproportionate sway over political decision-makers. While acknowledging that most Canadian Sikhs condemn violence, Sahani cautioned that prolonged political pressure from extremist organisations may keep bilateral relations in a deep freeze. (ANI)

Despite SC nod, HCs not keen on appointing retired judges to tackle backlog
Despite SC nod, HCs not keen on appointing retired judges to tackle backlog

Hindustan Times

time40 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Despite SC nod, HCs not keen on appointing retired judges to tackle backlog

New Delhi, Despite the Supreme Court clearing the idea nearly five months ago, the high courts seem not to be keen on appointing ad-hoc judges to tackle pending criminal cases, details available with the government showed. According to people aware of the procedure to appoint Supreme Court and high court judges, none of the high court collegiums have so far recommended names of retired judges to be appointed as ad-hoc judges. There are 25 high courts in the country. Till June 11, no high court collegiums sent any such proposal to the Union Law Ministry. Considering a backlog of over 18 lakh criminal cases, the Supreme Court on January 30 allowed the high courts to appoint ad-hoc judges, not exceeding 10 per cent of the court's total sanctioned strength. Article 224A of the Constitution allows the appointment of retired judges as ad-hoc judges in high courts to help deal with pendency. According to the laid down procedure, the respective high court collegiums send recommendations or names of candidates to be appointed as HC judges to the Department of Justice in the law ministry. The department then adds inputs and details of the candidates before forwarding the same to the Supreme Court Collegium. The SC Collegium then takes a final call and recommends to the government to appoint the selected persons as judges. The president signs the 'warrant of appointment' of the newly-appointed judge. The procedure to appoint ad-hoc judges will be the same except that the president will not sign the warrant of appointment. But the assent of the president will be sought for appointing ad-hoc judges. Except in one case, there is no precedence of appointing retired judges as ad-hoc HC judges, officials had earlier pointed out. In a judgement dated April 20, 2021, on the appointment of ad-hoc judges in the high courts, the top court imposed certain conditions. However, later a special Supreme Court bench comprising then Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justices B R Gavai and Surya Kant relaxed certain conditions and kept some in abeyance. The verdict, which was authored by former chief justice S A Bobde, directed retired high court judges to be appointed as ad-hoc ones for a period of two to three years to clear the backlog. While one condition said that ad-hoc judges cannot be appointed if a high court was working with 80 per cent of its sanctioned strength, the other said ad-hoc judges could sit separately on benches to deal with cases. Relaxing the conditions, the court said the requirement that vacancies should not be more than 20 per cent of the sanctioned strength for the time being shall be kept in abeyance. The bench also said each high court should keep the appointment to two to five ad-hoc judges and not exceed 10 per cent of the total sanctioned strength. "The ad-hoc judges will sit in a bench presided over by a sitting judge of the high court and decide pending criminal appeals," the apex court's order said. The rarely used Article 224A of the Constitution deals with the appointment of ad-hoc judges in high courts. "The chief justice of a high court for any state may at any time, with the previous consent of the president, request any person who has held the office of a judge of that court or of any other high court to sit and act as a judge of the high court for that state," it says.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store