Inside half-built and abandoned £40m mansion ‘bigger than Buckingham Palace' & owned by a convicted criminal
A £40million mansion in Sussex once said to be the most expensive private house built in Britain for a century remains unfinished – 40 years after work first started.
Hamilton Palace near Uckfield, in East Sussex, is owned by notorious property tycoon Nicholas van Hoogstraten and is bigger than Buckingham Palace.
5
5
5
Van Hoogstraten was once dubbed Britain's youngest millionaire and has been locked in a dispute with neighbours of the property for decades.
But, 40 years after work on the enormous £40 million mansion began in 1985, it remains no more than a huge shell and has been dubbed the "Ghost House of Sussex."
After work halted in 2001, the mansion was mostly abandoned, unfinished and is surrounded by acres of countryside.
It's been the subject of immense investment despite the fact that no one has ever lived in it.
But despite its scale, there is little to hint at its presence.
It is hidden away off of an unassuming junction on the A22 south of Uckfield and the house is completely obscured by a thick wooded area.
The closest glimpse you can get on foot is of a gated entrance onto the estate that gives nothing away, aside from a bricked unit and a large, white container.
But there is a definite sense of unease.
It has been reported that stuck on the gate is a sign, written in capital letters. It baldly states: "High Cross Estate, Private Property, Keep Out."
If that's not enough, multiple other signs reportedly warn of "shooting in progress", "dogs running free" and CCTV being in operation.
I came home to find my nightmare neighbour knocking down my DOOR – he claimed it was his right to do it
The only recent photographs of the property have been taken by drones and older photographs taken on site apparently when work was still ongoing.
Those photos show an an eerie building, shrouded in scaffolding and overgrowing foliage, with discarded containers, construction equipment and other items littered throughout the grounds.
It doesn't look like anything has happened at the site for a long time.
Few have been inside, but one reporter who did, in 2000, when it was said to be two years off completion, described a grand central staircase and reception hall, with lift shafts already installed and expensive stone balustrades and pillars.
Who is Nicholas van Hoogstraten?
Nicholas van Hoogstraten is a convicted criminal.
He is now 80 and goes by the name of Nicholas von Hessen.
A Sussex native born in Shoreham, he owns dozens of properties in the area.
He is said to have started making money selling stamps as a teenager before moving into property and, by the age of 22, had 350 properties in Sussex alone.
In the 1980s housing boom he acquired more than 2,000 properties and had sold 90% of them by the 1990s.
Over the past couple of decades, he has been involved in widely reported disputes with neighbours over Hamilton Palace.
Low-level lighting had been installed on the roof, where there was to be a garden, and there was space for a fountain below.
One entire floor was due to house van Hoogstraten's art collection.
Today, the domed roof of the main building still rises over the top of the treeline and remains visible from a distance from the nearest set of houses in the hamlet of Palehouse Common.
Locals have previously vented about the large area being left unused and there was a row over a public footpath that ran through it that van Hoogstraten did not want to be used.
In answer to those complaints, he was quoted as saying "even the most moronic of peasants would be able to see… that we have been busy landscaping the grounds of the palace so as to prepare for scheduled works".
And he has also denied that the house is falling apart.
He added: "Hamilton Palace is far from 'crumbling' and was built to last for at least 2,000 years.
"The scaffolding only remains as a part of ongoing routine maintenance such a property would require until completion."
It has been reported the estate is now owned by his children through the company Messina Investments.
