Rare photos for 'Jaws' filming uncovered by Yankee Magazine 50 years later
Fifty years ago, a movie about a man-eating shark took the world by storm.
"Jaws," the Steven Spielberg classic released in 1975, was filmed in Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, from May through October 1974 and went on to reach legendary film status.
Now, Yankee Magazine is publishing some rare photos from the legendary film, both on its website and in their upcoming July edition.
Peter Vandermark, a photojournalist and retired Boston University journalism professor, reached out to Yankee Magazine wanting to share some photos he took in 1974, when "Jaws" was filming on the island.
"Vandermark was 26 and working for the weekly Cape Cod News when he was sent to Martha's Vineyard for the day to photograph the filming of a movie there," Yankee magazine said. "He had unfettered access to the set, to the cast, and to the young director, a Hollywood upstart named Steven Spielberg. Vandermark's photos appeared in the next week's paper. Since then, he hasn't published a single frame from that shoot—until now."
Vandermark was on the set for the day they filmed the scene where the "Orca" is pursuing the harpooned but still fleeing shark, one of the iconic sequences in the film.
"Spielberg and I were around the same age, but I remember watching him and thinking, Who is this guy? How is he running the whole show? He just seemed like he was from a different world," Vandermark recalled from watching the shooting unfold.
Most of the crew was on a 65-foot tugboat called "Whitefoot" that was "crammed to the gunwales with movie equipment and crew," and where any wave could complicate the shot of the notoriously difficult movie to film.
Vanderbrook was having the photos from that day digitized as part of a book project last year, he told Yankee, which brought them back to the forefront.
"Seeing the digitally scanned images for the first time, with their surprising sharpness and tonal quality, was a thrill," he wrote. I'd been assigned to shoot the making of a movie, and yet the pictures that stand out for me now are the ones of cast and crew hanging out, reading, chatting, and joking around. Those are the kinds of photos that really tell a story."
Yankee executive editor Ian Aldric said they are thrilled to be publishing the photos on their website and in print. "Publishing these incredibly rare behind-the-scenes photographs from the 1974 Jaws set is a remarkable moment for Yankee,' Aldrich said in a press release. 'These images offer an intimate and candid look into the making of a cinematic legend, a true treasure trove for film enthusiasts, and a testament to the enduring power of this blockbuster.
According to The Daily Jaws website, some of the beach scenes in the movie were shot at South Beach in Edgartown. That's where the beach party in the opening scene of the movie was filmed.
One of the more iconic scenes where a boy is attacked in the water on a raft was filmed at Joseph A Sylvia State Beach in Oak Bluffs, The Daily Jaws noted.
Other places people can visit include:
The American Legion Memorial Bridge: In the movie, the shark swims under a bridge to what was supposed to be a' safe' inlet, Sengekontacket Pond. This bridge, located by Sylvia State Beach, is where the shark swims.
Edgartown Town Hall: Used as the town hall in the movie.
The Brody House: Located at 265 East Chop Dr. Vineyard Haven.
The town center: This is where Chief Brody (played by Roy Scheider) gets materials for beach-closed signs. It is at the junction of Water and Main streets in Edgartown, a town on Martha's Vineyard.
The ferry launch: In the north section of Edgartown, at the end of Daggett Street, the Ferry to Chappaquiddick Island can be found. This is where the Mayor of Amity (played by Murray Hamilton) has a talk with Brody about the potential for disaster in revealing the recent shark attacks to the public.
