
Elon's Boring Company Is ‘Helping' the Government With an $8 Billion Amtrak Tunnel Project
Musk has his finger in yet another pie.
Elon Musk's tunneling firm, the Boring Company, has agreed to 'help' the government's Federal Railroad Administration with a multi-billion dollar project to build a train tunnel in Maryland. While it's not yet clear that Musk's company will actually get a contract related to the project, it seems like yet another conflict-of-interest for the billionaire, who has exerted undue influence over the government ever since Donald Trump took office.
The New York Times reports that Musk's company is helping the government assess 'the costs and progress' of the Frederick Douglass Tunnel program, a new underground Amtrak route that has been designed to replace an aging tunnel system that connects Baltimore to Washington and Virginia. Department of Transportation officials recently met with representatives from the Boring Company to discuss the project and were told that Musk's firm could 'find ways to build the tunnel more cheaply and efficiently,' the newspaper writes.
The project has been in development for what seems like forever. The FRA and the MDOT initially announced a notice of intent for the project in 2014, over ten years ago. Since then, the projected price of the tunnel has also ballooned, tracking upwards from the original estimate of $6 billion to a more recent price tag of just over $8 billion, the Times writes. Last year, Amtrak picked two construction companies—Kiewit and J.F. Shea—to build the tunnel.
A Transportation Department representative told the newspaper that no 'decision has been made on bids' yet and that 'Amtrak in coordination with D.O.T. will follow standard procedures for bidding out contracting and subcontracting.' Gizmodo reached out to the Department and to the Boring Company for more information.
The Boring Company was founded in 2016 and allegedly sprang from Musk's desire to create a transportation solution that could allow drivers to avoid traffic jams. The firm has announced many projects over the years, many of which have failed to come to fruition. Currently, the company is working on a new tunnel system under Las Vegas, which it calls the 'Vegas Loop.' A recent ProPublica investigation showed that the Vegas venture, which is being privately funded by Musk, is proceeding without much of the regulatory oversight that a project of such a size and scope would traditionally have. The company also recently announced plans to develop a 10-mile tunnel in Dubai.
Musk's prominence in the Trump administration is well-known and, everywhere you look, the billionaire appears to be benefiting from his government ties. A recent report from the Washington Post showed that the White House has been bullying tariffed countries to adopt services from the billionaire's satellite internet company, Starlink. Starlink has seen other nebulous and problematic pacts with the U.S. government, including at the Federal Aviation Administration and in the White House. SpaceX also seems to have a variety of potential conflicts of interest, thanks to DOGE's interactions with NASA. Another recent report also shows that the billionaire's companies may have saved nearly $2.37 billion from federal fines and penalties that were active under Biden but have since been 'neutralized' in the Trump era.
As Musk has profited off his work in government, he has also sought to undermine many of the social services that are designed to benefit everyday Americans. His so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has taken aim at many agencies that protect consumers, including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which would have potentially overseen Musk's platform, X, had the agency not been gutted by DOGE. Critics also maintain that DOGE is working to wreck the Social Security Administration, which is the bedrock of the national retirement system.
At the same time, Musk's work with the government has also spurred problems for his businesses, including a nationwide political movement—the #TeslaTakedown protests—that have sought to target Musk through his car company Tesla. The EV company has suffered egregiously since Musk began helping the Trump administration. A recent earnings report showed the company's profits were down 71 percent in the first three months of this year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
It's Bulletproof, Fire-Resistant and Stronger Than Steel. It's Superwood.
FREDERICK, Md.—Inside a cavernous warehouse, in the midst of a half-finished industrial park not far from a Civil War battleground, robot arms the size of Cadillac Escalades are rehearsing their moves for a tightly choreographed dance that will commence later this summer. A strange new substance will begin rolling off the assembly line: soft wood transformed at the molecular level into something stronger than steel yet one-sixth the weight.

Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Donald Trump's Head-Spinning Foreign Policy
WASHINGTON—President Trump hasn't sounded much like Donald Trump in recent days. He said the U.S. needed to attack Iran over a growing nuclear threat, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization wasn't ripping off America and that Russian President Vladimir Putin was an impediment to ending the war in Ukraine. It was a remarkable shift for a president who said he would extract the U.S. from foreign entanglements, once called NATO obsolete and often has avoided criticizing Moscow.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Market Risk Overshadows IonQ's 466% Stock Surge
IonQ (IONQ) has established itself as a leading player in the quantum computing space, with its shares surging an impressive 466% since this time last year. The company's differentiated trapped-ion architecture and strong integration across major cloud platforms have garnered significant investor interest. Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter However, despite its technological strengths, IonQ's current valuation reflects elevated multiples and persistent profitability challenges. As a result, the risk-reward profile has become more nuanced. While the company's long-term potential remains compelling, I believe the stock is fairly priced at present, and I therefore maintain a Hold rating. Founded in 2015 and headquartered in College Park, Maryland, IonQ has established itself as a quantum computing leader through its distinctive trapped-ion architecture. The firm offers quantum computing as a service (QCaaS) through cloud platforms like Amazon Braket, Microsoft Azure Quantum, and Google Cloud. Users can also run quantum programs remotely on IonQ's hardware, without having to own the machines. The business model revolves around becoming a platform provider for next-generation computing, similar to how NVIDIA (NVDA) enables AI with GPUs, IonQ wants to enable quantum breakthroughs with trapped-ion systems. These systems can operate at room temperature while maintaining fidelity rates of 99.9% for two-qubit gates, providing significant advantages over competitors that require extremely cold operating conditions. Not intent on standing still, the company recently announced its largest acquisition, with the $1 billion purchase of Oxford Ionics, combining the stack with a proprietary ion-trap-on-chip architecture. Additional acquisitions include Lightsynq Technologies and a controlling stake in ID Quantique, representing a further $1 billion. These massive strategic moves demonstrate a commitment to building a comprehensive quantum ecosystem, though a significant dilution of between 7-11% of shares raises substantial concerns about shareholder value. Technological expansion through acquisitions is promising to a degree, but numerous execution risks remain, given the complexity of integrating multiple quantum technologies. IonQ's revenue trajectory highlights exceptional growth, rising from $1.6 million in 2021 to $43.1 million in 2024. Management forecasts revenue between $75 million and $95 million for 2025, implying a compound annual growth rate of approximately 200% since the company went public. This rapid acceleration reflects meaningful commercial traction and reinforces the growing demand for quantum computing solutions. IonQ holds a differentiated position as the only quantum hardware provider integrated across all major cloud platforms—Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud. The company is targeting high-impact markets, particularly in cryptography, cybersecurity, and encryption, which offer substantial long-term potential. However, the path to profitability remains uncertain. In 2024, IonQ reported a net loss of $331.7 million, while operating expenses rose 38% year-over-year to $83.2 million in Q1 2025. Moreover, free cash flow remained significantly negative at -$123.7 million in 2024, underscoring the capital-intensive nature of quantum technology development. These financial challenges raise important questions about the timeline for achieving sustainable profitability. IonQ's competitive advantage stems from the distinctive strengths of its trapped-ion quantum architecture, which offers several benefits over superconducting approaches used by peers such as IBM (IBM) and Alphabet (GOOGL). Key differentiators include all-to-all qubit connectivity, longer coherence times, and significantly lower error correction overhead, estimated at a 13:1 ratio compared to approximately 100:1 for some competing platforms. While often complex for investors to understand, these details provide IonQ with a meaningful competitive advantage. The roadmap outlines a clear path to scaling, with plans to reach 100-qubit systems in the coming years and eventually millions of qubits through the integration of multi-core technology and photonic interconnects. An extensive patent portfolio of over 950 patents, spanning both quantum computing and networking, also provides additional competitive protection. Recent commercial deployments, including a $22 million Forte Enterprise quantum system to EPB in Chattanooga, demonstrate that practical applications are taking shape. While these developments are encouraging, the quantum computing market remains in its early stages, with uncertain commercial timelines and a heavy lean towards revenues generated in the U.S. for now, as reported by Main Street Data. While IonQ has established itself as a leader in trapped-ion quantum computing, several key risks warrant investor caution. The company remains significantly unprofitable, with ongoing cash burn primarily driven by substantial investments in research and development. Furthermore, the recent decision to discontinue disclosing forward bookings may raise concerns within the investment community regarding revenue visibility, complicating efforts to assess near-term growth momentum. Although the company's balance sheet is currently stable—with low leverage and a strong cash position—the persistently negative cash flow, as previously noted, presents a risk. Without meaningful progress toward improved financial efficiency, there is concern that the current capital position may not be sustainable over the long term. IonQ's reliance on government contracts and research partnerships presents another massive vulnerability, especially if public-sector funding priorities shift. And while its trapped-ion architecture has technical advantages for now, the broader field of quantum computing remains fairly experimental, with competitors pursuing alternatives that could scale more quickly or efficiently. Investors are ultimately betting not just on the company's execution, but on its very specific technological thesis proving correct. The quantum computing market presents enormous potential, with McKinsey research projecting that the market could reach $87 billion by 2035. However, this potential comes with significant valuation challenges that warrant caution. IonQ currently trades at approximately 135x projected 2025 sales, with an EV/Sales ratio of 232, dramatically above the sector median of 6.46, according to TipRanks data. While IonQ is operationally solid, these extreme valuation multiples create substantial downside risk if the company fails to meet lofty expectations. For now, a ~$10 billion market capitalization appears to reflect overly optimistic assumptions. Turning to Wall Street, IonQ carries a Strong Buy consensus rating based on four Buys, one Hold, and zero recent Sell ratings. At $43, IonQ's average stock price target implies about 13% upside potential. Moreover, according to TipRanks data, the mixed trend in insider transactions reflects the complex variables at play. A spike in recent activity shows both heavy buying and selling. While these transactions are often unrelated to future performance, large transaction volumes of this nature are unlikely to send encouraging signals to the market about leadership confidence. In my view, IonQ presents a nuanced investment case within the emerging quantum computing sector. The company benefits from a strong technical foundation, an expanding patent portfolio, a healthy balance sheet, and a growing network of commercial and research partnerships—all of which support its long-term potential. However, the current valuation appears to be ahead of near-term fundamentals. Continued operating losses and execution risks—especially in such an early-stage and capital-intensive industry—highlight the disconnect between market performance and business maturity. Currently, it appears that the stock's exceptional run may have outpaced the company's underlying progress. My Hold rating reflects a balanced view of the risk-reward profile. While IonQ's leadership in technology and strategic positioning is compelling, the premium valuation constrains upside potential and introduces meaningful downside risk. Investors may be best served by exercising patience, allowing the company time to demonstrate continued execution and for the market to recalibrate its expectations accordingly. Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue Sign in to access your portfolio