
Education Secretary clashes with top Democrat over Harvard funding
Donald Trump 's Education Secretary had a fiery clash with a top Democrat over funding for Harvard. Linda McMahon was on Capitol Hill Tuesday to testify before the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee on her department's budget for next year.
During an exchange with Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), McMahon passionately defended the Trump administration's targeting of diversity programs at elite Ivy League institutions including Harvard and Columbia.
'How do you ask them to end diversity programs while instituting viewpoint diversity? This seems to be totally contradictory, ' Murphy pressed McMahon, kicking off the heated exchange.
'You know, the diversity programs that we've asked and demanded to be eliminated, were the DEI, where they were. Those programs actually were pitting one group against another,' McMahon responded.
'Is viewpoint diversity a diversity program?' Murphy asked. 'A viewpoint diversity is exchange of ideas. It's actually better, absolutely. We're now here because Harvard only has 3 percent by its own numbers, 3 percent conservative faculty. Do you think they are allowing enough of viewpoint diversity through that teaching?' McMahon argued.
Murphy said: 'Where in the statute, where in the statute, does it give you the ability to cut off federal funding for a university based upon your decision, your determination, that they don't have viewpoint diversity?'
'Can you cite to a statute an authority the Congress has given you to micromanage the viewpoint diversity of a college.' 'Can you cite a statute? If you can't cut off your funding for universities, unless you have a statutory authorization to do so. So what statute gives you the right to tell any university that they have to have a certain mixture of viewpoints...I think you have to say the statute,' Murphy continued.
'The statute is Title VI , these are civil rights violations. That is why we filed a case and defunded or stopped the funding for a while for Harvard, as well as we did Columbia … under federal funding if you are breaking the law, which they did under Title VI,' McMahon responded. 'I don't understand any conception of civil rights law to give you the authorization to micromanage viewpoint diversity on campus. That's, that's not authorized under the Civil Rights title provided to you by the United States Congress,' Murphy concluded.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. In April, the Trump Administration froze over $2 billion in research grants at Harvard. Federal funding made up over two-thirds of research funding received by the university in fiscal year 2024, to the tune of $686 million.
The Trump administration has also moved to bar Harvard from enrolling foreign students in May, but the action was blocked by a U.S. District Judge in Boston on May 29. Columbia University, also called out by McMahon in her testimony on Capitol Hill, relies on the federal government for 22 percent of its funding, which amounted to over $1.2 billion during the 2022–23 academic year, according to a report from the Urban Institute.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
37 minutes ago
- Reuters
Ohio food banks strain as Trump slashes federal aid programs
COLUMBUS, Ohio On a warm spring morning, volunteers at the Mid-Ohio Food Collective plucked cucumbers from a greenhouse where a state psychiatric hospital once stood and the land lay fallow. Now the state's largest food bank is working that ground again, part of an urgent effort to shore up supplies amid shrinking federal support, including deep funding cuts under President Donald Trump. They are planting more. Prepping soil for fruit trees, and installing hives for honey. In the greenhouse, crates of romaine and butterhead lettuce were packed for delivery, bound for a pantry across town. Back at headquarters in Grove City, staff chased leads from grocers, manufacturers, even truckers looking to unload abandoned freight. Every pallet helped. Every pound counted. In a state that handed Trump three straight wins, where Trump flags flap near food aid flyers pinned on bulletin boards, the cost of his austerity push is starting to show. 'Food banks will still have food,' said Mid-Ohio CEO Matt Habash. 'But with these cuts, you'll start to see a heck of a lot less food, or pantries and agencies closing. You're going to have a lot of hungry, and a lot less healthy, America.' For decades, food banks like Mid-Ohio have been the backbone of the nation's anti-hunger system, channelling government support and donations from corporations and private donors into meals and logistics to support pantries at churches, non-profits and other organizations. If a food bank is a warehouse, food pantries are the store. Outside one of those – the Eastside Community Ministry pantry in rural Muskingum County, Ohio – Mary Dotson walked slow, cane in hand. The minute she stepped through the doors, her whole body seemed to lift. They call her Mama Mary here, as she's got the kind of voice that settles you down and straightens you out in the same breath. The regulars grin as Dotson, 77, pats shoulders, swaps recipes. She had tried to do everything right: built a career, raised five children, planned for the quiet years with her husband. But after he died and the kids moved away, the life they'd built slipped out of reach. Now her monthly Social Security check is $1,428. She budgets $70 of that for groceries, and she gets $23 in food benefits as well. She started as a volunteer at Eastside. Simple math convinced her to become a customer. 