This article originally appeared on Cape Cod Times: 'Jaws' director, cast seen in new photos uncovered by Yankee Magazine
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
38 minutes ago
- Forbes
3 Questions To Ask Yourself To Boost Your Personal Brand
Who made Superman's personal brand what it is today? And what can you as an experienced leader learn ... More from that? Photo: Actor Brandon Routh launches the New Wax Figure of Superman from "Superman Returns" - June 27, 2006 at Madame Tussauds in New York, United States. (Photo by Michael Loccisano) As an experienced leader, your personal brand may not be as visible as Superman's. But just because you don't wear an S on your chest or a cape on your back, don't think your personal brand doesn't matter. In fact, if you suddenly find yourself job hunting, it's likely your personal brand that will determine whether or not you succeed. So what is your personal brand? And how do you boost it if it's not a matter of buying a shinier – and tighter – suit? In the movie, Batman Begins, Batman's alter ego Bruce Wayne argues that people need dramatic examples to shake them out of apathy – and that he can't do that as a man: 'As a man, I'm flesh and blood, I can be ignored, I can be destroyed. But as a symbol… As a symbol, I can be incorruptible. I can be everlasting.' Is that the answer to what your personal brand is? A symbol that makes you incorruptible and everlasting? As opposed to a man – or woman – of flesh and blood? With the promises of AGI flooding the news, it's tempting to say yes. After all, the job market is insatiable when it comes to people and machines that can out-think, out-pace, and out-perform other people and machines. And doesn't that call for super-human leaders who can shake everyone out of apathy? Before you rush to decide on a symbol that can neither be ignored nor destroyed, let's ask who made Superman and Batman's personal brands what they are today. Was it their alter egos, Clark Kent and Bruce Wayne? The comic book writers who invented the superheroes? The actors who embodied them on screen? Or the millions of readers and viewers who have followed them through generations? Of course, there is no single answer to who created Superman and Batman's personal brands. And the same goes for you and your personal brand. No matter how much time you spend defining who you are and what you want others to think and say about you, you cannot control how you are perceived. What you can – and should – do is ask yourself three questions that have guided flesh and blood humans for millennia. In the early 1700s, the German philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz came up with what is often described as the greatest philosophical question of all, namely: why is there something rather than nothing? This may seem like a peculiar question – not least in the context of personal branding. But reminding yourself of how Leibniz took the age-old question of why our universe is the way it is to the next level by asking why there is a universe at all can actually be a really good way to boost your personal brand. In addition to asking yourself questions about your personal values and career goals, asking questions that put you and your contribution as a leader in the greatest possible context will help you focus your efforts where they matter most. After all, if there is no industry, company, product, or customer demand for you to lead, your values and career goals will be as redundant as Batman without Gotham. So to boost you personal brand, don't focus on your personal brand. Instead, focus on why there is something rather than nothing for you to lead. And how you can help take industries, companies, products and customers to the next level. Great philosophical questions can be divided into three categories. Epistemological questions about how we know what (we think) we know – e.g. 'why is there something rather than nothing?' Ethical questions about what is the right thing to do. And existential questions about who we are as humans. Common to these three categories of questions is that no one – least of all a machine – can answer them for you. Also, they cannot be answered once and for all. And with ethical questions, like 'what is the right thing to do?', you must not only ask them again and again, you must ask them again and again – each day! While the advantage of being a symbol is that you can, in the words of Bruce Wayne, be incorruptible and everlasting, the advantage of being human is that you cannot. You can become corrupt, and you will eventually die. 'How is this an advantage?', you might ask. And you should. It only takes one bad decision to destroy your personal brand. And there are no guarantees. Even when you think you're making all the right decisions based on all the right answers, others may see it differently. And that's the advantage of being human: that your personal brand is negotiable. Changeable. Evolving. Just as it only takes one bad decision to destroy your personal brand, it only takes one question to start fixing it. It's not your answer to 'What is the right thing to do?' that make or break your personal brand. It's your willingness to keep asking it. Being corruptible, negotiable, and changeable is not only essential to your personal brand. It's essential to being you. Unlike Clark Kent and Superman, and Bruce Wayne and Batman, you and your personal brand are not two distinctive entities. Your flesh and blood is indistinguishable from your personal brand and vice versa. That's why you act differently in different situations. While Batman, who, in the words of the Joker, is destined to do the same thing forever, you are neither 'an unstoppable force' (like the Joker describes himself) nor 'an immovable object' (like Batman). You, like the people on the boats in The Dark Knight Rises, act according to who you are right here and right now. Sometimes you do as expected, sometimes you don't. Being a flesh and blood human as opposed to a symbol means asking the existential questions that help you assess and adapt to the situations you find yourself in. While the promise of AGI and superheroes is to out-think, out-pace, and out-perform everything and everyone, your job as a human leader is to see and hear the world from within. Like the industries, companies, products, and people you lead, you are a temporal being. You occupy a specific place at a specific time in history that enables you to see, hear, and act on some things and prevents you from seeing, hearing, and acting on others. It is because you are situated that you are able to take a position, make your perspective count, and build a personal brand. Not in spite of it. Because you cannot be everywhere at once, it matters where you choose to spend your time now. And now. Every moment, you prioritize and focus on something instead of something else. Someone instead of someone else. This prioritization and focus is what determines whether or not you succeed. In your job hunt and everything else.


