logo
Trump reenters California's water wars. It's unclear who will win

Trump reenters California's water wars. It's unclear who will win

Yahoo27-01-2025

President Trump has signed an order directing federal agencies to 'maximize' water deliveries in California and 'override' state policies if necessary.
Trump's executive order outlines steps intended to increase the amount of water pumped from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.
The directive was praised by agencies that supply water to farmlands in the San Joaquin Valley, which could receive more water under the changes ordered by Trump.
Westlands Water District, the largest agricultural water supplier in the Central Valley, welcomed the executive order.
'It's clear that what we've been doing for the past few decades has not been working; not for the people, for agriculture, or for the fish,' the district said in a written statement. Westlands General Manager Allison Febbo said the district intends to work with government agencies 'to bring common sense back' to water management in the valley, one of the nation's major food-producing regions.
Read more: Trump wants to upend California water policy. State officials say it could do harm
Environmental groups said the measures Trump is seeking, if fully carried out, would be disastrous for populations of threatened and endangered fish, as well as the state's commercial and recreational fisheries and the deteriorating ecosystem of the Delta.
'It would mean the loss of California's most important wild salmon runs, devastating impacts on salmon fishing jobs, enormous degradation in Delta water quality,' said Barry Nelson, a policy representative for the fishing group Golden State Salmon Assn. He also flagged the issue of states' rights: 'This is a very clear statement that the Trump administration believes that California should not have the right to control its water resources.'
The order, posted on the White House website Sunday, directs the Interior and Commerce secretaries to 'immediately take actions to override existing activities that unduly burden efforts to maximize water deliveries.'
It calls for delivering more water via the federally managed Central Valley Project, one of the two main systems of aqueducts, dams and pumping facilities in California that transport supplies from the Delta southward. The president also directed the federal Bureau of Reclamation to ensure state agencies 'do not interfere.'
In the order, Trump criticizes 'disastrous' policies and water 'mismanagement' by California, and directs federal agencies to scrap a plan that the Biden administration adopted last month, establishing new rules for operating the Central Valley Project and the State Water Project — California's other main water delivery system in the Central Valley. Instead, Trump has told federal agencies to more or less follow a plan adopted during his first presidency, which California and environmental groups challenged in court arguing it failed to provide adequate protections for endangered fish.
Read more: Why hydrants ran dry as firefighters battled California's deadly fires
The order also attempts to link local water supply problems during the deadly Los Angeles County firestorms, such as fire hydrants that ran dry, with changes in how water is managed in Northern California. It says the Trump administration is setting a new policy to "provide Southern California with necessary water resources."
However, water experts and state officials said such comments are inaccurate.
'The premise of this executive order is false,' said Tara Gallegos, a spokesperson for Gov. Gavin Newsom. 'We're unclear what the administration's concern with the current water policy is.'
She noted that California pumps as much water now as it could under prior policies during Trump's first administration, and that because reservoirs in Southern California are at record-high levels, bringing in more water from Northern California would not have affected the fire response.
'There is no shortage of water in Southern California,' Gallegos said. 'Water operations to move water south through the Delta have nothing to do with the local fire response in Los Angeles. Trump is either unaware of how water is stored in California or is deliberately misleading the public.'
Gallegos said the state 'looks forward to further dialogue with the federal government on securing our water supply for a hotter, drier future.'
Trump's order focuses largely on the federally operated Central Valley Project, which delivers water from the Delta to farmlands that produce almonds, pistachios, tomatoes and other crops. The CVP ends in the southern San Joaquin Valley near Bakersfield and does not reach Southern California's urban areas to the south.
'This is a manufactured crisis and water grab for the agricultural sector, who are mainly growing crops for export,' said Regina Chichizola of the advocacy group Save California Salmon.
In the San Joaquin Valley, agricultural water agencies have been under growing pressure from state regulators to curb chronic overpumping of groundwater, which has led to declining aquifer levels, sinking ground and growing numbers of dry household wells. Obtaining more water from the Central Valley Project could help some of these agencies address their water deficits.
Trump's order is broadly worded, with some provisions laying out ways the administration could expedite water storage projects and waive protective measures for endangered fish species.
Read more: Groundwater pumping is causing land to sink at record rate in San Joaquin Valley
