logo
Amid Row With Trump, A Look At The History Of Prestigious Harvard University

Amid Row With Trump, A Look At The History Of Prestigious Harvard University

News1825-05-2025

Last Updated:
Harvard University has had disputes with federal governments. In 1970s, it adapted to race and gender equity mandates. During the Cold War, it was accused of having Communist ties
The row between US President Donald Trump and Harvard University has brought attention to the historical significance of the Ivy League institution, its contribution towards American education and the political challenges it has faced over centuries.
The Harvard University has been in Trump's hair since January, when he took office, over issues related to academic freedom, campus protests, federal oversight and immigration.
The recent order, which was revoked by a federal judge, to bar the Harvard University from enrolling international students, has been the latest aggressive stance against the institution by the Trump administration.
Foreign students constitute more than a quarter of the university's strength for the past three years.
Let us look at the history of the university, which is often described as 'older than the United States".
When Was Harvard Founded?
The university was established in 1636, and was founded by the Massachusetts Bay Colony. It was named after John Harvard, a Puritan minister whose bequeathed his library and half his estate to lay the foundation for the college.
Initially focused on training clergy, the college evolved into a broader liberal arts institution by the 18th century, educating early American leaders like John Adams (Class of 1755), the second US President.
By 19th century, Harvard expanded to establishing academic schools like the Harvard Law (1817) and Harvard Medical School (1782). It became a melting pot for intellectual and cultural elites, with figures like Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau among its alumni. The university's endowment grew, laying the foundation for its financial strength, though it remained tied to traditional hierarchies.
Under President like Charles W. Eliot (1869–1909), Harvard transformed into a modern research university, stressing on the value of meritocracy, sciences, and elective curricula. It navigated tensions during national crises, such as World War II, when federal partnerships for research funding began, a practice now central to the Trump dispute.
The 20th century also saw Harvard's global influence grow, with alumni including eight US presidents (John Adams, John Quincy Adams, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy, George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Rutherford B. Hayes)
Post-World War II, the institution faced federal pressure to comply with civil rights and gender equity mandates in the 1970s, agreeing to race and gender targets and oversight, as noted in a 2025 post by @harvardrepclub. It provided financial aid, launched initiatives like the Radcliffe Institute under President Drew Faust (2007-2018), and co-founded edX with MIT for online learning. However, it also faced criticism for elitism and disconnect from broader American sentiment.
What's The Recent Dispute With Trump?
Over the past few months, the Ivy League institution has been in the crosshairs of the Trump administration over pro-Palestinian protests following the Hamas-Israel conflict and alleged ideological biases.
In March 2025, the Trump administration demanded Harvard eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programmes, audit faculty and student viewpoints, and cooperate with federal oversight, citing alleged civil rights violations and anti-semitism during campus protests. When Harvard did not comply, the administration froze $2.3 billion in federal funding (mostly research grants) and later cut an additional $450 million.
On May 22, the Department of Homeland Security revoked Harvard's ability to enroll international students via the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), affecting 6,800 international students (27% of its student body). A federal judge temporarily blocked this action following a lawsuit filed by Harvard.
In response, Harvard's President Alan Garber called Trump's action an attack on academic freedom, arguing they violate Harvard's First Amendment rights and exceed federal authority. On April 14, Harvard sued the administration in federal court, calling the funding freeze 'arbitrary and capricious." A temporary injunction on May 23, 2025, blocked the SEVP revocation, providing relief to international students. Garber allocated $250 million from Harvard's endowment to support affected research, signalling defiance.
More than 200 university presidents, including those from Princeton, Brown and Columbia signed a joint statement to condemn Trump's 'government overreach".
The Harvard University has had periodic tensions with federal governments.
In the 1970s, Harvard adapted to federal mandates on race and gender equity, suggesting a precedent for negotiation.
During the Cold War Era, during McCarthyism, universities faced scrutiny for alleged communist ties. But Harvard resisted loyalty oaths and maintained academic autonomy, a stance mirrored in Garber's defiance.
top videos
View all
Harvard navigated student activism in the 1960s-70s, balancing free speech with institutional stability, similar to today's protest-related tensions.
Harvard's defiance could galvanise other universities to resist Trump's government's aggressive policies. The outcome may shape the balance between federal oversight and academic independence, and the American higher education system.
First Published:

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US expected to block Gaza ceasefire vote at UNSC
US expected to block Gaza ceasefire vote at UNSC

Time of India

time29 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US expected to block Gaza ceasefire vote at UNSC

The UN Security Council will vote Wednesday on a resolution calling for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access in Gaza , a measure expected to fail due to a US veto. It is the 15-member body's first vote on the subject since November, when the United States , a key Israeli ally, also blocked a text calling for an end to fighting. The new resolution "demands an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties." It also calls for the "immediate, dignified and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups." Underlining a "catastrophic humanitarian situation" in the Palestinian territory , the resolution additionally demands the lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza. Live Events It will be put to vote at 4:00 pm Wednesday (2000 GMT), but several diplomats indicated to AFP that they expected the US to wield its veto power. They added that the representatives from the 10 elected members of the Council, who will introduce the text, tried in vain to negotiate with the American side. The veto, if applied, would be the first by Washington since US President Donald Trump took office in January. Israel has faced growing international pressure to end its war in Gaza, which was triggered by the unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas on Israeli soil. That scrutiny has increased over flailing aid distribution in Gaza, which Israel blocked for more than two months before allowing a small number of UN vehicles to enter in mid-May. A US-backed relief effort called the Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) has also come under criticism for going against long-standing aid principles by coordinating relief efforts with a military belligerent.

