logo
As critics decry ‘gross government overreach,' bill to ban pride flags from schools advances

As critics decry ‘gross government overreach,' bill to ban pride flags from schools advances

Yahoo01-03-2025

Utah is closer to banning the display of pride flags in K-12 classrooms and government buildings after a Senate Education Committee hearing. (Getty Images)
Building on past Republican efforts, Utah is one step closer to banning the display of pride flags in K-12 classrooms and government buildings after a 4-1 Senate Education Committee vote Friday morning.
HB77, from Rep. Trevor Lee, R-Layton, has eight amendments, and has undergone several changes over the course of several weeks to make sure certain flags — including those with Olympic symbols and certain historic flags, at one point including Nazi and Confederate flags — could be displayed.
Lee told the committee that his bill, HB77, is about 'political neutrality.'
'We want to make sure that if there is something that's considered political and makes someone feel uncomfortable, that they shouldn't have to worry about the government pushing and enforcing or pushing any type of ideology on anyone,' Lee said.
The bill defines flags as a piece of fabric with a design 'that symbolizes a location, government entity, or cause.' It also allows historic versions of Utah and U.S. flags to be displayed.
Over 20 people spoke in opposition to the bill during the public comment period of the hearing. Several people questioned whether international flags could be displayed, which is permitted in the law, and others brought up concerns that students may feel targeted by the legislation.
Kevin Labresh, a school psychologist, said some school districts already have guidelines in place for displaying flags and the voting body should consider the intent of the bill versus the impact.
'Many of our LGBTQ students will share freely that they feel targeted and erased by bills like these,' he said. 'Those are the voices I think we need to be paying attention to, especially when you look at what research says about higher rates of bullying, depression and suicidal ideation that this community experiences, so this visual representation is very important to them.'
Anna McNamer, a middle school teacher, said the bill is an example of 'gross government overreach.'
'It's important that our communities and our teachers are able to focus their skills on where it matters. Whether it's their community or their classroom, our state government should not have the ability to violate these freedoms of speech,' she said. 'Our government should not be able to give us a list of appropriate or correct flags to display at any time in a secular education setting.'
The original pride flag, an eight-striped flag with traditional rainbow colors along with pink and turquoise in it, was designed by Gilbert Baker at the request of San Francisco City Supervisor Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected official in California history, in 1978. Milk wanted queer people to have a symbol of pride for their community.
'This rainbow flag represents so much more than just a community,' Kat Kellermeyer, a Salt Lake City resident told the committee, after recapping the pride flag's history. 'It represents the queer community's full spirited hope (and) resilience against efforts to erase us. To define what is and is not historic sets dangerous precedent, especially when it comes to this community.'
Sen. Heidi Balderree, R-Saratoga Springs, said while she agrees that local control is best, 'we continue to have this bill before us, because the problem has not been mitigated.'
'I see these kind of propaganda in multiple classrooms,' she said. 'It's not just one in a school, it's in multiple classrooms, so the problem has not been fixed, and they've had time to fix it. And so, in the absence of this problem being addressed by local schools, which it clearly has not been, we're here today.'
Sen. Kathleen Riebe, D-Cottonwood Heights, pointed out that the latest version of the bill tasks the state auditor with enforcing flag displays, instead of local school districts. She said that provision was 'comical' given former State Auditor John Dougall's frustration last year with his office being put in charge of enforcing a law requiring individuals to use the bathroom that matches their biological sex in government and public buildings. Dougall criticized the legislature for making him a 'bathroom monitor' last year in a series of videos posted to X.
Ava Curtis spoke in opposition to the bill, and said she appreciated a teacher who displayed a pride flag in the classroom when she was in middle school and had not 'come out' to anyone in her life yet.
'I was dealing with bullying and going through a very difficult time, but what this did was it made me feel safe and seen in his classroom,' Curtis, now an adult, said. 'It was mentioned that this bill is about political neutrality, but our lives are not political. Queer people's identities should not be seen as political.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What to know about Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to LA immigration protests
What to know about Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to LA immigration protests

