
Mette Frederiksen: Denmark's PM on Trump, Russia and Greenland's Future
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen leads what consistently ranks as one of the world's most peaceful countries. Her office in the neo-baroque Christiansborg Palace overlooks a picturesque capital city as orderly as any in Europe. But at the top of her agenda is preparing for war. From the East there is a growing menace from Russia as it battles Ukraine and prepares for possible attacks elsewhere in Europe, Frederiksen tells Newsweek in an interview in Copenhagen.
At the same time, she must navigate Denmark's relationship with NATO ally the United States, which has been thrust into uncertainty by President Donald Trump's repeated assertions of his desire to take over Greenland, part of the Kingdom of Denmark.
Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen photographed for Newsweek magazine.
Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen photographed for Newsweek magazine.
Kasper Løftgaard
The world order established after World War II and the peaceful progress made since the end of the Cold War is in danger, Frederiksen says. That is, she believes, an immense challenge for a Europe that had grown accustomed to peace for 30 years and threatens to sideline other issues such as addressing climate change.
"It's like we convinced ourselves that everybody wants to be like us, or everybody seeks peace and wants peace. But it's not the case. Russia does not want peace. They want war," she says. "I think they are willing to attack again in Ukraine, or another place in Europe."
"I think it was an era. I think we are in the beginning of a new one with more uncertainty, an era that is more insecure and therefore also more dangerous. But I think the answers have to be the same. I mean that democracy has to win, and that all countries have to respect the UN Charter, so the principles have to be the same."
Danish PM Mette Frederiksen, Peter Strauss Halsboe Jørgensen, Strategic Advisor and Newsweek's Matthew Tostevin
Danish PM Mette Frederiksen, Peter Strauss Halsboe Jørgensen, Strategic Advisor and Newsweek's Matthew Tostevin
Kasper Løftgaard
Denmark is one of the smaller members of NATO and the European Union, with just under six million people—about the same number as Wisconsin. But it has been a pillar of both alliances, while sometimes taking a more independent line on European issues. Denmark rejected joining the euro and has retained its own currency, the krone, for example.
In European terms, support for Frederiksen, 47, is holding up relatively well after six years in office. She was recently labeled Europe's "least unpopular" leader by polling group YouGov. Frederiksen has a broader support base than many as a Social Democrat whose tough immigration policies have helped neutralize support for the far-right. She is known by many Danes as "Mother," in part for having guided the country through the COVID-19 pandemic.
Amager square, Strøget, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Amager square, Strøget, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dag Sundberg/Getty
The Greenland Issue
Just as unexpected as the threat to Europe's peace was the forcefulness of the confrontation with the world's most powerful leader over Greenland. In Trump's first term, the seriousness of his bid for the strategic Arctic island was in question. This time round, Frederiksen is sure he is serious.
"I have tried to de-escalate the situation, because in this world, with a very aggressive Russia, with a closer cooperation between Iran, North Korea and Russia, helped by China, I will do what I can to ensure that nothing goes wrong between allies and good friends and partners. But at the same time, we have to stick to the most important values and principles," she says.
Frederiksen picks her words carefully. There is a steeliness in her blue eyes and just the occasional thoughtful smile as she goes over the existential threats to the world she grew up with—one in which Denmark was ever grateful to the United States for its role in World War II and then challenging Soviet power. Trump has not ruled out using force to acquire Greenland, whose residents ultimately seek full independence from Denmark but oppose a U.S. takeover.
Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen (C), Greenland's acting head of government Múte Bourup Egede (R) and newly elected head of government Jens-Frederik Nielsen (L) are pictured in orange flight suits after a trip with a...
Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen (C), Greenland's acting head of government Múte Bourup Egede (R) and newly elected head of government Jens-Frederik Nielsen (L) are pictured in orange flight suits after a trip with a Danish Navy Sea Hawk helicopter from the Danish Navy inspection ship Vaedderen in the waters around Nuuk, Greenland, on April 3, 2025. More
MADS CLAUS RASMUSSEN/Ritzau Scanpix/AFP via Getty
"A situation where an ally attacks another ally would be very, very wrong, and it will challenge not only the relationship to the Kingdom of Denmark, but the trans-Atlantic relationship and that would be, I think, very dangerous for all of us," she says.
