Stephen Miller gets trolled by Dems after wife seen exiting White House with Elon Musk in viral photo moment
Live Events
FAQs
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Democrats don't have much to be happy about lately, but they had fun trolling Stephen Miller after his wife was seen leaving the White House with Elon Musk . Musk and Katie Miller were photographed together while exiting, and the moment went viral online, according to the reports.Katie Miller works as an adviser and spokesperson for DOGE, which is Musk's group in the government. The X account of the Democrats tagged Stephen Miller and posted a pic of an empty chair in a hotel room, clearly mocking him. They also retweeted a Daily Beast article saying Katie was leaving the Trump administration to work full-time for Elon Musk, according to the report by Daily Beast.The White House didn't respond when Daily Beast asked whether Stephen Miller is also leaving. Stephen Miller, just like Musk, was a 'Special Government Employee,' so he was allowed to work in the government for only 130 days. On Friday, Katie Miller was seen in the Oval Office while Musk was giving his farewell speech with the President.Musk criticized the President's 'big, beautiful bill' during his goodbye speech and said it was disappointing. Stephen Miller fired back on X with a long post, saying the bill couldn't cut spending due to Senate rules. He also said the Congressional Budget Office was wrong for saying the bill increases the deficit and called their analysis a 'gimmick.'In another post, Miller praised the work DOGE has done, but his fight with Musk on social media showed cracks in the MAGA camp . Stephen and Katie Miller were part of the first Trump administration, which is where they met and got married, according to the Daily Beast report.Now, Katie is one of the DOGE team members leaving government jobs as Musk shifts his focus back to his businesses. Steve Davis, Musk's close aide, is also leaving, the White House confirmed, as per reports.Because his wife was seen leaving the White House with Elon Musk in a viral photo.Katie Miller has decided to join Elon Musk after the latter left his position as DOGE chief in the Trump administration.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Why stricter voting laws no longer help Republicans
'The Republicans should pray for rain'—the title of a paper published by a trio of political scientists in 2007—has been an axiom of American elections for years. The logic was straightforward: each inch of election-day showers, the study found, dampened turnout by 1%. Lower turnout gave Republicans an edge because the party's affluent electorate had the resources to vote even when it was inconvenient. Their opponents, less so. The findings offered an empirical reason for Republicans to make voting harder for marginal or 'low propensity' voters. The party and its conservative allies had already adopted voting restrictions as an ideological plank, one previously advanced by southern Democrats courting white support in the Jim Crow era. In 2013 the Supreme Court gutted the preclearance system under the Voting Rights Act that had forced most southern states to vet changes to their voting rules with the federal government. Alabama, Mississippi and Texas immediately enacted voter ID laws that had been previously blocked. Over the next decade 29 states passed nearly 100 bills to restrict voting and Donald Trump's obsession with 'election integrity' became Republican doctrine. Yet Mr Trump's takeover of the Republican Party has scrambled the voting coalitions that underpinned the pray-for-rain logic. Rich people used to vote Republican and poor people Democrat. But the correlation started to wane in the 2000s and ultimately flipped for white voters when Mr Trump ran, according to research by Michael Barber and Jeremy Pope at Brigham Young University. Poor blacks and Hispanics still voted Democrat, but in 2024 they too moved to the right. At the same time, voters without college degrees took to the Republican Party and the college-educated moved in the other direction. Today voters who may or may not bother to turnout for elections no longer vote overwhelmingly for Democrats. Having embraced voting restrictions for so long Mr Trump and his party are reluctant to abandon them, even if they no longer help them win elections. In his second term the president is jostling for even tighter rules. Amongst his barrage of executive orders just one has dealt with elections, but it is one of his most constitutionally ambitious. In it Mr Trump criticises America's 'patchwork of voting methods' and calls for a national set of rules that require voters to prove their citizenship before registering. The attorney-general, it said, would also force states to stop counting absentee ballots that arrive after election day. A judge blocked the order, writing that Congress and the states set election rules under the constitution, not the president. She noted that Congress is considering a similar bill and Mr Trump should not 'short-circuit' that. The SAVE Act, which cleared the House in April, also makes voters prove citizenship. But it is very unlikely to pass the Senate. States, however, are passing voter restrictions with gusto. Since January at least 25 states have introduced new voter ID bills, 30 have ones related to citizenship verification and 26 are trying to change the rules around absentee voting. Florida lawmakers decided to punish non-citizens who vote with up to five years in prison and Wisconsin voters enshrined a voter ID requirement in their state's constitution. Americans want it to be harder to cheat in elections and 'that's why states aren't waiting for a solution from Washington,' says Lee Schalk of the American Legislative Exchange Council, a conservative group that writes model legislation. Indeed, Gallup polling shows that more than 80% support stricter ID and citizenship rules. In every country in Europe, where politics tends to be more liberal, voters must show ID at the polls. Would even stricter rules affect election outcomes in America? Consider Georgia, a swing state controlled by Republicans. When an omnibus election bill that tightened voter ID rules passed in 2021 Stacey Abrams, a Democrat who had run for governor, warned that it would disenfranchise black voters. She called it 'Jim Crow in a suit and tie'. But turnout in the next year's midterms surged and a consensus grew among election wonks that the suppression effect was negligible. Analysis by the Brennan Center for Justice, a public-policy institute, found that the turnout gap between white and black voters did widen in Georgia between 2020 and 2024. But the new rules may not have been to blame. The drop-off was mostly limited to younger black men, who were particularly unenthused by Kamala Harris. Fewer young women of both races voted for the first time, but white women slid more than black women. Democrats across the