Israeli official accuses UK minister of 'blood libel' over Gaza aid worker killings
An Israeli foreign ministry spokesperson appeared to accuse a British minister of "blood libel" for suggesting that Israel has targeted Palestinian aid workers in Gaza.
Hamish Falconer, a Labour MP and Britain's minister for the Middle East and North Africa, posted on social media platform X on Saturday: "Aid workers need protection and must never be targeted."
He added: "Following Israel's admission of responsibility for recent strikes on UN premises in Gaza, it must investigate all attacks that have killed aid workers, hold those responsible to account, and ensure this never happens again."
Hours later, Oren Marmorstein, a spokesperson for Israel's foreign ministry, shared the British minister's post and said: "Israel never targets aid workers. Israel targets terrorists only, and any other suggestion is pure blood libel and must be retracted."
He advised Falconer "to examine the investigations and accountability measures in all cases where the UK was responsible for the death of civilians during armed conflicts. We hope that the level of accountability would match that of Israel".
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Earlier this week, the Israeli military admitted it had killed Marin Valev Marinov, a Bulgarian employee of the UN Office for Project Services (Unops), with tank fire last month.
Marinov died in a UN compound in Gaza's Deir al-Balah on 19 March. Initially, the Israeli military claimed it had not attacked the site but, following an investigation, admitted on Thursday that its troops had killed Marinov.
The military said its troops had wrongly concluded that the UN building contained an "enemy presence".
Falconer appeared to reference this incident in his statement on Saturday.
Over 400 aid workers killed in Gaza
Israeli attacks have killed more than 400 aid workers in Gaza since 7 October 2023, according to the UN.
A Guardian investigation published in February found that more than 1,000 medical staff had been killed in the besieged enclave before January this year.
UK Labour MPs 'astounded' to be detained and deported from Israel Read More »
Falconer has not replied to Marmorstein's demand that he retract his statement.
The episode marks the latest in a series of minor spats between the British and Israeli governments.
Earlier this month, Labour MPs Abtisam Mohamed and Yuan Yang were refused entry by Israeli authorities to the occupied Palestinian territories on the grounds that they intended to "spread hate speech". The move provoked strong condemnation from British Foreign Secretary David Lammy.
Last month, the family of a British aid worker killed by an Israeli drone strike in Gaza slammed the British government for refusing to release information about the attack gathered by a Royal Air Force (RAF) spy plane.
James Kirby, a 47-year-old former British Army rifleman, was working in Gaza for the World Central Kitchen when he was killed last April in an Israeli targeted attack on a three-car aid convoy. He died alongside several others, including two other British veterans.
Israel's investigation a 'whitewash'
The UK's Ministry of Defence (MoD) told The Times it had footage from an RAF spy plane that was flying over Gaza trying to locate Israeli captives on the day of the strike. The MoD refused to disclose the footage, citing national security and defence exemptions.
UK won't release spy plane footage related to killing of UK aid worker in Gaza Read More »
In an interview with The Times, the Kirby family questioned why they were not allowed to be informed about what was filmed.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had initially claimed the killing of the British aid workers last April was "unintentional". The Israeli military later dismissed two officers and reprimanded two senior commanders, saying a drone operator had mistakenly targeted the convoy.
But the Kirby family has slammed the military's investigation as a "whitewash" and called for an independent inquiry.
An MoD spokesperson told Middle East Eye last month that surveillance flights over Gaza "are unarmed, do not have a combat role and are solely focused on securing the release of the hostages".
"The UK controls what information is passed on and only information relating to hostage rescue is passed to the relevant Israeli authorities. We will only pass information where we are satisfied that it will be used in accordance with international humanitarian law."
Israel's war on Gaza has killed at least 51,495 Palestinians since the Hamas-led attack on 7 October 2023, the Palestinian health ministry said in a statement on Saturday.
