logo
Islamic State Says It Targeted Syrian Forces in Bombings

Islamic State Says It Targeted Syrian Forces in Bombings

New York Times4 days ago

The Islamic State has claimed responsibility for two bomb explosions, the first time the extremist group has directly targeted the new government since it took over in December, a war monitoring group said.
In two statements posted online on Thursday and reported by the SITE Intelligence Group, ISIS claimed that bombs laid by its members had killed and wounded government soldiers and allied militia members.
The Syrian government did not report any attacks by ISIS in the area, but announced that it had conducted two raids against Islamic State operatives in the Damascus area in the past week.
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based monitoring group, reported that one person was killed and three members of the Syrian Army's 70th Division were wounded when a patrol was hit by a remote-controlled land mine in the east of Sweida Province on Wednesday. The man killed was accompanying the government forces, it said.
The two attacks claimed by ISIS took place in the southern province of Sweida, where the group has not been active for the best part of a decade. But the government has struggled to establish security in the province, which is effectively controlled by the Druse minority. Sectarian clashes between local militants and pro-government forces in the province killed more than 100 in late April and early May.
The Islamic State, which controlled large parts of Iraq and Syria a decade ago until U.S. and allied Syrian forces largely defeated it, has continued a low-level insurgency in eastern Syria since 2019. But it has shown a renewed vigor since the fall of the dictator Bashar al-Assad in December, plotting attacks even in the capital, Damascus, and claiming responsibility for a car bombing among other attacks in eastern Syria.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump reaffirms hard line on Iran nuclear deal: 'will not allow any enrichment of uranium'
Trump reaffirms hard line on Iran nuclear deal: 'will not allow any enrichment of uranium'

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Trump reaffirms hard line on Iran nuclear deal: 'will not allow any enrichment of uranium'

President Donald Trump on Monday evening looked to reaffirm his administration's position when it comes to nuclear negotiations with Iran and said Tehran will not be allowed "any enrichment of uranium." His message, which surfaced on multiple social media platforms, appeared to be a direct response to a report by Axios which cited two sources with "direct knowledge" of a secret proposal that Washington provided to Tehran, allegedly said the U.S. would agree to permit "limited low-level uranium enrichment on Iranian soil for a to-be-determined period of time." Fox News Digital could not independently verify the details of the proposal, but if the decision to grant Tehran some uranium enrichment were granted, it would directly contradict public comments issued by lead negotiator Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Trump. Iran has repeatedly said it will not agree to a uranium enrichment ban, arguing it has the right to the process, which is also vital for nuclear energy. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi on Monday reiterated this point in a press conference from Egypt, and, according to the Tasnim News Agency, said he plans to respond to the U.S. proposal soon. Araqchi did not comment on the specifics of the agreement but said his "response will be based on the principles of the Iranian nation." The proposal also reportedly included the notion that Iran could join a regional consortium for uranium enrichment, as a solution to its enrichment needs. However, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei on Monday reportedly argued that this was not a new solution, nor an adequate substitute. "If some parties are proposing such a process, we welcome it and have no problem with participation either. But we emphasize that such an initiative cannot replace enrichment inside Iran," the spokesperson said. The White House has not said how long it will attempt to negotiate with Iran over its nuclear program, as security officials have repeatedly warned that Iran could be playing for time as the threat of U.N. snapback sanctions is set to expire come October. Iran on Tuesday reiterated that it is not going to abandon negotiations but suggested it would not cave to Washington's demands either. "Iran won't leave the negotiating table while protecting its national interests," a spokesperson for the Iranian government, Fatemeh Mohajerani, said, according to the Tasnim News Agency. Though she added, "All scenarios are on the table. We are prepared for everything."

Iran Says US Proposal for Nuclear Deal Is Ambiguous and Unclear
Iran Says US Proposal for Nuclear Deal Is Ambiguous and Unclear

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Iran Says US Proposal for Nuclear Deal Is Ambiguous and Unclear

A US proposal for a nuclear deal with Iran contains 'many ambiguities and questions' that the Islamic Republic plans to address in the coming days, the country's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told state TV on Tuesday. Araghchi said 'a lot of issues' in the Trump-administration's framework for resolving a years-long standoff over Iran's atomic activities 'are unclear,' without giving any details. The two countries have so far met for five rounds of indirect negotiations over the matter.

