From Hawaii to Iran: Trump's remark spotlights US history of regime change
US President Donald Trump on Tuesday declared a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, calling it a 'complete and total ceasefire' after a "12-day war". This comes after he appeared to endorse the idea of regime change in Iran - claiming to 'Make Iran Great Again' - despite his administration's earlier insistence that recent airstrikes were not aimed at toppling the Islamic Republic's leadership.
Although US officials had previously asserted that the recent Operation Midnight Hammer airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites were intended solely as a deterrent, Trump's comment reopened discussions about America's long history of regime change around the world.
For over a century, the United States has been engaged in the removal of foreign governments - overtly and covertly. Many of these actions have been sold to policymakers at home and globally as part of geopolitical calculations, in response to market forces, or as part of the Cold War struggle with the Soviet Union. While many of these operations were framed as actions to stop communism or restore democracy in a foreign land, the result of many of these operations has only fostered instability and made countries susceptible to dictatorship.
Hawaii, 1893: The overthrow of a sovereign monarchy
The story of the US meddling in other nations' affairs to bring 'democracy, free market, and civilisation' dates back to over a century. In January 1893, a group of white American settlers, backed by a US diplomat, overthrew Queen Liliʻuokalani of Hawaii. This came just six years after her brother, King Kalakaua, had been forced to sign a new constitution at gunpoint.
Hawaii was annexed by the United States in 1898 and became the 50th state in 1959. A century after the coup, in 1993, the US formally apologised for the illegal overthrow and seizure of 1.8 million acres of land from the native Hawaiian people.
Cuba, 1933: From military coups to the fear of Red
After occupying Cuba in 1898, the US formally recognised Cuban independence in 1902, but retained the right to intervene. That right was exercised repeatedly to protect American sugar and fruit businesses.
In 1933, the US supported Fulgencio Batista's coup. But when Fidel Castro ousted Batista in 1959 and declared a communist regime, the US launched the 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion, an unsuccessful CIA-backed attempt to remove Castro.
Iran, 1953: Cold War and oil demand
Through a covert operation called Operation Ajax, the CIA was able remove the democratically-elected Prime Minister of Iran, Mohammad Mosaddegh, and restore the power of monarch Shah Muhammad Reza Pahlavi. Although US officials cited fears of Soviet influence in Iran, historians argue the motive was much more about protecting American and British oil interests.
The coup caused long-lasting consequences, creating a deep anti-American sentiment in Iran and laid the groundwork for the Islamic Revolution of 1979.
Guatemala, 1954: Corporate interests
The CIA-led Operation PBSuccess ousted Guatemalan President Jacobo Arbenz after fears arose that his land reforms would affect the US-based United Fruit Company. Many US officials involved had ties to the company, including CIA Director Allen Dulles. The coup replaced Arbenz with a military regime and sparked decades of civil unrest.
Congo, 1960–65: The fear of Soviet control
After the Congo gained independence from Belgium, its prime minister Patrice Lumumba was deposed and subsequently killed with the tacit support of the United States, over fears of Soviet control. The CIA endorsed a military coup by Mobutu Sese Seko in 1965, who would become the dictator of the Congo until 1997.
This era, called the 'Congo Crisis', undermined the stability of Central Africa and furthered priorities of foreign policy in the Cold War period.
Dominican Republic, 1961: CIA supplied weapons
Rafael Trujillo's violent dictatorship ended when dissidents ambushed and murdered him using weapons supplied by the CIA. Subsequently, the Church Committee found that the CIA did materially assist in funding and supporting the dissidents planning for the assassination, but denied any control or direct involvement.
Vietnam, 1963: The coup before JFK's assassination
In 1963, South Vietnamese president Ngo Dinh Diem was overthrown and assassinated in a US-backed coup. The Pentagon Papers later confirmed the CIA's involvement. The Kennedy administration believed Diem's repression of Buddhists weakened his position in the war against North Vietnam.
Brazil, 1964: Fears of another 'China' in Latin America
Concerned that Brazil's left-leaning President Joao Goulart might align with the Soviet bloc, the US supported a military coup that brought General Humberto Castello Branco to power. CIA documents confirm that Washington supplied arms and fuel to coup backers. The military ruled Brazil until 1985.
Chile, 1973: Bringing Pinochet in the scene
When Chile elected socialist Salvador Allende in 1970, the US immediately began plotting to undermine him. By 1973, General Augusto Pinochet led a military coup. While US involvement in the actual coup remains debated, declassified conversations show that president Nixon and his national security advisor Henry Kissinger were pleased with the outcome. Kissinger remarked: 'We helped them… created the conditions.'
Nicaragua, 1980s: Fighting socialism by training right-wing
To fight Nicaragua's socialist Sandinista government, the CIA armed and trained right-wing Contras. To fund this, the Reagan administration secretly sold weapons to Iran, violating US law. The Iran-Contra Affair became a national scandal in 1986.
By 1990, the US supported Violeta Chamorro's electoral victory over the Sandinistas, ending Daniel Ortega's rule, although he later returned to power.
