Scientists Just Confirmed a 67-Year-Old Hypothesis About Vitamin B1
You often need a lot of patience to be a scientist, and that's certainly been the case for researchers who have now found solid evidence for a hypothesis around vitamin B1 (or thiamine) that was first put forward almost 70 years ago.
In 1958, Columbia University chemist Ronald Breslow proposed that vitamin B1 performs key metabolic processes in the body by forming a molecular structure known as a carbene.
The problem: carbenes are highly unstable and reactive, and usually break down instantly in water. They should, by all accounts, be incompatible with the body's high water content.
But researchers led by a team from the University of California, Riverside (UC Riverside) have now managed to keep a carbene intact in water for months in their lab.
"This is the first time anyone has been able to observe a stable carbene in water," says chemist Vincent Lavallo, from UC Riverside. "People thought this was a crazy idea. But it turns out, Breslow was right."
Key to the breakthrough was the way the researchers were able to synthesize a "suit of armor" molecule in the lab, to wrap around the carbene and keep it intact. The team was able to use high-resolution imagery to verify the composition of the carbene.
Through some other chemical tweaks on top of the protective structure, the carbene could be kept stable in water for as long as six months. It shows that carbenes can be biologically feasible, and that vitamin B1 may take on that form to do its work in the body.
What's more, the researchers think that the approach they've used here could have industrial applications. Being able to stabilize carbenes could allow water to replace more toxic and dangerous substances in chemical reactions in the future, making for a cleaner way to produce things like pharmaceuticals and fuels.
"Water is the ideal solvent – it's abundant, non-toxic, and environmentally friendly," says chemist Varun Raviprolu, from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). "If we can get these powerful catalysts to work in water, that's a big step toward greener chemistry."
There's a twist here: the researchers were investigating the chemistry of reactive molecules in general, not looking to prove Breslow's hypothesis. It's another example of the serendipitous scientific discoveries that can sometimes come from careful research.
The research also acts as a reminder not to give up on a promising idea, even after almost six decades. There's plenty more to explore here for scientists – not least why the extra protection of the molecule seemed to reduce its reactivity – but Ronald Breslow would be happy to see his prediction was right.
"There are other reactive intermediates we've never been able to isolate, just like this one," says Lavallo. "Using protective strategies like ours, we may finally be able to see them, and learn from them."
"Just 30 years ago, people thought these molecules couldn't even be made. Now we can bottle them in water. What Breslow said all those years ago – he was right."
The research has been published in Science Advances.
Amazing Physics Experiment Reveals 'Quantum Rain' For The First Time
Physicists Found an Entirely New Way to Measure Time
Major Problem in Physics Could Be Fixed if The Whole Universe Was Spinning
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
US government report cited non-existent sources, academics say
A US government report on children's health cited "totally fabricated" studies to back up its findings, academics wrongly listed as the authors of those studies have said. First released on 22 May, the report detailed causes of a "chronic disease crisis" among children in the US. An amended version was issued on 29 May after digital outlet NOTUS found it had used seven non-existent sources. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said there were "formatting issues" and the report would be updated, but it did "not negate the substance of the report". US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, who has promoted debunked claims that vaccines cause autism, leads the department behind the report. It comes on the back of one of US President Donald Trump's sweeping executive orders earlier this year, specifically to "study the scope of the childhood chronic disease crisis and any potential contributing causes". Issued by the Make America Healthy Again Commission, the report concluded that poor diet, environmental toxins, stress, insufficient physical activity and "overmedicalisation" may contribute to chronic illness among American children. But the authors of several studies cited in the report told news outlets they did not write them, and that the studies never existed. Guohua Li, a Columbia University professor who was named as an author of a report on the mental health of children in the pandemic, told Agence France-Presse that the reference was "totally fabricated" and that he does not even know the listed co-author. He was listed as an author alongside Noah Kreski, a researcher at Columbia University, who also denied writing it, telling AFP it "doesn't appear to be a study that exists at all." Katherine Keyes, an epidemiology professor who told news agency Reuters she was also wrongly named as an author, said: "It does make me concerned given that citation practices are an important part of conducting and reporting rigorous science." Another study cited about the advertising of psychotropic medications for youth was not written by the listed author, the university that employs him told AFP and Reuters. The Democratic National Committee accused RFK Jr.'s Department of Health and Human Services of "justifying its policy priorities with sources that do not exist" and using citations that "are rife with errors, from broken links to misstated conclusions". RFK Jr was sworn in as US Health Secretary in February. Since taking office he has cut thousands of jobs in the health department and made plans to introduce placebo trials for all new vaccines. Fact-checking RFK Jr's views on health policy


San Francisco Chronicle
12 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Here's how dependent each UC campus is on international students
