logo
Columbus school board weighs defying state law, but tables transgender bathroom policy update

Columbus school board weighs defying state law, but tables transgender bathroom policy update

Yahoo05-02-2025

The Columbus City Schools Board of Education is weighing whether to defy state law and keep its transgender bathroom policy before a new state law requiring compliance takes effect this month.
But the board tabled action following a second reading at its meeting Tuesday after hearing from district General Counsel James Barnes about the legal risks involved with disregarding state law.
Board President Michael Cole said the board wanted to honor the wishes of the community.
"They're asking of us to maintain an environment, spaces for them in school buildings and elsewhere that give them full acknowledgement — that includes bathroom use," Cole said.
When asked by The Dispatch about what he thought the ramifications of defying the state government could be as negotiations over school funding in the state budget begins, Cole said tabling the discussion allowed them "to leverage the opportunity to take an educated approach to this."
"We want to have the opportunity to further deliberate around what those punitive actions could possibly be," Cole said.
At the board's last meeting, members weighed whether to update the existing board policy on transgender issues to comply with state law or to simply delete the policy. The district's legal counsel said they would also be compliant if they simply deleted their current policy.
The new Ohio law, Senate Bill 104, requires K-12 and college students at public and private schools to use bathrooms and locker rooms that match their sex assigned at birth. It also bans multi-occupancy, gender-neutral restrooms and prevents transgender students from sharing overnight accommodations with peers of the same gender. Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine signed the law in November and it takes effect Feb. 25.
More: Columbus City school board weighs dropping transgender policy, other changes under new law
A separate law signed in January also requires schools to disclose a student's health records to parents.
During public comment on Tuesday, a number of people spoke and urged the board to defend transgender students' ability to use the bathroom of the gender with which they identify.
Kari Kendzerski, a parent of two students in the district, said that the state legislature was making it clear that "schools are no longer a place for safety, learning and growth" for transgender students.
"This is cruel and this is dangerous," Kendzerski said. "This (proposed district) policy put students lives at risk, these students that sit in your classrooms, play with your children on the playground, eat with them in the cafeteria and ride the bus with them to the field trips."
Before the vote, Cole suggested that the district flout the state law and vote to reaffirm the existing policy in support of transgender students.
However, attorney Barnes warned board members that by keeping the current policy the board would be in violation of the law and ethics, and would be risking legal exposure to the board and individual members. He also expressed caution that staff and building administrators also could be found liable operating under the current policy.
'There is legal exposure to the board for violating the law. Our ethics dictate that you don't violate the law,' Barnes said.
During the meeting, board Vice President Jennifer Adair reflected on a passage from Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from a Birmingham Jail," where "he asks us to consider whether a law is just or unjust."
"My soul is questioning whether or not we have to figure out in this moment if we will fight in a way that allows us, as you are suggesting, President Cole, to follow what Dr. Martin Luther King says, and not follow an unjust law," Adair said. "I can't help but think about where we are at a moment in time, in history … We know what's coming, and we have to figure out how and when we are going to fight or what we're going to do."
Board Member Sarah Ingles agreed that Ohio's "Bathroom Bill" was unjust, but also said the district needs to choose its fights. Legal exposure and the potential cost for ignoring state law could be damaging to the district, she said.
"One lawsuit can be millions and millions and millions of dollars in a district where millions of dollars are whether or not you can feed children and keep the heat on and do the education programs that we need," Ingles said.
Ingles suggested that the practice of supporting transgender students could remain even if the policy is rescinded.
"Our practices do not have to change because the policy did," Ingles said.
The board also heard from Amanda Erickson, senior associate director of programs and operations at Kaleidoscope Youth Center, which supports LGBT youth.
Erickson said that the board should vote either to rescind the entire policy or keep it. By doing either of those, Erickson said, the district "will highlight the leadership of Ohio's largest school district while affirming its commitment to support and protect all students."
The proposed updates to the CCS district policy comply with state law, including removing language that allowed transgender students to use the bathroom and locker rooms corresponding with their gender identity and share overnight spaces with other students of their gender identity.
The new policy says transgender students can be accommodated with a single-user bathroom or changing area.
The proposed updates also say that faculty and staff "may" refer to students by their preferred pronouns, where it used to say faculty and staff "shall" do that.
The existing policy states that when staff or an administrator is required by law to provide a student's legal birth name or sex assigned at birth, they should "adopt policies avoiding the inadvertent disclosure of such confidential information." Existing policy also says the portion of student records relating to transgender students' preferred name and pronouns should be considered confidential and restricted.
Both sections have been struck from the proposed policy updates that had a second reading at Tuesday's meeting.
Cbehrens@dispatch.com
@Colebehr_report
This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Columbus school board debates defying state transgender bathroom law

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Columbus City Councilmember Barroso de Padilla denounces ICE cruelty, promises to protest
Columbus City Councilmember Barroso de Padilla denounces ICE cruelty, promises to protest

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Columbus City Councilmember Barroso de Padilla denounces ICE cruelty, promises to protest