Afghanistan, 2001-2021: Occupation to collapse
After the 9/11 attacks, the US invaded Afghanistan, toppling the Taliban and establishing an interim government led by Hamid Karzai. Despite 20 years of effort, the US-backed administration collapsed in 2021 after American withdrawal, returning the Taliban to power.
Iraq, 2003: Claims of weapons of mass destruction
The US invaded Iraq in 2003 on the false pretext of its supposed possession of weapons of mass destruction, resulting in the ousting of Saddam Hussein. The resulting occupation destabilised the country resulting in civil war, sectarian violence, and the rise of the Islamic State. And while the US withdrew in 2011, destabilisation of Iraq continues.
Covert and failed operations: The other side of US interventions
While some regime changes succeeded, others either failed or were shrouded in secrecy for years.
Syria (1956-57): The CIA's plans for an overthrow of the Syrian government in the form of staged border incidents were exposed as plots that failed.
Albania (1949): US-UK plans to foment a revolt against the communist regime were foiled due to Soviet counterintelligence.
France and Italy (1940s-50s): The CIA funded centre-right parties in order to prevent electoral victories by communists is another covert intervention that exemplifies election interference.
Syria (2010's): The CIA trained anti-Assad rebels under Operation Timber Sycamore, but the CIA was unable to effectuate the removal of the Syrian president and was drawn into complex entanglements.
The US has pursued regime change for decades, consistently intervening to oppose communist ideals or protect its economic interests. American interventions have repeatedly resulted in prolonged conflict, civil unrest, or authoritarianism. While some operations were public, others remained secret for decades, only revealed through declassified documents and Senate investigations later.
Trump may have announced a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, motivated by his desire for a Nobel Peace Prize, but his penchant for policy flip-flops casts uncertainty over his future actions.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
29 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India should intervene diplomatically to stop Iran-Israel conflict: Mamata
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Tuesday expressed concern over the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict and urged the Centre to take diplomatic initiatives to help end the hostilities between the two West Asian nations. The conflict has seen hundreds of missiles and drones exchanged between Israel and Iran since tensions escalated over a week ago, with the situation worsening significantly following the US bombing of three major Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday morning. During her address in the assembly on environmental issues, Banerjee said, "War has broken out in many parts of the world. Such things cause air and water pollution. We have to take steps to stop this." She said, "External affairs come under the Indian government. Diplomatically, peacefully, we must take initiative so that war stops." Banerjee clarified, "I am not authorised to speak on external affairs and diplomatic issues. This is my personal view as a concerned citizen of this world." Speaking on the flood situation in Ghatal sub-division in Paschim Medinipur district, she said, despite repeated reminders, the central agency DVC is "not undertaking dredging operations" at its dams in Maithon and Panchet. She accused the DVC of releasing large volumes of water from its dams during the rainy season "without informing" the West Bengal government. "They are releasing water without informing us. They have not conducted dredging operations for many years. Now, DVC has the accumulated capacity to store one lakh cusec of water in its dams. Had they undertaken dredging operations regularly, four lakh cusecs of water could have been stored in their dams and such overflowing in vast parts of south Bengal won't recur," Banerjee said in the assembly. West Bengal Irrigation Minister Manas Bhuniya had on Monday said nearly two lakh people have been affected in the floods at Ghatal sub-division in Paschim Medinipur district and asserted that the government was taking every possible step to help the marooned people. Bhuniya had alleged that the Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC) aggravated the situation by "failing to regulate the release of water" from its dams in Jharkhand despite requests from the West Bengal irrigation department. The minister had told reporters that he wrote to the chairman of the organisation to exercise caution while discharging additional water in future.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
29 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US carrier strike group scheduled for deployment amid tensions in West Asia
The US was already planning to deploy the USS Gerald R. Ford when American warplanes bombed three Iranian sites early Sunday to support Israel's goals AP Norfolk (US) The United States' most advanced aircraft carrier leaves Virginia for a regularly scheduled deployment on Tuesday that could position it near Israel after the US inserted itself in Israel's war to destroy Iran's nuclear programme. The US was already planning to deploy the USS Gerald R. Ford when American warplanes bombed three Iranian sites early Sunday to support Israel's goals. Iran retaliated with a limited missile attack on a US military base in Qatar on Monday. But later on Monday, President Donald Trump said on social media that Israel and Iran have agreed to a complete and total ceasefire to be phased in over 24 hours. Trump said on Truth Social that the ceasefire would bring an Official END to the war. The Ford will sail for the European theater of command, which includes waters off Israel's Mediterranean coast. The presence of the aircraft carrier and its accompanying warships gives Trump the option of a third carrier group in the West Asia if needed. The US has been shifting military aircraft and warships into and around the region to protect Israel from Iranian attacks. Nearly 4,500 sailors will depart Tuesday morning from the nation's largest Navy base in Norfolk, which sits near the southern edge of Chesapeake Bay. The carrier strike group includes guided-missile destroyers and several squadrons of fighter jets. The Ford is the first in the new Ford class of aircraft carriers, which use an electromagnetic system for launching planes instead of steam catapults to increase flying missions. The ships are also