With tens of thousands of students from other countries studying at University of California campuses, UC officials say they are 'very concerned' about President Donald Trump's targeting of international enrollment, which could put a dent in colleges' budgets, slow research and harm the state economy. On Thursday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the Trump administration will 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students.' Also this week, Trump paused new student visa interviews, and he dangled the idea of a 15% cap on international enrollment. About 41,000 international students study at UC's 10 campuses, about 13% of systemwide enrollment. Nearly a third of UC graduate students, 31%, are from another country, while 9% of undergraduates are from outside the U.S. China accounts for the greatest share of international students at UC by far — 43%. 'Our international students and scholars are vital members of our university community and contribute greatly to our research, teaching, patient care and public service mission,' the university said in a statement. Officials at major private universities in California expressed concern as well. At Stanford, where ratios of international students are similar to UC's, President Jonathan Levin said it was 'self-defeating to send away young people with so much potential to contribute to the country.' A spokesperson for Caltech, where international students include 14% of undergraduates and 47% of graduate students, credited 'foreign talent' with helping American innovators develop 'extraordinary new advances,' from AI, to smartphones, personal computing and sequencing the human genome. Trump's actions 'undermine the stability of our country's research, education and innovation enterprise, a system that has ensured U.S. leadership and global competitiveness in the advancement of science, the development of new technologies and the prosperity of our communities,' said Caltech spokesperson Shayna Chabner. The Trump administration's efforts to reduce the presence of international students is part of an 'America first' policy, Rubio said, adding that the restrictions will focus especially on students 'with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' He did not say how the administration would determine which students have connections with the Chinese government or what fields are considered critical. But the crackdown is already causing deep concern among international students and those hoping to study in the U.S. Roughly 1.1 million international students study at U.S. universities — 6.6% of college students, according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's ' Study in the States ' webpage. International enrollment increased by a record 7% last year, according to the Open Doors report cited by the department. International students don't qualify for federal student aid, so the vast majority pay full tuition. That's a lucrative source of revenue for many universities, especially UC campuses, where taxpayers and the university help subsidize the tuition of state residents. Nonresidents pay three times the in-state rate. But the research university system says it also depends upon foreign students for a robust exchange of ideas — academic and cultural. 'The University of California is very concerned about the U.S. State Department's action to pause new interview appointments for applicants for student and exchange visas and the direct impact it will have on our international students, scholars and faculty,' UC officials said through a spokesperson. Sharply reducing the flow of international students is Trump's latest attempt to wrest control of American universities, which he and his allies see as centers of liberal bias. Last year's widespread campus protests against the war in Gaza helped to fuel a claim of systemic antisemitism on campuses. His administration is investigating numerous universities, including UC campuses, seeking evidence to bolster that idea. Trump has also unsuccessfully tried to revoke existing student visas. A Bay Area federal judge blocked that effort last week. Trump has aimed much of his ire at Harvard — including by trying to block new international students from enrolling there — after Harvard's President Alan Garber rebuffed his attempt to take over decision-making powers there last month. Harvard sued twice and won a temporary restraining order. On Thursday, a federal judge extended the order. Now Trump has turned the effort to campuses everywhere. At the White House on Wednesday, he said that American students 'can't get in' to universities 'because we have foreign students there' that take their slots, Bloomberg reported. Trump then suggested that international students should be capped at 15%. 'How did he come up with that number?' asked Shaun Harper, a professor at the University of Southern California's Rossier School of Education. As for international students crowding out U.S. students, 'if that were a problem, I certainly would know,' said Harper, a past president of the Association for the Study of Higher Education. 'It's only suddenly a big problem because Donald Trump has declared it so, as part of his larger war on Harvard University.' Citing college enrollment numbers at the U.S. Department of Education's data site, Harper noted that Harvard's enrollment of foreign students sits at 14% of undergraduates, while schools typically enroll a smaller ratio than that, including UC Berkeley's 12%. At Stanford, 16% of undergraduates are international students. John Aubrey Douglass, senior research fellow at UC Berkeley's Center for Studies in Higher Education, called the halt on international students 'shortsighted and vindictive.' 'We are witnessing an unraveling of a century of a partnership between the federal government and universities and colleges that helped build the world's premier mass higher education system built in part on attracting talent internationally,' he said. In 2017, UC imposed a cap on undergraduate non-state residents, including international students, as it faced a backlash by students and lawmakers who said the university was admitting increasing numbers of nonresidents — who pay full price — at the expense of many Californians. Douglass said this is how the process is supposed to work. 'Let the states decide,' he said. 'And allow independent private schools to make their own enrollment decisions.' On Wednesday, the nonprofit Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration said that international students contributed nearly $44 billion to the U.S. economy last year, and supported over 378,000 jobs. The new crackdown on international students is part of a 'growing climate of fear, volatility, and uncertainty' in the country, the group said in a statement, as it urged the Trump administration to reverse its decision.

Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
New supercomputer to power AI and scientific research unveiled at Berkeley National Lab
A new supercomputer named after a winner of the Nobel Prize in chemistry will help power artificial intelligence technology and scientific discoveries from a perch in the hills above the University of California, Berkeley, federal officials said Thursday. (AP video: Haven Daley)