Kash Patel dragged for ‘hit a cop, you're going to jail' threat to LA anti-ICE protesters: ‘Unless it's for Trump'
FBI Director Kash Patel has been mocked online after responding to anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles, telling demonstrators that if you 'hit a cop, you're going to jail."
'Doesn't matter where you came from, how you got here, or what movement speaks to you. If the local police force won't back our men and women on the thin blue line, we @ FBI will,' Patel wrote on X on Saturday.
Social media users were quick to point out the different stance taken by the administration in relation to the January 6 rioters – hundreds of whom were pardoned by President Donald Trump.
During the violent insurrection at the U.S. Capitol in 2021, more than 140 police officers were injured. One, Brian Sicknick, died the following day and several others took their own lives in the days and weeks after the attack. The rioters had been urged to go up to the Capitol and 'fight like hell or you won't have a country' on the day his election defeat to Joe Biden was being certified. Trump was criminally charged over his actions although the charges were dropped when he was re-elected in 2024.
Patel's tweet on Saturday night prompted some social media users to point out the irony. 'Unless you're doing it for Trump,' one user responded to Patel's comment, with another adding 'Unless you are trying to overturn an election.'
'But if you do it wearing Trump merch while rioting at the US Capitol, you'll get a pardon, right, Kash?' another user responded. More users piled in, sharing pictures and videos of the clashes between police and demonstrators on January 6.
'Interesting,' one user captioned the photo.
On his first day back in office, Trump granted pardons to around 1,500 people who had been charged or convicted for their role in the attack, even those who had been convicted of violently assaulting police officers.
The Trump administration is now planning to pay millions in compensation to the family of Ashli Babbitt, one of the pro-Trump rioters, who was shot dead inside the Capitol.
During his confirmation hearing for FBI Director, Patel distanced himself from the pardons, telling the Senate Judiciary Committee: "I have always rejected any violence against law enforcement, and I have included in that group specifically addressed any violence against law enforcement on January 6.
"I do not agree with the commutation of any sentence of any individual who committed violence against law enforcement."
The FBI Director seemed not to be the only Trump official failing to see the irony of their remarks on Saturday.
'The violent mob assaults on ICE and Federal Law Enforcement are designed to prevent the removal of Criminal Illegal Aliens from our soil; a dangerous invasion facilitated by criminal cartels (aka Foreign Terrorist Organizations) and a huge NATIONAL SECURITY RISK,' wrote Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
'Under President Trump, violence & destruction against federal agents & federal facilities will NOT be tolerated. It's COMMON SENSE.'
However more users were concerned about Hegseth's threat that active duty U.S. Marines, stationed at nearby Camp Pendleton, may be mobilized if needed. 'They are on high alert,' he wrote.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Matteo Manassero and Ryan Fox surge into lead to set up intriguing final round at Canadian Open
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
The Sun
15 minutes ago
- The Sun
Donald Trump gets astonishing reaction at UFC 316 amid Elon Musk row before stunning gesture by winner Merab Dvalishvili
DONALD TRUMP has made a surprise appearance at UFC 316 - but this time Elon Musk was nowhere to be seen. The President was cageside to watch Merab Dvalishvili's title scrap with Sean O'Malley on Saturday night. 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Trump was flanked by UFC kingpin Dana White in a one-man entourage as he entered the arena in Newark, New Jersey. He received loud cheers from the capacity crowd at the Prudential Center before taking his seat close to boxing icon Mike Tyson. Trump shook hands with former NFL stars Will Compton and Taylor Lewan as he settled in to watch a packed main card. Son Eric, daughter Ivanka and her husband Jared Kushner were also in the audience, as well as US Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The 47th President arrived in New Jersey on Friday, where he stayed at his golf course in Bedminster. Trump was on the end of a high five from Kevin Holland after his submission victory against fellow welterweight Vicente Luque. And he later shared words of encouragement to Georgian star Dvalishvili following an epic end to the main event. Elon Musk. His relationship with the world's richest man disintegrated earlier this week. The former allies battled it out on social media after disagreeing on Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill', with the President claiming Elon had "gone crazy". I'm an ex-UFC champ who has quit masturbating and smoking weed to try win my belt back at UFC 316, Musk, who is worth an estimated $330 billion, was a major contributor to Trump's presidential campaign. He reportedly spent $250 million in supporting the Republican's race for the White House last year. Musk accompanied Trump to his last UFC showing in April. The President was given a thunderous reception as he entered the arena for UFC 314 in Miami, Florida. But prior to Saturday's action, Trump indicated his working relationship with Musk was irreparable. "I'm too busy doing other things. I won an election in a landslide," he said. "I gave [Musk] a lot of breaks, long before this happened. "I gave him breaks in my first administration, and saved his life in my first administration, I have no intention of speaking to him." 10 Donald Trump and Elon Musk's complicated relationship Former president Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk's relationship started rocky, but the pair have since reconciled, with Musk fully endorsing Trump and interviewing him on X Spaces on August 12. In 2022, Elon Musk and Donald Trump publicly feuded on X, then still known as Twitter. Trump called Musk a liar and "bulls**t artist" during a rally in Alaska. "Elon is not going to buy Twitter," Trump said at the time. "You know, he said the other day, 'I've never voted for a Republican.' I said, 'I didn't know that - you told me you voted for me. So he's another bulls**t artist, but he's not going to be buying it." In response to Trump's critiques, the SpaceX founder clapped back. "I don't