logo
‘I paid easyJet £363 extra to avoid a five-hour delay and it horribly backfired'

‘I paid easyJet £363 extra to avoid a five-hour delay and it horribly backfired'

Telegraph3 days ago

Has a company treated you unfairly? Our Consumer Champion is available to help. For how to contact her click here.
Dear Katie,
Back in March I was flying back from Geneva with a couple of friends. We had been scheduled to fly at 6.50pm, but about 1.30pm that day I received a text from easyJet saying that the flight was significantly delayed. Instead it was expected to depart at approximately 11.20pm.
My heart sank as 11.20pm is very late and I have been caught at Geneva airport twice before and had to stay overnight because of delayed easyJet flights and crews running out of roster time.
This delay seemed unlikely to change as a follow up communication from easyJet made it clear that the bag drop would remain open for the delayed 6.50pm flight to 8pm. It was not the usual instruction given of 'despite the delay, please check in bags by the original check in time'.
Based on this information and previous experience of travelling with easyJet, I made what felt like a reasonable decision to move all three passengers to another easyJet flight departing at 8.35pm. To do this, I was required to pay a total of £363 in flight change fees.
Upon arriving at the airport, and sitting in the bar for a short while, the departure boards changed to show that the 8.35pm we were now booked on was now also rescheduled to 11.20pm, while the 6.50pm flight we were originally booked on was reassigned to the departure time of 8.35pm. Gallingly, this meant we had paid £363 to arrive home later than we would have done had we done nothing.
We rushed to the assigned gate only to find several other passengers equally irate at the situation. Many had made the same switch and, on talking to them, I found they had managed to switch for free.
As I was travelling with no luggage fortunately I was able to switch back to the 6.50pm flight, now departing at 8.35pm. However my friends could not, and had to wait until 11.20pm to fly as they had checked in bags.
I claimed compensation, but easyJet refused. It said that it was my choice to re-book and pay. It is my belief that the flights were switched so that no passengers originally booked flight would be delayed for more than three hours, after which compensation is due.
Either way, I am very unhappy that I had to pay £363, especially as my friends were delayed for more than three hours as they were denied boarding and departed at 11.20pm instead of 6.50pm.
EasyJet did offer a £100 voucher for use on one of its flights, however I have not redeemed it as I do not find this acceptable.
– AG, via email
Dear AG,
No wonder you were enraged, having made what you thought was a good decision to pay to escape this intolerable delay, only to find that you would have been better off if you had done nothing.
When I asked easyJet it said that your original flight was scheduled to depart at 6.50pm and was initially delayed until 11.20pm, because of a technical issue. This meant a replacement aircraft needed to be flown from the UK to operate the flight.
When flights are delayed by more than five hours, EasyJet said, it advises customers that it provides the option to transfer to an alternative flight for free by contacting its customer services team. However since your flight was delayed by just less than five hours, this didn't apply in your case.
You changed your booking to an earlier flight scheduled to depart at 8.35pm. However, as you made this change yourself online, this meant you incurred a change fee and a fare difference that amounted to £363.
Then, because of the knock-on impact to the schedule of flying an aircraft from the UK, the decision was made to bring forward the delay for the 6.50pm flight, so that it could depart at 8.35pm. Meanwhile the 8.35pm departure was then delayed to fly at 11.20pm, but with a different aircraft.
EasyJet subsequently transferred you back to your original flight for free, to ensure you could depart as early as possible, however, of course, this ignored the fact that your poor friends, who you had also paid to fly at 8.35pm, were still stuck on the later flight.
The airline said it did not deny boarding to your friends as they did not reach the gate or expect to board the aircraft.
In line with security requirements, it said, they would have needed to re-check in their bags and go back through security and passport control. Unfortunately it would not have been possible to do this in time for the earlier flight, it said.
EasyJet said it fully understands the frustration this will have caused in the circumstances, however it 'always endeavours to bring forward delays where we can and this meant that both flights were able to operate with as reduced delays as possible for all customers on these flights'.
In line with regulations it is unable to provide compensation as the flight you travelled on was delayed for less than three hours, however following my involvement, as a gesture of goodwill, it will now be reimbursing the fees incurred from the flight changes that you made yourself.
A spokesman said: 'We are sorry for the delay to Mr G's journey from Geneva to London Gatwick, due to a technical issue with the aircraft scheduled to operate his original flight.
'We always work to reduce delays where we can and as it was possible to bring his original flight delay forward, our team in the airport transferred Mr G back to his original flight for free.
'Due to security requirements, this was unfortunately not possible for his friends, who were travelling with hold luggage as there was not enough time to re-check their bags and pass through airport security before the scheduled departure time.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal
China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

