Indiana lawmakers pushing for tougher penalties for failing to report child abuse
Indiana lawmakers are considering a measure that would toughen the penalty for failing to report child abuse at schools, gyms, hospitals, daycares and other institutions.
House Bill 1412 would make it a class A misdemeanor for employees or volunteers to knowingly fail to report child abuse or neglect to police or the Indiana Department of Child Services. Repeat violators would face a level six felony.
The change would result in a higher maximum sentence of a year in prison and a $5,000 fine, or 2.5 years and $10,000 for repeat offenders. The maximum sentence under current law is six months and $1,000.
The bill would also require law enforcement to investigate whether an institution failed to report abuse when the alleged abuser is a staff member, coach or volunteer.
The measure, introduced by state Rep. Becky Cash, R-Zionsville, is intended to address the kind of high-profile failures that allowed widespread abuse in USA Gymnastics and other organizations.
"The country watched in horror as we learned that not only had some of our most elite gymnasts been horrifically abused, but that the cover up was pervasive and widespread," Cash said during a recent hearing on the bill. "As these stories played out, we learned that USA Gymnastics, based out of Indiana, had not only failed to make reports, but had actually told coaches and gymnasts that they would handle the accusations themselves."
She was referencing a scandal that an IndyStar investigation first exposed in 2016. Reporters found that the sport's national governing body failed to report concerns about the sexual abuse of its athletes to authorities. The failures included a five-week delay in reporting longtime USA Gymnastics team doctor Larry Nassar, who has since been accused of abusing hundreds of athletes.
"It was clear that despite being mandated reporters in the state of Indiana, these reports had not been made, and many young lives were devastated," Cash said. "A question remains: If we are all mandated reporters, where was the fallout for those who knowingly failed to make the reports?"
In Indiana, where USA Gymnastics is headquartered, the law requires anyone who has "reason to believe" that a child has been abused or neglected to "immediately" report it police or the Department of Child Services. However, nobody from the organization was ever prosecuted under the law.
USA Gymnastics isn't the only institution to receive scrutiny over its abuse reporting practices. IndyStar investigations have also uncovered reporting failures at schools and residential youth treatment centers.
Despite such findings, prosecutions for failing to report abuse are relatively uncommon. IndyStar found fewer than 30 convictions across the state over a five-year period from 2018 to 2023.
The new legislation has received support from child abuse prevention experts and investigators.
"The current system can fail children when there's a delay in reporting, an attempt to keep abuse quiet, or when somebody just chooses not to report at all," said Shannon Perry of the Children's Advocacy Center of Southeastern Indiana, an organization that facilitates forensic interviews with children on behalf of law enforcement.
Reporting delays can also make it difficult to hold perpetrators accountable, said Dawn Dobyns-Gross, a former investigator with the Tippecanoe County prosecutor's office.
"A time lag allows others to destroy evidence, hide child victims and witnesses, or alter crime scenes, significantly hindering our ability to protect children and gather evidence for prosecution," she said.
Administrators with IU Health and Riley Hospital for Children have expressed some reservations about the bill because many people on a child's care team may become aware of abuse concerns, including doctors, nurses and social workers. Requiring all of them to report suspected abuse would be inefficient for the hospital and investigators.
To address those concerns, lawmakers introduced a change to the bill on Wednesday that would allow the duty to report to be delegated to someone else involved in the child's care as long as both parties document the referral in writing.
Cash proposed a similar bill last year, but it failed to advance due to time constraints, she said. This year's measure has received unanimous approval from two House committees and is now headed to the full House. If approved, it will then move to the Senate for consideration.
Contact IndyStar reporter Tony Cook at 317-444-6081 or tony.cook@indystar.com. Follow him on X: @IndyStarTony.