5
5
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Sexual assault and drink driving – cosy crime but not as we know it
A puzzle-setter turns sleuth in a quirky British crime series. Stop me if you think you've heard this one before. Murder Most Puzzling is trying to be Ludwig, which was a hit for the BBC last year. But it's a pale imitation. While that one was a five-star treat starring David Mitchell, this one is a two-star rip-off starring Phyllis Logan. The missteps start as soon as we are introduced to her character, Cora Felton. Cora is The Puzzle Lady, a crossword compiler whose job has made her so famous that she has her own range of biscuits and TV adverts. Let's not pause to ponder how unlikely that is. She is called in to investigate the case of a young woman found murdered in a churchyard, with a mysterious crossword clue in her pocket. Unfortunately, Cora can't make head nor tail of the clue when she first sees it because she's still sozzled from the night before. When we first meet her, she is passed out at the wheel of her car after a spot of drink-driving. Drink-driving? Really? We're supposed to find this quirkily amusing, but it strikes the wrong tone right away. It's a sign that the show doesn't quite know what it's supposed to be. This is cosy crime, yet having someone at a town hall meeting ask if the murder victim was sexually assaulted belongs in a grittier police drama. At least the mystery is wrapped up in a feature-length episode rather than being dragged out. The show is based on a book series by Parnell Hall and the failings of the TV series are odd because its writer, Dominique Moloney is a veteran of Father Brown and The Sister Boniface Mysteries. Some bits do conform to the cosy crime template: jaunty music, a picturesque setting in the fictional market town of Bakerbury (it's Lisburn in Northern Ireland), and the odd silly character, such as the blustering mayor in a cravat who runs the local police force. The programme's saving graces are the three lead performances. Logan, best known as Mrs Hughes in Downton Abbey, is a safe pair of hands and does her best with the material. Charlotte Hope is a bright spot as Cara's niece and right-hand-woman, Sherry. And Adam Best is, well, the best thing here as DCI Derek Hooper, who has never worked a murder case before and reluctantly turns to Cora for help. There is a twist halfway through relating to Cora's job, and if you didn't see it coming then I'm afraid your sleuthing skills are a little below par.
Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Loophole that lets terrorists enter UK to be closed
Suspected terrorists will no longer be able to exploit a loophole that allows them to enter Britain despite being stripped of citizenship. Ministers are to pass legislation that will ensure citizenship is not automatically reinstated if terrorists successfully appeal against a decision to strip them of it. The loophole, identified by the Supreme Court, would mean that they could return to the UK while the Government sought to overturn the successful appeal. The terror suspects could then renounce any other citizenship that they had, which would mean that Britain would have no option but to allow them to stay in the UK and could not deport them. Under international law, governments cannot render a person stateless by stripping them of their citizenship if they are not citizens of another country. 'An essential tool' Official data suggests more than 1,000 Britons were deprived of their citizenship between 2010 and 2023, including Shamima Begum, one of three east London schoolgirls who travelled to Syria in 2015 to support the IS group. She fought a series of high-profile legal battles to return to the UK after being stripped of her citizenship in 2019, but has remained unsuccessful. It mirrors the case of two Pakistani members of one of the most notorious grooming gangs in Rotherham, whom the Government stripped of their British citizenship. Qari Abdul Rauf, a 55-year-old father of five and Adil Khan, 54, were jailed for their part in sexually assaulting 47 girls. They subsequently renounced their Pakistani citizenship, effectively declaring themselves stateless. Pakistan is refusing to take them back on the basis that they have renounced their citizenship and are regarded as dangerous criminals. Dan Jarvis, the security minister, said: 'Protecting our national security and keeping the British public safe is the first duty of this government and the foundation of our Plan for Change. The power to deprive someone of their British citizenship is an essential tool, and helps protect us from some of the most dangerous people. 'We must close this gap in the law and prevent British citizenship being reinstated to individuals until all appeals have been determined. This is the right thing to do if we believe someone is a threat to our national security, and it will make Britain safer.' For the public good The Home Office said deprivation decisions on 'conducive to the public good' grounds were taken only in the most serious cases by the Home Secretary, where it is in the public interest to do so because of the individual's conduct or the threat they pose to the UK. About 222 of the those deprived of citizenship between 2010-2023 were for the public good. In 2018, the number of appeals reached a record high of 88 as the UK sought to counter the threat from Islamic state fighters returning home. That was up from just five in 2011. The change in the law follows the similar approach taken in asylum and human rights appeals cases, where asylum is not granted to a person appealing a rejection until all further appeals, up to the Court of Appeal, have been determined. Home Office officials said the narrowly focused Bill, consisting of two clauses, made no change to a person's existing right to appeal any decision to remove their British citizenship, and did not widen the reasons for which a person could be deprived of their citizenship.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
