logo
Germany chancellor-in-waiting suggest change for Europe-US relations

Germany chancellor-in-waiting suggest change for Europe-US relations

BBC News24-02-2025

Germany chancellor-in-waiting no wan wait for di final results of im kontri election on Sunday to begin a new era in Europe.
Declaring di US indifferent to di continent fate, Friedrich Merz kwesion di future of Nato and demand to make Europe boost dia own defences. Sharpaly.
Dis tone from di close US ally - and from Friedrich Merz wey dey known to be a passionate Atlanticist - bin dey unimaginable even some months ago.
Dis na seismic shift. Even if e dey read like say e dey exaggerate, but wetin we now dey experience in terms of transatlantic relations dey surprising in di 80 years since di end of World War Two.
Big European powers dey shocked to di core by di Trump administration, wey suggest say dem fit revoke di security guarantees to Europe wey dey in place since 1945.
"I no ever tink say I go tok sometin like dis for TV show but, afta Donald Trump remarks last week... e dey clear say dis goment no care much about di fate of Europe," Friedrich Merz tok during a post-election debate on Sunday.
"My absolute priority go be to strengthen Europe as quickly as possible so dat, step by step, we go really achieve independence from di USA," e add.
Merz hint say di endeavour dey so urgent sotay e no dey sure weda di transatlantic alliance leaders wey dey gada for a summit in June "go still dey tok about Nato in dia current form or weda we get to establish an independent European defence capability much more quickly".
Significantly, di forthcoming chancellor put Donald Trump America on di same level wit Russia - wey widely dey viewed as a security threat to Europe more broadly. "We dey under such massive pressure from two sides wey make my absolute priority now really na to create unity in Europe," Merz tok.
Di UK prime minister go head to Washington on Thursday, following di visit dia on Monday by French President Emmanuel Macron.
Friedrich Merz admit, indirectly, to a sense of Fomo - fear of missing out. By rights Germany suppose dey dia, too, dis week, e tok. Berlin, na one of Europe Big Three powers, alongside France and di UK.
And wit di US and Russia now dey consider bilaterally, about, but no be wit, Ukraine, e feel like a global return to big-power politics.
But Germany don dey MIA [missing in action] for a good while now on di European and di world stage.
Di outgoing goment hia dey weak and distracted by serious internal fight. Dis dey vex German voters - wey want immediate focus on di economy and migration - and European allies, dey demand action on Russia, security and defence.
Merz say a top priority for Germany na to re-engage internationally.
Di kontri already be di second-biggest donor of military aid to Ukraine, afta di US.
Merz wan kontinu dat support, but, unlike France and di UK, e no too like di idea of sending sojas to Ukraine, to back up eventual ceasefire dia.
Based on Germany track record - e don drag dem at evri stage of Ukraine support, and despite dat, end up delivering more aid dan any of dia European neighbours - a 'No' now, no mean a 'No' forever to committing troops or participate in wateva form a European "reassurance force" in Ukraine fit take.
For now, wetin di German sojas dey worry about na di 35,000 American ones, wey dey stationed in dia kontri, wey dey make dem feel safe.
E dey highly unusual for foreign policy to be a top voter concern for election time. But for Germany dis weekend, alongside di economy and migration, voter afta voter say dem dey worry about peace in Europe and feel very insecure.
Back in November, Germany interior ministry say dem dey draw up a list of bunkers wey fit provide emergency shelter for civilians.
Ukraine fit dey far away, but Germans feel at great risk from Russia for two reasons.
Firstly, di amount of military equipment dia kontri don send Ukraine. Di far right, Alternative for Germany (AfD), wit dia "Germany First" slogan, campaign for Berlin to disengage from Kyiv and to re-establish relations wit Russia. A strategy not unlike Donald Trump own, as di party dey fond of pointing out.
Secondly, many in Germany think say if Russia wan really destabilise Europe, e fit dey tempted to strike one of diamonds Big Three wit a long-range missile.
France and di UK na nuclear powers. Germany no follow. Even dia conventional military no get enof staff and no better equipment, so Germany dey fear say dem go be a soft target.
All di more so if President Trump withdraw im active servicemen and women from Germany.
Im don pledge to significantly reduce US troop presence for Europe as a whole.
Di German sense of deep domestic insecurity na im prompt Friedrich Merz to suggest last week say e go look to France and Britain to form a European nuclear umbrella, to replace US nuclear guarantees.
Dis na idea wey dey easy to bring up on di campaign trail, but dat in reality dey hugely complex - involving questions of capabilities, commitment and control.
Di reality check: Friedrich Merz go need a lot of money for im plans to secure Germany and Europe, and Germany economy dey depressed.
E also get to reach agreement with di coalition partner, or partners, wey im go form di next German goment - as well as with oda European countries, like di UK.
And dem fit no want to strike dat kain strong tone against di US.
Dis election fit bring stronger leadership from Germany. But di rest of Europe dey ready?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Four European countries 'outraged' over new airline luggage rules passed by EU
Four European countries 'outraged' over new airline luggage rules passed by EU