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

What to know about Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to LA immigration protests

The 2,000 Guard members authorized Monday are an addition to the 2,100 Guard troops the president previously mobilized for the protests Sunday morning. Trump also deployed 700 Marines to help them Monday. Trump, a Republican, said in a post on his social media site that the city would have been 'completely obliterated' if he had not sent Guard members. Advertisement This appears to be the first time in decades that a state's National Guard was activated without a request from its governor. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Here are some things to know about the lawsuit, the protests and the guard's deployment: State sues the president over troops California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit over the use of National Guard troops following the first deployment, telling reporters Monday that Trump had 'trampled' the state's sovereignty. 'We don't take lightly to the president abusing his authority and unlawfully mobilizing California National Guard troops,' Bonta said. He sought a court order declaring Trump's use of the Guard unlawful and asking for a restraining order to halt the deployment. Bonta has said the lawsuit became necessary once Trump escalated the number of troops, leading to growing unrest. Advertisement California Governor Gavin Newsom Trump and his border czar, Tom Holman, traded taunts with Newsom about the possibility of arresting the governor if he interfered with federal immigration enforcement efforts. 'I would do it if I were Tom. I think it's great,' Trump said. Newsom responded in a post on X: 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America.' Newsom has called the presence of troops on the streets of Los Angeles both 'illegal and immoral.' On the social platform X, Newsom called the decision to deploy the additional National Guard troops reckless and 'disrespectful to our troops.' 'This isn't about public safety. It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego,' said Newsom, a Democrat. In a post Monday evening, Newsome called the deployment of Marines 'a blatant abuse of power' and said officials would sue to stop it. 'U.S. Marines serve a valuable purpose for this country — defending democracy. They are not political pawns,' Newsom wrote on X. 'The Courts and Congress must act. Checks and balances are crumbling.' What's the mood in Los Angeles? A large crowd gathered Monday in a park across from Los Angeles City Hall to protest the arrest of prominent labor leader David Huerta, whose arrest Friday while protesting immigration raids became a rallying cry for people angry over the administration's crackdown. Huerta was later released on $50,000 bond. Monday's demonstrations were less raucous than Sunday's, with thousands peacefully attending the rally at City Hall and hundreds protesting outside a federal complex that includes a detention center where some immigrants are being held. The protests have been driven by anger over Trump's stepped-up enforcement of immigration laws that critics say are breaking apart migrant families. Advertisement Demonstrations were also taking place in other cities, including inside Trump Tower in Manhattan, and more than a dozen were planned in all. In Los Angeles, the smell of fire hung in the air and ash piles littered Los Angeles Street with the charred remnants of cars set afire during protests. Police cars blocked streets, and workers swept up debris. Crews painted over graffiti that covered downtown buildings. An Australian television journalist was hit in the leg by a nonlethal round Sunday while reporting live, while a British photographer remained hospitalized Monday after undergoing surgery for a similar strike to the thigh Saturday in Paramount. The Los Angeles Police Department confirmed in a news release on Monday that it used tear gas and more than 600 rubber bullets and other 'less than lethal' munitions on protesters over the weekend. Police arrested 29 people Saturday night 'for failure to disperse' and made 21 more arrests on Sunday on charges ranging from attempted murder with a Molotov cocktail and assault on a police officer to looting. Five officers had minor injuries, police said. Perla Rios, an indigenous community leader in Los Angeles, stood outside of Ambiance Apparel on Monday, where US Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids on Friday set off days of tense protests. Rios urged legal representation and due process for immigrants who were detained by federal agents. The weeklong tally of immigrant arrests in the area climbed above 100, federal authorities said. Many more were arrested while protesting. 'What our families are experiencing is simply a nightmare,' Rios said. Behind her, relatives of the detained of workers held up signs saying, 'Immigrants make America Great' and 'We want justice,' next to photos of their loved ones. Advertisement What are officials in California and Washington saying? Newsom, in a post on X, warned that Trump could activate the National Guard in other states unless he is challenged. 'This is exactly what Donald Trump wanted. He flamed the fires and illegally acted to federalize the National Guard,' Newsom wrote. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, speaking on CNN, said she was concerned that more federal immigration raids will spark 'pandemonium.' She said protesters are prepared to respond quickly if they see ICE in action. 'It's just a recipe for pandemonium that is completely unnecessary,' said Bass, a Democrat. ICE officials, in a statement, said they are working to enforce immigration laws and remove immigrants with criminal convictions. They also said they stand ready to arrest protesters who break the law. Holman called Newsom 'late to the game' in responding to the demonstrations. Trump, speaking to reporters in Washington, called Newsom 'grossly incompetent.'

