logo
Trump administration reviewing Biden-era submarine pact with Australia, UK

Trump administration reviewing Biden-era submarine pact with Australia, UK

RNZ Newsa day ago

By
Phil Stewart, Idrees Ali
and
David Brunnstrom
US President Donald Trump.
Photo:
AFP / Brendan Smialowski
US President Donald Trump's administration has launched a formal review of a defence pact worth hundreds of billions of dollars that former president Joe Biden made with Australia and the United Kingdom, a US defence official has told Reuters.
The pact allows Australia to acquire conventionally armed nuclear submarines.
The formal Pentagon-led review is likely to alarm Australia, which sees the submarines as critical to its own defence as tensions grow over China's expansive military buildup.
It could also throw a wrench in Britain's defence planning. AUKUS is at the centre of a planned expansion of its submarine fleet.
"We are reviewing AUKUS as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the President's America First agenda," the official said of the review, which was first reported by
Financial Times
.
"Any changes to the administration's approach for AUKUS will be communicated through official channels, when appropriate."
AUKUS, formed in 2021 to address shared worries about China's growing power, is designed to allow Australia to acquire nuclear-powered attack submarines and other advanced weapons such as hypersonic missiles.
Vocal sceptics of the AUKUS deal among Trump's senior policy officials include Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon's top policy advisor.
In a 2024 talk with Britain's Policy Exchange think-tank, Colby cautioned that US military submarines were a scarce, critical commodity, and that US industry could not produce enough of them to meet American demand.
They would also be central to US military strategy in any confrontation with China centred in the First Island Chain, an area that runs from Japan through Taiwan, the Philippines and on to Borneo, enclosing China's coastal seas.
The Virginia-class nuclear powered submarine USS Minnesota arrives at the US Naval Base Guam, on 26 November 2024.
Photo:
US Navy/ Justin Wolpert
"My concern is why are we giving away this crown jewel asset when we most need it," Colby said.
The Australian and UK embassies in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The US National Security Council also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
AUKUS is Australia's biggest-ever defence project, with Canberra committing to spend A$368 billion ($NZ396 billion) over three decades on the programme, which includes billions of dollars of investment in the US production base.
News of the US review comes hours after the British government announced plans to invest billions of pounds to upgrade its submarine industrial base, including at BAE Systems in Barrow and Rolls-Royce Submarines in Derby, to allow the increase in submarine production rate announced in Britain's
Strategic Defence Review.
Britain said this month it would build up to 12 next-generation attack submarines of the model intended to be jointly developed by the UK, US and Australia under AUKUS.
Only six countries operate nuclear submarines: the US, the UK, Russia, China, France and India.
AUKUS would add Australia to that club starting in 2032 with the US sale of Virginia-class submarines.
Before that, the US and Britain would start forward rotations of their submarines in 2027 out of an Australian naval base in Western Australia.
Later, Britain and Australia would design and build a new class of submarines, with US assistance, with the first delivery to the UK in the late 2030s and to Australia in the early 2040s.
Although Australia has declined to say ahead of time whether it would send the submarines to join US forces in any conflict between the US and China, Colby noted Australia's historic alliance with Washington, including sending troops to Vietnam.
"I think we can make a decent bet that Australia would be there with us in the event of a conflict," Colby said last year.
Speaking in Congress on Tuesday, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said "we're having honest conversations with our allies."
On Australia, Hegseth said: "We want to make sure those capabilities are part of how they use them with their submarines, but also how they integrate with us as allies."
Former Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, who signed a previous agreement to acquire French submarines that was shelved in favour of AUKUS, told CNBC last week it was "more likely than not that Australia will not end up with any submarines at all, but instead, simply provide a large base in Western Australia for the American Navy and maintenance facilities there".
-Reuters

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Protests spread across US as Marines prepare for Los Angeles deployment
Protests spread across US as Marines prepare for Los Angeles deployment

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Protests spread across US as Marines prepare for Los Angeles deployment