China rejects Trump's accusation that it breached Geneva trade deal

June 2 (Reuters) - China said on Monday that U.S. President Donald Trump's accusations that Beijing had violated the consensus reached in Geneva trade talks were "groundless", and promised to take forceful measures to safeguard its interests. The comment by the commerce ministry was in response to Trump's remarks on Friday that China had breached a bilateral deal to roll back tariffs. The ministry said China had implemented and actively upheld the agreement reached last month in Geneva, while the U.S. had introduced multiple "discriminatory restrictive" measures against China. Those measures included issuing guidance on AI chip export controls, halting sales of chip design software to China and revoking visas for Chinese students, the ministry added. "The U.S. government has unilaterally and repeatedly provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating uncertainty and instability in bilateral economic and trade relations," the ministry said in a statement. It did not elaborate on what forceful measures it might take in response. Beijing and Washington agreed in mid-May in Geneva to pause triple-digit tariffs for 90 days. In addition, China also promised to lift trade countermeasures that restricted its exports of the critical metals needed for U.S. semiconductor, electronics and defence production. Trump on Friday also announced a doubling of import tariffs on steel and aluminium to 50%. While China is the world's largest steel producer and exporter, it ships very little to the United States after a 25% tariff imposed in 2018 shut most Chinese steel out of the market. China ranks third among aluminium suppliers.

Visa A2A payments land in the UK
Visa A2A payments land in the UK

Finextra

time5 hours ago

  • Finextra

Visa A2A payments land in the UK

Card giant Visa is taking aim at the UK's burgeoning account-to-account market through its new pay-by-bank offering. 0 Visa A2A promises to give Brits greater choice, control and protection over how they pay via bank transfers. The firm says it will let people easily manage their bills and subscriptions through their bank app while effectively providing a similar level of protection typically associated with card payments. For businesses, Visa A2A takes advantage of real-time settlement through Faster Payment System to offer greater visibility over payments and simpler cash flow management. Firms can take advantage of the digital nature of the service to get notifications if a consumer changes or cancels payment permissions, and it also provides them with the ability to include more transaction data for reconciliation. With an operational technology platform ready to process bills and subscriptions, Visa plans to expand Visa A2A to include ecommerce payments in the UK with a phased approach. The firm is also working with an open model that will enable banks and other industry partners to join and extend open banking-enabled payments to businesses. Mandy Lamb, MD, Visa UK and Ireland, says: "Visa A2A is a game-changer - it means for the first time UK consumers and businesses using pay by bank will benefit from a similar level of protection typically associated with card payments." Isabel Pitt, deputy director of payments, Nationwide, adds: "A2A payments are rapidly gaining traction across UK businesses and consumers, offering a seamless and efficient way to transact. However, for these payments to reach their full potential, the right framework - rules, capabilities, and protections - must be in place. That's why we're excited to collaborate with Visa and our industry partners to bring Visa A2A to the UK."

Pubs and restaurants are ‘under threat' after Labour's tax hikes — with a third now running at a loss
Pubs and restaurants are ‘under threat' after Labour's tax hikes — with a third now running at a loss

The Sun

time5 hours ago

  • The Sun

Pubs and restaurants are ‘under threat' after Labour's tax hikes — with a third now running at a loss

PUBS and restaurants are being driven into the ground by Labour's tax hikes - with a THIRD now operating at a loss. A damning industry survey reveals the number of boozers at risk of closure has increased 11 per cent in the last three months. Landlords are now warning punters that putting up drink prices is the only way they can survive. The average price of a pint has already soared to £5.17 in Britain, and The Sun's Save Our Sups campaign is calling for more support for the countries' embattled locals. In a rare joint intervention, four trade bodies have come together today to warn hospitality is 'under threat' due to April's National Insurance rises and Business Rates whack. They are demanding urgent relief for the pub and restaurant sector which they claim was saddled with £3.4billion extra costs. As well as a third of bosses disclosing they are in the red, their survey also revealed six in 10 have been forced to cut staff to save money. Sounding the alarm are UK Hospitality, the British Beer and Pub Association, the British Institute of Innkeeping and Hospitality Ulster. They said: 'Hospitality is vital to the UK economy but is under threat from ongoing costs rises, which the April increases have only exacerbated. 'Jobs are being lost, livelihoods under threat, communities set to lose precious assets, and consumers are experiencing price rises when wallets are already feeling the pinch.' Meanwhile, a separate report showed private sector activity is at its weakest since 2022. The Confederation of British Industry also blamed Rachel Reeves' £25billion NICs hikes for hurting businesses. Locals Heartbroken as Auchenmalg's Only Pub, The Cock Inn, Closes Down 1

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store