Geek Tyrant
43 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
Robert Eggers Is Writing and Directing A CHRISTMAS CAROL with Willem Dafoe Eyed as Scrooge — GeekTyrant
It looks like Robert Eggers isn't ready to leave the haunting chill of Christmas behind just yet. After Nosferatu carved out a spooky, snow-dusted corner of the holiday box office, Eggers is reportedly diving back into the winter shadows, this time, with Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol . According to Deadline, Eggers is officially set to write and direct a new adaptation of the classic ghost story for Warner Bros., and he's crafting the role of Ebenezer Scrooge with one actor in mind… Willem Dafoe. While no deals are currently in motion, insiders say Dafoe is Eggers' top choice to play the iconic miser. Given their creative history, it's not hard to see why. Dafoe has been a regular fixture in Eggers' cinematic world, appearing in The Lighthouse , The Northman , and most recently, Nosferatu . At this point, casting him as a grim, tormented old soul visited by Christmas ghosts feels like a great opportunity, and Defoe would be awesome in the role! A Christmas Carol isn't exactly uncharted territory, it's been adapted countless times across film, stage, and television. But Eggers' fascination with historical detail, mood-soaked cinematography, and the supernatural makes this particular version worth paying attention to. A spectral tale of regret, redemption, and the macabre. Eggers will also produce the film alongside Chris Columbus and Eleanor Columbus under the Maiden Voyage banner, continuing a trend of filmmakers bringing their own trusted collaborators along for the ride. It doesn't hurt that his last outing, Nosferatu , was both a critical and financial success. The gothic vampire film earned $181 million globally (including $95 million domestically) and scored four Oscar nominations in technical categories like Cinematography, Production Design, Costume Design, and Makeup and Hairstyling. Eggers is already gearing up to shoot Werwulf for Focus Features later this year. But between werewolves, vampires, and now Dickensian spirits, Eggers has carved out a unique niche as cinema's reigning lord of the old-world supernatural, and I love it! Source: Deadline


Geek Tyrant
43 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
James Gunn's SUPERMAN Rewrites the Clark and Lois Dynamic with a Modern Spin on Classic Romance — GeekTyrant
James Gunn's Superman may borrow a page from Richard Donner's 1978 classic, but it's giving us a new dynamic, especially when it comes to the heart of the story… Lois and Clark. In the original Superman: The Movie , Christopher Reeve's Superman and Margot Kidder's Lois Lane share an iconic rooftop interview where the reporter quizzes the caped hero about his height, hometown, and mission, 'To fight for truth and justice and the American way', all without realizing her awkward colleague Clark Kent is the man floating just above her window. That whole 'doesn't-know-he's-Superman' dynamic was tossed out the window in Gunn's film. His version introduces us to a very different Lois and Clark, one where the cape is optional, and the truth is already out. This time around, Clark (David Corenswet) sits down for an interview with Lois (Rachel Brosnahan) as Superman, yes, but she already knows exactly who she's talking to. They're not hiding secrets. They're in the thick of it. Corenswet told Entertainment Weekly: 'This isn't like the interview in the Donner movie where Lois doesn't know that he's Clark. Lois knows everything about him, so he's in a very vulnerable position. He's madly in love with this woman and desperately wants her to understand him and appreciate him and love him back.' That vulnerability flips the dynamic on its head. It's not about the thrill of discovery anymore, it's about emotional honesty, and in this story, the relationship is already in motion when we meet them. They've been together for about three months. Brosnahan explained: 'Which is the point in a relationship where you're like, Was this a really great fling or is this more serious, possibly forever? It's one of the things that I love about their love story. While they have totally opposite worldviews, they complete each other, and they kind of need each other.' Gunn and the cast seem to be embracing the roots of the Donner classic while making room for something more emotionally evolved. Brosnahan called out Gunn's attention to showing Lois in action, both on the ground and, literally, in the sky piloting Mister Terrific's T-Sphere alongside Perry White (Wendell Pierce) and Jimmy Olsen (Skyler Gisondo). Brosnahan said: 'I think, in that moment, she sees an opportunity for a front-page story. I really appreciated that James makes space for you to see her in action at the height of her journalistic prowess.' The new Superman is clearly embracing its comic book world unapologetically. By the time the movie starts, Superman is already an active player in a larger superhero ecosystem, fighting in international conflicts like Boravia vs. Jarhanpur, and swapping headlines with supervillains like Metallo, who Lois and Clark were covering when they met. As far as the casting for the film goes, actors like Tom Brittney and Nicholas Hoult were considered for Superman before Hoult ultimately landed Lex Luthor. Phoebe Dynevor and Emma Mackey tested for Lois. But in the end, it was all about that elusive chemistry. Gunn said: 'We mixed and matched these different actors and actresses to find out not only who was the best Clark and who was the best Lois, but who was the best 'Clois,' who was the best together. I do think that David was the best Clark, Rachel was the best Lois, but they also had the most chemistry together.' While Gunn's take feels modern, the roots still run deep. The John Williams-style score. The bright optimism. Even Brosnahan's personal connection brings it full circle. She added: 'My dad was a huge Christopher Reeve, Margot Kidder, Superman fan, and I feel like he showed me that movie when I was about 12. So that was the definitive Superman for me, even though it was long before my time.' This Superman may not be hiding behind glasses anymore, but he's still wearing his heart on his sleeve.