‘Mastermind' behind murder of man who was found naked bound with duct tape sent joke texts about attack, court hears
THE alleged mastermind behind the murder of a man who was found naked and bound with duct tape texted jokes about the attack, a court heard. Thomas Campbell was ambushed on his doorstep in an attack allegedly orchestrated by his partner's ex-boyfriend. 9 9 9 His body was discovered by his neighbours the morning after three men "pounced" on him as he arrived home late on a Saturday night, a court heard. Manchester Crown Court was told the 38-year-old was killed on July 3, 2022 after "very careful planning by a team of highly organised criminals". The alleged "mastermind" of the plot is John Belfield, 31, who is on trial and denies murder. Thomas was dating Belfield's ex-girlfriend and he was "hostile" about the relationship, the court heard. The victim's glam ex Coleen was previously convicted for manslaughter after his death, and she was jailed for 13 years in 2023. The mum-of-four passed on information about her ex husband's movements - including details she learned from her children. Manchester Crown Court heard today how Belfield sent texts after the alleged attack which read the victim "must have bled everywhere". The 31-year-old travelled to South America after the victim was found. He was extradited from the former Dutch colony of Suriname, to stand trial over the "harrowing and violent assault", a court heard. Jurors were told today of messages sent to Belfield by his alleged "right-hand man" Reece Steven. Steven, 29, was previously found guilty of Thomas's murder with conspiracy to rob and he was sentenced to life in prison. Belfield's driver Stephen Cleworth, 38, was also convicted of manslaughter and conspiracy to rob and was jailed for 12 years. The identity of the third attacker remains a mystery. In a conversation about Thomas' horror injuries, Steven wrote: "Tommy crumble. Dripping in tom juice everywhere." 9 9 9 Belfield replied: "Must have bled everywhere." Steven answered: "I didn't say blood mate. I said juice, U're crazy, bro." Belfield: "Tom juice." Steven: "A little bit of Tommy ketchup." Belfield: "All the lights on but no one at home. Actually, the lights have been smashed out of him." Steven: "He ran out of sauce. Empty bottle. No lid on." Belfield: "He didn't believe the team." Steven: "He's just crum now. In the graveyard." In another message Belfield wrote how the police "know I'm the one in charge" but had "next to f***-all on me". He added: "Got a chance of getting away with it." In further texts while Belfield was in Suriname, jurors heard how the 31-year-old wrote to another recipient: "Just looking like what it is going to be to like for me. "If I have an alibi, I cannot get found guilty. "There is no evidence. I could have just been naive." He told the unknown person to "check if they have got warrants for the phones because if they haven't, then they cannot be used". Belfield also sent a message to another recipient which read: "If the evidence is not strong enough against them, they cannot use it against me. "The trouble is getting a not guilty. Got a chance of getting away with it." The defendant then sent one person called Pacheco a text which read: "We did not use a blowtorch. We used hot liquid in a flask to burn him." He added: "Funny, innit. Police know I'm the one in charge but they know there is next to f*** all on me. "I don't even put the tracker on. "They have no evidence to back up what they are saying. Just some story books." The jury heard Steven told Belfield: "I reckon you could squeeze a manslaughter. Accidents happen, bro." He also said in a voice note: "If you put all the cuts on his face aside and the burns that was off whatever. "He's got a f****** wound to the arm what got tarted up and a few bangs to the head. "And he was f****** breathing when they called 999." Prosecutors argued Belfield was looking for "items of value" in Thomas' Mossley home, in Greater Manchester. Dr Philip Lumb told Manchester Crown Court yesterday that Thomas was discovered in the hallway of his home, lying on his back after the savage attack. "He was naked apart from a pair of socks," he told the court. Dr Lumb said his ankles were "bound together tightly" with duct tape. Injuries to the head and neck suggested a "sustained blunt sharp force physical assault". Dr Lumb argued that burns on Thomas's body had been caused by a "hot liquid such as hot water", MEN reported. His arm was found with a "makeshift tourniquet" after an injury that would have bled a lot. Dr Lumb concluded that Thomas's cause of death included "multiple sharp force injures, blunt force head injuries" and "pressure to the neck". The court heard that there was a tracking device placed on Thomas's car and "reconnaissance" was carried out in the days before he died on July 2, 2022. The court was told that Belfield was responsible for putting the tracker on Thomas's car and he was involved in the "reconnaissance" at his home. He was not present at the scene of the death, the trial heard. Belfield denies murder and conspiracy to rob. The trial continues. 9 9 9
