Fetterman's chief of staff leaves amid string of departures
Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman's chief of staff is leaving her post, two people familiar with the matter confirmed to POLITICO on Tuesday. The move is yet another key departure for a congressional office that's been marked by turnover amid mounting questions about the Democrat's health and shifting political persona.
Axios first reported Krysta Sinclair Juris' plans to part ways with Fetterman's office.
POLITICO has learned Cabelle St. John, who previously served as Fetterman's deputy chief of staff, senior adviser and scheduling director, is taking over as his new top aide.
'Cabelle St. John has been a trusted advisor since day 1 in the office. I'm lucky to have her taking over as my Chief of Staff and I'm confident she'll do a great job,' Fetterman said in a statement. 'I'm grateful for Krysta's work. She's been an invaluable member of the team for over two years and I wish her all the best.'
In the last year and a half, the senator's former chief of staff, Adam Jentleson, top communications aides and legislative director all left his team. Two more aides departed Fetterman's office in the last couple months.
In a Monday debate in Boston with Sen. Dave McCormick (R-Pa.), Fetterman said that reporting about his missing votes and committee hearings is a 'weird smear.' Previously, he criticized a New York magazine article about former and current aides who expressed concerns about his health 'a one-source hit piece.'
'I'm here. I'm doing that job,' he said in the debate that aired on Fox Nation. 'For me, if I miss some of those quotes — I mean some of those votes — I've made 90 percent of them and, and we all know those votes that I've missed were on Monday; those are travel days, and I have three young kids, and I — those are throwaway procedural votes. … That's a choice that I made, and if you want to attack me for that, go ahead.'
In addition to concerns over his health, some ex-staffers have been frustrated with Fetterman's hardline support of Israel and recent meeting with President Donald Trump.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tell Us That One Political Take That Makes You The Black Sheep In Your Party
In recent years, US politics has become so polarizing that many people have chosen sides and felt pressured to support all of the the beliefs of their political party or candidate. In a recent online video, a TikTok user asked people to comment on a political opinion they hold that the majority of their political party disagrees with, and thousands of people shared their unconventional takes, with many people leaving comments like this one: Related: Just Buy Some Jellycats To Reveal Your Red And Green Flags So, we're asking people in the BuzzFeed Community to share a political opinion they hold that makes those in their party look at them sideways. Maybe you're a Republican who believes climate change is real and supports stronger laws when it comes to protecting the environment. Related: I'll Be Really Impressed If You Can Get 15/15 On This Really Hard World Capital Quiz Maybe you're a Democrat who supports many of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency cuts to the federal government. Or, maybe you're a conservative who wouldn't personally get an abortion, but believes the right to have one should be legal in every state. Whatever your opinion is, we want to hear it. Let us know your political affiliation and your opinion in the comments. Or, if you'd like to remain anonymous, use the form below. Your response could be featured in an upcoming post. Also in Community: If You Can Correctly Answer At Least 9 Questions On This Taylor Swift Trivia Quiz, You're The ULTIMATE Swiftie Also in Community: Wanna Know Which Disney Princess Is Your 100% Personality Twin? Just Eat A Bunch Of Desserts To Find Out Also in Community: Eat Onlyyyyyy Red Foods And I'll Guess Your Biggest Red Flag
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AOC just gave a boost to New York's new socialist superstar
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., has endorsed democratic socialist assemblyman Zohran Mamdani for mayor of New York City. It could give Mamdani a significant boost as he strives to topple former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo from the top of the polls in the final two weeks of the race. This is a crucial endorsement for Mamdani. In about six months he's gone from an obscure 33-year-old state assemblyman from Queens to left-wing superstar and the most viable contender to take on a powerful establishment Democrat in a crowded race decided by ranked-choice voting. The New York Times reports that Ocasio-Cortez and her aides studied Mamdani and other candidates for weeks before deciding that he was the one she wanted to put her weight behind. 'Assemblymember Mamdani has demonstrated a real ability on the ground to put together a coalition of working-class New Yorkers that is strongest to lead the pack,' Ocasio-Cortez told the Times. 