Myanmar earthquake: What caused it and why did it make a building in Bangkok collapse?
A major earthquake in Myanmar on Friday has caused more than 1,000 deaths and led to the collapse of numerous structures.Even though Myanmar is a high risk region for earthquakes, damage to buildings has been widespread. On the other hand, Bangkok is not considered earthquake-prone. The Thai capital is more than 1,000km (621 miles) from the epicentre of Friday's earthquake - and yet an unfinished high-rise building in the city was felled by it.Here we will explain what caused this earthquake, and how it was able to have such a powerful effect so far away.
What caused the earthquake?
The earth's upper layer is split into different sections, called tectonic plates, which are all moving constantly. Some move alongside each other, whilst others are above and below each other.It is this movement that causes earthquakes and volcanoes.Myanmar is considered to be one of the most geologically "active" areas in the world because it sits on top of the convergence of four of these tectonic plates - the Eurasian plate, the Indian plate, the Sunda plate and the Burma microplate.The Himalayas were formed by the Indian plate colliding with the Eurasian plate, and the 2004 Tsunami as a result of the Indian plate moving beneath the Burma microplate.Dr Rebecca Bell, a reader in tectonics at Imperial College London, said that to accommodate all of this motion, faults - cracks in the rock - form which allow tectonic plates to "slither" sideways. There is a major fault called the Sagaing fault, which cuts right through Myanmar north to south and is more than 1,200km (746 miles) long.Early data suggests that the movement that caused Friday's 7.7-magnitude earthquake was a "strike-slip" - where two blocks move horizontally along each other.This aligns with the movement typical of the Sagaing fault.As the plates move past each other, they can become stuck, building friction until it is suddenly released and the earth shifts, causing an earthquake.
Why was the earthquake felt so far away?
Earthquakes can happen at up to 700km (435 miles) below the surface. This one was just 10km from the surface, making it very shallow. This increases the amount of shaking at the surface.The earthquake was also very large - measuring 7.7 on the moment scale. It produced more energy than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima, according to the US Geological Survey. The size of the earthquake was because of the type of fault, said Dr Bell."The straight nature [of the fault] means earthquakes can rupture over large areas - and the larger the area of the fault that slips, the larger the earthquake," she explained. "There have been six magnitude 7 or greater earthquakes in this region in the last century."This straight fault also means a lot of the energy can be carried down its length - which extends for 1200km south towards Thailand.How earthquakes are felt at the surface is also determined by the type of soil. In soft soil - which is what Bangkok is built on - seismic waves (the vibrations of the earth) slow down and build up, getting bigger in size. So Bangkok's geology would have made the ground shaking more intense.
Why did just one skyscraper collapse in Bangkok?
While dramatic footage has emerged of high-rise buildings in Bangkok swaying during the quake - knocking water from rooftop pools - the unfinished headquarters for the auditor-general's office Bangkok's Chatuhak district appears to be the only skyscraper to collapse.Prior to 2009, Bangkok did not have a comprehensive safety standard for constructing buildings to withstand earthquakes, according to Dr Christian Málaga-Chuquitaype, a senior lecturer in earthquake engineering at Imperial College London.This means that older buildings would have been particularly vulnerable.This is not unusual, as earthquake-resistant buildings can be more expensive to construct and Thailand, unlike Myanmar, does not frequently experience earthquakes.Dr Emily So, a professor of architectural engineering at the University of Cambridge, noted that older buildings can and have been strengthened, such as in California, western Canada and New Zealand.
Yet the building that collapsed was new - in fact, it was still under construction when the earthquake hit - and the updated building standards would have applied.But having studied the video, Dr Málaga-Chuquitaype said it appears a "flat slab" construction process was being favoured - which is no longer recommended in earthquake-prone areas."A 'flat slab' system is a way of constructing buildings where floors are made to rest directly on columns, without using beams," he explained. "Imagine a table supported only by legs, with no extra horizontal supports underneath."While this design has cost and architectural advantages, is performs poorly during earthquakes, often failing in a brittle and sudden (almost explosive) manner."
What about the buildings in Myanmar?