Daily Mirror

time43 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Four European countries 'outraged' over new airline luggage rules passed by EU

Last week, the Council of Europe made two major decisions on the future of commercial air travel. The first was on compensation rights, and the second related to free hand luggage Four European countries are outraged at new rules that could limit how much delayed passengers can claim in compensation and when airlines can charge passengers for carrying hand luggage. Last week, the Council of Europe made two major decisions on the future of commercial air travel. The first was on compensation rights. ‌ The Council decided that passengers on short-haul flights would have to be delayed by four hours or more before they could claim compensation, rather than the current three. For long-haul flights, delays will have to be six or more hours. ‌ The good news for passengers is that compensation for those delayed on short-haul flights will increase from €250 (£211) to €300. However, compensation for long-haul flights will be cut from €600 to €500. The changes were first tabled 13 years ago and must still be approved by the European Parliament before they become law. The European Consumer Organisation, the BEUC, has argued that the changes will be a huge blow for consumers and deprive 'the majority of passengers from their compensation rights". The BEUC claims that most delays are between two and four hours. While the UK now sets its own compensation rules following Brexit, the changes will impact Brits if they come into force, as it will apply to passengers taking flights with an EU carrier. This means it could affect a passenger travelling to and from an EU country on an EU airline. The second decision relates to baggage allowance. Under the new rules, the concept to free luggage will be limited to 'personal items' that can be placed under the front seat. That will leave other stowed cabin bags exposed to charges. ‌ Spain, Germany, Slovenia, and Portugal voted against the changes, warning that they could mean passengers end up paying extra for almost any cabin bag. The Spanish government criticised the new rules as 'too restrictive.' Spain's Minister for Social Rights, Consumer Affairs and the 2030 Agenda, Pablo Bustinduy, described the changes as an 'outrage'. The political agreement, adopted by a qualified majority in the EU Council, was voted against by Spain, Germany, Slovenia and Portugal. Minister Bustinduy argued that the new rules would violate consumer rights and "only strengthen the power and profits of airlines." If the rules are accepted, then Ryanair would have to change its free hand luggage policy. Right now, the budget Irish airline require customers to have a bag no larger than 40x20x25 centimetres, which must fit under the seat in front. Under the new rules, the dimensions will be changed to 40x30x15 centimetres. That means Ryanair would be obliged to allow a bag 10 centimetres wider, but could also reduce the depth currently allowed by 10 centimetres.

Boost of £14,200,000,000 for new nuclear power plant 'will lead to lower bills'
Boost of £14,200,000,000 for new nuclear power plant 'will lead to lower bills'

Metro

time5 hours ago

  • Metro

Boost of £14,200,000,000 for new nuclear power plant 'will lead to lower bills'