As protesters in California continue to clash with law enforcement over Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids, Columbus City Councilmember Lourdes Barroso de Padilla denounced the federal government's immigration crackdown and commended peaceful protesters. "I stand in solidarity with brave individuals protesting in Los Angeles against the cruel and inhuman actions of ICE," Barroso De Padilla said. She made the comments from the dais at the beginning of the Columbus City Council meeting on June 9 while wearing a T-shirt touting that she is the daughter of immigrants. Born in Columbus, Barroso De Padilla is a first-generation Cuban-American. Barroso De Padilla told The Dispatch ahead of the meeting that she planned to attend a protest planned for the evening of June 10 in front of City Hall. Several pro-immigrant and left-leaning groups organized the "ICE Out!" protest, including 50501, the Ohio Immigrant Alliance, the Party for Socialism and Liberation Columbus, the La Raza Movement, and the Columbus Democratic Socialists of America. Related: As LA protests erupt, multiple demonstrations planned in Columbus this week "These protests are a reflection of the pain and outrage felt by communities across the country who have been torn apart by unjust immigration policies," Barroso de Padilla said. "These protests are not just about opposition. They are a call to action for leaders at every level to defend immigrant rights, to invest in communities rather than criminalize them and to build a system that treats all people with compassion and respect." Barroso de Padilla told The Dispatch ahead of the council meeting that President Donald Trump's administration committed to deporting criminals, and the federal government has overreached. Government and Politics Reporter Jordan Laird can be reached at jlaird@ Follow her on X, Instagram and Bluesky at @LairdWrites. This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Columbus Council member denounces ICE raids, supports peaceful protest

Columbus ICE Out! demonstration brings anti-Trump protesters Downtown
Columbus ICE Out! demonstration brings anti-Trump protesters Downtown

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Columbus ICE Out! demonstration brings anti-Trump protesters Downtown

Between 200 and 300 people gathered in downtown Columbus June 10 to protest the Trump administration's crackdown on immigration, show support for the city's immigrant communities, and to express solidarity with protesters in Los Angeles. Several pro-immigrant and left-leaning groups organized the "ICE Out!" protest, which took place June 10 at Columbus City Hall on West Broad Street. The Ohio Immigrant Alliance, 50501, the Party for Socialism and Liberation Columbus, the La Raza Movement and the Columbus Democratic Socialists of America organized the demonstration. Scores of protesters holding signs denouncing the Trump administration and showing support for immigrant communities were in attendance as organizers gave speeches and led pro-immigration, anti-Trump chants and slogans. Other protesters waved Palestinian flags and donned the traditional keffiyehs or held upside-down American flags, which is used as a signal of distress. Rene Levino, 69, of Pataskala, told The Dispatch that he attended the protest because as a Vietnam veteran, he felt obligated to continue to protect the country from what he called a "form of dictatorship." "I'll do whatever it takes to stand up for my country," said Levino, donning a black Vietnam veteran cap. "I just want our country back, and I want (Trump) to follow the law." James McCullough, 22, of Columbus, said that it was hypocritical that the United States relies on immigrant labor but at the same time is trying to have undocumented immigrants deported. McCullough also noted the plight that migrants from African countries face, such as Senegalese and Sudanese migrants. "(Immigration) is another race issue," said McCullough. The demonstration was entirely peaceful. After leaders led chants and gave speeches at Columbus City Hall for an hour, protesters walked onto Broad Street and marched eastbound before turning north onto High Street while still chanting. Columbus police officers, including officers from the division's dialogue team, largely stayed on the periphery of the crowd while temporarily shutting down street intersections so protesters could safely march through. The protesters marched past Columbus police headquarters as they continued back onto West Broad Street in front of Columbus City Hall. Protesters then dispersed without incident. Columbus City Council member Lourdes Barroso de Padilla said on June 9 that she would attend the protest, but The Dispatch could not immediately determine if she was in attendance. Columbus' ICE Out! protest was a sharp contrast to pictures and videos coming out of Los Angeles. Protests and outright riots have broken out in L.A. in response to ICE agents conducting immigration raids and arresting immigrants at businesses in the city. The protests there hit a boiling point on June 7, as masked protesters stormed city streets, hurling slabs of concrete, Molotov cocktails and other items at heavily armed and masked agents and law enforcement officers. Videos taken by both residents and protesters show rioters blocking highway traffic, facing off with law enforcement agencies and setting fire to Waymo self-driving cars. Law enforcement agencies deployed tear gas to disperse protesters and one officer was captured on video shooting an Australian reporter with a rubber bullet. A New York Post photographer was shot in the head with a rubber bullet by another officer on June 9. In an effort to quell the protests, President Donald Trump deployed a total of 4,000 National Guard troops and a Marine unit consisting of 700 soldiers from Camp Pendleton. Trump's actions drew rebuke from California's leaders, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has filed an emergency lawsuit against the Trump administration, accusing Trump and other officials from his administration of violating the Constitution and "trampling over" Newsom's authority. 'Donald Trump is creating fear and terror by failing to adhere to the U.S. Constitution and overstepping his authority. This is a manufactured crisis to allow him to take over a state militia, damaging the very foundation of our republic,' Newsom said in a prepared statement. Trump recently stated that he wants an additional 20,000 National Guard troops deployed to LA. The deployment of National Guard troops and the Marine battalion is expected to cost around $134 million, according to reporting from USA TODAY. The addition of 20,000 National Guard troops would cost around $3.6 billion. Several "No Kings" protests are scheduled in central Ohio in defiance of the large military parade Trump is holding in Washington, D.C. to commemorate the Army's 250th birthday on June 14, which is also President Trump's birthday. On June 10, Trump said he expected protesters to try and ruin the parade and warned that they would be met with "very big force." Central Ohio protests scheduled include: An Indivisible Central Ohio No Kings protest from 8:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. during the Stonewall Columbus Pride March A No Kings Hilliard protest at Warehouse 839 from 4:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. A No Kings Clintonville protest at the intersection of North Broadway and Indianola Avenue from 12 p.m. to 2 p.m. A No Kings: National Day of Action protest at Westerville City Hall from 3 to 4 p.m. A No Kings Grove City protest from 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. A No Kings Pickerington protest at the intersection of State Route 256 and Refugee Road from 12 p.m. to 2 p.m. A No Kings Delaware protest at Delaware City Hall from 12 p.m. to 1 p.m. A No Kings London protest at the Madison County Courthouse from 12 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. Reporter Shahid Meighan can be reached at smeighan@ at ShahidMeighan on X, and at on Bluesky. This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Columbus protest opposes Trump, support LA demonstrations