To address concerns voiced by Trump that Denmark could not defend Greenland in the face of Russian or Chinese confrontation, Frederiksen says it would be a priority for Denmark to step up its defense role in the Arctic in partnership with other NATO countries as well as to do more on Europe's eastern frontier.
Surfer honing his skills at the Amager Strandpark.
Surfer honing his skills at the Amager Strandpark.
Getty
Europe Has 'Made Mistakes' With Defense
The tariffs imposed by Trump on Europe to try to redress trade imbalances have been another source of friction with the U.S. As a member of the European Union, Denmark does not hold separate trade negotiations with the United States.
"I think a trade war will be a problem, not only for Europe, but for everybody, and therefore everything we're doing is to avoid it," she says. "What I'm trying to say to our American friends and colleagues is that there are so many challenges globally. At the moment, things are moving in the wrong direction."
At this dangerous moment, Europe has no choice but to rearm itself, Frederiksen says. That was not because the United States could not be trusted, but because Europe had been failing to do enough to defend itself—a theme echoed by officials in the Trump administration and elsewhere who say Europe was able to channel funds to its welfare states as Washington paid for its security umbrella.
Large demonstration for the Syrian migrants in Copenhagen closed to Christianborg Palace on November 9, 2016 in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Large demonstration for the Syrian migrants in Copenhagen closed to Christianborg Palace on November 9, 2016 in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frédéric Soltan/Corbis via Getty
"It has been a mistake that after the end of the Cold War that we reduced our military budgets in a big part of Europe. It was a mistake, and maybe one of the most important things right now is to agree that it will never happen again," she says. "We have to be able to defend ourselves, to deter Russia, and I don't think it's fair to ask somebody else to come and defend you if you're not willing to do it yourself."
Relative to its economic might, Denmark has been one of the biggest financial supporters of Ukraine since the Russian invasion in 2022. Frederiksen says it would be "a disaster" if Russia won the war.
"We are being too naive if we are only focusing on Ukraine," she says. "I've never believed that this war is only about Ukraine. It is about Ukraine and thereby paying the highest price, but it is about Europe, and it is about the imperial dreams in Russia."
Attacks were already happening, Frederiksen says.
"If you look at the situation now, maybe it's on a daily basis or almost a daily basis that you see attacks from Russia: hybrid attacks, cyberattacks, disinformation. They are trying to change democratic elections," she continues.
"I think we have one question we have to ask ourselves in Europe: If we are not willing to stand up for ourselves, to protect ourselves, then who are we?"
Building Stronger Ties
Frederiksen pauses occasionally to choose from the carrot and cucumber sticks placed alongside the coffee and tea on the meeting room table. Denmark is regularly ranked as one of the world's healthiest countries as well as being within the Top 10 of those on the Global Peace Index of the Institute for Economics and Peace. The streets of Copenhagen are abuzz with cyclists, with 36 percent of Danes commuting to work by bicycle at least once a week, compared with 0.6 percent of Americans.
With the questions over the U.S. relationship with Europe under the Trump administration, European countries have also been evaluating their relationships with China, which is now a bigger trade partner for many of them but also has a "strategic partnership" with Russia.
"The answer is building a strong Europe and a strong Europe that is open-minded and able to work, of course, globally, with different partners, including China," she says. "I want us to be able to produce the technologies that we need on our own, all with partners with whom we always share the same interest with... To make a strategic choice now, less U.S., more China will be, I think, not the right way forward."
Green Transition Under Threat
One point that Frederiksen wants to stress in the face of the litany of global problems is the concern that climate change is now being sidelined. Denmark has become a leader in green energy—particularly from the winds that all too often bluster the country pinned between the North Sea and the Baltic. More than half of Denmark's electricity supply comes from wind energy, five times more than in the U.S.
Elsewhere in Europe, the shift to renewables has prompted concerns over higher energy prices from the use of less stable sources of energy as well as the risks of outages to power supplies themselves.
A Danish Leopard 2 main battle tank prepares as a U.S. soldier looks on during the U.S. Army Europe and Africa International Tank Challenge on February 11, 2025 at Grafenwoehr, Germany.
A Danish Leopard 2 main battle tank prepares as a U.S. soldier looks on during the U.S. Army Europe and Africa International Tank Challenge on February 11, 2025 at Grafenwoehr, Germany.
Sean Gallup/Getty/Getty
Trump, meanwhile, has voiced skepticism over climate change and declared a national energy emergency in order to ramp up production of coal, oil and gas, which emit the carbon dioxide many scientists say is causing global temperatures to rise.