This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Indiana bill would toughen penalties for failing to report child abuse
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indianapolis Star
8 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Here's what the woman forcibly removed from Indianapolis meeting wanted to say
Standing outside the City-County Building on June 9 after sheriff's deputies forcibly removed her, Lauren Roberts — a former deputy campaign manager for Mayor Joe Hogsett and the first woman to accuse the mayor's top aide of sexual harassment — read the statement she had planned to share with the Indianapolis City-County Council before she was kicked out. "If I could tell my younger self what Joe Hogsett and his then-campaign manager, Thomas Cook, were about to put me through," Roberts said of her time working for Hogsett from November 2014 to June 2015, during his first mayoral run, "I would tell her to run away and don't look back." Law enforcement's aggressive removal of Roberts is the latest eruption in a conflict made public in July 2024, when IndyStar reported Roberts and two other women's allegations that Cook pressured them toward intimacy and unwanted sexual encounters while he served as their boss under Hogsett. To investigate the claims, the city hired the Chicago-based law firm Fisher Phillips to conduct an investigation. The 54-page final report released May 29 found that the Hogsett administration followed the law in handling the women's claims. But investigators highlighted ethical concerns around Hogsett's decision to allow Cook to resign in 2020, more than two months after an internal recommendation to fire him. What further outraged Roberts and another Cook accuser, however, is what did not appear in the report: that the mayor, who was married and more than 30 years older than each woman at the time, sent them late-night and personal texts alluding to poetry. Fisher Phillips investigators have declined to comment on the omissions. Cook in the past apologized for his conduct. Hogsett, meanwhile, has defended his handling of his past investigations into Cook and did not address IndyStar's questions about the text exchanges. In her statement, Roberts called the Fisher Phillips report a "political performance" because the text messages were left out and Cook wasn't subpoenaed to testify — an authority granted to the council's Investigative Committee. "Fisher Phillips' report made glaring omissions in favor of the mayor's version of events, made sloppy errors about basic facts that we backed with overwhelming documentation, and frequently, in the most misogynistic way, characterized survivors' statements as claims while the mayor's were treated as facts," Roberts said in her statement outside the council meeting. At the June 9 meeting, the council voted to postpone the final $300,000 payment to Fisher Phillips until councilors learn more about why the law firm left out certain details. The council said its Administrative and Finance Committee would hear public comment on the report in its next hearing on June 17 at 5:30 p.m. During her official comments to the council, Roberts spoke for about 10 seconds before a councilor interrupted her to ask whether her speech was relevant to the meeting agenda. After Roberts restarted and accused councilors of trying to silence her with "manipulative back-room conversations," Council President Vop Osili interrupted Roberts. 'You're welcome to have me hauled out by sheriffs, but I'm going to take my time," Roberts told Osili. 'You will have two minutes," Osili replied, invoking the standard time limit for public comment, "and when you are done with that two minutes, you will be done." When the two minutes were up, Osili said, "Ms. Roberts, you are now done." After she refused to stop talking and leave the microphone, Osili said, "Sheriff, you will remove anyone who is talking at this point." Multiple sheriff's deputies pushed Roberts out of the room while she resisted and told them to stop touching her. "It is never a pleasure to escort someone from our room," Osili told media after the meeting. "But we have a sense of order here and we have rules that we have followed … for a very long time. And others have had to abide by those. When someone indicates or says that they will talk for as long as they like, it's not something that this council can stand with." Roberts' overarching message to councilors Monday night was that they should call for Hogsett to resign. So far, three councilors — Democrat Andrew Nielsen, Democratic socialist Jesse Brown and Republican Joshua Bain, who announced his demand Tuesday — have called on Hogsett to resign. Councilor Crista Carlino, chair of the investigative committee, said after Monday's meeting that she was "deeply considering" that possibility. In her statement, Roberts chastised all the councilors for failing to act. "Survivors, whistleblowers, city workers and campaign staff who speak out about abuse are not the problem for the Democratic party, for this administration, or for this council," Roberts said. "Abusers are the problem. Your constituents cannot afford for you to spend another moment wringing your hands or claiming that your role is limited to policymaking."


