logo
Isle of Man takes further step towards legalising assisted dying

Isle of Man takes further step towards legalising assisted dying

Yahoo25-02-2025

Campaigners have hailed a 'historic' step on the Isle of Man, as it edged closer to potentially becoming the first part of the British Isles to legalise assisted dying.
The House of Keys voted on various amendments to the assisted dying Bill before sending it back to the upper chamber – known as the legislative council – next month, from where it could be sent for royal assent.
Dr Alex Allinson, the member of the House of Keys (MHK) who introduced the private member's bill in 2022, has said he is hopeful it can become law later this year and that an assisted dying service could be in place by 2027.
Campaigners opposed to a change in the law have voiced concerns that legalising assisted dying could put pressure on vulnerable people to end their lives for fear of being a burden on others, and argue that the disabled, elderly, sick or depressed could be especially at risk.
As it stands, the Isle of Man Bill is only for adults resident on the island for five years who have a terminal illness with a life expectancy of no more than 12 months, and who have a settled intention to end their life.
Doctors are free to choose whether they want to opt-in to the service, following a previous request from the British Medical Association (BMA) that this should be a choice.
The legislative council had recommended the residency criteria be reduced from five years to one since the person's diagnosis, but the House of Keys rejected this during the sitting on Tuesday.
The Bill includes a requirement for specific training for healthcare professionals to identify coercion, duress or undue influence, with Dr Allinson saying it has 'strengthened safeguards' having faced scrutiny in the various debates since first being introduced.
The House of Keys rejected other amendments on recording the occupation of the witness to the assisted dying application, and for someone to remain present in the room at all times with a dying person, instead suggesting a doctor should be in close proximity.
It is possible the legislative council could disagree with some of the amendments and choose to send the Bill back to the House of Keys.
But Dr Allinson told the PA news agency: 'I am hoping we can work with the legislative council to achieve consensus for this to then go on for royal assent hopefully later this year.'
The development on the Isle of Man comes as a committee of MPs resumed line-by-line scrutiny of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, covering England and Wales, on Tuesday.
The Bill is expected to return to the House of Commons, most likely towards the end of April, for further debate and a vote by all MPs.
In May last year, Jersey's parliament voted in favour of drawing up laws to establish an assisted dying service on the island for terminally ill people.
After a law has been drafted, a debate could take place by the end of this year, with a likely 18-month implementation period if a law is approved, meaning the earliest for it to come into effect would be summer 2027.
Scotland is also considering separate assisted dying legislation.
Vicky Christian, chair of pro-change group My Death, My Decision on the Isle of Man, said: 'This is a historic step, and is likely the last time the Bill will be debated in the lower chamber.
'This Bill will ensure people on the Isle of Man will finally have choice and dignity at the end of their lives.
'I am incredibly proud of our island for not only listening to its people but, more importantly, listening to those facing the end of life. In this debate, compassion and evidence have prevailed.'
Dr Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of Care Not Killing – which is opposed to a change in the law, said: 'The current laws prohibiting assisted suicide and euthanasia provide a safeguard against abuse and exploitation and do not need changing.'
He repeated calls for a focus on 'fixing the broken palliative care system'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

1 Small-Cap Stock with Promising Prospects and 2 to Approach with Caution
1 Small-Cap Stock with Promising Prospects and 2 to Approach with Caution

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

1 Small-Cap Stock with Promising Prospects and 2 to Approach with Caution

Investors looking for hidden gems should keep an eye on small-cap stocks because they're frequently overlooked by Wall Street. Many opportunities exist in this part of the market, but it is also a high-risk, high-reward environment due to the lack of reliable analyst price targets. The downside that can come from buying these securities is precisely why we started StockStory - to isolate the long-term winners from the losers so you can invest with confidence. Keeping that in mind, here is one small-cap stock that could be the next 100 bagger and two that could be down big. Market Cap: $128.6 million Aiming to address a high-stakes and often confusing decision, eHealth (NASDAQ:EHTH) guides consumers through health insurance enrollment and related topics. Why Do We Think Twice About EHTH? Struggled with new customer acquisition as its estimated membership averaged 1.8% declines Forecasted revenue decline of 3.4% for the upcoming 12 months implies demand will fall off a cliff Depletion of cash reserves could lead to a fundraising event that triggers shareholder dilution eHealth is trading at $4.23 per share, or 2.8x forward EV/EBITDA. Check out our free in-depth research report to learn more about why EHTH doesn't pass our bar. Market Cap: $1.18 billion Tracing its roots back to 1921 when Bill and Salie Utz began making potato chips in their kitchen, Utz Brands (NYSE:UTZ) offers salty snacks such as potato chips, tortilla chips, pretzels, cheese snacks, and ready-to-eat popcorn, among others. Why Are We Out on UTZ? Organic sales performance over the past two years indicates the company may need to make strategic adjustments or rely on M&A to catalyze faster growth Modest revenue base of $1.41 billion gives it less fixed cost leverage and fewer distribution channels than larger companies Low returns on capital reflect management's struggle to allocate funds effectively At $13.51 per share, Utz trades at 15.7x forward P/E. Read our free research report to see why you should think twice about including UTZ in your portfolio, it's free. Market Cap: $1.38 billion Originally known as Safariland, Cadre (NYSE:CDRE) specializes in manufacturing and distributing safety and survivability equipment for first responders. Why Are We Fans of CDRE? Offerings and unique value proposition resonate with customers, as seen in its above-market 9.7% annual sales growth over the last two years Exciting sales outlook for the upcoming 12 months calls for 19.3% growth, an acceleration from its two-year trend Earnings per share grew by 19.7% annually over the last two years and trumped its peers Cadre's stock price of $33.96 implies a valuation ratio of 21.4x forward P/E. Is now a good time to buy? See for yourself in our in-depth research report, it's free. Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election sent major indices to all-time highs, but stocks have retraced as investors debate the health of the economy and the potential impact of tariffs. While this leaves much uncertainty around 2025, a few companies are poised for long-term gains regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate, like our Top 5 Strong Momentum Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-micro-cap company Tecnoglass (+1,754% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today for free. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Growing number of MPs changing their mind on assisted dying
Growing number of MPs changing their mind on assisted dying