For example, it calls for expediting 'ongoing or potential major water-supply and storage projects' in California. It says the Interior and Commerce secretaries will each designate one official to coordinate environmental compliance for such projects, and develop a plan to 'suspend, revise, or rescind any regulations or procedures that unduly burden such projects.'
Though the order does not specifically mention it, Trump has previously called for raising Shasta Dam to expand California's largest reservoir. Nelson, of the Golden State Salmon Assn., believes parts of the order are intended to move forward that dam-raising plan by attempting to override protections in state law for the McCloud River, which feeds into the reservoir.
Conservation advocates said the order lays the groundwork for the Trump administration to leverage a rarely used amendment to the Endangered Species Act that enables the convening of a committee to exempt a federal action from the endangered species law. This committee has been called the 'God Squad,' referring to its authority to render a decision that may cause a species to go extinct.
Environmental advocates said invoking this process could exempt the Central Valley Project's pumping operations from measures that protect vulnerable fish species in the Delta and San Francisco Bay, rendering these federal protections nonexistent.
'I have been working on water issues for 40 years. I have never seen such a clear statement of an administration's intent to devastate the Bay Delta system,' Nelson said.
In recent years, fish populations have suffered major declines in the Delta and San Francisco Bay.
Pumping to supply farms and cities has contributed to the ecological degradation of the Delta, where the fish species that are listed as threatened or endangered include steelhead trout, two types of Chinook salmon, longfin smelt, Delta smelt and green sturgeon.
Fisheries authorities have shut down the salmon fishing season in California the last two years because of declining salmon populations.
'The Delta has been dying a death of a thousand cuts. This will accelerate that death significantly,' said Barbara Barrigan-Parrilla, who leads the nonprofit group Restore the Delta, which advocates for protecting the estuary.
In 2020, when the previous Trump administration adopted new water delivery rules that weakened environmental protections, the state and conservation groups successfully challenged the changes in court. That cleared the way for the Biden administration, working together with the Newsom administration, to develop the current plan and the supporting biological opinions, which determine how much water can be pumped and how river flows are managed.
Now, Trump is seeking to return to his administration's 2020 rules, while imposing additional measures to increase pumping.
Trump's order does not appear to directly affect California's management of the State Water Project, the system that delivers water from the Delta to Los Angeles and other cities.
However, because state flow requirements to protect endangered fish will remain in place regardless of any federal changes, an increase in the pumping by the federal system could, in theory, lead to a decrease in pumping by the state system, said Greg Gartrell, a former manager of the Contra Costa Water District. 'The whole situation is more complicated than turning a valve.'
Read more: As salmon populations struggle, California bans fishing on rivers for a second year
Gary Bobker, program director for the environmental group Friends of the River, said implementing the president's wish list would 'dewater California rivers, promote toxic algal blooms, cause a number of native species to go extinct — not just Delta smelt, but salmon, steelhead and sturgeon.'
The biggest winners would be agribusinesses in the San Joaquin Valley, not people living in fire-prone areas, Bobker said. 'This exploitation of a humanitarian crisis to impose misinformed and destructive policies on California is an insult to the state's residents and the victims of the wildfires.'
Trump's order also calls for emergency measures to improve disaster response. It directs federal agencies to ensure that state and local governments 'promote sensible land management practices,' calling for officials to report to the president on state policies 'inconsistent with sound disaster prevention and response.'
It says the federal Office of Management and Budget will review all federal programs that support land management, water supply and disaster response.
The order also directs federal agencies to expedite housing options for those displaced by the fires, and develop a plan to quickly remove contaminated waste and debris from burned areas. It calls for investigating alleged 'misuse' of federal grant funds by the city of Los Angeles.
Read more: Visiting L.A. after firestorm, Trump focuses on overhauling California water policy
The order packages Trump's goals for California water policy together with unrelated wildfire relief measures, said Felicia Marcus, a visiting fellow at Stanford University's Water in the West Program.
'He's sort of wrapping what he wants to do for other reasons into an L.A. disaster relief cloak, which isn't cool,' Marcus said. 'It distracts from the hard, real discussions that mature and reasonable federal and state water managers and stakeholders need to have to figure out how we manage California water resources for all the things that are important to Californians, which include urban use, agricultural use, recreational use, fish and wildlife.'
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ICE raids meat production plant in Omaha, dozens detained
ICE raids meat production plant in Omaha, dozens detained