designed to carry a wider variety of planes and operate with several hundred fewer sailors. The Ford was previously sent to the Eastern Mediterranean to be within striking distance of Israel after Hamas' October 7 attacks in 2023. The carrier stayed in the Eastern Mediterranean while its accompanying warships sailed into the Red Sea, where they repeatedly intercepted ballistic missiles fired at Israel and attack drones fired at the ships from Houthi-controlled Yemen. From November 2023 until January 2025, the Iranian-backed Houthis waged persistent missile and drone attacks against commercial and military ships in the region in what the group's leadership described as an effort to end Israel's war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The US-led campaign against the rebels included Navy fighter jets and turned into the most intense running sea battle the Navy has faced since World War II. US Navy sailors saw incoming Houthi-launched missiles seconds before they were destroyed by their ship's defensive systems. Pentagon officials talked last year about how to care for the sailors when they returned home, including counselling and treatment for possible post-traumatic stress. The Houthi rebels recently said they would resume attacks on US vessels in the Red Sea if the Trump administration joined Israel's military campaign against Iran. The Houthis paused such attacks in May under a deal with the US. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
30 minutes ago
- First Post
NATO summit opens with calls for unity and increased military spending
The summit may lead to consensus on a new goal for member states to allocate 5% of their gross domestic product (GDP) to defense and security, in line with NATO's strategic objectives read more NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte addresses the audience at the NATO public forum on the sidelines of the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands. AP NATO leaders convened in the Netherlands on Tuesday for the start of a two-day summit focused on defense spending and alliance commitments. The summit may lead to consensus on a new goal for member states to allocate 5% of their gross domestic product (GDP) to defense and security, in line with NATO's strategic objectives. However, opinions among the 32 allies vary. Spain has expressed concerns, calling the target 'unreasonable,' while U.S. President Donald Trump has questioned the extent of the U.S.'s financial role. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Slovakia stated it retains the right to determine how it will meet the proposed 2035 deadline. 'We are not living in happy land after the Berlin Wall came down. We are living in much more dangerous times and there are enemies, adversaries who might want to attack us,' NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said ahead of the summit in The Hague. 'We have to make sure that we defend our beautiful way of life and systems and our values,' he said. Ahead of the two-day meeting, Britain, France and Germany committed to the 5% goal. Host country the Netherlands is also onboard. Nations closer to the borders of Ukraine, Russia and its ally Belarus had previously pledged to do so. 'It's a historic moment. It's probably one of the most consequential moments in this alliance's history," U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker said. 'We're going to see a renaissance of our defense industries.' Trump's first appearance at NATO since returning to the White House was supposed to center on how the U.S. secured the historic military spending pledge from others in the security alliance — effectively bending it to its will. But in the spotlight instead now is Trump's decision to strike three nuclear enrichment facilities in Iran that the administration says eroded Tehran's nuclear ambitions, as well as the president's sudden announcement that Israel and Iran had reached a 'complete and total ceasefire.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ukraine has also suffered as a result of that conflict. It has created a need for weapons and ammunition that Kyiv desperately wants, and shifted the world's attention away. Past NATO summits have focused almost entirely on the war in Ukraine, now in its fourth year. Still, Rutte insists it remains a vital issue for NATO, and that the allies can manage more than one conflict. 'If we would not be able to deal with … the Middle East, which is very big and commanding all the headlines, and Ukraine at the same time, we should not be in the business of politics and military at all,' he said. 'If you can only deal with one issue at a time, that will be that. Then let other people take over.' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy arrived in The Hague for a series of meetings, despite his absence from a leaders' meeting aiming to seal the agreement to boost military spending. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It's a big change since the summit in Washington last year, when the military alliance's weighty communique included a vow to supply long-term security assistance to Ukraine, and a commitment to back the country 'on its irreversible path' to NATO membership. Zelenskyy's first official engagement was with Dutch caretaker Prime Minister Dick Schoof at his official residence just across the road from the summit venue. But in a telling sign of Ukraine's status at the summit, neither leader mentioned NATO. Ukraine's bid to join the alliance has been put in deep freeze by Trump. 'Let me be very clear, Ukraine is part of the family that we call the Euro-Atlantic family,' Schoof told Zelenskyy, who in turn said he sees his country's future in peace 'and of course, a part of a big family of EU family.' Schoof used the meeting to announce a new package of Dutch support to Kyiv including 100 radar systems to detect drones and a move to produce drones for Ukraine in the Netherlands, using Kyiv's specifications. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In a joint opinion piece on the eve of this year's summit, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said they backed U.S. peace efforts that should preserve Ukraine's sovereignty and European security. 'For as long as the current trajectory lasts, Russia will find in France and Germany an unshakeable determination. What is at stake will determine European stability for the decades to come,' they wrote in the Financial Times newspaper. 'We will ensure that Ukraine emerges from this war prosperous, robust and secure, and will never live again under the fear of Russian aggression,' the two leaders wrote.