Indianapolis Star
19 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indianapolis family waited months for arrest in son's death. They aren't alone
The long, agonizing wait for justice didn't make sense to Alexander Melton's family. Indianapolis police knew the identity of the driver who slammed into his 2014 Kia Optima at the intersection of East McCarty Street and Madison Avenue on Feb. 22. She'd stayed at the scene. The family saw a video of the driver screaming about her phone as bystanders tried to save Melton and the severely injured woman and baby who were his Uber passengers. After being taken to the hospital, police tried to tell the woman someone died in the crash, but she kept interrupting the officer's explanation; all she appeared to care about was her phone. At one point, out of frustration, a police officer ordered her to stop talking so he could tell her of Melton's death, according to court documents. Why, then, wasn't she arrested that night? That's a question Melton's family asked themselves for months? 'We wanted to know why police would take so long to arrest her,' said his mother Laura Melton. It's a common frustration for many families seeking justice for their family members killed in fatal accidents. "While the community may understandably want quick action, investigators often need time to carefully piece together the facts and make sure any arrest is supported by solid, admissible evidence," said an IMPD spokesperson. In Melton's case, police were waiting for a toxicology report. Police had told his family they needed the report before they filed charges on the woman who killed Melton. "Which I understood after they told me, but it was still hard," Laura Melton told IndyStar. For months, Melton's family waited to see if their son would receive justice. They hoped the driver who caused the accident would be behind bars by the time the man they called a "shimmering light in this dark world" was buried. They waited even as photos of the other driver enjoying her life appeared in their social media feeds. The images of her partying in Indianapolis and Bloomington, while their son was in a grave, felt cruel and unfair. It's not uncommon for families such as Melton's to wait weeks or months to see their loved one's day of justice. However, some never experience that moment. A majority of deaths from motor vehicle crashes don't result in the driver being charged with a serious offense for the crash, according to a 2024 Pew Research Center study. Out of the 23 fatal crashes IMPD has investigated through May 2025, investigators have made only five arrests. Investigations are continuing in several other fatal crashes, the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department said in an email to IndyStar. However, IMPD noted these investigations take time to conclude, and in some cases, an arrest may not be the appropriate action. Melton's case wasn't typical. It was one of the few cases in which IMPD appeared to have ample evidence related to the woman responsible for the crash. Once police received the toxicology report, they had everything needed before filing the case with the county prosecutor. The report showed her blood alcohol level could have been as high as 0.143% at the time of the crash, which is close to twice the legal limit in Indiana. Her test also showed that Delta-9 THC was present in her system. More: 'He knew God got him': Family searches for other victims in fatal crash Police ultimately arrested her and prosecutors charged her with 10 felonies, most of which were related to her operating a vehicle while either intoxicated and under the influence of a Schedule 1 or 2 controlled substance that resulted in death or serious bodily injury. She was also charged with reckless homicide. 'She needs to be held accountable for this. I'm glad that the process is beginning,' Laura Melton said. Laura Melton believed things would be easier after the driver was arrested and charged with her son's death. But it soon became clear the pain would never leave her. A new wave of emotions hit the family after attending the driver's initial hearing on May 13. 'My daughter Rainey, she's been one of the strongest people throughout this whole process, but when we walked out of the court today, she was in tears,' Laura Melton said. 'And this is one of the easiest hearings, it was just formal charges. I know we will have a lot more harder days ahead of us.' It's a bittersweet feeling many families will never be able to experience. 'Even if we get justice for my son," Laura Melton said, "it's not going to bring him back.' IndyStar uses discretion in naming people accused of crimes, considering the severity of charges and available information, among other factors. Suspects may not be named if ongoing reporting of the associated court proceedings is not immediately planned.


Indianapolis Star
a day ago
- Indianapolis Star
'We won't allow facts to be buried': Hogsett investigative report omissions raise concerns
Republicans and a few Democrats on the Indianapolis City-County Council want answers about why the investigation probing misconduct in Mayor Joe Hogsett's administration omitted any mention of the mayor's late-night and personal text messages to two female junior staffers in its final report. IndyStar reported last week that Caroline Ellert and Lauren Roberts — two former Hogsett staffers who alleged Hogsett's former chief of staff Thomas Cook harassed and assaulted them — provided information to the law firm investigators compiling the report that did not appear in it. Some councilors are arguing to withhold the $450,000 payment for the report until the law firm, Chicago-based Fishers Phillips, answers questions about the omission. The text messages the women provided to investigators contradicted some of what appears in the final report — including Hogsett's assertion that he knew nothing about Roberts' personal life. Instead, the text messages showed that Hogsett knew Roberts' then-partner's name and joked that she needed his permission