USA Today

time32 minutes ago

  • USA Today

ICE raids meat production plant in Omaha, dozens detained

ICE raids meat production plant in Omaha, dozens detained WASHINGTON, June 10 (Reuters) - An immigration raid on Tuesday at a meat production plant in Omaha, Nebraska was the "largest worksite enforcement operation" in the state during the Trump presidency, the Homeland Security Department said. U.S. Congressman Don Bacon told local media 75-80 people were detained. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raid happened at a plant of Glenn Valley Foods. The food packaging company said it was surprised by the raid and had followed the rules regarding immigration status. Chad Hartmann, president of Glenn Valley Foods in Omaha, said the plant that was raided used E-Verify, a federal database used for checking employees' immigration status. He told Reuters that when he said this to a federal agent, the agent responded "the system is broken" and urged him to contact his local congressional representative. ICE officers have been intensifying efforts in recent weeks to deliver on U.S. President Donald Trump's promise of record-level deportations. The White House has demanded the agency sharply increase arrests of migrants in the U.S. illegally, sources have told Reuters. More: Curfew enacted for parts of LA; Newsom says Trump chose 'theatrics over public safety' Tensions boiled over in Los Angeles over the weekend when protesters took to the streets after ICE arrested migrants at Home Depot stores, a garment factory and a warehouse, according to migrant advocates. Local police in Omaha said they were informed by immigration officials about the raid in advance while the company said it got no notice about the operation ahead of time. Hartmann said federal agents had a warrant that said they had identified 107 people who they believed were using fraudulent documents. "This was the largest worksite enforcement operation in Nebraska under the Trump Administration," the Homeland Security Department said on X, adding no law enforcement official was hurt. ICE said a criminal investigation was ongoing into what immigration officials called a large-scale employment of immigrants who are present in the U.S. illegally. More: In LA's Paramount neighborhood ICE raids hit hard. Here's why. "U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and federal law enforcement partners, executed a federal search warrant at Glenn Valley Foods, today, based on an ongoing criminal investigation into the large-scale employment of aliens without authorization to work in the United States," an ICE spokesperson told an ABC News affiliate. More than half of all meatpacking workers in the U.S. are immigrants, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a think tank. Rights advocates, including the ACLU of Nebraska, condemned the raid. (Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Washington and Kristina Cooke in San Francisco; Editing by Michael Perry)

Musk regrets some of his Trump criticisms, says they 'went too far'
Musk regrets some of his Trump criticisms, says they 'went too far'

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk regrets some of his Trump criticisms, says they 'went too far'

Elon Musk, the world's richest person and Donald Trump's former advisor, said Wednesday he regretted some of his recent criticisms of the US president, after the pair's public falling-out last week. "I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote on his social media platform X. Musk's expression of regret came just days after Trump threatened the tech billionaire with "serious consequences" if he sought to punish Republicans who vote for a controversial spending bill. Their blistering break-up -- largely carried out on social media before a riveted public since Thursday last week -- was ignited by Musk's harsh criticism of Trump's so-called "big, beautiful" spending bill, which is currently before Congress. Some lawmakers who were against the bill had called on Musk -- one of the Republican Party's biggest financial backers in last year's presidential election -- to fund primary challenges against Republicans who voted for the legislation. "He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that," Trump, who also branded Musk "disrespectful," told NBC News on Saturday, without specifying what those consequences would be. Trump also said he had "no" desire to repair his relationship with the South African-born Tesla and SpaceX chief, and that he has "no intention of speaking to him." In his post on Wednesday, Musk did not specify which of his criticisms of Trump had gone "too far." - 'Wish him well' - The former allies had seemed to have cut ties amicably about two weeks ago, with Trump giving Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But their relationship cracked within days as Musk described the spending bill as an "abomination" that, if passed by Congress, could define Trump's second term in office. Trump hit back at Musk's comments in an Oval Office diatribe and from there the row detonated, leaving Washington stunned. "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore. I was surprised," Trump told reporters. Musk, who was Trump's biggest donor to his 2024 campaign, also raised the issue of the Republican's election win. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," he posted, adding: "Such ingratitude." Trump later said on his Truth Social platform that cutting billions of dollars in subsidies and contracts to Musk's companies would be the "easiest way" to save the US government money. US media have put the value of the contracts at $18 billion. With real political and economic risks to their falling out, both appeared to inch back from the brink on Friday, with Trump telling reporters "I just wish him well," and Musk responding on X: "Likewise." Trump had spoken to NBC on Saturday after Musk deleted one of the explosive allegations he had made during their fallout, linking the president with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Musk had alleged that the Republican president is featured in unreleased government files on former associates of Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while he faced sex trafficking charges. Trump was named in a trove of deposition and statements linked to Epstein that were unsealed by a New York judge in early 2024. The president has not been accused of any wrongdoing in the case. "Time to drop the really big bomb: (Trump) is in the Epstein files," Musk posted on X. "That is the real reason they have not been made public." Musk did not reveal which files he was talking about and offered no evidence for his claim. He appeared to have deleted those tweets by Saturday morning. bur-sco/dhc

