Judge set to pass verdict after trial of man who burned Koran
A judge is set to pass verdict after the trial of a man who burned a Koran outside the Turkish consulate in London.
Hamit Coskun, 50, shouted 'f*** Islam', 'Islam is religion of terrorism' and 'Koran is burning' as he held the flaming Islamic text aloft in Rutland Gardens, Knightsbridge, London, on February 13, Westminster Magistrates' Court heard last week.
Coskun denies a religiously aggravated public order offence of using disorderly behaviour 'within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress', motivated by 'hostility towards members of a religious group, namely followers of Islam', contrary to the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 and the Public Order Act 1986.
He also pleaded not guilty to an alternative charge of using disorderly behaviour 'within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress', contrary to section five of the Public Order Act 1986.
The charges are alternative to each other, meaning if hostility towards religion is not proven, Coskun could still be found guilty of the simple offence of disorderly behaviour.
His lawyer, Katy Thorne KC, argued last week that the prosecution is effectively trying to revive blasphemy laws, which were abolished in England and Wales in 2008 and Scotland in 2021.
Blasphemy remains an offence in Northern Ireland but is rarely enforced.
Prosecutor Philip McGhee said the case is about disorderly conduct, not the act of burning the Koran itself, adding that the prosecution of Coskun does not represent a restriction on criticising religion.
Turkey-born Coskun, who is half Kurdish and half Armenian, travelled from his home in the Midlands and set fire to the Koran at around 2pm, the court heard.
In footage captured on a mobile phone by a passerby that was shown to the court, a man approached and asked Coskun why he was burning a copy of the Koran.
Coskun can be heard making a reference to 'terrorist' and the man called the defendant 'a f****** idiot'.
The man approached him allegedly holding a knife or bladed article and appeared to slash out at him, the court heard.
The footage appeared to show Coskun back away and use the burning Koran to deflect the attacker, who is alleged to have slashed out at him again.
The man chased Coskun, and the defendant stumbled forward and fell to the ground, dropping the Koran, the footage showed.
Coskun was spat at and kicked by the man, the court heard.
The man said: 'Burning the Koran? It's my religion, you don't burn the Koran.'
Coskun had posted on social media that he was protesting against the 'Islamist government' of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan who the defendant allegedly said 'has made Turkey a base for radical Islamists and is trying to establish a Sharia regime', prosecutors said.
The defendant, who is an atheist, believes that he protested peacefully and burning the Koran amounted to freedom of expression, the court heard.
His legal fees are being paid for by the Free Speech Union and the National Secular Society (NSS).
District Judge John McGarva will pass verdict at the same court on Monday.
Stephen Evans, chief executive of the NSS, said before the trial: 'A successful prosecution in this case could represent the effective criminalisation of damaging a Koran in public, edging us dangerously close to a prohibition on blasphemy.
'The case also highlights the alarming use of public order laws to curtail our collective right to protest and free speech based on the subjective reactions of others.
'Establishing a right not to be offended threatens the very foundation of free expression.'
A spokesperson for Humanists UK previously said that a successful prosecution would 'effectively resurrect the crime of blasphemy in England and Wales – 17 years after its abolition'.
They added: 'This reintroduction of blasphemy by the back door would have profound consequences, not only for free expression in the UK but for the safety and wellbeing of hundreds of thousands of so-called 'apostates' in the UK and their right to freedom of thought and conscience.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Calls for new elections after Dutch far-right party exits government
Calls are growing for snap elections in the Netherlands after the far-right party of populist Geert Wilders withdrew from government in a dispute over migration policy, breaking apart the four-way coalition. Dutch opposition politicians immediately demanded new elections after firebrand Wilders withdrew his Party of Freedom (PVV) from the coalition. "The Netherlands deserves a government that unites the people and works shoulder to shoulder on real solutions," said Frans Timmermans, leader of the largest opposition group in parliament. "It's time for elections, we are ready for them." Wilders pulls the plug Wilders threatened on Sunday to pull out his anti-Islam PVV - the strongest force in parliament - unless the four-party coalition agreed to his demands on a stricter immigration policy. His party's 10-point plan included measures such as the closure of Dutch borders to asylum seekers, the closure of asylum seeker reception centres and an end to family reunification for recognized refugees. "No sign-off for our asylum plans, no adjustment of the coalition agreement. The PVV is leaving the coalition," Wilders wrote on X after failed consultations with the other parties on Monday evening. During the meeting, the other parties told Wilders to introduce a draft bill on his plans or a motion for a resolution to discuss them. However, the far-right leader was unwilling to go down that road, insisting on the implementation of his 10-point plan. "I couldn't do anything other than say that we would withdraw our support for this Cabinet," he later said, adding that the PVV ministers would resign. The future of the government hangs in the balance following the PVV's withdrawal, with snap elections considered to be likely. The remaining three parties could potentially continue as an even more fragile minority government. Cabinet