logo
Justice Department sues Texas over in-state tuition for students without legal residency

Justice Department sues Texas over in-state tuition for students without legal residency

Hindustan Times2 days ago

AUSTIN, Texas — The Justice Department on Wednesday sought to block a Texas law that for decades has given college students without legal residency in the U.S. access to reduced in-state tuition rates,
Texas was the first state in the nation in 2001 to pass a law allowing 'Dreamers,' or young adults without legal status, to be eligible for in-state tuition if they meet certain residency criteria. Twenty-four states now have similar laws, according to the Higher Ed Immigration Portal, which tracks state policies on immigration and education.
The lawsuit filed in Texas federal court asks a judge to block the law, which some state Republican lawmakers have sought to repeal for years. The lawsuit is the latest effort by the Trump administration to crack down on immigration into the country.
'Under federal law, schools cannot provide benefits to illegal aliens that they do not provide to U.S. citizens,' said Attorney General Pam Bondi said. 'The Justice Department will relentlessly fight to vindicate federal law and ensure that U.S. citizens are not treated like second-class citizens anywhere in the country.'
Texas has about 57,000 undocumented students enrolled in its public universities and colleges, according to the Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, a nonpartisan nonprofit group of university leaders focused on immigration policy. The state has about 690,000 students overall at its public universities.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and state Attorney General Ken Paxton, did not immediately comment on the lawsuit and staff did not immediately respond to email messages seeking comment.
The Texas law was initially passed by sweeping majorities in the Texas Legislature and signed into law by then-Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, as a way to open access to higher education for undocumented students already living in the state.
Supporters of the Texas law argue it boosts the state's economy by creating a better educated and better prepared work force.
'Targeted attacks on Texas students who are seeking an affordable college education, led by the Trump administration, won't help anyone- they only hurt us all,' said Luis Figueroa of Every Texan, a left-leaning public policy group.
The difference in tuition rates are substantial. For example, at the flagship University of Texas at Austin, a state resident paid about $11,000 in tuition for the 2024-2025 academic year compared to about $41,000 for students from outside of Texas.
The law allows for students without legal resident status to qualify for in-state tuition if they have lived in the state for three years before graduating from high school, and for a year before enrolling in college. They must also sign an affidavit promising to apply for legal resident status as soon as possible.
But the policy would soon come under fire from conservatives and critics who called it unfair to legal residents as debates over illegal immigration intensified. In the 2012 Republican presidential primary, Perry ended up apologizing after saying critics of the law 'did not have a heart.'
Legislative efforts to repeal the Texas law have repeatedly failed, but have started to gain traction elsewhere. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, earlier this year signed a bill that will repeal Florida's in-state tuition law in July.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

X user with ‘184 followers' ends Elon Musk-Donald Trump feud; SpaceX CEO backs down after viral comment: ‘Won't decommission Dragon'
X user with ‘184 followers' ends Elon Musk-Donald Trump feud; SpaceX CEO backs down after viral comment: ‘Won't decommission Dragon'

Indian Express

time26 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

X user with ‘184 followers' ends Elon Musk-Donald Trump feud; SpaceX CEO backs down after viral comment: ‘Won't decommission Dragon'