'I figured if I'm going to take these things,' Dotson said, 'I'm going to work here, too.' Campaign fodder The Mid-Ohio Food Collective was born out of church basements and borrowed trucks nearly a half-century ago, when factory closures left more families hungry. It's now the state's largest food bank, feeding more than 35,000 Ohio families a week. It supplies more than 600 food pantries, soup kitchens, children and senior feeding sites, after-school programs and other partner agencies. When Trump returned to office in January, Mid-Ohio was already slammed. Pantry visits across its 20 counties hit 1.8 million last year, nearly double pre-COVID levels, and are continuing to grow this year. The biggest surge came from working people whose paychecks no longer stretch far enough due to pandemic-era inflation under Joe Biden's presidency, staff said. Then came the Trump cuts. In March, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) cancelled the pandemic-era Local Food Purchase Assistance (LFPA) program, which funded about $500 million annually for food banks; and froze about $500 million in funding for The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), one of the agency's core nutrition programs that supplies food to states to pass on to food banks for free. Much of the food Mid-Ohio distributes is donated, but donations alone can't stock a pantry consistently. Its current $11.1 million purchasing budget, built from federal, state and private dollars, helps fill the gaps. The March cuts wiped out about 22% of Mid-Ohio's buying power for next fiscal year – funds and food that staff are trying to replace. In early December, Mid-Ohio ordered 24 truckloads filled with milk, meat and eggs for delivery this spring and summer. The food came through the TEFAP program, using about $1.5 million in government funding. The first delivery was scheduled to show up April 9. The only thing to arrive was a cancellation notice. USDA said in a statement Secretary Brooke Rollins is working to ensure federal nutrition spending is efficient, effective, and aligned with the administration's budget priorities. More cuts could come. Last month, the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives passed Trump's tax and spending bill. It called for $300 billion in cuts to food benefits for low income people under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which fed nearly 1.4 million Ohioans in January, according to the latest state data. If the cuts survive the Senate and are passed into law, it annually would cost Ohio at least $475 million in state funding to maintain current SNAP benefits, plus at least $70 million for administrative program costs, said Cleveland-based The Center for Community Solutions, an independent, nonpartisan policy research group. That would consume nearly every state-controlled dollar in Ohio's Department of Job and Family Services budget, roughly 95% of the general revenue meant to help fund everything from jobless claims to foster care. Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine and other lawmakers in this GOP supermajority state capitol, facing a constitutional requirement to pass a balanced budget, told Reuters that extra money for food banks isn't there. The proposed fiscal 2025 Ohio budget would set food bank funding back to 2019 levels – or about 23% less than what it spent this year, in a state where nearly one in three people qualify for help. Federal safety-net programs have become campaign fodder, too. At a recent Ohio Republican Party fundraiser in Richland County, Ohio, voters in suits and Bikers for Trump gear alike listened to Vivek Ramaswamy, the tech millionaire turned presidential candidate now running for Ohio governor. He spoke out against 'a culture of dependence on the entitlement state that has festered in our country for 60 years.'


The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘He's a bad guy': Trump backs decision to bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia back to US to face charges
Donald Trump has called Kilmar Abrego Garcia a 'bad guy' and backed the decision to return him to the US to face criminal charges. Abrego Garcia was wrongly deported to El Salvador nearly three months ago under the Trump administration. He was returned to the US on Friday (6 June) and charged with trafficking migrants into the country. The charges relate to a 2022 traffic stop, during which the Tennessee Highway Patrol suspected him of human trafficking. Speaking to reporters on Saturday, Trump said: 'By bringing him back, you show how bad he is.' 'He's a bad guy,' he added.


Reuters
42 minutes ago
- Reuters
Critical minerals part deux: China's dominance
Follow on Apple or Spotify. Listen on the Reuters app. Decades ago, China foresaw what the U.S. didn't - a future dependent on critical minerals. Now, the U.S. is playing catch up as China's export controls threaten global supply chains. Join Laurie Chen, Ernest Scheyder and Jarrett Renshaw to hear the latest on critical minerals, particularly what China's dominance means for the modern world. Listen to part one here. Sign up for the Reuters Econ World newsletter here. Listen to the Reuters Econ World podcast here. Visit the Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement for information on our privacy and data protection practices. You may also visit to opt out of targeted advertising. Further Reading China's rare earth weapon changes contours of trade war battlefield, opens new tab China's rare earth export curbs hit the auto industry worldwide, opens new tab Global alarm as China's critical mineral export curbs take hold, opens new tab