logo
Gov. Gordon will see surgical abortion regulation bill again after last year's veto

Gov. Gordon will see surgical abortion regulation bill again after last year's veto

Yahoo26-02-2025

CHEYENNE – Gov. Mark Gordon vetoed a bill last year that would require surgical abortion centers to be licensed as an ambulatory surgical center.
An identical bill is headed back to the governor's desk this year after the House of Representatives voted to concur with the Senate on House Bill 42, 'Regulation of surgical abortions.'
On Monday, representatives passed HB 42 on a concurrence vote of 55-6, with one member excused. Five of Wyoming's six House Democrats and Cheyenne Republican Rep. Bob Nicholas voted against the bill. Fort Washakie Democrat Rep. Ivan Posey voted in favor of it.
Last year's bill, HB 148, 'Regulation of abortions,' was amended in the House to also apply to chemical abortions, and require an ultrasound no more than 48 hours before a pregnant woman takes drugs or substances to induce abortion. Gordon said in his veto message these amendments to the bill 'complicated' its intention, making it 'vulnerable to legal challenges.'
There are two separate bills this year addressed to surgical abortion centers and requiring an ultrasound before taking abortion pills. Although both bills crossed over to the Senate and were passed by the Senate Labor, Health and Social Services Committee at the same time, only one of them has passed all the way through the Legislature at this point.
HB 64, 'Chemical abortions-ultrasound requirement,' which is in its third and final reading in the Senate, was delayed for discussion a second time on Monday.
A 'burdensome' bill
Both of the Senate's Democratic lawmakers, and a handful of Republican colleagues, questioned the necessity of the bill during its first reading on the Senate floor last week. Sens. Mike Gierau, D-Jackson, and Chris Rothfuss, D-Laramie, said abortion is the only type of surgical health care that's been targeted by state lawmakers.
'The only surgeries that we mention in the green books are abortion,' Rothfuss said. 'Every other surgery we actually leave up to the medical board.'
Sen. Chris Rothfuss, D-Laramie (2025)
Sen. Chris Rothfuss, D-Laramie
Gierau pointed to the state's difficulty in keeping and recruiting health care providers. The Cowboy State faces a growing maternity services crisis, as hospitals shut down OB-GYN services in order to stay afloat. Anti-abortion laws, such as HB 42, are the only legislation that can turn doctors into felons, he said.
'At some point, we need to say we really don't want doctors here, because if we keep doing bills that turn them into felons, that is the result,' Gierau said. 'We should stop messing around with it.'
Sen. Mike Gierau, D-Jackson (2025)
Sen. Mike Gierau, D-Jackson
Sen. Evie Brennan, R-Cheyenne, responded that the discrimination issue is actually reversed in the bill, since physicians who perform surgical abortions are not currently required to be in good standing with the state or have hospital admitting privileges.
'Madam Chairwoman, those are things that we require of all other types of major surgeries and even minor surgeries within the state,' Brennan said to Sen. Wendy Schuler, R-Evanston, who was presiding over the Senate at the time.
Sen. Evie Brennan, R-Cheyenne (2025)
Sen. Evie Brennan, R-Cheyenne
Katherine Knutter, the executive director of Wyoming's sole surgical abortion center, Wellspring Health Access in Casper, previously testified that her physicians don't admit enough patients to the hospital to get hospital admitting privileges.
'(That's) because abortion is very, very safe,' Knutter said during a House committee's discussion of the bill.
Sen. Bill Landen, R-Casper, echoed his Democratic colleagues' concerns. Landen said he failed to see the justification behind legislation penalizing doctors, especially as the Cowboy State faces a shortage in health care providers.
Sen. Bill Landen, R-Casper (2025)
Sen. Bill Landen, R-Casper
'I don't think that we're giving enough thought to what we're doing to our medical community out there,' Landen said. 'What we're doing here is making them think twice or three times before they come back, and they sure as heck aren't going to be in women's health, I'll tell you.'
Potential shutdown
Knutter previously told both House and Senate committee members the passage of this bill could mean shutting down Wellspring Health Access. The bill would require the clinic to undergo extensive construction in order to comply as an outpatient surgical center, in addition to the "major barrier" of getting hospital admitting privileges for her physicians.
'We feel that this is specifically targeted to put us out of business,' Knutter previously told House committee members.
Senators in favor of the bill during its first reading on the floor said it was about protecting the health and safety of pregnant women. Sen. Lynn Hutchings, R-Cheyenne, denied that the bill was meant to restrict abortion access for women.
"If we're going to have legal abortions, we're going to try to make them as safe as possible," Hutchings said. "The bill is pretty clear cut. Nobody is trying to prevent anybody's reproductive rights from being denied."
Rothfuss, however, didn't buy that argument.
"It would be refreshing to just hear, perhaps, an admittance that this has nothing to do with women's health. ... The bill is not about that," Rothfuss said. "The intent is to make it harder to have abortions."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicaid & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now
Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicaid & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicaid & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now

