Do Arizonans need to open their door for the police? Here's what to know
A man posing as a police officer shot and killed two Minnesota lawmakers on June 14, prompting some to wonder if they could ever find themselves in a similar situation.
When police knock on your door, you do have rights — but navigating those rights isn't always as simple as just refusing to answer.
Experts provided answers on how to best handle a similar situation.
Here's what Arizonans should know.
On Saturday, June 14, two Minnesota state lawmakers and their spouses were victims of what prosecutors called a political assassination.
Vance Boelter, 57, reportedly dressed like a police officer, down to the vest and flashlight like that of real officers, according to an affidavit filed in federal court and written by Special Agent Terry Getsch of the FBI.
According to police in the records, Boetler had a "planned campaign of stalking and violence," according to the affidavit.
Boelter also was driving an SUV equipped with a fake "POLICE" license plate and "law enforcement-style emergency lights."
It's understandable that someone would open the door to a police officer knocking late at night.
"You're kind of disarmed in the middle of the night, in the fog of sleep," said George Kirkham, a criminologist, professor emeritus at Florida State University and a former police officer, in an interview with USA TODAY.
If an officer is knocking on your door, the American Civil Liberties Union recommends talking through the door and asking for identification.
"You do not have to let them in unless they can show you a warrant signed by a judicial officer that lists your address as a place to be searched or that has your name on it as the subject of an arrest warrant," the ACLU says.
Another immediate option presented by Minnesota police is to simply call 911.
"It is okay to remain in your vehicle or home and not open the window or door until you receive confirmation from dispatch," the Richfield Police Department posted on Facebook June 14.
Kirkham agreed that it's a good option, and as a former officer himself, that he wouldn't mind waiting for such a call.
Amanda Lee Myers is a senior crime reporter for USA TODAY. Follow her on X at @amandaleeusat.
Contact reporter Rey Covarrubias Jr. at rcovarrubias@gannett.com. Follow him on Instagram, X, Threads and Bluesky: @ReyCJrAZ.
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Do you have to open your door if police are knocking?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Pakistan's Army Chief Set to Meet Trump Amid Iran Tensions
By and Faseeh Mangi Updated on Save President Donald Trump is expected to meet Pakistan's army chief for talks as the US considers supporting Israeli airstrikes on Iran — a partner of the government in Islamabad. The lunch meeting between Trump and Pakistan's Asim Munir is scheduled to take place at 1 p.m. Washington time Wednesday in the White House Cabinet Room, according to the president's daily public schedule. It would be the first of its kind with a high-ranking Pakistani official since Trump returned to the White House.
Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
US Lawmakers' Talks With Top Taiwan Official Risk Irking China
A group of US lawmakers held a rare publicly disclosed meeting with Taiwan's top defense official, a discussion that risks spurring China to step up its military intimidation of the democracy. The delegation led by Ami Bera, a Democratic representative from California, met with Defense Minister Wellington Koo on Tuesday in Taipei, Taiwan's Military News Agency reported.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Proposal to cancel Miami's November election, push it to 2026 passes first vote
The city of Miami has moved one step closer to postponing the upcoming November election without voter input. On Tuesday night, the Miami City Commission voted 3-2 in favor of switching the city from odd- to even-year elections, pushing forward a proposal that entails moving the November election to 2026 and giving the city's current elected officials an extra year in office — including those who will have reached their term limits. The yes votes were Commissioner Damian Pardo — the item's sponsor — as well as Commissioners Ralph Rosado and Christine King. Commissioners Miguel Angel Gabela and Joe Carollo voted no. The proposal must pass a second City Commission vote to become official. It's slated to come back at next week's meeting on June 26. Pardo has the support of Mayor Francis Suarez, who has been lobbying behind the scenes to push the legislation through. Suarez has veto power but does not have a vote on the City Commission. The circumstances are such that Rosado — whom Suarez supported in his special election earlier this month — voted to give himself an extra year in office during his first meeting as a Miami city commissioner. Pardo's proposal has faced pushback from Florida officials. Last week, Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier issued a written opinion saying the city does not have the legal authority to move the election without voter approval. Gov. Ron DeSantis weighed in on social media, saying that 'city of Miami politicians do not have the authority to cancel this year's elections and extend their terms in office without voter approval.' In response to Uthmeier's opinion, City Attorney George Wysong issued an opinion last week in which he cited Florida law to argue that the city has the authority to move the election date via a City Commission vote. Pardo has pointed to two Miami-Dade cities that have done so already: North Miami and Coral Gables. Commissioners in North Miami extended their terms, while Gables commissioners voted to shorten their terms. At Tuesday's meeting, several people spoke in favor of moving the city to even-year elections, describing it as a 'common sense' solution to raising the city's paltry voter turnout, which typically hovers between 10% to 15%. 'You will hear a lot about the extra year in office, and that is far from ideal,' downtown resident Steven Smith said. However, he described it as a 'sacrifice' worth making. Others expressed concern — particularly about the prospect of the extra year for elected officials. Resident Xiani Cox supported moving to even years but 'only if it's done right.' Cox described this particular proposal as 'stealing an extra year.' 'It's a power grab dressed up as reform,' Cox said. 'Voters elected you for four years ... not five. Canceling the 2025 elections without a public vote is a direct attack on our democracy, and it's unethical and an abuse of power.' Miami pollster Fernand Amandi commended Pardo for his efforts toward reform but said it was 'indefensible' to cancel an election without voter consent. 'I find myself in the unfamiliar position today where I wholeheartedly agree with Governor DeSantis and Attorney General Uthmeier, and even Commissioner Joe Carollo,' he said. The commission also advanced another proposal from Pardo that's related to his push to change the election date. That proposal, which would create lifetime term limits for elected officials, also passed a City Commission vote 3-2 on Tuesday — but with a different makeup than the election date change vote. Pardo, Gabela and Rosado voted in favor of sending the term limits proposal to voters, while Carollo and King voted against. The change needs to come back to the commission for a second vote, after which point it will be sent to voters as a ballot referendum. That means it will ultimately be up to voters to decide whether the city should limit elected officials to two terms as city commissioner and two terms as mayor for their entire lifetime. It will also, however, be subjected to campaigning efforts by those invested in keeping the city's term limits as-is. Currently, elected officials in Miami must leave office after two terms but can run again after sitting out a term. The term limits proposal is connected to the election date change proposal because it clears the way for term limits to get voted on ahead of the city's next municipal election. Assuming the even-year election change gets commissioners' approval in a second, final vote on June 26, that means there would be a special election in November to ask voters about lifetime term limits, while the general election to select a mayor, a District 3 commissioner and a District 5 commissioner would be held in November 2026. If voters approve the lifetime term limits, that legislation would block Suarez from seeking elected office in Miami again. It would also block Carollo from office since he has already served at least two terms as both mayor and a commissioner, and it would keep his younger brother, former two-term City Commissioner Frank Carollo, from running for the City Commission again. Frank Carollo has already filed to run for the District 3 City Commission seat — currently occupied by his brother — and Joe Carollo has long been mulling another run for mayor. If the general election remained scheduled for November 2025, that could create legal roadblocks because the term limits proposal would be on the same ballot as candidates who would be affected by it, like Frank Carollo. Joe Carollo has argued that Pardo's proposals are designed to block him from becoming mayor, while Pardo has said that he's not targeting anybody.