At least 2,062 Palestinians have been killed and 5,375 wounded since Israel broke the ceasefire on 18 March, the ministry added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
18 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel's attacks on Iran amount to crime of aggression, legal scholars say
Israel's attacks across Iran on Friday, which targeted "dozens" of sites including nuclear facilities, military commanders and scientists, are manifestly illegal, leading scholars of international law have said. Accusing the government in Tehran of beginning to build nuclear warheads, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the attack was aimed at "rolling back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival", adding that it would take "many days". "We struck at the heart of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme," Netanyahu said in a recorded televised address. "We targeted Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz. We targeted Iran's leading nuclear scientists working on the Iranian bomb. We also struck at the heart of Iran's ballistic missile programme." Netanyahu's decision is premised on "preventive self-defence" arguments, which justify the use of force against another state to prevent an anticipated future attack. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters However, such an argument is inconsistent with the rules governing the use of force under international law, including the limited justifications for the use of force established by the United Nations Charter and the prohibition of the crime of aggression. The use of force is only lawful if it seeks to repel an imminent attack or one that is underway, experts have explained. International law scholar Marko Milanovic said that the stated goals of Israel this time are about preventing a future nuclear attack by Iran. It is not a response to an attack that has started, or one that is imminent. Iran has yet to obtain any nuclear weapons. Therefore, there was no threat of an imminent attack justifying preemptive self-defence. 'It cannot reasonably be argued that Iran would imminently attack Israel, or that using force was the only option to stop that attack' - Marko Milanovic, legal scholar There are three positions with respect to the right to self-defence under international law, explained Milanovic in an article for Ejil Talk. The first is that states can use preventive self-defence to deflect future anticipated threats, in particular those perceived to be existential. The second is that states can use force with the aim of preempting future attacks that are imminent, and the third is that states can only resort to the use of force when attacks have already occurred. According to Milanovic, the use of force to prevent a future attack, as used by Israel in its Friday operation, is considered 'legally untenable' by the majority of international lawyers. "Israel's use of force against Iran is, on the facts as we know them, almost certainly illegal," he wrote. Article 2 (4) of the UN Charter prohibits "the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state". 'No self-defence at all' The only justification for the use of force is outlined in Article 51 of the UN Charter, which is to respond to an attack that is underway. "Unless Israel is able to provide substantially more compelling evidence than is currently publicly available, it cannot reasonably be argued that Iran would imminently attack Israel, or that using force was the only option to stop that attack," said Milanovic. "Israel is therefore using force against Iran unlawfully, in violation of Article 2(4) of the Charter. It is committing aggression." The crime of aggression is one of the four core international crimes under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), alongside genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. It refers to the planning, preparation, initiation, or execution of an act of aggression, or use of force in violation of the UN Charter, by a person in a leadership position, such as a head of state or senior military commander. Other scholars on Friday also accused Israel of committing the crime of aggression. Professor Kevin Jon Heller of the University of Copenhagen said: "Few acts are more unequivocally illegal than preventive (non-imminent) self-defence. So Israel's attack is both unlawful and criminal - the crime of aggression." "Israel's attack on Iran is not simply a violation of the UN Charter. It is a manifest violation of it," he wrote on X. Sergey Vasiliev of the Open University of the Netherlands also qualified the attack as falling under the crime of aggression. "This operation is an unlawful use of force," he wrote. "Iran presented no imminent threat to Israel that would justify such an attack. This is an act of aggression." Netanyahu's justification for Friday's attack is similar to arguments made by Russia to justify its invasion of Ukraine, said Milanovic, or those used by the US to justify the use of force against Iraq. "The problem with this approach is that it is so boundless that it completely eviscerates the prohibition on the use of force - a state could act whenever it perceives an existential threat," argued Milanovic. "In short, this 'preventive' form of self-defence is simply not self-defence at all." According to Jon Heller, while the US has taken the same position as Israel only occasionally, "Israel is the only state that has unequivocally endorsed the right of preventive self-defence."
Middle East Eye
18 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel attacks Iran: Tehran's residents fearful and angry after strikes
At roughly 3:30am the first Israeli missiles rained down across the Iranian capital Tehran. "Both my husband and I were thrown from our bed. The explosions didn't stop. We had no idea what was happening," said Samira, a resident of the northern Tehran neighbourhood of Kamranieh. The windows of the entire apartment had shattered and the chandelier had crashed to the floor. "We got up from the ground in fear and realised the apartment across from ours had been bombed," she told Middle East Eye. Samira - not her real name - lives directly opposite the residence of Ali Shamkhani, an advisor to Iran's Supreme Leader, who was among the senior Iranian officials reportedly killed in Israeli air strikes oi the early hours of Friday morning. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Describing her survival as a "miracle," she said the dining table in her living room was blown to pieces by the force of the blast. Soon after, the sound of warning sirens and emergency vehicles rushing to extinguish fires could be heard resonating across the city. Onlookers gather in front of a building damaged in an Israeli strike on Tehran on June 13, 2025 (AFP) Shamkhani was Tehran's representative at talks with the US over a new deal to limit Iran's nuclear capabilities and ease tensions in the region. His death - which the Iranian government is yet to confirm - alongside the deaths of senior figures in the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), senior military leaders, scientists and countless civilians, has obliterated hopes for a diplomatic solution. Now Israel is saying that its operations against Iran, which have heavily targeted its nuclear facilities and reportedly killed 78 people in Tehran alone, could last for more than two weeks. The most brutal attack to hit the capital since the end of the Iran-Iraq war in 1988 has left the city's residents reeling, angry and fearful of what could come next. Panic and fear Bahram, a 45-year-old architect living in the Pasdaran neighborhood in northeastern Tehran, was also jolted awake by the blasts. He lives near the Shahid Rajaei complex, one of the main targets of the Israeli strikes. At first, he thought the sound was thunder, but when the explosions continued, he got out of bed and saw smoke rising from the window. 'I stepped onto the balcony, and the entire area smelled of gunpowder,' he said. Friday's attacks are not the first targeting the capital in the past year. In July 2024, Israel killed Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh after attending the swearing-in of Iran's president, Masoud Pezeshkian in Tehran. Middle East Eye reported that witnesses believed Haniyeh was killed by a projectile fired at a guesthouse controlled by the IRGC. 'I stepped onto the balcony, and the entire area smelled of gunpowder' - Bahram, Tehran resident But Friday's attacks have marked a severe escalation, excarbated by their open-endedness. Danial, 39, lives in the Marzdaran district in western Tehran - another area reportedly targeted by Israel. He says he woke up in shock from multiple blasts, disoriented and frightened. 'All the car windows on my street were shattered,' he said. "And the tires had blown out.' Just hours after the strikes, panicked residents rushed to petrol stations to fill lines formed across fuel stations in the capital. The mix of anger, confusion, and uncertainty was etched on the faces of locals. Some, however, are hoping the attacks will remain limited to military and official targets. Mixed feelings The Israeli and Iranian governments have been enemies for a long time, with both regularly threatening the other regimes' destruction. Among ordinary Iranians, however, views are somewhat more mixed - while some are angry at Israel over its attacks on Iranian soil, others are critical of the Iranian government, which has become increasingly unpopular over a mix of heavy-handed repression, economic failure and corruption. 'Finally, someone took revenge on these criminals,' said 21-year-old Mahsa, a university student. 'Things can't get worse than they already are. We've suffered so much. Let it be done with - death once, mourning once. Whatever happens, it can't be worse than this.' 'Finally, someone took revenge on these criminals' - Mahsa, student 41-year-old Farzaneh, who works in sales at a private auto parts company, said that while she was "scared and worried" she also wanted to "stay hopeful." "Hopeful that in a not-so-distant future, we can live freely and peacefully without cruel people like those who rule over us now," she explained. The war on Gaza, which began in October 2023, has had a polarising effect on a lot of Iranians. While the government and much of the populace has been supportive of the Palestinians, some opposed to the Islamic Republic are sympathetic to Israel and its opposition to a regime they see as a tyranny. Danial, for his part though said Israel "only understands force." "It's naive to think this will be the end of it," he said . "They've attacked our land, and they must be answered with decisive force.' Until 'there is nothing left' The sense of optimism that had permeated Iran after the signing of the 2015 nuclear deal is a distant memory. In his latest comments on the Truth Social network on Friday afternoon, US President Donald Trump warned that Iran should sign a new deal with the US before Israel launched further attacks and "there is nothing left" of the country. Israel's attack on Iran prompts widespread support and alarm at home Read More » Ryan Costello, Policy Director with National Iranian American Council, told MEE that prospects for a new deal were looking bleak. "While we hope that the war will not spread out of control, Iran will not negotiate a nuclear deal when under active bombardment," he said. "Diplomatic efforts need to pivot to ending the bombing and keeping the US out of the war. Unfortunately, Trump's initial remarks after the strikes do not seem grounded in that reality, and risk ensuring the US is a target in any reprisals." Iranian officials have vowed a 'strong and unforgettable' retaliation against Israel, already having launched around 100 (largely intercepted) drones on Friday. The scale of that response - and Israel's counter-response - will likely shape the lives of tens of millions of people, both inside Iran and across the Middle East, and Tehran's residents are waiting with bated breath.
Al Etihad
37 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
At least 78 killed, 329 injured in Israeli strikes, say Iranian media
13 June 2025 20:15 TEHRAN (WAM) Israeli strikes in Iran have killed at least 78 people and injured 329, according to Iranian News Agency said the exact death toll will be announced later by official announced that Chairman of the Chiefs of Staff of Iran's Armed Forces Major General Mohammad Baqeri, Chief Commander of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) Major General Hossein Salami, and other military and civilian figures have been killed in Israeli strikes in Tehran on a related development, the Iranian Mehr News Agency reported this afternoon that several loud blasts were heard in the cities of Kermanshah and Hamadan, western Iran, near the Nojeh Air the Iranian mission at the United Nations has called for an urgent Security Council meeting after Israel conducted airstrikes on some Iranian nuclear sites and civilian areas early on to the state-run news agency (IRNA), Iran - in a letter to the UNSC - also called for a UNSC emergency meeting to condemn Israel's attack on nuclear facilities and civilian areas. Iran's mission also denounced the Israeli attack as a clear violation of the UN Charter, warning that its dangerous consequences jeopardise regional and international peace and security.