By Brad Brooks and Sandra Strojanovic , Reuters Police officers surround arrested protesters following a demonstration against federal immigration operations near Los Angeles City Hall in Los Angeles on 11 June, 2025 Photo: RONALDO SCHEMIDT / AFP California will face off with the Trump administration in court on Friday (NZT) over the deployment of US troops in Los Angeles after demonstrators again took to the streets in major cities to protest President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. Some 700 US Marines will be on the streets of Los Angeles by Thursday or Friday, the military said, to support up to 4000 National Guard troops in protecting federal property and federal agents, including on immigration raids. Trump's decision to dispatch troops to Los Angeles over the objections of California Governor Gavin Newsom has sparked a national debate about the use of the military in law enforcement operations on US soil. A federal judge in San Francisco will hear arguments on Thursday as part of California's lawsuit against Trump. The state is requesting a temporary restraining order to block the troops' participation in law enforcement activities. In a court filing on Thursday, California argued that the federal government has already violated the law by having National Guard troops assist ICE agents in immigration raids. On Saturday, Americans likely will see split-screen images of US troops on the streets of two major cities: Los Angeles, where troops are guarding federal buildings, and Washington where soldiers, accompanied by tanks and other armored vehicles, will rumble down Constitution Avenue in a rare public display of military might to celebrate the Army's 250th birthday . Nearly 2000 protests against the parade, which is taking place on Trump's 79th birthday, are planned around the country in one of the biggest demonstrations against Trump since he returned to power in January. Mostly peaceful street protests so far this week have taken place in multiple cities besides Los Angeles including New York, Chicago, Washington and San Antonio, Texas. The Los Angeles protests began last Friday in response to a series of immigration raids in the city. Trump in turn called in the National Guard on Saturday, then ordered the deployment of Marines on Monday. "Los Angeles was safe and sound for the last two nights. Our great National Guard, with a little help from the Marines, put the L.A. Police in a position to effectively do their job," Trump posted on social media on Thursday. State and city officials say Trump is exaggerating what is happening in the city and that local police have the situation under control. The protests have been largely orderly but occasionally punctuated by violence, mostly contained to a few blocks. Police said demonstrators at one location threw commercial-grade fireworks and rocks at officers on Wednesday night. Another group of nearly 1000 demonstrators was peacefully marching through downtown when police suddenly opened fire with less lethal munitions in front of City Hall. Los Angeles Police Department Chief Jim McDonnell, in an interview with CNN late on Wednesday, said the city was calmer and asserted that police were protecting people's free speech rights to protest while holding those intent on violence accountable. Photo: AFP / SPENCER PLATT Trump is carrying out a campaign promise to deport immigrants, employing forceful tactics consistent with the norm-breaking political style that got him elected twice. US President Donald Trump Photo: SAUL LOEB / AFP The administration has circulated images showing National Guard troops protecting immigration agents who were arresting suspected illegal migrants - a permissible function for the troops under federal law. But the state argues those Guard troops have crossed the line into illegal activity under the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits the military from participating in civilian law enforcement. "For example, photos posted on social media by ICE depict heavily armed members of the National Guard standing alongside ICE agents during arrests," California said in its latest court filing. Unless a judge intervenes, the military's role likely will grow to include "detention, interrogation, and other activities that are practically indistinguishable from urban policing operations", the filing asserts. California is seeking a court order that would stop troops from "patrolling the streets of Los Angeles" and limit their role to protecting federal personnel and property. The lawsuit ultimately seeks a ruling that would return California's National Guard to the state's control and a declaration that Trump's action was illegal. The Trump administration said in a Wednesday court filing that the judge should not restrict the military's activities in Los Angeles. "Neither the National Guard nor the Marines are engaged in law enforcement. Rather, they are protecting law enforcement, consistent with longstanding practice and the inherent protective power to provide for the safety of federal property and personnel," the administration wrote. US Army Major General Scott Sherman, who commands the taskforce of Marines and Guardsmen, told reporters the Marines will not load their rifles with live ammunition, but they will carry live rounds. - Reuters

US senator forcibly removed from Trump official's press conference
US senator forcibly removed from Trump official's press conference