Hegseth questions Air Force plan to buy E-7, touts space-based recon
Hegseth questions Air Force plan to buy E-7, touts space-based recon

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Hegseth questions Air Force plan to buy E-7, touts space-based recon

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday cast doubt on the future utility of airborne battle management aircraft, particularly the E-7 Wedgetail, and said space-based capabilities represent the future of intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance. Hegseth's skepticism of the E-7 and touting of space intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, or ISR, may presage a split between the Pentagon's top leadership and Air Force leaders and some lawmakers who feel that airborne assets are still the best option for managing battlefields. The Air Force wants to buy 26 Boeing-made E-7s, which have been flown for years by Australia and are being bought by other nations such as the United Kingdom, to replace its fleet of aging E-3 Sentry airborne warning and control system, or AWACS, planes. The AWACS, with its unmistakable massive radar dome high atop its fuselage, has been in service since the late 1970s, but is approaching the end of its life, and its capabilities are falling short in many ways. But while Air Force leaders often speak about the E-7's importance for the service's future battlefield needs, reports have swirled in recent months that the White House is seriously considering scrapping the Air Force's plans to buy the planes in favor of a space-based option. The Pentagon is researching shifting moving target indication — the use of radar or other technology to identify and track targets and tell them apart from friendly or civilian assets — to satellites instead of aircraft, but top officials have said those demonstrations have not yet shown enough data to draw conclusions and that both air- and space-based systems will be needed. In Tuesday's House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense hearing, Oklahoma Republican Rep. Tom Cole — whose district includes Tinker Air Force Base, where most of the service's 16 remaining E-3s are stationed — stressed the importance of bringing on the E-7 to replace the AWACS. While space-based ISR shows promise, Cole said, aircraft like the E-7 bring capabilities that will still be needed even when those satellites are operational. 'It's not a new technology,' Cole said of the E-7. 'Our friends in Australia use it. Our friends in the United Kingdom use it. It's much superior to what we have.' Hegseth responded that the Pentagon is rethinking its investments, in part based on lessons learned from the war in Ukraine and from watching China's own military modernizations. And if systems will not be able to survive in a modern war, or give the U.S. enough of an advantage, Hegseth said, 'We have to make the tough decisions right now.' 'It's our job to fund those new systems and make tough calls,' Hegseth said. 'So the E-7 is an example of that. We're going to fund existing platforms that are there more robustly and make sure they're modernized. But we believe most of the ISR, or a great deal of ISR, in the future will be space-based.' 'We're funding capabilities that will surpass some of those airborne capabilities,' Hegseth continued. 'So we're willing to continue to review things like the E-7. But from our view, investments in existing systems that carry forward that capability alongside even bigger investments in space-based ISR gives us the kind of advantages we need on a future battlefield.' Cole said Hegseth made a 'fair point,' but asked him to use caution when shifting course on the E-7 procurement. 'We got a platform here that works,' Cole said of the E-7. 'Space is great. It's unknown. It's undeveloped. And I would just urge you to look at this pretty carefully as you make the decision.' The Air Force declined to comment on Hegseth's remarks on the E-7. In a separate hearing on May 6, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin said satellites are not yet ready to take over all airborne moving target indication missions, even though they provide crucial sensing capabilities. Former Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall said in a May interview with Defense News that a satellite-based moving target indication capability still faces several technical challenges, including whether it could have enough power, penetrate cloud cover and withstand enemy attacks. Kendall said a moving target indication system based entirely in space would take years to field and not be ready by the time the E-3 fleet would need to be retired.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store