country argue that new citizenship verification policies will cause mass confusion and get citizens tangled up in bureaucracy. The hassle would be more justifiable if the new laws solved a big problem, but non-citizens rarely vote. An audit by Georgia's secretary of state from the summer of 2024 found just 20 non-citizens out of 8.2m on the voter rolls. Most were registered before Georgia checked for citizenship and had never cast a ballot. The best evidence seems to be that the impact of restrictive laws is minimal. An analysis published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics of 1.6bn voting records from every state in America found that strict voter ID rules, on average, neither significantly suppressed votes nor prevented fraud. Nor do ID laws hurt Democrats any longer, other research by Jeffrey Harden and Alejandra Campos shows. While in 2010 voter ID laws reduced Democratic vote share by 3%, by 2020 they increased it slightly. Because of the changes in party voting coalitions, the overall effect of the next phase of even tighter voting rules could now 'easily be a wash' when it comes to benefitting one party or the other, says Nicholas Stephanopoulos, who studies elections at Harvard University. Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
May GST mopup up by 16.4%; shows FY26 off to a flying start
Revenues from imports up 25% Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Goods and services tax collections surged 16.4% in May to ₹2.01 lakh crore from a year earlier, signaling robust demand at the start of the fiscal year after a strong close to FY25, data released on Sunday high-frequency monthly data also showed strong economic momentum in May. Unified Payments Interface transactions rose 33% year-on-year in the month to 17.8 billion transactions. Mahindra & Mahindra, the country's second-largest automaker, reported 21% higher sales in May, though overall industry sales are likely to be flat on the high base of last economy grew at a better-than-expected 7.4% in the March quarter from a year ago, as per data released May 30. Previously released numbers showed HSBC Flash India Composite Output Index for May at 61.2 against 59.7 in April, indicating expansion in private sector activity.'The (GST collection) figures reported for May 2025, which relate to transactions in the first month of FY26, at ₹2.01 lakh crore would provide significant fiscal headroom for the government,' said MS Mani, partner, indirect taxes, Deloitte India. 'These figures are also in line with the recent GDP growth estimates, which indicate a robust consumption pattern across months.'This is the second time in a row GST has exceeded ₹2 lakh crore. The average monthly gross GST collection in FY25 was ₹1.84 lakh be sure, the May figure is down from the high of ₹2.38 lakh crore in April, but analysts said collections in that month are traditionally higher. 'While last month's spike was expected with year-end reconciliations, the consistency this month along with a 16% plus year-on-year growth points to strong underlying momentum and a recovery that is clearly taking hold,' said Abhishek Jain, indirect tax head and partner, revenues from imports are 25% higher despite tariff headwinds, indicating strength in the domestic GST collections stood at ₹1.49 lakh crore, up 13.7%. After accounting for refunds, net GST revenue for May was ₹1.73 lakh crore, 20% up from last export refunds were down 36.25%. 'This suggests that April's increased exports were primarily on account of companies building their stocks owing to the tariff threat,' said Saurabh Agarwal, tax partner, the large states, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu reported a 17–25% rise while Gujarat and Telangana clocked a 4–6% increase.'The wide variations in the growth of GST collections across states require a thorough analysis across the sectors that are important in each state,' Mani also said consistent robust GST collections make a case for rate rationalisation. 'If the growth continues in this range for next couple of months, it might provide the cushion for the government to look at rate rationalisation on which a lot of work has already been done,' said Pratik Jain, partner, May, gross central GST revenue stood at ₹35,434 crore, state GST revenue at ₹43,902 crore and integrated GST at ₹1.09 lakh crore. Revenue from cess was ₹12,879 crore.
India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
Katie Miller, Elon Musk, and Stephen: What's behind the buzz?
Rumours claiming Katie Miller, wife of senior Trump aide Stephen Miller, left him for billionaire Elon Musk have surfaced online after Musk's White House exit. However, official reports have indicated the claims as pure story spread like wildfire after Elon Musk showed up with a black eye during a press conference announcing he was leaving the Trump administration. Musk said the bruise came from playing with his son, X. But internet users think otherwise. They came up with a wild theory claiming that Trump aide Stephen Miller punched Musk because of a personal issue involving Miller's wife, Katie. Elon Musk appeared with a bruised eye.(Photo: AP) advertisementMore people speculated after news broke that Katie Miller was leaving her White House position to work full-time for Musk. She had been the spokesperson for Musk's federal agency, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). According to reports, she will join his private ventures. Katie Miller is a prominent figure in Washington, having earlier worked as communications director for Vice President Mike SPARKED THE RUMOURSThe timing of several events seems to have added fuel to the speculation. Musk had criticised President Donald Trump's $3.8 trillion "Big Beautiful Bill." It reportedly upset several Trump officials, including Stephen Miller. Musk said the bill went against everything DOGE had worked for and called it a very same day, it was announced that Katie Miller would be joining Musk's team full-time, working on media bookings and other tasks for Tesla and none of these developments prove anything about the personal relationship between Musk and Katie Miller. There are no official reports of a fall-out between Katie and Stephen Miller either. In fact, Stephen Miller appeared on Fox with Lara Trump, speaking about his family and his wife."When I first met her, she was the communications director at the Department of Homeland Security," he said. "So it's on-brand, the relationship, because we were on conference calls every day on border security."NO EVIDENCE OF AFFAIR OR CONFLICTDespite the viral claims on the internet, there's simply no confirmation that Katie Miller "left" her husband for Elon Musk. Musk himself has denied spending too much time on politics and says he's now focusing on his private ventures. "It's not like I left the companies. It was just relative time allocation that probably was a little too high on the government side," Musk InMust Watch