Yahoo

time17 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Growing number of MPs changing their mind on assisted dying

Opposition to a bill which would legalise assisted dying in England and Wales is growing among MPs, the BBC has found. The Assisted Dying Bill was supported by 330 MPs last year, passing its first major vote in the House of Commons with a majority of 55 MPs from a wide range of political parties. But at least a dozen MPs who backed it or abstained in November have now said they are likely to vote against it. The bill would allow terminally ill adults with less than six months to live to receive medical assistance to die Supporters remain confident it will eventually become law but it faces further parliamentary tests. How assisted dying laws across the UK could change GPs split over assisted dying plans, BBC research suggests MPs back proposals to legalise assisted dying Assisted dying bill: How did my MP vote? The bill is a private members' bill, sponsored by backbench Labour MP Kim Leadbeater. MPs have been given a free vote on it, meaning they can decide based on their conscience rather than having to follow a party line. They have spent the past few months examining it in detail, with more than 500 amendments tabled. Some of these changes will be voted on by MPs next Friday - and a final Commons vote will take place in the summer, before it heads to the House of Lords for further scrutiny. Markus Campbell-Savours, the Labour MP for Penrith and Solway, is one of those who has said he's now likely to vote against the bill after previously supporting it. He said he still considers himself "a supporter of assisted dying" but believes the current bill crosses "red lines for protecting the vulnerable". "I want to see safeguards that will ensure that assisted dying is not overextended to include those in situations where there are alternative ways to improve the quality of their lives," said Campbell-Savours. "I would also be very concerned if legislation produced a situation where people who considered themselves a burden on their families and friends felt pressured to end their life." Fellow Labour MP Josh Fenton-Glynn also plans to vote no, having previously abstained. "If you'd asked me at any point in my life what I thought of assisted dying, I'd have always said in favour," he told the BBC. He has suggested a number of amendments to the bill, and claims he is "still open to supporting" the plans, but doubts it will change after Leadbeater blocked previous similar attempts. "We see quite a few of the amendments which are specifically aimed at stopping coercion being opposed by the supporters of the bill," he said, adding: "I don't think chances to make the bill safer have been taken." The two MPs have added their names to a growing list of their colleagues who have suggested they will switch sides including: Tory former minister George Freeman, Tory MPs Mike Wood and Andrew Snowden, Lib Dem Brian Matthew, Labour's Jonathan Hinder, Reform UK chief whip Lee Anderson and ex-Reform MP Rupert Lowe. Labour MP Debbie Abrahams and Tory MP Charlie Dewhirst, who abstained previously, will vote against. Labour's Karl Turner, who voted in favour at second reading, is now abstaining. Tory MP David Davis has not announced how he plans to cast his next vote, but has publicly backed a number of amendments that would make sweeping changes to the bill. Some MPs have also changed their stance, by supporting the bill. Minister Chris Bryant is understood to be backing it, having abstained in November. Labour MP Jack Abbott, who voted against last November, is also now likely to vote in favour. Others who were hesitantly supportive are now more firmly in favour. Liz Saville Roberts, the leader of Plaid Cymru at Westminster, said she was initially concerned but supported the principle of assisted dying. "I think the safeguards have got stronger," she said. "They have been improved through the bill committee and through the evidence that we heard." One of the changes made as the bill was scrutinised was allowing Senedd members a vote on whether it will apply in Wales. Despite opposition, supporters expect the bill to clear the Commons and go on to the House of Lords. Campaigners backing the bill do not expect many MPs to reverse their views - but with such tight margins, efforts to shore up support are in full swing. One major threat, for supporters of the bill, is MPs deciding to return home to their constituencies instead of voting. Due to a quirk of the parliamentary system, private members' bills are normally debated on Fridays - a day when MPs are normally in their constituencies. There is also growing concern that the government cannot afford to keep giving it parliamentary time. One Labour source told the BBC: "Given the huge amount of difficult issues the government face, from winter fuel payments and Personal Independence Payment to defence and special educational needs and disabilities spending, a tight vote on assisted dying becomes a real problem. "Lots of MPs think No 10 would be unwise to expend political capital continuing with this very divisive issue rather than choosing to fix the stuff we got elected to sort." Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.

Disability rights advocates encourage senators to vote against Big, Beautiful, Bill
Disability rights advocates encourage senators to vote against Big, Beautiful, Bill

Yahoo

time20 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Disability rights advocates encourage senators to vote against Big, Beautiful, Bill

IOWA (KCAU) — Disability rights advocates joined forces on June 5. They encouraged Iowa senators to vote against the president's so-called 'Big, Beautiful, Bill' due to the ramifications Iowans would face. The group 'Protect Our Care Iowa' said that the bill would cut Medicaid to over 600k Iowans, including 81k people with disabilities. Advocates for the bill say it cuts waste, fraud, and abuse, but the group says it's a way to cut services to the most vulnerable and offer tax cuts to the wealthy. Zach Mecham, medicaid recipient and disability rights advocate, said, 'I know throughout my history of disability advocacy that all of these policies, whether they're aimed at efficiency, or fraud, or abuse, or privatizing healthcare. I know that they all, based on my personal experience, trickle down and harm people like me.' The bill is in the hands of the U.S. Senate. Lawmakers said their goal is for it to be on the President's desk by the Fourth of July. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store