'Trojan Horse', 'Pearl Harbour': Decoding Terms Used For Ukraine's Drone Attack On Russia
Last Updated:
Ukraine launched a daring drone strike over 4,000 km from the border deep inside Russia, targeting five Russian airbases and damaging 41 nuclear bombers and warplanes.
On June 1, Ukrainian forces launched one of the most audacious drone operations in modern military history, targeting multiple Russian airbases across 4,000 km of hostile territory. The attack took place on the eve of US-brokered ceasefire talks between the two countries in Istanbul.
Ukraine's Security Service (SBU) carried out ' Operation Spider's Web ', using first-person-view (FPV) drones, which were reportedly hidden inside makeshift wooden cabins and mounted on trucks that were parked near major military airbases. They were remotely triggered, damaging at least 41 Russian heavy bombers and other warplanes.
The daring attack on Russian military aircraft has led to comparisons with 'Pearl Harbour' and 'Russian Trojan Horse'. Ukraine claimed the attack caused $7 billion in damage and could deal a critical blow to Russia's aerial capabilities as it could no longer manufacture more of these aircraft.
'Today, a brilliant operation was carried out — on enemy territory, targeting only military objectives, specifically the equipment used to strike Ukraine. Russia suffered significant losses — entirely justified and deserved," said Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
'Trojan Horse'
The audacious drone operation by Ukraine was compared to the legendary Trojan War between the Greeks and the city of Troy in Anatolia (now Turkey) in the 12th and 13th century BC, where a similarly deceptive attack was used to cripple enemy forces.
As per reports, Ukraine concealed at least 117 FPV drones in the ceilings of transportation containers, along with mobile wooden cabins. The cabins were taken near major Russian airbases and opened remotely, and the drones swarmed and hammered Russia's bomber fleet, demolishing nearly one-thirds of bombers Moscow has.
Once the horse was brought inside city walls, the soldiers hiding inside opened the gates of Troy, allowing Greek soldiers to enter and destroy the city. The Trojan War is famously known through Homer's renowned poems Iliad and the Odyssey, describing several events of the Trojan War, centring on the horrors of war and the themes of anger, pride, honour, fate, and mortality.
'Pearl Harbour'
The drone attack is also being called Russia's Pearl Harbour, referring to the surprise Japanese attack on the US naval base at Pearl Harbour, which paved the way for the entry of America into World War II and marked a critical point in world history.
After more than three years of war between Russia and Ukraine, the Ukrainian Army unleashed a devastating attack on Russia's nuclear bombers and warplanes, which were originally designed to destroy the atomic weapons of the United States and Europe in case an all-out war broke out. Exploiting gaps in Russian intelligence, Ukrainian forces used a covert mission to deal a critical blow to Russia's bomber fleet.
Ukraine destroyed Russia's TU-95 'Bear" nuclear bombers, TU-22 'Backfire" fast-attack bombers and A-50 'Mainstay" command-and-control jets in the strike. These warplanes were at the heart of cruise missile strikes in Ukraine.
This attack was reminiscent of Imperial Japan's surprise attack on the Pearl Harbour base on December 7, 1941. Tensions between the US and Japan had reached a boiling point, after the imperial Army invaded Manchuria and China. After the US imposed strict trade restrictions on Japan, the latter launched pre-emptive strikes targeting airfields, battleships and other facilities at the strategic naval base located in Hawaii
Japan managed to damage or sink at least 8 US battleships, while damaging or destroying three cruisers, three destroyers and 188 aircraft. More than 2,400 Americans were killed in the attack. On the next day, the US declared war on Japan and formally entered World War II.
As the rivalry intensified into full-scale war, the US Navy turned the tide in its favour during the Battle of Midway, sinking four Japanese aircraft carriers. By 1945, Japan was on the brink of defeat when the US dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing unprecedented destruction. In the aftermath, Japan surrendered unconditionally and eventually became a close ally of the United States.
Why Is Ukraine's Attack Significant?
Ukraine's SBU said that 'Operation Spider's Web' was being planned for around 18 months. It differed from the sort of attacks Ukraine had unleashed so far, which were closer to areas adjoining Russia's border. This time, drones were used 4,000 km from the border, reaching as far as Siberia.
Russia's defence ministry confirmed on Telegram that several of its military aircraft 'caught fire", adding that there were no casualties. Russian authorities said it had arrested several suspects, including the driver of a truck from which a drone had taken off, state agencies said.