President Donald Trump's 'one big beautiful bill' has passed in the House and is now awaiting Senate approval. If passed, Trump's signature bill would extend the tax cuts granted by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and add additional tax cuts. While this might be welcome news to many, the bill also includes changes to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) that could threaten seniors' access to these programs. Find Out: Read Next: 'The 'one big beautiful bill' passed by the House of Representatives, if it were passed into law today, would cut Medicaid and SNAP by a combined $1 trillion,' said Chris Orestis, president of Retirement Genius. 'In addition, because of the increase to federal debt of as much as $5 trillion, the bill would trigger an automatic reduction in Medicare funding of $500 billion,' he continued. 'This would represent the largest cut to social services and health insurance for the poor, disabled, children and the elderly in U.S. history.' Here's a look at the changes retirees can make now to secure care and avoid benefit disruptions if the bill were to pass. Before changes go into effect, check with your healthcare providers to ensure there won't be any interruption to your care if there are cuts to Medicaid. 'Check with your healthcare provider to see if they might cut back on services or cease accepting Medicaid-funded patients, and contact any nursing home where you or a loved one may reside to find out if they will be reducing the number of patients they can support — or even [if they are] possibly planning to close,' Orestis said. Knowing this ahead of time will allow you to find alternative care providers before it's too late. Learn More: If you are reliant on SNAP, start searching for alternatives that may be able to provide food assistance in the event your benefits are reduced or cut. 'Make sure you know where there are local support services through community or faith-based organizations to replace lost access through SNAP,' Orestis said. Many retirees plan to 'spend down' their savings so that they qualify for Medicaid to pay for their long-term care. However, this may no longer be a viable option. 'If you are considering going onto Medicaid for long-term care and are preparing to engage the 'spend down' process to impoverish yourself and get below the poverty level to qualify, you may want to reconsider that strategy, and instead look to leverage private pay resources to pay for your care,' Orestis said. 'If you are on Medicaid, you will primarily be reliant on nursing homes for your care, and their ability to withstand these cuts will be very challenging and up in the air,' he continued. 'If you are private pay, you are in control and can decide where and when you will receive care, such as at home or an assisted living community not funded by Medicaid.' Strategies to stay private pay for long-term care would include long-term care insurance, annuities, a life insurance settlement, a reverse mortgage or VA benefits. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 This article originally appeared on Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicaid & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now

GOP Senators' Competing Demands Risk Pulling Trump Megabill Apart
GOP Senators' Competing Demands Risk Pulling Trump Megabill Apart

Wall Street Journal

time36 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

GOP Senators' Competing Demands Risk Pulling Trump Megabill Apart

WASHINGTON—Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R., S.D.) is trying to release this week a revised version of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' But as he races to pass the legislation ahead of Republicans' self-imposed July 4 deadline, he has got about as many problems as there are GOP senators, with lawmakers battling over the additional borrowing and spending cuts that will be used to finance tax relief, plus spending on the border and military.

Live Updates: Tensions Flare Between Protesters and Law Enforcement in L.A.
Live Updates: Tensions Flare Between Protesters and Law Enforcement in L.A.

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

Live Updates: Tensions Flare Between Protesters and Law Enforcement in L.A.