In an unexpected twist straight out of the digital age, a high-stakes showdown between two global titans – tech mogul Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump – was defused not by diplomats or high-level advisers, but by a regular user on X. A little-known account named Alaska (@Fab25june) stepped into the heated exchange with a calm, level-headed reply that read: 'This is a shame this back and forth. You are both better than this. Cool off and take a step back for a couple days.' This is a shame this back and forth. You are both better than this. Cool off and take a step back for a couple days. — Alaska (@Fab25june) June 6, 2025 Musk, surprisingly, took the advice to heart. The tension had escalated quickly after Trump posted on his platform, Truth Social, demanding the cancellation of government contracts and subsidies for Musk's companies. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote, adding that he was shocked President Biden hadn't already done it. In response, Musk issued what sounded like a dramatic retaliatory move: 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' But then came Alaska's now-viral comment. And Musk's reply changed the mood completely: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 6, 2025 The screenshot of this exchange blew up online, and one user said, 'An account with 184 followers has achieved de-escalation between two of the most powerful people in the world.' An account with 184 followers has achieved de-escalation between two of the most powerful people in the world. — Joe Weisenthal (@TheStalwart) June 6, 2025 Last year, Trump and Musk were political allies. Musk was among Trump's most vocal supporters, especially after an assassination attempt on Trump during the campaign trail in July 2024. But that alliance has since fallen apart in full public view. Things took a turn after Musk broke with Trump's administration over a major spending proposal dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Musk went after it hard on X, calling it 'a disgusting abomination… massive, outrageous, pork-filled.' On June 5, tensions officially erupted when Trump accused Musk of turning against the bill because it stripped electric vehicle tax credits – a move that directly hit Tesla's finances. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters. Musk didn't hold back either. He claimed he was instrumental in Trump's 2024 win and blasted the President for being ungrateful. In one particularly explosive post, Musk wrote: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' As expected, the Internet wasted no time in turning the Musk-Trump feud into meme gold. Social media platforms lit up with GIFs, jokes, and wild speculation, all feeding off the drama like it was a Netflix thriller. Elon aur Trump ki ladai hogyi hai🤣 — Abhishek (@be_mewadi) June 5, 2025 Elon musk right now — kira 👾 (@kirawontmiss) June 5, 2025 Elon Musk right now: — Jon Snow (@LordSnow) June 5, 2025 Seems like a great time to pull out this meme again 🤣 #muskvstrump — Deb🐝 🇸🇬 (@intjgamergirl) June 5, 2025 — Pepel Klaasa (@pepel_klaasa) June 5, 2025

Wall street is too pessimistic on the Dollar. That could be a problem.
Wall street is too pessimistic on the Dollar. That could be a problem.

Mint

time29 minutes ago

  • Mint

Wall street is too pessimistic on the Dollar. That could be a problem.

The dollar is struggling, and strategists overwhelmingly agree it's heading even lower. But with such strong consensus on a negative outlook, any positive news on the greenback could deliver an unexpected—and much harder—blow. For investors, it's a risk worth considering now. The U.S. Dollar Index, which measures the value of the dollar against a basket of foreign currencies, fell as low as 0.45% during Thursday's trading before recovering. The WSJ Dollar Index, a similar but newer index, fell to lows last seen in summer 2023 during the session, but finished at 95.21, a level that isn't particularly significant. That bodes well for Wall Street's big banks, who've been increasingly predicting a dollar rout. On Thursday, Deutsche Bank's macro strategist Tim Baker said the proposal for new levies on foreign investment adds to the firm's bearish view on the dollar. Bank of America's foreign-exchange strategist Alex Cohen referred to his team as 'core dollar bears." Morgan Stanley's Matthew Hornbach expects the dollar to slide in 2025 and some part of 2026. That's not all. JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Société Générale strategists are others part of this near-consensus view on the greenback. It's important to note that Wall Street isn't predicting an all-out demise for the U.S. dollar: The currency is entrenched within global financial machinery, and any significant decoupling by foreigners selling U.S. assets could take years. However, big money managers, hedge funds, and other institutions who've been holding lots of dollars by overweighting U.S. stocks or other dollar-denominated assets are rethinking exposure under a new, fast-paced regime in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump's tariffs also imply fewer dollars in the hands of other countries as they sell less goods in the U.S. That, in turn, will reduces foreign nations' ability to buy as many U.S. assets. Also, the dollar's usual role as a safe haven and a buffer against market swings is being questioned: The greenback is not reacting to moves in the S&P 500 and other major indexes as it once did. But here's the kicker: Even with many factors pointing to further dollar weakness, its not crazy to think that the dollar could go up—and that makes the groupthink on the dollar risky. Economic data could give the dollar a much-needed boost. Initial jobless claims published on Thursday were higher than economists anticipated. However, the unemployment rate has remained rather steady at 4.2%, and inflation seems more or less in control; an improvement on the economic front can strengthen the dollar. 'While the longer-term USD outlook is still bearish, a move lower from here may require signs of cracks forming in the economic data," wrote Kit Juckes, Chief FX Strategist at Société Générale on Monday. Trump's evolving tariff policy is another wild card. Trump said he had a 'very good" phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday, which likely led to the dollar moderating its losses. It's unclear where negotiations between the U.S. and Europe stand, Cohen pointed out in a note listing upside risks to his bearish call. However, most harsh rhetoric between the U.S. and foreign powers has been walked back soon enough, he wrote. Goldman listed the comeback of U.S. exceptionalism talk as 'the biggest risk to our forecast for further Dollar depreciation." If Trump uses money from tariffs as fiscal support, that could eventually strengthen the dollar—and foreign investors may get drawn by even higher yields on bonds and cheaper equity valuations on stocks. When pessimism is this strong, its wise to consider if the market could have other plans that could make a sudden rebound hurt badly. Write to Karishma Vanjani at

