South Africa's Ramaphosa recalls his bemusement at Trump Oval Office encounter
President Cyril Ramaphosa (left) of South Africa and President Donald Trump meet in the Oval Office in the White House in Washington on May 21. PHOTO: ERIC LEE/NYTIMES
CAPE TOWN - South African President Cyril Ramaphosa laughed off US President Donald Trump's Oval Office ambush, in his first direct comments since returning from the encounter with his American counterpart last week.
The lights were dimmed as Mr Ramaphosa entered an infrastructure conference in Cape Town on May 27, evoking the US president's call to turn the lights down in the Oval Office to cue up a video montage that amplified his false claims of a white genocide in South Africa.
'When I came in, I saw the room going a bit dark,' Mr Ramaphosa told the audience. 'For a moment, I wondered what is this? Is it happening to me again?'
Mr Ramaphosa visited Washington last week to persuade Mr Trump to spare South Africa from the full brunt of his sweeping trade tariffs. The US is the country's second-largest trading partner after China. While the meeting between the two leaders began with pleasantries, Mr Trump surprised his visitor with the video after a few minutes.
'At that point, I was seated very nicely. I was beginning to get into a groove of interacting with this man, and I suddenly hear him say, 'dim the lights',' Mr Ramaphosa recalled, reliving the moment for his Cape Town audience. 'Some people have said this was an ambush. I was bemused. I was there thinking, what is happening?'
The face-to-face Oval Office meeting marked the first between the leaders following months of tension, after Mr Trump froze aid to South Africa over his claims about attacks on white farmers. He has also criticised Pretoria's genocide case against Israel – a key US ally – at the International Court of Justice.
The encounter also took place after 49 South Africans of Afrikaner descent were flown to the US on a plane charted by Washington and granted refugee status on the back of Mr Trump's claim that white Afrikaner farmers are victims of a genocide and the state is seizing their land.
There have been no official land seizures in South Africa since apartheid ended in 1994, while police statistics show young black men bear the brunt of violent crime.
Notwithstanding the video, Mr Ramaphosa declared the visit a success for opening a path to consider a new trade deal between the two countries. He also voiced confidence that Mr Trump will attend the Group of 20 summit in November in Johannesburg, which South Africa is hosting before it hands the leadership of the global forum to the US. BLOOMBERG
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
34 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Nigeria detains soldiers, police over weapons sales to armed groups
ABUJA - The Nigerian military has detained over two dozen soldiers and members of the police force over sales of weapons from military stockpiles to armed groups, including Islamist insurgents, a spokesperson said. Africa's most populous country and biggest energy producer, Nigeria is battling insecurity on many fronts, including a long-running insurgency in the northeast and armed kidnapping gangs in the northwest. Captain Reuben Kovangiya, spokesperson for the military's anti-insurgency operation, said the arrests were part of a crackdown on racketeering involving ammunition. Local media reported that 18 soldiers, 15 policemen and eight civilians were taken into custody. "It is part of the counter-arms and ammunition racketeering operation conducted in every theatre of operations," Kovangiya told Reuters. "If any personnel engage in any act that is inimical to the system, they are arrested and tried." Kovangiya did not elaborate on the types and numbers of weapons sold but said the suspects would be prosecuted. Nigeria has this year experienced a surge in attacks by militants from Boko Haram and its offshoot, Islamic State West Africa Province, who have overrun some military bases in the northeastern state of Borno. In the course of most of the raids, militants have seized weapons from army bases. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Ukraine needs 500 million euros to rebuild critical port facilities damaged by Russia
Firefighters work at a site of a Russian missile strike in a sea port of Odesa, as Russia's attack on Ukraine continues, Ukraine July 23, 2022. Press service of the Joint Forces of the South Defence/Handout via REUTERS KYIV - Ukraine needs an initial 500 million euros ($566 million) to rebuild the most important infrastructure facilities at its Black Sea ports destroyed by constant Russian missile and drone attacks, a government minister said on Friday. Almost 400 port infrastructure facilities have been damaged as a result of Russian attacks during more than three years of war. Seaports are critical for Ukraine, which ships more than 90% of its exports by sea. "The main critical infrastructure facilities for ports and shipping that we have already lost have been identified ... and now we have to restore them," Andriy Kashuba, deputy minister of territorial development, told the Black Sea Security Forum in Odesa. Ukraine currently operates three major seaports in the Odesa area. Other Black Sea ports suspended operations after Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022. Kashuba said the total cost of rebuilding the ports' infrastructure was estimated at around 1 billion euros. That figure is dwarfed by the total estimated cost for Ukraine's overall reconstruction and recovery. The World Bank last December put that cost at $524 billion (€506 billion) over the next decade, or about 2.8 times the country's estimated nominal GDP for 2024. Many industrial and residential infrastructure facilities across Ukraine have been destroyed or severely damaged by Russian attacks. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
The AI job suck is the China shock of today