The impact of the drone strike also provided insight into the changing modes of modern warfare. Rybar, a Telegram account that is close to the Russian military, called it a 'very heavy blow" for Moscow and pointed to what it called 'serious errors" by Russian intelligence.
First Published:
June 02, 2025, 17:48 IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
40 minutes ago
- First Post
Pope Leo, Putin discuss Ukraine war; Vatican calls for peace, Kremlin focuses on ‘root causes'
In his first call since taking over as the Vicar of Christ, Pope Leo appealed to Russian leader Vladimir Putin to make peace in Ukraine and address the humanitarian situation in the country. Before taking over as the pope, he had condemned the Russian war on Ukraine as an 'imperialist' invasion. read more Pope Leo discussed the ongoing war in Ukraine with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday. Since taking over as the Vicar of Christ last month, this was Leo's first call with Putin. While Leo stressed the need for a ceasefire and referred to the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine, Putin spoke of the purported Ukrainian aggression and repeated his maximalist demands. 'The Pope made an appeal for Russia to take a gesture that would favor peace, emphasising the importance of dialogue to create positive contacts between the parties and seek solutions to the conflict,' the Vatican said in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The conversation came at a time when Ukraine and Russia are holding direct talks hosted by Turkey. The talks have come amid increasing violence as Russia has continued to launch hundreds of drones and missiles on a near-daily basis lately. On Sunday, Ukraine launched a drone attack on five Russian airbases and destroyed nearly a third of Russia's long-range, nuclear-capable bomber and surveillance fleets. In its readout, the Kremlin said that Putin told Leo that 'root causes' needs to be addressed for their to be an 'ultimate, fair, and thorough resolution'. 'Root causes' is how Putin and his top officials refer to their maximalist demands for the end of the Ukraine war. Such demands essentially amount to Ukraine's surrender and the cessation of Ukrainian neighbourhood. Such demands include the complete surrender of five Ukrainian provinces that Russia claims and Russian occupation's international recognition; limits on post-war Ukrainian military; amendments to Ukrainian constitution to include Russian language in official business, a ban on nationalist bodies in Ukraine, and other changes; creation of a buffer zone on Ukraine's side of the envisioned new border; etc. The Kremlin said that Putin 'drew special attention to the fact that the Kyiv regime was banking on escalating the conflict and carried out sabotage against civilian infrastructure' in Russia. Before taking over as the Pope, Leo had condemned the Russian war on Ukraine as 'a true invasion, imperialist in nature, where Russia seeks to conquer territory for reasons of power'. The approach was in sharp contrast to then-Pope Francis' stand on the conflict, who was often criticised for taking a softer position and not directly condemning Russia for invading Ukraine. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Fact check: How credible is Russian Fact-check Site GFCN?
Representative Image (AI-generated) In early April, Russia's ministry of foreign affairs unveiled the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN) — a self-proclaimed international alliance of fact-checkers and media outlets. The initiative was first presented at the "Dialogue about Fakes 2.0" forum in Moscow in November 2024. At a press briefing following the April announcement, Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova framed the GFCN as a counter to what she called the West's "relentless stream of fake stories and disinformation campaigns," accusing western fact-checkers of engaging in "biased pseudo-fact-checking. " "This global civic initiative," Zakharova said, "will enable us to counter destructive Western actions using our own constructive agenda." But established fact-checking sites such as Facta and Maldita have raised red flags over the GFCN's Kremlin-aligned backers, opaque operations, and overtly one-sided narratives. DW Fact check takes a closer look. Who's behind the GFCN? The GFCN was co-founded by TASS, Russia's state-run news agency, and the Autonomous Non-Profit Organization ANO Dialog — both known for their close ties to the Kremlin. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo TASS was suspended in 2022 by the European Alliance of News Agencies (EANA) over concerns about its editorial independence. In 2023, the European Union sanctioned ANO Dialog for its role in spreading disinformation and for operating the pro-Kremlin website War on Fakes. Ahead of Russia's 2024 presidential election, the US Treasury also sanctioned the group under Executive Order 14024, targeting individuals and entities linked to the Russian government. Does the GFCN meet global fact-checking standards ? Independent fact-checking relies on transparency, verifiable sourcing, and open methodologies. Leading organizations such as the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) require fact-checks to cite public data and provide transparent methods that others can replicate. DW reviewed several GFCN articles and found consistent problems with sourcing and methodology. In