Threat of US-China land grab in space demands urgent legal reforms
The United States is in an arms race with China, similar to the one it had with the Soviet Union during the Cold War.
Space is being militarised as Beijing and Washington are on a course to dismantle the few current limits on space competition devised in that earlier era.
America set a lander down on Mars in 1976, and Nasa is working to land humans
on the moon again by the end of this decade. Nasa also plans for a
crewed Mars mission in the 2030s, with Elon Musk setting SpaceX's goal for crewed landings as early as 2029.
What rules will govern the establishment of a human presence on the moon and elsewhere in the solar system, governing claims of sovereignty, the exploitation of resources and
the militarisation of space ? What will happen to current international undertakings concerning the prohibition of placing weapons of mass destruction in space?
Jon B. Wolfsthal, director of global risk at the Federation of American Scientists, recently said that
China, Russia and others are 'testing new ways to deliver these weapons, including … nuclear weapons in space that can attack satellites or targets on Earth without warning'.
01:52
SpaceX's latest Starship test flight ends with another explosion
SpaceX's latest Starship test flight ends with another explosion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
34 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
How a ‘Harvard International' could boost Hong Kong as an education hub
Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu has invited international students worried about finishing their courses at Harvard University in the US to continue their studies at one of Hong Kong's universities. Other universities in Malaysia and Japan have put forward similar suggestions. This comes as Hong Kong is considering how to make best use of the part of the Northern Metropolis reserved for universities to bolster its role as an education hub . That site is at the heart of our future technology research and development area, and within shouting distance of Shenzhen, China's engineering and manufacturing powerhouse. Lee's invitation is a bold step in the right direction, but I suggest we take the opportunity to go even further and advance the city's higher education profile. Hong Kong should reach out to Harvard and offer to make a site available for an additional campus in the city. The new facility could be called Harvard International and admit all the university's international students and a significant number of American students at any one time, perhaps on a revolving basis. The trigger for these suggestions is the Trump administration's extraordinary attack on the American institution, widely regarded as one of the best in the world. The university has had its research grants cancelled and was told its tax status would be reconsidered while its ability to admit international students remains uncertain. We don't need to consider the merits of these assaults, and we should note that many are still subject to legal challenges in the US. But the uncertainty they have created gives Hong Kong an opening.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Beijing's top Taiwan official warns independence forces will bring ‘disaster' to island
Mainland China's top official on Taiwan affairs has called on both sides of the Taiwan Strait to oppose 'Taiwan independence and external interference' and promote closer integration. Advertisement 'Taiwan independence forces and their activities undermine national sovereignty and territorial integrity, disrupt peace and stability in our homeland, and incite confrontation and division among compatriots,' said Wang Huning , the fourth-ranking official of China's ruling Communist Party. He made the comments at the opening ceremony of the annual Straits Forum in Xiamen, Fujian province on Sunday. 'They will only bring disaster to the people of Taiwan,' added Wang, who is also chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), China's top advisory body Wang described cross-Strait relations, as well as the current international situation, as 'complex and severe'. Fujian provincial party chief Zhou Zuyi vowed to optimise the business environment for Taiwanese companies and adopt policies to promote integrated development, 'making new contributions to the great cause of national reunification'. Advertisement
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong puts construction of 8,300 homes on hold in Fanling
Hong Kong's housing authorities have suspended a key public residential development in a northern town consisting of 8,300 homes due to the suspected high costs of building the flats on deep rock strata, according to a lawmaker. The suspension of the development, including its site formation and infrastructure works, in Fanling came to light on Sunday in a document the Housing Department and the Civil Engineering and Development Department submitted to the North District Council, a day before a meeting to discuss the matter on Monday. The Fanling Area 17 site, spanning about 5.47 hectares (13.5 acres) of both government and private land, is located to the east of Ling Shan Road and Jockey Club Road, south of Ma Sik Road and west of Fan Leng Lau Road. It currently houses the Fan Garden Police Driving and Traffic Training Centre. The document did not mention the exact reasons of the suspension but said: 'To align with the government's principle of maintaining sustainable public finances, the Housing Bureau has adjusted the development plan for the Fanling Area 17 public housing project after reviewing the cost-effectiveness of public housing initiatives over the next ten years.' Authorities said they had 'more flexibility to prioritise sites that are more suitable and cost-effective for construction' with sufficient land supply for public housing in the next decade. Lawmaker Edward Lau Kwok-fan, who is a member of the Legislative Council's housing panel, said the government's decision stemmed from geotechnical studies revealing unusually deep rock strata beneath the site, leading to significantly higher foundation costs.