News Analysis National Guard troops in Los Angeles on Sunday. Gov. Gavin Newsom of California has formally asked the Trump administration to remove them. It is the fight President Trump had been waiting for, a showdown with a top political rival in a deep blue state over an issue core to his political agenda. In bypassing the authority of Gov. Gavin Newsom of California, a Democrat, to call in the National Guard to quell protests in the Los Angeles area over his administration's efforts to deport more migrants, Mr. Trump is now pushing the boundaries of presidential authority and stoking criticism that he is inflaming the situation for political gain. Local and state authorities had not sought help in dealing with the scattered protests that erupted after an immigration raid on Friday in the garment district. But Mr. Trump and his top aides leaned into the confrontation with California leaders on Sunday, portraying the demonstrations as an existential threat to the country — setting in motion an aggressive federal response that in turn sparked new protests across the city. As more demonstrators took to the streets, the president wrote on social media that Los Angeles was being 'invaded and occupied' by 'violent, insurrectionist mobs,' and directed three of his top cabinet officials to take any actions necessary to 'liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion.' 'Nobody's going to spit on our police officers. Nobody's going to spit on our military,' Mr. Trump told reporters as he headed to Camp David on Sunday, although it was unclear whether any such incidents had occurred. 'That happens, they get hit very hard.' The president declined to say whether he planned to invoke the 1807 Insurrection Act, which allows for the use of federal troops on domestic soil to quell a rebellion. But either way, he added, 'we're going to have troops everywhere.' Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, posted on social media that 'this is a fight to save civilization.' Mr. Trump's decision to deploy at least 2,000 members of the California National Guard is the latest example of his willingness and, at times, an eagerness to shatter norms to pursue his political goals and bypass limits on presidential power. The last president to send in the National Guard for a domestic operation without a request from the state's governor, Lyndon B. Johnson, did so in 1965, to protect civil rights demonstrators in Alabama. Image President Donald Trump in New Jersey on Sunday. On social media, he, his aides and allies have sought to frame the demonstrations against immigration officials on their own terms. Credit... Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times But aides and allies of the president say the events unfolding in Los Angeles provide an almost perfect distillation of why Mr. Trump was elected in November. 'It could not be clearer,' said Newt Gingrich, the former Republican House speaker and ally of the president who noted that Mr. Trump had been focused on immigration enforcement since 2015. 'One side is for enforcing the law and protecting Americans, and the other side is for defending illegals and being on the side of the people who break the law.' Sporadic protests have occurred across the country in recent days as federal agents have descended on Los Angeles and other cities searching workplaces for undocumented immigrants, part of an expanded effort by the administration to ramp up the number of daily deportations. On social media, Mr. Trump, his aides and allies have sought to frame the demonstrations against immigration officials on their own terms. They have shared images and videos of the most violent episodes — focusing particularly on examples of protesters lashing out at federal agents — even as many remained peaceful. Officials also zeroed in on demonstrators waving flags of other countries, including Mexico and El Salvador, as evidence of a foreign invasion. 'Illegal criminal aliens and violent mobs have been committing arson, throwing rocks at vehicles, and attacking federal law enforcement for days,' wrote Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary. Mr. Newsom, whom the president refers to as 'Newscum,' has long been a foil for Mr. Trump, who has repeatedly targeted California and its leader as emblematic of failures of the Democratic Party. 'We expected this, we prepared for this,' Mr. Newsom said in a statement to The New York Times. 'This is not surprising — for them to succeed, California must fail, and so they're going to try everything in their tired playbook despite the evidence against them.' Image Law enforcement officers and members of the California National Guard engaged protesters in downtown Los Angeles on Sunday. Credit... Gabriela Bhaskar/The New York Times On Sunday, the governor sent a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth formally requesting that Mr. Trump rescind the call-up of the National Guard, saying federal actions were inflaming the situation. He was echoed by other Democratic officials, who said the mounting demonstrations were the result of Mr. Trump's own actions. The president and his aides 'are masters of misinformation and disinformation,' Senator Alex Padilla of California, a Democrat, said in an interview. 'They create a crisis of their own making and come in with all the theatrics and cruelty of immigration enforcement. They should not be surprised in a community like Los Angeles they will be met by demonstrators who are very passionate about standing up for fundamental rights and due process.' Republicans defended Mr. Trump's moves, saying he was rightfully exercising his power to protect public safety. 'The president is extremely concerned about the safety of federal officials in L.A. right now who have been subject to acts of violence and harassment and obstruction,' Representative Kevin Kiley, Republican of California, said in an interview. He added: 'We are in this moment because of a series of reckless decisions by California's political leaders, the aiding and abetting the open-border policies of President Biden.' Trump officials said on Sunday that they were ready to escalate their response even more, if necessary. Tom Homan, the president's border czar, suggested in an interview with NBC News that the administration would arrest anyone, including public officials, who interfered with immigration enforcement activities, which he said would continue in California and across the country. Image Protesters in Pasadena, Calif., on Sunday. Credit... Alex Welsh for The New York Times Mr. Trump appears to be deploying against California a similar playbook that he has used to punish universities, law firms and other institutions and individuals that he views as political adversaries. Last month, he threatened to strip 'large scale' federal funding from California 'maybe permanently' over the inclusion of transgender athletes in women's sports. And in recent days, his administration said it would pull roughly $4 billion in federal funding for California's high-speed train, which would further delay a project that has long been plagued by delays and funding shortages. 'Everything he's done to attack California or anybody he fears isn't supportive of him is going to continue to be an obsession of his,' Mr. Padilla said. 'He may think it plays smart for his base, but it's actually been bad for the country.' White House officials said there was a different common denominator that explains Mr. Trump's actions both against institutions like Harvard and immigration protests in Los Angeles. 'For years Democrat-run cities and institutions have failed the American people, by both choice and incompetence,' Abigail Jackson, a White House spokeswoman, said in a statement. 'In each instance,' she added, 'the president took necessary action to protect Americans when Democrats refused.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store