"I have this feeling that climate change, the green transition renewables, you know, there's not the focus that just was there a few years ago," Frederiksen says.
"To make Denmark and Europe less dependent on foreign fossil fuels and more competitive, the green transition is the solution—not the problem. Expanding our own clean energy production and investing in energy infrastructure that further connects Europe is a fundamental prerequisite for strengthening our continent. At the same time, it reduces emissions and tackles climate change."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
24 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
19 US Military Members Share Thoughts On Donald Trump
Recently, we asked active and reserve US military members and veterans to share their honest thoughts on Donald Trump and the Trump administration, and they got incredibly candid. Amid Veterans Affairs layoffs, jeopardizing America's relationship with long-standing allies like Canada, and even using the military as a backdrop for Trump's political rallies, here's how veterans and US military members are responding: "Nine-year veteran here. I think Trump is using executive orders to bypass checks and balances among the three branches. Trump's actions make it look like he thinks he is above the law, which is similar to every other dictator in history. It's sad that the judicial and legislative branches don't have more backbone to defend the Constitution against this clown." —Anonymous "I served for over 23 years before retiring. I'm now realizing I may have to pick up arms again because there are too many idiots in the country and in the US military." "I've been Active Duty for 13 years. The way the military has evolved over the years — with all the DEI stuff — has been hard to deal with. I'm glad to see it gone, as I believe that service should be merit-based for promotion. I also like the fact that we project strength now." "I retired from the USAF. I served during the Cold War, when we kept Russia at arm's length because we knew they couldn't be trusted. Two of my sons served; my daughter-in-law is serving in the Air Force, and my son-in-law is in the Army. I have discouraged two grandsons and three strangers from joining the military, and THAT hurts my heart. I never thought I'd do that. A dangerous man is in charge. God help us." —magicalsquid60 "He's the worst president in my lifetime. Him calling veterans 'suckers and losers' says it all!" "I'm a veteran and physician. I just hope that active military members remember that their oath is to the Constitution, not a wannabe dictator. I'm glad I'm at the end of my life, but I feel bad for my son and the younger generations who will suffer for Trump's megalomania. He and his puppets break the Constitution with impunity. And, as a physician, I'm appalled at RFK Jr. being the Secretary of Health." "I believe this country — effectively a plutocracy — is rapidly becoming an oligarchy. Politics aside, I'm mostly dependent on Social Security retirement, VA disability, and subsidized housing, so I'm quite apprehensive about the current administration's attack on all three of those programs. Every day, it seems like we're reverting back to the '50s." "I'm currently serving in the Army Reserve and spent 10 years on active duty. The majority of people I work with are glad Trump won, and so am I. As soldiers, we pray for peace while preparing for war. Finally, someone is in charge who will keep us out of war. Strong men make peace while weak ones start wars." —Anonymous "I have 30 years of active and reserve duty, primarily during the Cold War. We didn't have Trump and the MAGAs when I served, but I imagine that many in service now may agree with their policies. However, many civilians may not realize that military members have it drilled into them that the US military should not get involved in politics on a professional level. I cannot imagine any service member from my generation taking an active part in action against the American public based on orders coming down the Chain of Command. I don't think that aspect of military service has changed. For those afraid that Trump has no guardrails left in his second term, I believe the military can keep him in check if he ever looks to them to support actions against the Constitution, regardless of his justifications. I want to believe that service members won't shrink from standing up to a dictator." "I'm an 80-year-old veteran, and I'm completely appalled by what Trump is committing. I am disgusted, and I feel like our democracy is on the verge of complete collapse." "Never in my life would I have thought I'd ever say the following: Trump, his entire administration, and the entire MAGA cult make me ashamed to be an American! I predict that Trump will declare himself to be the 'Leader of America' for life before the end of his current term. From an Air Force retiree, I fear another civil war is coming." "I voted for President Trump twice and have served a total of 26 years: 16 active and 10 reserve. At 69 years old, I have no regrets serving all that time or voting for him. I'd do it again, actually." —Anonymous "I'm a veteran. I voted for Trump the first time, but I didn't vote for him the last. He's doing exactly what I thought he would do: be a bully. He talks to our allies the way he should be talking to Putin and his thugs. To me, Trump is disgusting and an embarrassment to our great country. Everything he says is a lie. I don't blame our allies for fighting back; Trump is poison to good people, and I'll be glad when he disappears from office." "I'm a 23-year retiree, and I'm embarrassed that I ever served. I feel