REARVIEW-mirror policymaking seems as unavoidable as it is self-defeating. President Donald Trump is falling into this trap with his focus on reversing the past quarter-century of trade policy — trying to put the toothpaste back in its tube. In attempting to undo the so-called China shock, he is missing the opportunity to preempt collateral damage from the coming artificial intelligence shock, which will reshape labor markets over the coming decade. Even relatively positive economic changes hurt some workers. As did the decline of America's manufacturing hubs, AI is likely to prove a challenge for millions of workers. At the more apocalyptic extreme, Anthropic chief executive officer Dario Amodei told Axios this week that AI could eliminate half of entry-level white-collar jobs and push unemployment as high as 20 per cent over one to five years. While I'm not expecting anything that dire, there are subtle signs — as The Atlantic's Derek Thompson pointed out last month — that the impacts may be already materialising in the unique and recent increase of the unemployment rate for recent college graduates to the highest since 2021. Brookings Institution research projects that about 30 per cent of the workforce could see at least half of their tasks disrupted by generative AI. That could include close to 19 million people in office and administrative support; 13 million in sales and related jobs; and 10 million in business and financial operations, according to Brookings' analysis of OpenAI and Bureau of Labour Statistics data. Geographically speaking, economists Scott Abrahams and Frank Levy found that such work is most concentrated in expensive coastal areas, including the Bay Area and the nation's capital. For the government, the key is to stand ready to provide help to those who need it. The wildly uncertain fallout from AI requires modern tools for monitoring trends in employment and wages. In the China shock, the negative outcomes were concentrated in manufacturing communities. By failing to appreciate the scope of the problem early, policymakers allowed parts of the country to fall into a self-reinforcing cycle of decay, engendering a sense of unfairness and lighting a fire under a populist backlash in American politics. In contrast, the Abrahams and Levy study shows that a generative AI shock could nudge workers away from expensive coastal cities to places such as Savannah, Georgia, or Greenville, South Carolina, which offer affordable housing and economies that are less exposed to the job losses. One source of forward-looking data is online job postings, which can be mined for keywords related to AI, Abrahams told me this week. Such data is far more comprehensive than it was in earlier shocks, and it reveals in real time the areas where companies are expanding and replacing workers — and, equally important, the areas where they aren't. As Abrahams pointed out, AI's impact may play out in large part through job-leavers that go unreplaced, rather than large and obvious layoffs. In terms of the latter, improved disclosure would help. Kevin Frazier, the AI Innovation and Law Fellow at the UT Austin School of Law, has suggested updating the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act, which generally requires companies to provide 60 days advance notice of closures and layoffs of 50 workers or more. Frazier has suggested that medium and large-sized firms be required to disclose 'widespread integration of new AI tools', whether or not the new technology corresponds with immediate job cuts. Though compliance could be a challenge, this would add a layer of forward-looking visibility. Frazier also wants to change the WARN policy to capture more layoffs and give communities and policymakers more time to respond. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Second, the US should make preparations to provide a strong response to any visible labour market disruptions, including getting its fiscal house in order. While some people believe that AI will eventually be so disruptive that it demands a version of Universal Basic Income, the near-term solution is likely to look like an improved and probably costlier version of Trade Adjustment Assistance, the programme rolled out during John F Kennedy's presidency to help workers sidelined by trade. That programme was too bureaucratic and small to blunt a development as big as the China shock. Any new effort would have to cut down on red tape and be better funded. Frazier has suggested businesses themselves be required to pay into rainy-day-type funds for worker retraining. Third, policymakers should make it easier for workers to move for new opportunities. Many lost jobs will be replaced by new and even better ones, but we can't take for granted that the labour supply will automatically migrate to the sectors and regions with the greatest opportunity. In fact, one key takeaway from the China shock literature is that, while the labour market migrated, many individuals didn't. David Autor, David Dorn and Gordon Hanson have found that incumbent workers were 'largely frozen in the declining manufacturing sector in their original locations'. It's not clear why so many stayed. Personal ties may have motivated some, but others may have faced financial constraints — a problem exacerbated by today's housing affordability crisis. As for Trade Adjustment Assistance, it provided only a laughable relocation allowance of no more than US$1,250, a figure that should be much larger if it's going to promote labour mobility. Finally, the US must ensure that the next generation is equipped with the skills of the future, including general AI literacy as well as domain expertise around AI and robotics engineering. The future is also likely to place a premium on the general critical thinking skills and emotional intelligence that liberal arts degrees engender. While the payoffs of higher education may become less clear, it's likely to remain essential to America's success. Policymakers can support it through thoughtfully allocated student and research grants, and immigration policies that bring the best inventors and entrepreneurs to our country. Unfortunately, Trump has paid short shrift to the AI challenge. He's spending much of his time pursuing a policy of ex post protectionism, seemingly trying to reverse the outcomes of a shock that the US inadequately prepared for a quarter century ago. Instead, if he wants to leave an economic legacy, he should take steps to ensure that AI maximally benefits Americans by mitigating the inevitable dislocations along the way. Left unaddressed, America could face another populist backlash against uneven labour market outcomes, and the Republican Party may well find itself on the wrong side of this one. BLOOMBERG