hate the man, but it's time for Trump to hang up his hat & sail into the sunset," Musk posted. Musk also went on to buy X months later. The X owner said he had previously voted mostly for Democrats since becoming a United States citizen in 2002. Musk initially backed Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to be the Republican Party's presidential nominee. "My preference for the 2024 presidency is someone sensible and centrist," Musk wrote on X in 2022. "I had hoped that would [be] the case for the Biden administration, but have been disappointed so far." His shift in political parties might be attributed to his plummeting relationship with President Joe Biden who didn't invite Musk to the 2021 White House electric vehicle summit. Despite their past issues, Trump and Musk's relationship took a turn in March after they met at Mar-a-Lago. Trump was also previously against electric vehicles but has since changed his stance. "I'm for electric cars," he said at a rally earlier this month. "I have to be, because Elon endorsed me very strongly. So I have no choice." Following the assassination attempt at Trump's rally in July, Musk announced his support for the former president. "I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery," Musk wrote on X after the shooting. During a recent press conference, Trump spoke highly of Musk. "I respect Elon a lot. He respects me," he said. "Elon, more than almost anybody I know, he loves this country. He loves the concept of this country, but like me, he says this country is in big trouble, it's in tremendous danger." Musk has been pictured at events at Mar-a-Lago and the UFC, buddying up with Trump. Trump selected Musk to lead the Department of Government Efficiency - a taskforce aimed at cutting bureaucracy. In the Octagon, it was a night to remember for Dvalishvili, who proved too strong for O'Malley in their main event rematch. The reigning bantamweight champion secured his first-ever UFC submission following a brutal choke-out. And he celebrated by vaulting out of the Octagon for a handshake and words with Trump. The President also shook hands with a devastated O'Malley, who was able to leave the Octagon under his own steam after the choke. "He was well trained, he was well prepared, and I knew that he was going to make changes," Dvalishvili told reporters after the third round win. "Every time I lost I made big changes and I learned from it. "But I'm getting better and better. I wasn't showing this technique [before] and I have more tools in my pocket I'm still working on, and then little by little I will show. "Now it's my time." Elsewhere on the main card, there were also wins for Kayla Harrison, Joe Pyfer, Holland, and Mario Bautista. 10
The Herald Scotland
18 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Justice Jackson warns Supreme Court is sending a 'troubling message'
"It is particularly startling to think that grants of relief in these circumstances might be (unintentionally) conveying not only preferential treatment for the Government but also a willingness to undercut both our lower court colleagues' well-reasoned interim judgments and the well-established constraints of law that they are in the process of enforcing," Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote. Jackson was dissenting from the conservative majority's decision to give Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency complete access to the data of millions of Americans kept by the U.S. Social Security Administration. Once again, she wrote in a dissent joined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, "this Court dons its emergency responder gear, rushes to the scene, and uses its equitable power to fan the flames rather than extinguish them." A district judge had blocked DOGE's access to "personally identifiable information" while assessing if that access is legal. Jackson said a majority of the court didn't require the administration to show it would be "irreparably harmed" by not getting immediate access, one of the legal standards for intervention. "It says, in essence, that although other stay applicants must point to more than the annoyance of compliance with lower court orders they don't like," she wrote, "the Government can approach the courtroom bar with nothing more than that and obtain relief from this Court nevertheless." A clock, a mural, a petition: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's chambers tell her story In a brief and unsigned decision, the majority said it weighed the "irreparable harm" factor along with the other required considerations of what's in the public interest and whether the courts are likely to ultimately decide that DOGE can get at the data. But the majority did not explain how they did so. Jackson said the court `plainly botched' its evaluation of a Trump appeal Jackson raised a similar complaint when the court on May 30 said the administration can revoke the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans living in the United States. Jackson wrote that the court "plainly botched" its assessment of whether the government or the approximately 530,000 migrants would suffer the greater harm if their legal status ends while the administration's mass termination of that status is being litigated. Jackson said the majority undervalued "the devastating consequences of allowing the Government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are pending." The majority did not offer an explanation for its decision. More Supreme Court wins for Trump In addition to those interventions, the Supreme Court recently blocked a judge's order requiring DOGE to disclose information about its operations, declined to reinstate independent agency board members fired by Trump, allowed Trump to strip legal protections from 350,000 Venezuelans and said the president can enforce his ban on transgender people serving in the military. Jackson disagreed with all of those decisions. The court's two other liberal justices - Sotomayor and Elena Kagan - disagreed with most of them. More: Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson can throw a punch. Literally. The court did hand Trump a setback in May when it barred the administration from quickly resuming deportations of Venezuelans under a 1798 wartime law. Two of the court's six conservative justices - Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito - dissented. Decisions are expected in the coming weeks on other Trump emergency requests, including whether the president can dismantle the Education Department and can enforce his changes to birthright citizenship.