one article titled "The Romanian Elections: How Did the West Win Only on the Second Try?", the author cites the 2024 Eurobarometer, claiming only 22 per cent of Romanians support aid to refugees, only 14 per cent back the EU's actions on Ukraine, and only 13% favor Ukraine's EU candidate status. But these figures are false. DW cross-checked the data and found significantly higher levels of Romanian support for EU policies on Ukraine in the 2024 Eurobarometer, contradicting the article's core claim. Another piece alleges that the Soros family was the "shadow organizer" behind the "HANDS OFF!" protests against US President Donald Trump's second administration, which took place across the United States on April 5, 2025. The article argues that, since some organizers had previously received grants from the Open Society Foundations, the Soros family must have orchestrated the protest. That's misleading. The piece focuses narrowly on two groups — MoveOn and Indivisible — and ignores the broader coalition behind the rallies. While both organizations have indeed received funding from Open Society Foundations, the grants supported general programming, not the April 5 protests specifically. Moreover, these groups list dozens of funders, not just the Soros-backed foundation. Receiving support from Open Society Foundations doesn't prove direct involvement on the part of the Soros family, whose philanthropic work has long been targeted by conspiracy theorists. These narratives often paint Soros as a puppet master behind protests, migration, or global unrest — claims that have been widely discredited. Another GFCN article titled "Is ChatGPT Prone to Russian Propaganda?" fails to seriously engage with the question it raises. Instead, it spends most of its word count defending TASS and attacking a Norwegian media outlet that questioned the Russian agency's credibility. The article barely mentions recent investigations — such a report by NewsGuard, which DW covered — which document Russian attempts to manipulate generative AI platforms. The piece's only conclusion appears in the final paragraph, which vaguely states: "It is incorrect to give a chatbot human qualities and accuse it of 'preferring' one of the sources to the others." GFCN: Who is writing these stories? One contributor to the GFCN is Sonja van den Ende, a Dutch journalist living in Russia who has been embedded with Russian troops in Ukraine. Some Dutch media have described her as a conspiracy theorist. On X, she recently posted: "Germany is the country of knife pullers, used to be a country of beer and bratwurst, now asylum seekers, i.e. radicalized rebels from Syria, Iraq etc." Other GFCN contributors include Tim Anderson, director of the Centre for Counter Hegemonic Studies. He has called the massacre of Ukrainian civilians in Bucha a "scam" and falsely claimed that Russia's invasion of Ukraine did not involve the targeting of civilian infrastructure. A familiar Russian playbook: mimic and confuse: Observers say the GFCN's name — just one letter removed from the IFCN — is no accident. The International Fact-Checking Network, founded in 2015 by the Poynter Institute, is a respected consortium of more than 150 independent fact-checkers worldwide. It trains journalists, enforces professional standards, and certifies outlets based on transparency and editorial independence. The GFCN, on the other hand, appears to follow a long-standing tactic of the Russian state: imitating legitimate institutions to blur the line between journalism and propaganda. "We do not consider their activities to fall within the professional fact-checking ecosystem," IFCN director Angie Drobnic Holan told DW, citing Russia's consistent suppression of independent journalism. "Professional fact-checking requires the ability to independently verify claims across the political spectrum," she said. "Journalists must be free to publish findings that contradict the government. We are highly dubious that this effort allows for that." Tommaso Canetta, a policy officer with the European Digital Media Observatory (EDMO), called the GFCN a classic case of political appropriation. "This is a tactic we've seen many times; co-opting terms with credibility, like 'fact-checking,' and stripping them of meaning," he explained. "Political actors often label partisan narratives as 'fact checks' when they clearly are not." He stressed that affiliations with networks like the IFCN or the European Fact-Checking Standards Network (EFCSN) help distinguish legitimate outlets from those engaged in manipulation. "Without such standards, we end up with initiatives — like this one from Russia — that pollute the term and muddy the waters."
Hindustan Times
43 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Harvard student fires back in exclusive interview as Trump goes to war on foreign students
An exclusive interview with Fangzhou Jiang, Forbes 30 Under 30 honoree and Harvard Kennedy School student, on the Trump administration's aggressive visa revocations for Chinese students. Hear firsthand about the anxiety and uncertainty among Chinese students at Harvard, the impact on academic freedom, and the broader implications for US-China relations. Jiang shares insights on national security, community support, and why he co-founded Crimson Education. Don't miss this insightful discussion on America's shifting immigration policies and the future of international students in the US.