Trump and Musk's feud timeline: From Epstein allegations to Elon's olive branch
Trump and Musk's feud timeline: From Epstein allegations to Elon's olive branch

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump and Musk's feud timeline: From Epstein allegations to Elon's olive branch

On Friday May 30, President Donald Trump handed his close aide and 'first buddy' Elon Musk a golden key to the White House, praising the work the tech billionaire had done for his administration. 'Elon gave an incredible service,' Trump said in a joint press conference with Musk last week. 'There's nobody like him.' That press conference was intended to mark the end of Musk's 130 days as a special government advisor, leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in slashing excess federal spending. For the latest updates on the feud read our blog here Although there had been some disagreements during Musk's time in the role – the Tesla owner made it clear he was not a fan of Trump's tariffs, for instance – the event seemed to mark a conciliatory end to their working relationship. But there were rumblings: Musk, whose whole purpose at DOGE had been reducing federal expense, was deeply opposed to Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' fearing it would ramp up the national debt over the next 10 years. While White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt had successfully managed to spin their difference of opinion as an example of healthy debate for a couple of days, everything came to a head on Thursday June 5. Here's a timeline of how the very public fight between Trump and Musk unfolded, which appeared unresolvable until Musk offered a grovelling apology six days later. Writing on X, Musk says: 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' He continued: 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America (sic) citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' Two days later, things escalated dramatically. In an Oval Office appearance with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump said he was 'very disappointed' by Musk's comments. 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here,' Trump told reporters. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' Trump added he 'would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway,' without Musk's help. Musk posts a slew of tweets to X, in one of which he rebuts Trump's point about Pennsylvania, arguing: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' In another, he asks, 'Where is this guy today??' in response to a tweet of screenshots from the president's previous criticisms of increasing the debt ceiling. He then tweeted: 'The Big Ugly Bill will INCREASE the deficit to $2.5 trillion!' This is shortly followed by a new suggestion from Musk: 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' This post was still pinned to the top of the X owner's timeline for several days thereafter. Responding to MAGA blogger Laura Loomer on X, who was commenting about the divide amongst Republicans over the fight between Musk and Trump, the billionaire said: 'Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years...' The president says that Musk was 'wearing thin' in a series of posts on his social media platform. 'I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump said. He then added: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Retweeting a screenshot of Trump's EV mandate comment (alluding to the Big, Beautiful Bill scrapping a $7,500 tax credit for EV customers, which would impact Tesla), Musk said: 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.' Musk tweeted: 'Files linked to the investigation of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have emerged as a point of fixation for Trump and his allies and right-wing media figures. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' Shortly after, he wrote: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' he tweeted. Another X user replied, urging Musk to 'cool off and take a step back for a couple of days.' Musk replied: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Trump wrote on Truth Social: 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. 'If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Musk retweets an X user, who said: 'President vs Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him.' Musk tweets: 'The Trump tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year.' The point echoes a warning issued by many of the president's critics, from economists to pundits, but most notably his former presidential rival Kamala Harris. Musk tweets: 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL.' Musk's last repost for the day came from an X user, who said: 'This is why Republicans will likely lose the House in 2026 and then Democrats will spend two years investigating and impeaching President Trump. 'Trump and the Republicans in Congress need to deliver. We want budget cuts. We want agencies shut down. We don't want big govt.' The following day, West Wing aides briefed the media that the two men were planning a private phone call to clear the air, only for the president himself to tell reporters that he had no interest in speaking to the man who had donated at least $288m to his election campaign just months earlier, leaving their once-close relationship in limbo. Trump told Jonathan Karl of ABC News he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk and said to Dana Bash of CNN: 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem.' With Trump and his administration subsequently shifting focus to the Los Angeles anti-ICE protests, the tech boss unexpectedly extends an olive branch. 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week,' Musk wrote on X in the small hours of the morning. 'They went too far.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store