Opinion - Trump must take on his own administration's isolationist wing
Opinion - Trump must take on his own administration's isolationist wing

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Trump must take on his own administration's isolationist wing

President Trump has been harsh on the Middle East policies of former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. He has good reasons for that. The Obama-Biden era saw the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood and political Islam, the empowerment of Iran, the creation of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria and the deadly Oct. 7 terrorist attack in Israel and ensuing war in Gaza. In contrast, Trump's first term had brought stability to the region. Trump led efforts to destroy the Islamic State, repaired fractured relations with the Gulf States and Israel and restored deterrence to the region through shows of force. Now, in Trump's second term, he should make sure he doesn't make the same mistakes as his predecessors, which could embolden Iran and political Islamist movements. Specifically, the president should avoid public conflicts with the government of Israel, take a strong stance against Iran and restore the deterrence that the Biden administration eroded. To do this, he must take on the isolationist wing of his own administration. Officials including Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Middle East Michael DiMino and other isolationist adherents have strongly pushed against any sort of U.S. intervention in the region. But avoiding intervention at all costs is perceived in the Middle East as weakness. Trump's rhetoric signals he understands the true meaning of peace through strength, yet some of his actions have signaled something else. Washington halted strikes against the Houthi rebels in Yemen, for instance, after the Houthis promised not to strike U.S. ships. Trump and his secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, have also failed to hold Iran accountable for Houthi actions; even during Trump's recent visit to Saudi Arabia, the Houthis launched rockets at Israel over Saudi airspace. Administration officials told the New York Times that the operation was costly and the United States was unable to establish air superiority. Such claims seem strange, considering the United States spends more than the next nine countries combined on its military. Trump also avoided a stopover in Israel during his recent Middle East tour, inspiring reports of a widening gulf between Washington and Jerusalem. This is dangerous, as Israel plays a key part in establishing regional deterrence. While the U.S. prematurely aborted its attacks against the Houthis, Israel has decimated Hezbollah — Iran's greatest deterrent — destroyed Iranian air defenses and carried out targeted assassinations against top Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps officials. Washington still urgently needs Israel as an enforcer. The danger of such policy is that regional adversaries like Iran stop taking U.S. statements seriously. Take, for example, how Iran has scoffed at the Trump administration's avowed red line in negotiations: zero tolerance for nuclear enrichment. Over the past weeks, Iranian authorities have signaled their defiance. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called the U.S. demands 'nonsensical, ' Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Tehran was considering whether to participate in talks, and Iranian members of parliament issued a statement saying Iran would 'never back down on our nuclear rights' followed by chanting 'death to America' and 'death to Israel.' Iranian state media called the administration's most recent proposal 'far from reality.' Such impudence may seem strange for a country whose economy is in shambles, whose proxy network has been smashed and whose air defenses have been obliterated. Yet as Iran watches the administration's policy divisions and leaks, its leaders believe they can spot weakness, and have shown they are willing to gamble on its nuclear enrichment program. For Iran, the stakes are high; the ayatollahs do not want to share the fates of deposed Arab dictators Saddam Hussein or Muammar Gaddafi, and nuclear proliferation is their guarantee of existence. Trump's modus operandi is using economic incentives and punishments to shape policy. While such policy may work with the Gulf nations, whose prime concern is building a wealthy and stable society, history has shown that the ideologically driven actors of the region, including Iran, only respond to credible threats. Trump proved this concept himself when he ordered the assassination of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds Force chief Qassem Soleimani. What followed was a drop in Iranian proxy activity and what then CENTCOM commander Kenneth McKenzie Jr. referred to as 'reestablished … deterrence.' But while Trump understands this concept, many of the isolationists in his Cabinet do not. Gabbard argued that even building up U.S. weaponry in the region could 'spark a wider conflict with Iran.' Such logic is exactly what led the Obama and Biden administrations before, and what caused the current chaos in the region: de-escalation at all costs. But such policy doesn't lead to peace. Peace has historically been achieved through the unipolar dominance of a single power, as seen during the Pax Romana, Pax Mongolica and Pax Britannica. These eras of stability endured as long as that dominant influence remained strong, and they unraveled when it began to decline. In the case of Iran, the assassination of Soleimani proved the opposite: decisive action leads to submission while de-escalation leads to further aggression. In the meantime, the White House asked agencies to pause new sanctions against Iran — a move that will only further embolden the Islamic Republic. As Trump likes to bring up, Biden proved this concept through the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. Kremlin officials later confirmed that the resulting perceived U.S. weakness inspired Russian President Vladimir Putin to invade Ukraine. While many of Trump's isolationist advisers believe that the U.S., despite having the strongest military and economy in the world by far, is incapable of 'policing the world,' they do not consider that Washington is not alone. A U.S.-led world order is much more appealing to most of the world than what China might offer. In the case of the Middle East, Israel would carry out the bulk of any operation against Iran. The key to U.S. hegemony without being overstretched is relying on and supporting alliances. If Trump wants to be the president of peace, he should take lessons from his own first term. If he listens to the voices denouncing 'forever wars,' he may end up repeating the mistakes of his predecessors. Joseph Epstein is director of the Turan Research Center, a nonpartisan research program at the Yorktown Institute focused on the Turkic and Persian worlds. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store