like I wasted my life in the military. Politicians only care about politicians. I've been shit on by both sides of the aisle, but Republicans have clearly painted veterans to be 'entitled' individuals. We get treated like shit under President Trump." "I'm a Cold War vet, and there is absolutely nothing that the current administration can do to convince me that they are not compromised by Russian agents. Today's military leaders need to make sure that their troops know the difference between an illegal order and a lawful one! I see no reason to trust our current political leaders." —edgynugget757 "As a retiree and veteran, I think Trump is doing a great job, and I hope he keeps it up. For those who say they took an oath to defend the Constitution from foreign and domestic enemies, where were you during the last presidency? Now that was a real clown show. The world was laughing at the United States because of the stumbling, bumbling moron. I don't know any service member who supported Joe Biden or his pathetic Vice President." "I served in the US Army for 33 years under President Reagan, all the way through President Obama. The former Soviet Union has been our enemy since the end of WWII, yet Trump gives them aid and comfort. He pardoned those who partook in an insurrection, and he totally disregards his oath to support the Constitution. I believe he will go down as one of the worst presidents the United States has ever had. I am thankful that I do not currently serve, because I would find it very difficult to obey his orders. I am sad to say that I am extremely disappointed in the American voters for electing a convicted felon, and a person so unworthy to lead this country and represent us on a world stage." "After giving the Air Force four years of my life for my country, I am now ashamed to be an American! Having turned on our most important allies and treating our fellow Americans like numbers by terminating their jobs without can anyone respect a moron like the one we have in charge now? I fear for the future of my grandchildren and can only hope we can last until he is replaced! The sooner, the better!" Lastly: "It appears Trump is consolidating power by forcing qualified people out of their positions and placing MAGA puppets in their stead. As a veteran, I've not seen anything like this in my life. I weep for my country. Trump pardoned January 6 rioters, including those convicted of violent assaults, which undermines the accountability of justice and emboldens extremists to an alarming degree. Our oath was to the Constitution — how do we defend against an unlawful order from this country's leader when he pardons those who have attacked the Capitol? Follow the money. Trump is laying waste to our country while playing golf. I can only pray that our resilience as Americans will get us through the next four years. Stand up!" —purplephone528 If you're an active duty or reserve US military member or a veteran, what are your thoughts on Trump's presidency so far? Let us know in the comments, or you can anonymously voice your thoughts using the form below.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth won't rule out military actions against Greenland, Panama
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday would not rule out the possibility of a future military invasion of Greenland and Panama, suggesting to lawmakers the Pentagon may have plans for such a future strike. Appearing before the House Armed Services Committee, Hegseth asserted the department 'plans for any particular contingency' and said, 'I think the American people would want the Pentagon to have plans for anything.' Pressed by Republican lawmakers to dismiss the possibility of such a U.S. military attack on Greenland or Panama, Hegseth reiterated that the 'Pentagon has plans for any number of contingencies' and that officials 'look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats.' Democrats on the panel scoffed at those answers. 'I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland,' said committee ranking member, Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash. 'The message this sends to the rest of the world is one that the U.S. is purely in it for itself, and does not care about alliances.' Space Force commander fired after email DOD says 'undermined' JD Vance The issue of possible U.S. military intervention to take over Greenland, Panama, Canada and other allied territories has been a point of concern for months among critics of President Donald Trump. On social media and in White House comments, Trump has stated multiple times that Denmark should surrender control of Greenland for the good of global security, and that Canada should become the 51st state in the American union. Administration officials have downplayed those comments. Hegseth, in his first appearance before the committee, avoided directly responding to the claims, but said the United States government has significant interest in protecting the areas from Chinese influence or manipulation. Earlier this week, Denmark's Parliament approved legislation to allow new U.S. military bases on Danish soil, broadening an existing previous military agreement between the countries. But Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen in recent months has vowed to oppose any U.S. efforts to take over the Danish territory. The Pentagon, meanwhile, is likely to shift Greenland from U.S. European Command to U.S. Northern Command, the military body responsible for defense of the American homeland, Mexico and Canada. The change itself only involves redrawing the maps of U.S. combatant commands and handing over responsibility for the military forces in Greenland, but it has caused angst among some in Denmark who think the administration is trying to draw the territory closer to America.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The UK, Germany and Canada have slashed foreign aid this year, deepening damage done by US cuts, analysis shows