Mandalay in Myanmar was much closer to where the ground slipped and would have experienced significantly more severe shaking than Bangkok.Although Myanmar regularly experiences earthquakes, Dr Ian Watkinson, a lecturer in earth sciences at Royal Holloway University, thought it was unlikely that many buildings were constructed to be earthquake-proof."General poverty, major political upheaval, alongside other disasters - e.g. the Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004 - has distracted the country from concentrating on the unpredictable risks from earthquakes," he said."This means that, in many cases, building design codes are not enforced, and construction happens in areas that could be prone to enhanced seismic risk, for example flood plains and steep slopes."Parts of Mandalay and its buildings also lie along the floodplain of the Ayerwaddy River. This makes them very vulnerable to a process called liquefaction.This happens when the soil has a high water content, and the shaking causes the sediment to lose its strength and behave like a liquid. This increases the risk of landslides and building collapses, as the ground can no longer hold them up.Dr So warned that there was "always a chance" of further damage to buildings near a fault line due to aftershocks - tremors that follow an earthquake, which can be caused by the sudden transfer of energy into nearby rock."Most of the time aftershocks are smaller than the main shock, and tend to decrease in size and frequency over time," she said.Additional reporting by Vicky Wong
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
13 hours ago
- BBC News
Great Exhibition Road Festival: What is the weirdest thing in the universe?
London's Exhibition Road will close to traffic this weekend as the famous museums and institutions of South Kensington combine for the Great Exhibition Road the series of free events taking place along the street, three researchers affiliated with Imperial College London (ICL) will take to the stage to try to answer one small question - what's the weirdest thing in the universe? For ICL research fellow Mariana Carrillo Gonzalez, the answer is to be found far away from our own planet."My object is black holes," she holes are regions of space where matter has collapsed in on itself, meaning they have such strong gravity that not even light can escape there's a key problem with them for scientists, explains Mariana."We still have no clue how they work."We can't observe them, we just observe the effects of a black hole. We observe the light that goes around the black hole and we observe how it deforms space and how things move... but we really can't see it because there's nothing that can escape from a black hole."We can prove they are there, we just have no idea what's inside," she adds."I think that's just a very weird thing." Nevertheless, Rita Ahmadi argues her research specialism is even more bizarre - "Quantum physics, by which I mean the physics of subatomic particles."They have behaviours that are different from the classical physics that you see around yourself, so the rules are different," the postdoctoral researcher rules include that "they can be observed in two different states at the same time, which is called superposition", while they also have an unusual problem when trying to observe them as "any interaction with a quantum system changes the state of the quantum system".Rita says such peculiarities mean "we know that the mathematics of quantum mechanics work properly so we know that the model works... but still we cannot make sense of that".Even so, quantum science is still seen as hugely important for the future."My research is quantum computing and I'm building devices out of that even without understanding if it makes sense." The other researcher taking part is Fernando Ernesto Rosas De Andraca whose area of expertise is another one full of conundrums."I took human consciousness as the weirdest thing I can think of," he says."Our best guess is that consciousness is somehow generated by the brain but most people would argue that single neurons are not conscious."So you have these little parts that are not conscious, you put them together and they are conscious and that's very strange."He also points to other arguments such as "the only thing you cannot doubt is your consciousness, but at the same time consciousness is this thing that nobody else can see so everybody else can doubt it".Elaborating further, Fernando brings up artificial intelligence (AI), declaring it as something he has become "completely obsessed" with."Most people believe that current AI systems are not conscious... but I think most people agree that there is no fundamental limits to say it will never be conscious so then the question is at one point it might become so," he says."We then get into a different arena that we have to be concerned about things like creating a system that can suffer." The reason for such existential arguments is the festival, which seeks to celebrate science and the arts for people of all ages through activities like insect yoga, quantum discos and robotics."We're always trying to find different and creative ways of exploring some of the topics that we study at Imperial," says James Romero, who is one of the festival organisers for the university."In this case it's challenging the researchers to tweak the public lecture format into a different format and introducing a competitive element into it."Once the three researchers have presented their arguments, a vote will be held with those in the crowd deciding which phenomena should be considered the weirdest in the universe."We thought that the researchers might be too polite to be competitive but clearly that's not necessarily the case," says James, having listened to their arguments."I came from Oxford," replies Rita. "I take debates very seriously."The Weirdest Object in the Universe debate is free to attend and will take place in the Sir Alexander Fleming Building at Imperial College London at 15:30 BST on Saturday.
