Boom, baby! The Pacers' G League team rebrands, pays tribute to Slick Leonard
NOBLESVILLE, Ind. (AP) — Boom, baby! The Indiana Pacers' G League team has rebranded.
The Pacers announced Wednesday that their G League team will be called the Noblesville Boom — the nickname being a nod to longtime Pacers coach and broadcaster Slick Leonard's infamous catch phrase of 'boom, baby!'
The Boom will begin play next season in Noblesville, an Indianapolis suburb.
'We're thrilled to tip off an exciting new era for our G League team, the Noblesville Boom, while honoring the legacy and global brand power of the Indiana Pacers,' Pacers Sports & Entertainment CEO Mel Raines said.
Leonard was enshrined in the Basketball Hall of Fame as a coach in 2014. He played seven seasons in the NBA, then coached the Pacers to three ABA championships and eventually became a broadcaster. And as the story goes, 'boom, baby' was something he yelled once after a big shot during his coaching career. It immediately stuck and became part of Pacers' lore.
The Pacers even had 'Boom Baby!' painted on the sideline of the court they used for home NBA Cup games this season.
The team — formerly known as the Fort Wayne Mad Ants and Indiana Mad Ants — joined the G League in 2007 and played in Fort Wayne until 2023, then spent the last two seasons playing in Indianapolis. The Mad Ants nickname was in tribute to 'Mad' Anthony Wayne, a general in the Revolutionary War, a member of the U.S. Congress and the namesake of Fort Wayne.
___
AP NBA: https://apnews.com/NBA
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
NBA Finals Game 2 updates: Thunder vs Pacers predictions, time, where to watch
NBA Finals Game 2 updates: Thunder vs Pacers predictions, time, where to watch Show Caption Hide Caption Pacers and Thunder NBA Finals is better than it's 'small-market' billing USA TODAY Sports' Jeff Zillgitt breaks down the star-studded NBA Finals between the Indiana Pacers and Oklahoma City Thunder. Sports Pulse The 2025 NBA Finals continue on June 7 with a surprising team holding a 1-0 series lead between the Indiana Pacers and Oklahoma City Thunder. Through much of Game 1, the Thunder showed why it entered the finals as the clear favorite, leading by as much as 15 points in the fourth quarter until the Pacers pulled off a dramatic comeback. Tyrese Haliburton, who contributed with 14 points and 10 rebounds, gave the Pacers the lead with 0.3 seconds remaining in the contest with a clutch jumper. It would be enough to secure the shocking 111-110 win. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander had an otherwise-prolific night for Oklahoma City, dropping 38 points on 14-for-30 shooting. Pascal Siakam led the way for Indiana, posting 19 points on 7-for-15 from the field. It all adds up to a must-see Game 2. USA TODAY Sports will provide the latest updates, highlights, wild plays, analysis, and more throughout the game. Follow along. What time is Thunder vs Pacers game today? The Oklahoma City Thunder hosts the Indiana Pacers for Game 2 of the NBA Finals at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City. The game is scheduled for 8 p.m. ET. Where to watch Indiana Pacers vs. Oklahoma City Thunder Game 1 Watch the NBA Finals with Fubo Where is Game 2 between Indiana Pacers and Oklahoma City Thunder? The Oklahoma City Thunder hosts the Indiana Pacers at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City for Game 2 of the NBA Finals.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
4 things OKC Thunder must do to win Game 2 against Pacers in 2025 NBA Finals
4 things OKC Thunder must do to win Game 2 against Pacers in 2025 NBA Finals The 2025 NBA Finals is only a game old, but the Oklahoma City Thunder have already found themselves cornered. Tyrese Haliburton shocked the NBA world when he drained a Game 1 game-winner to give the Indiana Pacers the early 1-0 series lead. All the pressure of the world is on the Thunder already. After being viewed as the heavy title favorite, they enter Game 2 in a must-win scenario. You can't afford to fly across the country on the road in a 0-2 deficit. That would put them at risk of being on the wrong side of one of the biggest upsets in league history. Here are four things the Thunder must do to ensure they leave OKC with a 1-1 series tie: Stick to your Game 1 starters The Thunder threw a curveball before the batter even reached the batter's box. They abandoned their double-big lineup in favor of a more traditional starting five. Cason Wallace started over Isaiah Hartenstein for Game 1 of the series. The sudden lineup change was met with approval. But then the result played out. The Thunder lost a heartbreaker. They were killed on the boards. In a results-oriented business, expect fans to double-guess your moves with the benefit of hindsight. That said, the starting lineup successfully achieved its goal of creating perimeter disruption. The Pacers committed 25 turnovers. 17 in the first half. The tight ball-security squad looked lost against the Thunder. That stat should've been enough to secure a Game 1 win for OKC. Instead, an abnormally bad transition offense destroyed that advantage and allowed Indiana to hang around. You have to stick with Wallace. The plan worked. Haliburton and Andrew Nembhard were relatively quiet for the first three quarters. This was the lineup that won the Thunder their two games against the Pacers in the regular season. You can't overreact and return to Holmgren-Hartenstein or risk messing up the team's mojo. Complete steal-and-score sequences Throughout the first three quarters, everybody had the same lingering thought in the back of their mind. The Thunder had a double-digit lead, sure, but they should've blown the game wide open by halftime. 