Trump signs order to double steel, aluminium import tariffs to 50%
Trump signs order to double steel, aluminium import tariffs to 50%

Hindustan Times

time38 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Trump signs order to double steel, aluminium import tariffs to 50%

New Delhi: A 50% tariff on steel and aluminium imports into the United States went into effect on Wednesday, doubling the previous rate as President Donald Trump cited national security concerns for the dramatic escalation in trade protections. The new tariff rates, increased from an earlier 25% rate, were announced by Trump in a statement on Tuesday. The president claimed legal authority to impose the tariffs through Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which allows the president to address national security risks arising from imports. 'In my judgement, the increased tariffs will more effectively counter foreign countries that continue to offload low-priced, excess steel and aluminium in the United States market and thereby undercut the competitiveness of the United States steel and aluminium industries,' read Trump's statement released by the White House. Trump said the earlier 25% tariff rates, first announced in February and implemented on March 12, had helped America's steel industry but had not enabled companies to maintain the capacity needed to meet national defence needs. 'I have determined that increasing the previously imposed tariffs will provide greater support to these industries and reduce or eliminate the national security threat posed by imports of steel and aluminium articles and their derivative articles,' Trump said. The tariff increase comes amid broader trade disputes at the World Trade Organisation. Several countries, including India, have formally challenged the US measures, characterising them as 'safeguard measures' that violate WTO rules and threaten retaliatory action. In May, India formally notified the WTO that it viewed America's tariffs on steel and aluminium as safeguard measures and indicated it could suspend 'concessions and other obligations' given to the US and that it retains the right to enforce retaliatory measures. On May 22, America rejected India's characterisation of the tariffs as safeguard measures and refused to engage in talks on the matter. The introduction of tariffs has proven controversial within the US. The America Iron and Steel Institute, an industry group, has welcomed the increased tariffs as a necessary measure to protect domestic producers from cheaper foreign competition. However, manufacturers using steel as input for production have publicly raised concerns that more expensive steel will impact competitiveness across other domestic industries. For India specifically, the consequences are direct and substantial. According to the Global Trade Research Institute (GTRI), a New Delhi-based research group, India exported $4.56 billion worth of iron, steel, and aluminium products to the US in FY2025, with key categories including $587.5 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion in articles of iron or steel, and $860 million in aluminium and related articles. 'These exports are now exposed to sharply higher US tariffs, threatening the profitability of Indian producers and exporters,' the GTRI said in a brief.

UN Security Council will vote on a resolution demanding a Gaza ceasefire, with US veto expected
UN Security Council will vote on a resolution demanding a Gaza ceasefire, with US veto expected

Hindustan Times

time43 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

UN Security Council will vote on a resolution demanding a Gaza ceasefire, with US veto expected

UNITED NATIONS — The U.N. Security Council will vote Wednesday on a resolution demanding an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, and the Trump administration is expected to veto it because it does not link the ceasefire to the release of all the hostages held by Hamas. The resolution before the U.N.'s most powerful body also does not condemn Hamas' deadly attack in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza — two other U.S. demands. The U.S. vetoed the last resolution on Gaza in November, under the Biden administration, because the ceasefire demand was not directly linked to the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. Similarly, the current resolution demands those taken by Hamas and other groups be released, but it does not make it a condition for a truce. Calling the humanitarian situation in Gaza 'catastrophic,' the resolution, put forth by the 15-member council's 10 elected members, also calls for 'the immediate and unconditional lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza and its safe and unhindered distribution at scale, including by the U.N. and humanitarian partners.' President Donald Trump's administration has tried to ramp up its efforts to broker peace in Gaza after 20 months of war. However, Hamas has sought amendments to a U.S. proposal that special envoy Steve Witkoff has called 'totally unacceptable.' The vote follows a decision by an Israeli and U.S.-backed foundation to pause food delivery at its three distribution sites in the Gaza Strip after health officials said dozens of Palestinians were killed in a series of shootings near the sites this week. Israel and the United States say they supported the establishment of the new aid system to prevent Hamas from stealing aid previously distributed by the U.N. The United Nations has rejected the new system, saying it doesn't address Gaza's mounting hunger crisis, allows Israel to use aid as a weapon and doesn't comply with the humanitarian principles of neutrality, impartiality and independence. The U.N. says its distribution system throughout Gaza worked very well during the March ceasefire and is carefully monitored. The resolution demands the restoration of all essential humanitarian services in line with humanitarian principles, international humanitarian law and U.N. Security Council resolutions. Several U.N. diplomats from different countries, speaking on condition of anonymity because discussions have been private, said they expect the United States to veto the resolution. They also said they expect a similar vote to the one in November, when the 14 other council members supported the resolution. Israel's U.N. Mission said Ambassador Danny Danon, who will speak after the vote, will say the resolution undermines humanitarian relief efforts and ignores Hamas, which is still endangering civilians in Gaza. He also will say the resolution disregards the ceasefire negotiations that are already underway, the mission said. Gaza's roughly 2 million people are almost completely reliant on international aid because Israel's offensive has destroyed nearly all food production capabilities. Israel imposed a blockade on supplies into Gaza on March 2, and limited aid began to enter again late last month after pressure from allies and warnings of famine. 'The world is watching, day after day, horrifying scenes of Palestinians being shot, wounded or killed in Gaza while simply trying to eat,' U.N. humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher said in a statement Wednesday. He called for a flood of aid to be let in and for the world body to be the one delivering it. The Security Council has voted on 14 Gaza-related resolutions and approved four since the war began. That is when Hamas-led militants stormed into southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducting 251. They are still holding 58 hostages, a third of them believed to be alive, after most of the rest were released in ceasefire agreements or other deals. Israel's military campaign has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which doesn't say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants. The ministry is led by medical professionals but reports to the Hamas-run government. Its toll is seen as generally reliable by U.N. agencies and independent experts, though Israel has challenged its numbers. writer Farnoush Amiri at the United Nations contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store