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Poorer children more likely to age faster than affluent counterparts, study finds
Children from poorer backgrounds are more likely to experience biological disadvantages such as ageing faster than their more affluent counterparts, according to a study. Academics at Imperial College London looked at data from 1,160 children aged between six and 11 from across Europe, for the study published in the Lancet. The children were scored using an international scale of family affluence, which is based on a number of factors including whether a child had their own room and the number of vehicles per household. Children were split into groups of high, medium and low affluence groups, and blood samples were used to measure children's average telomere length in white blood cells, while the stress hormone cortisol was measured from urine. Telomeres are structures found within chromosomes that play an important role in cellular ageing and DNA integrity, and their degradation is linked to ageing. Telomeres become shorter as humans age. Previous studies have suggested a link between telomere length and chronic diseases, and that acute and chronic stress can reduce telomere length. The study found that children from the high affluence group had telomeres 5% longer on average compared with children from a low affluence group. Girls were found to have longer telomeres than boys, by an average of 5.6%, while children with a greater body mass index (BMI) had shorter telomeres by 0.18% for each percentage increase in fat mass. Children from the medium and high affluence groups had cortisol levels between 15.2% and 22.8% lower than children from the low affluence group. The authors acknowledged the study had some limitations in that the children analysed were not from families living in poverty, and that the study should not be interpreted as showing a link between affluence and 'quality' of genes, but rather showing the indirect impact of environment on a known marker of ageing and long-term health. Dr Oliver Robinson, from Imperial's school of public health and senior author of the study, said: 'Our findings show a clear relationship between family affluence and a known marker for cellular ageing, with potentially lifelong patterns being shaped in the first decade of a child's life. 'It means that for some children, their economic background may put them at a biological disadvantage compared to those who have a better start in life. By failing to address this, we are setting children on a lifelong trajectory where they may be more likely to have less healthy and shorter lives.' Robinson added: 'Our work suggests that being from a low affluence background is causing additional biological wear and tear. For children from the low affluent group this may be equivalent to approximately 10 years of ageing at the cellular level, compared to children from high affluence backgrounds.' Kendal Marston, from Imperial's school of public health and the first author of the study, said: 'We know that chronic exposure to stress causes biological wear and tear on the body. This has been demonstrated in animal studies at the cellular level – with stressed animals having shorter telomeres. 'While our study couldn't show that cortisol was the mechanism, it does demonstrate a link between affluence and telomere length, which we know in adulthood is related to lifespan and health. It may be that children from less affluent backgrounds are experiencing greater psychosocial stress. For example, they may be sharing a bedroom with family members, or they may not have the resources they need for school – like access to a computer for homework.'
Time Out
3 days ago
- Time Out
Houston, we have Thai chicken! Street food delicacy makes space debut
Thai food has long been a global favourite – so much so that the Thai government launched the 'Thai Kitchen to the World' campaign to promote its cuisine internationally. But now, the world isn't enough. Thai chicken is heading to space, earning a spot on the menu for astronauts. It's not every day that food gets to take a trip to space. Every dish sent onboard has to pass strict tests to make sure it's safe, nutritious and ready to handle zero-gravity dining. Thanks to a collaboration between the Thai government and private partners, including the Department of Livestock Development, the Thai Broiler Processing Exporters Association and Charoen Pokphand Foods (CPF), Thai flavours were made to meet tough space-grade standards. All under the expert supervision of NASA and Axiom Space, who are making sure this mission is out of this world. The Thai chicken dishes chosen by NASA include green curry chicken and baked rice with herbs and chicken. Both menu items went through multi-stage lab testing, checking everything from shelf life and sterility to nutritional value and how well they hold up during zero-gravity taste tests. The astronauts lucky enough to taste this cuisine are part of the Axiom Mission 4 to the International Space Station. The launch is set for June 9 at 7.45pm (Bangkok time) from Cape Canaveral, Florida, USA. This marks the first time in history that Thai food has been sent into orbit. If you want to witness this milestone event, catch the rocket launch and Axiom Mission 4 live broadcast on the official NASA and Axiom Space channels. Celebrations will also take place across the nation.