Utah senator looks to resuscitate Nevada-Utah federal lands sale proposal
Utah senator looks to resuscitate Nevada-Utah federal lands sale proposal

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Utah senator looks to resuscitate Nevada-Utah federal lands sale proposal

Organizations from around the country signed a letter on Monday urging U.S. senators not to include a controversial proposal to sell thousands of acres of federal land in Congress' budget bill. The letter comes in the wake of reports that Utah Sen. Mike Lee is considering reviving an amendment to the bill originally proposed by Republican U.S. Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada and Celeste Maloy of Utah that would dispose of nearly 11,500 acres of Bureau of Land Management land in southwestern Utah, and about 450,000 acres in Nevada. Lee, when asked by a Politico reporter last week if he intended to reintroduce the disposal, responded, 'I gotta go vote, but yes.' Lee's office did not respond to a request for comment on Monday, and it's unclear whether Utah's senior GOP senator is considering bringing back an exact copy of the amendment, or something different. Amodei outrages NV congressional colleagues with 'dead of night' federal land sales amendment But more than 100 organizations and nonprofits around the country are sounding the alarm, telling Senate leaders to 'heed how dramatically unpopular this idea is and reject any misguided attempt to get public lands sales back in this bill.' 'Decisions about the future of public lands should remain in public hands. Leaders in the House and Senate, extractive industry, and private developers are using the reconciliation process to sell off federal lands to pay for billionaire tax cuts. But such moves are deeply unpopular. Polling has repeatedly shown that the public — especially westerners — strongly believes in keeping public lands in public hands and, across partisan lines, rejects any efforts that would lead to the sale of these shared and cherished lands,' reads the letter, signed by Utah groups like the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Conserve Southwest Utah, Save Our Canyons, Great Basin Water Network and Back Country Horsemen of Utah. The letter is addressed to Lee, who chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, New Mexico Democrat Martin Heinrich, the committee's ranking member, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat. The House amendment backed by Amodei and Maloy was dropped from the budget bill after it received pushback from all sides of the aisle. That includes Montana Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke, who previously said selling public lands is a line he would not cross and rallied support from a bipartisan group of lawmakers to strip the proposal from the bill. 'The public had no opportunity to participate in the process of identifying these parcels, let alone time to understand the long-term effect of selling off these public lands,' the letter reads. This story was originally published in Utah News Dispatch.

Watch live: House GOP leaders brief media as Senate grapples with ‘big, beautiful bill'
Watch live: House GOP leaders brief media as Senate grapples with ‘big, beautiful bill'

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Watch live: House GOP leaders brief media as Senate grapples with ‘big, beautiful bill'

House GOP leaders will hold a press conference Tuesday morning as Senate Republicans rework the 'big, beautiful bill' encompassing President Trump's legislative agenda. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has urged senators not to make significant changes to the bill, which narrowly passed the House. The upper chamber does not appear inclined to follow his advice. Republican senators are torn over various aspects of the bill, including its impact on the deficit and deep cuts to programs like Medicaid and food assistance. A number of House members have also expressed concern with aspects of the bill, even though they voted for it, signaling another heavy lift for Johnson and his team when it returns to the lower chamber. Other Republicans joining the Speaker Tuesday are House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (La.), Majority Whip Tom Emmer (Minn), GOP Conference Chair Lisa McClain (Mich.) and Rep. Gabe Evans (Colo.). Watch the press conference live starting at 10 a.m.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store