Trump Travel Ban Explained: Which Countries Are Most Impacted And Why
Trump Travel Ban Explained: Which Countries Are Most Impacted And Why

NDTV

time34 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Trump Travel Ban Explained: Which Countries Are Most Impacted And Why

New Delhi: US President Donald Trump has imposed a ban on citizens from 12 countries, along with entry restrictions on nationals from seven other nations, citing national security and immigration enforcement concerns. The US President signed the executive order on June 4, nearly five months after taking office for the second term, and it will come into effect on June 9. List of banned countries The travel ban has been divided into two categories: a complete ban and a partial ban. Trump has imposed a full entry ban on 12 countries - Afghanistan, Myanmar, the Republic of the Congo, Haiti, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Iran, Libya, Sudan, Yemen, Eritrea, and Somalia. The complete travel ban means the citizens of the aforementioned countries cannot enter the US at all irrespective of the reason and purpose. He said that these countries don't respect US immigration rules. Most countries on the list denied taking their citizens back and most of the people from here overstayed their visas, he said. The partial ban means people having certain types of visas, such as immigrant visas, B-1 business visas, B-2 tourism visas, combined business and tourism visas, F student visas, M vocational training visas, and J exchange visitor visas, are barred from entering the US. Only people holding H-1B work visas are allowed to enter the US. Partial restrictions apply to seven countries - Burundi, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, Cuba, and Venezuela. Who is exempt from the ban? There are several people exempt from the ban. Those are: 1. Green card holders and legal permanent residents. 2. People having dual citizenship, one of the US and another of the banned countries. 3. Athletes, coaches and teams travelling for a global sporting event such as the World Cup or the Olympics. 4. Iranians from an ethnic or religious minority fleeing prosecution. 5. Foreign nationals who have worked for the US government for at least 15 years, along with their families and children. 6. Those who were admitted to the US as refugees or granted asylum prior to the ban's implementation. 7. People with US family members who apply for visas in connection to their spouses, children or parents. 8. Foreign officials and diplomats on official visits. 9. Those who are just visiting the UN headquarters in New York for business purposes. 10. Official trips to the US by representatives of NATO and international organizations. 11. Afghans with Afghan special immigrant visas who were employed by the US or its allies in Afghanistan. Does it impact you? If you're from one of the countries on the list New visas are not valid for entry into the US from the 12 nations that are completely banned. The seven partially restricted nations may not be able to provide some visas, such as green cards and immigrant visas. Athletes, diplomats, dual citizens, green card holders, and refugees admitted prior to June 9, 2025, may be eligible for exemptions. If you're in the US already Existing visas are acknowledged and holders of valid green cards or visas are safe. If you intend to work or travel Applications from the 12 nations that are completely prohibited will not be accepted. People from the seven nations that are partially banned can experience delays or specific limitations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store