members were due to convene for a crisis meeting on Tuesday afternoon. The PVV, who emerged as the strongest force from parliamentary elections in November 2023, has called for the military to be deployed to protect the country's borders in case they are not shut to asylum seekers. Wilders also called for tens of thousands of Syrian refugees to be sent back to their home country. Offenders with dual citizenship should be deported and lose Dutch nationality, according to the PVV's plans. Opposition up in arms Opposition leader Timmermans, who heads the Labour Party, said the collapsed government has led the country to a standstill, while war is being waged in Europe and people are worried about their future. He described the failed four-party ruling alliance as powerless, disunited and ridden by conflict. "That's what happens when you give power to extremes," Timmermans concluded. The leader of the Socialist Party, Jimmy Dijk, also called for new elections - "preferably as soon as possible." An alliance doomed to fail? Following their surprise win in the parliamentary elections, the PVV became part of a coalition government for the first time, striking a deal with the conservative People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), the centrist New Social Contract (NSC) and the populist Farmer–Citizen Movement (BBB). But the centre-right coalition led by independent Prime Minister Dick Schoof was considered fragile from the outset, with the NSC in particular harbouring serious doubts as to whether Wilders' PVV would respect the constitution. The NSC and VVD have accused PVV Asylum Minister Marjolein Faber of incompetence.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Taliban Banned Chess
Since the Taliban's takeover of Afghanistan in 2021, the extremist Islamic group has unleashed sweeping draconian policies to transform the nation into a more traditional society that espouses the moral and religious values of Sharia law. The banning of girls from secondary education, forcing women out of work, and extreme media censorship have made headlines, but an equally insidious campaign has largely been missed. The Taliban has focused on dismantling leisure and joy, with its latest target one of humanity's oldest pastimes: chess. On May 11, Afghanistan's Ministry of Sports issued a declaration stating the game's indefinite suspension, elaborating that "religious concerns" needed to be properly addressed. This declaration came after Atal Mashwani, spokesperson for the country's sports directorate, stated last year that the game was considered gambling under Sharia law. Until these religious objections are resolved, chess will remain in limbo. The Ministry for the Propagation of Virtue and Prevention of Vice effectively dissolved the Afghanistan National Chess Federation (ANCF), an organization that governs chess competitions in the nation and represents Afghanistan in the World Chess Federation. Speaking with president of the ANCF Ghulam Ali Malak Zad said the suspension halted all of the federation's official operations, even restricting casual, non-competitive play in public spaces. This is part of a broader pattern. Since 2021, the Taliban have been targeting different forms of recreation, under the guise of improving morality. In 2022, the government barred women from entering public spaces such as gyms and parks, decreeing that "people were ignoring gender segregation orders and that women were not wearing the required hijab." In 2023, the government burned musical instruments, claiming music "causes moral corruption." The founder of the Afghanistan National Institute of Music, Ahmad Sarmast, called it an act of "cultural genocide." Many musicians have fled the nation since 2021. The Taliban are not only regulating morality—they are fundamentally eliminating voluntary activity. The bans reflect a political effect more than a religious one. Building a community and asserting some level of individuality outside the state's control is a grave threat to regimes that thrive on obedience and passivity. Furthermore, a game that promotes strategic reasoning, voluntary and friendly competitions, and independent thought is truly dangerous to a regime that demands conformity. Authoritarian regimes don't just rewrite their constitutions or crush any form of political dissent; they slowly chip away at small freedoms that make life more enjoyable. When any government decides how people relax, think, or enjoy themselves, it isn't just about policing morality—it's about asserting political control. The post The Taliban Banned Chess appeared first on
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Magnitude 5.8 earthquake rattles Turkey, causes panic and injuries
A magnitude 5.8 earthquake shook southwestern Turkey early Tuesday morning, sending residents running into the streets and injuring dozens in a panic, according to Turkish authorities and the U.S. Geological Survey. The earthquake struck at 2:17 a.m. local time (7:17 p.m. EDT Monday), with the epicenter located in the Mediterranean Sea roughly 3 miles south of Ä°çmeler, near the resort town of Marmaris. Tremors were also felt in neighboring regions, including the Greek island of Rhodes. While no major structural damage has been reported, Turkey's Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency said at least 70 people were injured, many of them after jumping from windows or balconies in fear. A 14-year-old girl died after being taken to a hospital for what officials described as an anxiety attack. On Rhodes, tourists and residents evacuated buildings and spent the night outdoors, but island officials confirmed only minor damage. The quake struck at a depth of about 37 miles (60 kilometers), which helped reduce surface impact, according to Greek seismologist Efthymios Lekkas. Turkey sits atop several major fault lines and is one of the most seismically active regions in the world. Tuesday's quake follows the devastating 7.8 magnitude earthquake in February 2023 that killed more than 53,000 people in southern Turkey.