Western countries have slashed foreign aid budgets this year and reductions will steepen in 2026, with the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Canada cutting the most, according to a new analysis from the Center for Global Development (CGD). The aid cuts will mean 'significant losses' for many developing nations, according to the analysis from the DC-based think tank, shared exclusively with CNN. Ethiopia is projected to lose the most aid in nominal terms, with Jordan, Afghanistan and the Democratic Republic of Congo also hit particularly hard. Smaller nations will also be hammered by the reduction in foreign aid, with Lesotho, Micronesia and Eswatini each losing around 50% of their aid. 'It's setting fire to the bold ambitions to solve poverty and transform developing countries,' Lee Crawfurd, one of the authors of the report, told CNN. 'It's some of the poorest, most fragile places in the world that are going to be hardest hit.' The analysis looked at projections of bilateral aid – money provided directly to another country rather than routed through multilateral organizations such as United Nations agencies or the World Bank – for 2025 and 2026. The US is projected to cut the most, with a projected 56% reduction compared to levels two years ago. The Trump administration's gutting of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) earlier this year has already left a hole in many international aid budgets, and several other Western nations are following suit rather than filling the void. 'A big, big chunk of overall cuts in the next couple of years are going to be from the US pulling out, rather than other countries. But these other countries are making things worse,' said Crawfurd, a senior research fellow at the CGD. The UK aid cuts are estimated to represent a roughly 39% reduction compared to 2023 levels of spending. Meanwhile, Germany is cutting about 27%, Canada 25% and France 19% of their international aid budgets. The true level of aid cuts remains unclear, as the Trump administration's proposed budget and other government proposals are still making their way through legislatures. But some funding cuts are almost guaranteed. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced in February that his government would increase the UK's defense spending by cutting its aid budget to 0.3% of gross national income in 2027, its lowest level since 1999. Many organizations and aid workers have raised alarm about European governments pitting aid budgets against defense spending. 'Cutting the already lean aid budget is a false economy and will only increase division and amounts to a betrayal of the world's most vulnerable people,' said Halima Begum, head of Oxfam GB. 'It is a false dichotomy to pit international cooperation to tackle poverty against national security interests in order to avoid tax increases.' Crawfurd said that bilateral aid is a 'really small part of government budgets' and the money for defense or security could be found elsewhere. 'It's a choice… it's a political choice,' he added. The think tank wrote in its analysis that 'one striking takeaway is that some countries are projected to lose large amounts of ODA (official development assistance) simply because of who their main donors are – while others are projected to lose very little' – a game of chance, with losses not matching up to the recipient country's needs. Yemen, for example, is projected to experience a 19% fall in its bilateral funding compared to 2023, while its 'comparable' neighbor country Somalia is projected to lose about 39%. The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) has also warned that multilateral aid cuts are threatening efforts to tackle 44 of the highest-priority, protracted humanitarian crises. As of April, only 11.9% of the funding for UN response plans had been covered. 'Every year, the UN has been helping more than 100 million people in the world as they go through the worst time of their lives in wars and disasters. But let's be clear: we won't reach the level of funding in 2025 that we've seen in previous years,' Anja Nitzsche, OCHA's chief of partnerships and resource mobilization told CNN in a statement. 'Vulnerable families are being left without food, clean water, healthcare, shelter or protection in places such as Sudan, Yemen, Ukraine, Myanmar and Afghanistan.' The CGD is urging Western donors to reallocate aid to the poorest countries to try to 'ensure that resources are directed to populations in greatest need.' Western countries also need to improve coordination to mitigate further damage, especially as they are withdrawing from countries receiving aid, the think tank said. In some countries, the cuts will change who the largest donor is, which 'can lead to major shifts in what gets funded and how,' according to the CGD. For example, Portugal will likely overtake the US in aid to Angola, and Japan is projected to overtake France in Egypt. 'A new lead donor may not continue the same programs' or may take time to get up and running, according to the analysis. Giving a larger share of aid to multilateral organizations can also help improve international cooperation and cut down on duplication of aid efforts. 'Coordination is an ongoing challenge,' Crawfurd told CNN. 'The easiest way to do that is just to fund big multilateral funds like the World Bank.'