'In the final stretch of the race, we need to get very real about that.' Ocasio-Cortez said that, after Mamdani, she will rank New York City Council speaker Adrienne Adams, city comptroller Brad Lander, former comptroller Scott Stringer, and state senator Zellnor Myrie, in that order, on her ballot. Mamdani is running on an unapologetically left-wing policy platform. As The City reports, Mamdani "is running on a platform of affordability: free buses, city-run grocery stores, universal childcare and a rent freeze." Cuomo, who resigned from the governor post in 2021 in response to sexual harassment allegations, has maintained a double-digit lead in most polls in the race, and Mamdani has been coming in second. (Cuomo has denied the allegations.) While Mamdani still faces a challenging road ahead, he seems to have a monopoly on the excitement factor of the race. His fundraising numbers have been exceptionally strong, he has emerged a social media darling and viral video savant, and he has by far the biggest ground game in the race with an army of canvassers enthusiastically fanning across the city. Mamdani appears to be the top candidate of young people and progressives, whereas Cuomo represents older, more moderate Democrats. Cuomo ultimately has a huge name recognition advantage — his scandal doesn't seem to have swayed many establishment Dems against him. What Mamdani needs is a way to build trust with voters as a young candidate who many voters have little to no familiarity with. Winning an endorsement from one of the most prominent Democrats in not just New York City politics, but national politics, is one way to help build that trust. Will it be enough? Ocasio-Cortez touched on why Mamdani faces such a tough road when she observed to the Times: 'Trust can't be built quickly." With a little more than two weeks until the June 24 primary, it's not clear if that leaves enough time for Mamdani to gain the momentum, and trust, he'll surely need for a win. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pentagon Wants To Shift Funds From Navy F/A-XX To USAF F-47: Report
The U.S. Navy's F/A-XX sixth-generation fighter program looks to have hit another snag, with the Pentagon reportedly prioritizing the Air Force's F-47 stealth fighter, amid concerns about how to run the two efforts simultaneously. Already, the F/A-XX was in limbo, with a U.S. official telling TWZ last month that the future of the program was still being reviewed. This came after reports that a contract award for the Navy's new combat jet could be delayed by as much as three years. Navy officials, meanwhile, continue to stress the importance of the F/A-XX to their plans. 'There's certainly a strong requirement for a sixth-gen fighter still,' Dr. Brett A. Seidle, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development, and Acquisition (RD&A), said yesterday. 'I know there's a lot of discussion about [F/A-XX] right now, but the Navy position on that is there's a requirement that's necessary.' Seidle was speaking at a House Armed Services Committee hearing on Seapower and Projection Forces. His comments came in response to questions from U.S. Rep. Joseph David Courtney, the Democrat representative for Connecticut's 2nd congressional district. You can see that exchange in the video below, starting at the 35.25 mark: The hearing followed a Pentagon request last month to the House and Senate defense policy committees, which was seen by Bloomberg News, warning that 'Simultaneously pursuing two sixth-generation fighters risks under-delivery on both.' 'Given the schedule delays and cost growth across numerous airframes, DoD recommends a focus on the F-47, giving the Navy's F/A-XX program time for technical maturity and development,' the Pentagon request added. 'Phasing the F/A-XX after the Air Force's initial F-47 development will alleviate capacity concerns in the industrial base.' Exactly why there should be concerns about industrial capacity is somewhat unclear, although that could be a factor were Boeing to win the F/A-XX contract on top of the F-47. On the other hand, with Northrop Grumman busy with the B-21 stealth bomber, which still needs to get through flight testing, adding a few years to the F/A-XX timeline could mitigate risk there, were this contractor to walk away with F/A-XX. Reportedly, the U.S. Department of Defense requested that Congress shift $500 million from F/A-XX to the F-47, the contract for which was awarded to Boeing in March. Previously, these funds were allocated for the 'accelerated development' of the Navy fighter. There is now something of a battle between the Pentagon Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and the House Armed Services Committee (HASC). On the one hand, the F-47 is considered by the Pentagon to have 'full presidential support,' making it a priority for the $500 million that the House Armed Services Committee had added to the F/A-XX program under President Donald Trump's sweeping $3.9-trillion tax breaks package. While we previously reported on Pentagon recommendations to withhold $500 million from the F/A-XX program, it wasn't previously understood that it wanted to redirect this to the Air Force's equivalent effort, the F-47. The House Armed Services Committee is now seeking to block the funds from being redirected to the F-47, arguing that the Pentagon hasn't provided an adequate reason for this. Heather Vaughan, a committee spokesperson, told Bloomberg News that the Pentagon 'has yet to brief the committee on any changes for its plans to develop and procure' the Navy's new stealth jet. 