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

US senator forcibly removed from Trump official's press conference

US Senator Alex Padilla, Democrat from California, is removed from the room after interrupting a news conference with Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem at the Wilshire Federal Building in Los Angeles on 12 June, 2025. Photo: PATRICK T. FALLON / AFP A US senator from California was forcibly removed after interrupting a news conference being held by the US homeland security chief on Thursday. "I'm Senator Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary," he said as two men pushed and shoved him from the room where Kristi Noem was speaking about controversial immigration arrests that have rocked America's second-biggest city. Footage of the incident showed security agents forcing the senator to the floor and handcuffing him. I just received FULL VIDEO from inside Noem presser showing @SenAlexPadilla manhandled, pushed, and shoved to the ground and handcuffed. Outrageous. Padilla, one of two Democratic senators representing California in the upper chamber of Congress, can be heard trying to ask Noem about the targeting of immigrants. Response to the incident was rapid. California Governor Gavin Newsom said Padilla "is one of the most decent people I know." "This is outrageous, dictatorial and shameful. Trump and his shock troops are out of control. This must end now," he wrote on social media. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the episode "absolutely abhorrent and outrageous". "He is a sitting United States Senator. This administration's violent attacks on our city must end." Noem's press conference came after almost a week of protests in Los Angeles sparked by an immigration crackdown ordered by President Donald Trump. The mostly peaceful protests have been marred by eye-catching violence including the torching of cars and rocks thrown at police officers. The White House responded with overwhelming force, sending 4700 troops to the city, despite objections from local officials and the police, who said they had the manpower and ability to handle the demonstrations. - AFP

Corroding corruption in NZ
Corroding corruption in NZ

Otago Daily Times

time6 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Corroding corruption in NZ

Wake up, naive New Zealand. That, in summary, is the message from a team of experts warning the government about the growing threat of corruption from organised crime. The Ministerial Advisory Group on Transnational, Serious and Organised Crime, in a report released this week, said the government must act urgently to prevent further infiltration into democratic institutions and borders. New Zealand may rate well internationally, but there is plenty of what might be termed soft corruption, even if we try to convince ourselves otherwise. The quid pro quos of political influence, donations, lobbying and the like remain questionable. Hard corruption, by contrast, is not up for debate. It is palpably pernicious and dangerous, undermining democracy, eroding trust in institutions, and corroding justice. It creates economic and social burdens. Because corruption feeds on itself, the monster must be confronted with vigour and purpose. New Zealand has long prided itself on its relatively corruption-free status. Alongside its strong rule of law, business, prosperity and fairness are supported. This comparative advantage is one New Zealand cannot afford to lose. Historically, New Zealand distinguished itself from Australia through the integrity of its police, the security of its borders, the mostly corruption-free prison service and the rarity of blatant business bribery. But this distinction is eroding. Insiders at airports, ports and prisons have succumbed to criminality — whether for greed, because of threats or through family connections. "Bribery, coercion, and cronyism can transform ports, airports, and checkpoints into open channels," the report said. The report referenced Transparency International NZ chief executive Julie Haggie, as saying "New Zealand's response to increasing corruption pressures over several years has been lacklustre and complacent". The report also noted that New Zealand was the only Five Eyes country without a comprehensive, whole-of-government national anti-corruption strategy. This left "a significant gap in the country's ability to prevent, detect, and respond to corruption risks in both the public and private sectors". New Zealand's backdoor through the Pacific was an adjacent threat. Increasing flows of illicit drugs were spurring corruption, compounded by the large numbers of deportees from Australia and New Zealand. About 1000 more were expected from the United States under President Donald Trump's policies. New Zealand needed to act immediately to protect institutions, borders and regional stability, the report said. It called for a centralised reporting and investigative body, a national strategy to address corruption and an updated Crimes Act. Stronger prison sentences and enhanced vetting for employees in high-risk industries were deemed necessary. Pacific Island nations also required support, including access to specialist expertise. Earlier reports said New Zealand was "losing the fight" against organised crime. Police required greater financial powers to fight it. This latest report said that lucrative markets and crime networks made New Zealand "more susceptible than ever" to corruption and insider threats. New Zealand has been too tolerant, too passive and too complacent in the face of organised crime and the hard corruption it fuels. This country's approach must harden immediately. The stakes are too high. Fabulous Mr Fox Many New Zealanders are still revelling in Ryan Fox's triumph at the Canadian Open on Monday. Just days later, we have the opportunity to follow his progress on golf's grandest stage — a "major" tournament. One PGA Tour victory in North America was superb. Two in a month was magnificent. Both wins came from a little way back as he combined fine shot-making with a touch of well-earned luck. He then clinched both victories in playoffs, the first sealed by an astounding 16m chip-in. Ryan Fox's humility and openness make him deeply endearing. In his mild self-deprecation, he is another archetypal New Zealand sporting hero, evoking figures like Sir Edmund Hillary or Sir Peter Snell. Fox's successes come after many years of battling, making them all the more admirable. We all wish the 38-year-old well at the US Open this weekend — and beyond.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store