to date the partner. Council Democrat John Barth called June 9 for the city to withhold payments to the law firm Fisher Phillips until the investigators address why they did not include this information in the report. In addition, Barth raised concerns about "clear discrepancies" between the mayor's public statements and the "documented evidence shared by two survivors." "Their accounts suggest that the culture of inappropriate conduct extended to the highest levels of city leadership," Barth said. "It appears that the 'tone at the top' was set by the mayor himself." Council Minority Leader Michael-Paul Hart, a Republican, also said in a statement that the public "deserves transparency, and survivors deserve accountability." "We won't allow facts to be buried or voices to be ignored," Hart said. Council Republicans also called for several additional action steps, including an oversight hearing, more documentation from Fisher Phillips and a public addendum to the report "documenting evidence and findings omitted from the official version." Hogsett did not dispute the accuracy of the text messages but declined to answer IndyStar's specific questions about them. Instead, he said in a June 5 statement that "there have been many lessons learned and I believe working together we can continue to move our city forward." Meanwhile, two other council members—Democratic Socialist Jesse Brown and Democrat Andy Nielsen — have so far both called on Hogsett to resign. After the law firm's report release but before the two women publicly shared their texts from the mayor, Nielsen said the mayor's actions constituted a leadership failure. The Fisher Phillips report found that despite a recommendation from Human Resources that Cook be fired from his city job in 2020, Hogsett allowed Cook to stay on for 68 days to work on economic development projects and then resign. Cook was also heavily involved in his 2023 mayoral campaign. The rest of the Democratic caucus —led by Democratic Council President Vop Osili, Vice President Ali Brown, and Majority Leader Maggie Lewis — did not immediately respond to IndyStar's request for comment on the omissions from the report. Democrats have a supermajority on the council. Barth's statement didn't address whether the mayor should stay in office but said there should be "accountability at every level." As a matter of process, it's not up to the City-County Council whether Hogsett stays in office. An impeachment process exists, but is largely controlled by the Indiana General Assembly. Recall elections also don't exist here. More: Can Indiana mayors be removed from office? There's a law, but it's rare, experts say. But the calls for accountability are politically significant, even if councilors can't take direct action. The mayor losing political support on the City-County Council could impact his ability to effectively govern. As one of two Republicans on the council's seven-member Investigative Committee that hired Fisher Phillips to investigate Hogsett, Councilor Joshua Bain said the firm's lawyers wouldn't answer the committee's questions about their findings throughout the monthslong investigation. Now councilors are left with what feels like an incomplete report, Bain said. 'I felt like this report is actually going to end up making things worse and people are going to continue to not feel heard," Bain said. "People are going to continue to think things are getting swept under the rug." In a February Council meeting, Fisher Phillips lawyers reviewed their investigative methods in a presentation to councilors but kept their specific findings secret. Bain and fellow Republican Brian Mowery said they asked multiple follow-up questions about the hundreds of pages of documents the lawyers said they had gathered, their meetings with city leaders and any search terms that lawyers were singling out in text messages. "Because this is an interim report, we prefer to keep the details of what's been discussed and what we've found very high-level," Fisher Phillips Danielle Kays responded at the time, "because disclosing information could affect the integrity of our investigation and what information is provided to us or told to us." To restore public trust, Bain called on the lawyers to answer questions about their process now. Fisher Phillips did not answer multiple questions from IndyStar sent last week about why the text messages that contradict assertions in the report were not included. "Fisher Phillips is being paid $450,000," Bain said. "I think the least they can do is set some time aside and do a follow-up hearing with us." Committee Chairwoman Crista Carlino did not respond to IndyStar's request for comment on Monday, though council members indicated on May 29 that their work to stop future abuse from happening to city workers was just beginning. The ordinance that created the investigative committee indicates the council would prepare its own report that would detail "the conclusion of their investigation, including the method of their investigation and any evidence discovered." The Hogsett administration previously also said it would seek to work with the council on recommendations from the report, which included dissolving the city's current HR department in favor of an independent structure. Meanwhile, an impending June 9 evening City-County Council meeting has garnered interest by those calling for Hogsett's resignation. The group Indiana Progressive Democrats has called on Hogsett to resign and urged people to show up to the Monday evening meeting. "Stand with survivors, workers and every resident who believes in a better Indianapolis," according to the group's Facebook post. "Our presence shows that we will not accept silence or complicity any longer." Democrats also met privately over the weekend to discuss the situation, according to someone close to the caucus who asked to remain anonymous because they were not authorized to disclose Democratic caucus meetings. They did not share any conclusions that were reached or any details of that meeting.