'Absent any new information from the Navy concerning revision to defined capability gaps and shortfalls, mission requirements, cost, or acquisition strategy for F/A-XX, the committee continues to support the development of this critical platform,' Vaughan added. Earlier this week, the Senate Armed Services Committee released its defense section of the tax breaks package, which includes $750 million to 'accelerate the F/A-XX aircraft.' Originally, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman were all in the running to develop the F/A-XX. However, Lockheed Martin was reportedly eliminated from the competition in March because its proposal 'did not satisfy the service's criteria,' according to Breaking Defense, whose story cited an unnamed source with knowledge of the program. Any holdups to the F/A-XX program will be a worry for the Navy. The service considers a sixth-generation combat aircraft as a prerequisite for the future carrier air wing, especially in terms of a potential confrontation with China in the Indo-Pacific theater. 'The sixth-gen fighter has some capabilities that we need to counter the PRC,' Navy Adm. James W. Kilby, acting Chief of Naval Operations, said of the F/A-XX last month. 'Those are signatures, those are range, those are different engines. Those are all the things that will make it survivable. The Air Force and Navy have different missions, but we're going against the same threat.' Last month, a U.S. official, speaking to TWZ on condition of anonymity, denied reports that the F/A-XX program contract award could be delayed by as much as three years. 'Nothing is being delayed,' the official stated. 'A decision hasn't been made yet. That decision is still being determined by [the Pentagon] and service leaders, with conversations among Congress as well. It's a big program. Obviously, these things don't get settled on by one individual. Leaders are making a decision on whether to invest. It's all part of the process.' The Navy had planned for the F/A-XX aircraft to enter service in the 2030s and thereafter to replace F/A-18E/F Super Hornet strike fighters and EA-18G Growler electronic attack jets. According to a 2025 Naval Aviation Playbook, the F/A-XX 'is expected to feature superior range, speed, and sensor capabilities, with an emphasis on integrating manned and unmanned systems. This includes collaboration with autonomous drones serving as force multipliers and electronic warfare assets.' In regards to the range, it emerged earlier this year that the F/A-XX may offer just a 25 percent increase in this respect over the existing tactical combat jets in its carrier air wings. That disclosure is surprising, given that the service consistently makes it clear that extending the reach of its carrier strike groups and thus enhancing their survivability is a critical priority, as the range of expected threats also continues to grow. Regardless, the continued funding dispute may well still derail the current timeline for F/A-XX. In a report last month, Reuters wrote that the Pentagon's main issue about the F/A-XX program was 'concerns about engineering and production capacity,' but didn't elaborate further. If the F/A-XX does end up being delayed, the Navy might well have to look again at its tactical fighter fleet to avoid shortfalls. One immediate result would be the service relying longer than expected on its aging fleets of Super Hornets and Growlers. At one stage, the Super Hornet production line was expected to be shut down this year. However, in March of last year, the Navy issued Boeing a $1.3-billion contract for 17 new Super Hornets with a final delivery planned for spring 2027 at the latest. Buying more Super Hornets could be an option, but such a move would have to be made before the line is closed. An alternative would be to push more resources toward the F-35C stealth fighter, which the Navy has introduced to replace the last of its 'legacy' Hornets. As well as the baseline F-35C, Lockheed Martin is increasingly looking at the potential of further advanced developments of the Joint Strike Fighter, something the company has previously described as a 'Ferrari' or 'NASCAR upgrade' to the F-35's core 'chassis.' This could include a substantial fuselage redesign. With a future Pacific fight very much on its mind, neither of these options would be ideal for the Navy, and the current uncertainty around the F/A-XX program is very much bad news for the service. It's also worth considering the Navy's approach for the fleets of carrier-capable drone wingmen that it wants to accompany crewed combat aircraft in the future. As it now stands, the service wants its Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) designs to cost no more than $15 million to buy and have zero long-term sustainment costs. At the same time, there are signs the Navy may not be moving as quickly on CCAs as the Air Force, as you can read about here. Meanwhile, if the Pentagon gets its way and is able to inject another $500 million into the F-47, that will only help realize its goal to have the next-generation Air Force combat jet flying before the end of the current Trump administration. Contact the author: thomas@