A new nuclear power station on the east coast of England will be given a £14.2 billion boost to finally get it off the ground. Sizewell C in Suffolk has been mooted as the site of a new facility since at least 2009, when Ed Miliband identified it in his role as the Energy Secretary in the previous Labour government. A decade and a half later, after returning to the same role, Miliband has secured funding from Chancellor Rachel Reeves as part of her major spending review. He said the move would lead to 'lower bills and good jobs for energy security'. The new power station at Sizewell would help fill the gaps left as all the UK's existing nuclear plants, except Sizewell B, are gradually phased out by the mid-2030s. Miliband said: 'We will not accept the status quo of failing to invest in the future and energy insecurity for our country. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sign up here. 'We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis.' Sizewell C is described as a 'sister project' to Hinkley Point C in Somerset, which is currently under construction and is set to become the first new nuclear power station in the UK since 1995. However, building work at Hinkley Point is far behind schedule and the budget for the project has ballooned massively since it began in 2017. It is now expected to become operational around 2030. Like Hinkley Point C, it is expected that Sizewell C will be jointly owned by the British government and French energy giant EDF. Campaign groups have said the construction of the new facility would have a 'devastating impact' on its stretch of the Suffolk coast, which is susceptible to erosion. It is set to be built on a platform seven metres above sea level to protect it from the sea as it rises due to climate change. The Labour government has also backed the development of small modular reactors to supply nuclear-sourced power to millions of homes and power-hungry sites like AI data centres. More Trending Once all these projects are in operation, they will 'deliver more new nuclear to grid than over the previous half century combined', according to the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero. Reeves, who will announce the Sizewell C funding later today at the GMB Union Congress, said: 'Today we are once again investing in Britain's renewal, with the biggest nuclear building programme in a generation. 'This landmark decision is our Plan for Change in action. 'We are creating thousands of jobs, kickstarting economic growth and putting more money people's pockets.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Government finally reveals who will get winter fuel payout after U-turn MORE: New solar panels 'could cut people's bills by £530 per year' MORE: Universal digital 'BritCards' on an app could soon be used to prove who you are

Putin could attack NATO by 2030 as ‘Europe needs Golden Dome defence system'
Putin could attack NATO by 2030 as ‘Europe needs Golden Dome defence system'

Daily Mirror

time6 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Putin could attack NATO by 2030 as ‘Europe needs Golden Dome defence system'

NATO secretary general Mark Rutte warned Europe needed to commit to a "quantum leap" amid fears that Vladimir Putin could launch an attack against the defensive alliance Maniac Russian despot Vladimir Putin could launch an attack against NATO by 2030 prompting a call for Europe to "build its own Golden Dome" defence system. NATO secretary general Mark Rutte on Monday urged Europe to drastically ramp up its spending on missile defence systems while Russia remains engaged in Ukraine. The fresh appeal for united military might comes after US President Donald Trump unveiled an ambitious Golden Dome plan that would set taxpayers back more than half a trillion dollars, about a quarter of money spent by the US throughout the duration of the two-decade long operation in Iraq. ‌ ‌ Mr Rutte said the Europe would need a "quantum leap" in building its defence systems with a warning that Putin is "speeding up, not slowing down" his militaristic ambitions. Mr Rutte said Europe needed to be prepared to protect the continent from any attacks from Russia. He added: "The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defence. "The fact is, we must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defence plans in full. The fact is, danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends." He called for militaries to stock up with thousands of additional tanks and vehicles as well as building an arsenal of millions of artillery shells. He also hinted at a possible nightmare scenario where Putin manages to pull together allies in China, North Korea and Iran. The NATO chief added Russia is capable of producing in three months what the whole of the organisation takes a year to do. According to The Sun, he said: "Wishful thinking will not keep us safe. "We cannot dream away the danger. Hope is not a strategy. So NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance." ‌ Mr Rutte now wants NATO members to commit to 3.5 per cent of GDP by 2032 as well as an additional 1.5 per cent on broader security-related expenditure. It comes as NATO chiefs aim to keep Mr Trump content with allies after he demanded each commit to 5 per cent spending, far above the previous 2 per cent of GDP. He added NATO members are expected to agree to the proposal when leaders from the 32 countries attend a meeting at The Hague between June 24 and 25. He said: "It will be a NATO-wide commitment and a defining moment for the alliance" US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth last week said allies were close to reaching an agreement about reaching the 5 per cent target. He said on Thursday, adding: "That combination constitutes a real commitment, and we think every country can step up." The return of Mr Trump to the White House sent shockwaves through Europe with some nations raising concerns the US was no longer a steadfast ally. Mr Rutte added: "Danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends. We must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defence plans in full."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store