25 created turnovers is an unreal number that likely won't get matched again. But only 11 points scored off them nullified the advantage. The Thunder learned their lesson the hard way, just like the Bucks, Cavaliers and Knicks. You can't give the Pacers hope. After Williams' transition dunk gave OKC a 15-point lead in the early stages of the fourth quarter, it felt like that would've been enough to squeeze by with an ugly win. Nope. The Pacers stayed within striking distance. Unreal shot-making by Indiana's role players flummoxed the Thunder. Nembhard looked like prime James Harden when he shook Gilgeous-Alexander off him for a stepback 3-pointer. The Thunder only had half measures with their bread and butter. All year, they've buried their opponent on the scoreboard with avalanche runs snowballed by steal-and-score sequences. They only did the first half of that against the Pacers. That wasn't enough. Williams, Holmgren bounce back For all the overanalyzing of a weird Game 1, you can simplify everything back to Williams and Holmgren. Gilgeous-Alexander had 38 points on 14-of-30 shooting. It was one of the most dominating NBA Finals debuts ever. The MVP winner did enough to secure a win. But Williams and Holmgren no-showed. And you can't win playoff games if two of your three best players disappear. Williams had 17 points on 6-of-19 shooting. Holmgren only had six points and six rebounds. That's rough. For comparison, the Pacers had an even-scoring attack with six players in double-digit points. This has been a theme in most of the Thunder's playoff losses this year. Williams and Holmgren struggle. Gilgeous-Alexander does his best to carry them to the finish line but falls just short. They will need both to be a lot better in Game 2. OKC can't afford just flashes. It needs a consistent four quarters. SGA has first signature NBA Finals moment Despite all the Game 1 talk that followed the next two days, none of this would matter or be discussed ad nauseam if the Thunder scored one extra bucket. Such is life in the NBA. A one-point loss puts every small mistake under a microscope. For Gilgeous-Alexander, it's his missed mid-range jumper with 11 seconds left that would've put the Pacers in a tough spot. Instead, his attempt hits the rim and sparks Haliburton's game-winner and Indiana raced down the floor in the final seconds without a timeout. While Gilgeous-Alexander was the best player with 38 points, it wasn't on his usual efficient volume. He earned his points the blue-collar way with tough shot-making. He only went 7-of-8 on free throws. It's a little ridiculous on the surface to ask for better, but that's the standard the MVP has set for himself over the last three years.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Pacers vs. Thunder odds, predictions: NBA Finals Game 2 picks, best bets
New York Post may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you click or buy through our links. Featured pricing is subject to change. As we often hear, the NBA playoffs are about adjustments within a series. Thus, sports bettors must learn to anticipate them and understand how they will impact the betting market and potentially offer value. The Pacers delivered yet another improbable comeback to steal home-court advantage in the NBA Finals. The Thunder are now 11-point home favorites in Game 2 with an Over/Under total of 228.5. I expect Oklahoma City coach Mark Daigneault to change his starting lineup and revert to the one he used all postseason, after he mysteriously benched center Isaiah Hartenstein in favor of Cason Wallace. In fact, the double-big lineup of Hartenstein and Chet Holmgren didn't log a single minute together, after each had started every game this postseason. The move looked wise in the first half, forcing 19 turnovers. Daigneault afterward said the smaller Wallace provided more defensive flexibility against guards Tyrese Haliburton and Andrew Nembhard. Though that logic makes sense, it also allowed a poor rebounding Pacers team to dominate the glass with a 56-39 edge. Indiana also finished with 13 offensive boards, which is their most this postseason. For context, the Pacers ranked third worst in rebounds per game and rebounding percentage throughout the regular season. The glass was supposed to be an Indiana weakness and the relatively inexperienced Daigneault unnecessarily and inexplicably made it an advantage. Isaiah Hartenstein grabs a rebound during the Thunder's Game 1 loss to the Pacers on June 5, 2025. Getty Images I think the coach realizes the mistake and starts Hartenstein. Even if that adjustment does not occur, he still figures to play him more than the 17 minutes he logged in Game 1. Even still, Hartenstein managed to grab nine rebounds in that limited play. Betting on the NBA? So any way you slice it, Hartenstein's rebounds prop of 6.5 feels too low. OKC needs his presence, especially because Holmgren seems allergic to rebounds lately. The 7-footer has gone under his rebound prop in six straight games. I am 46-40-1 ATS in this Post sports section and my next play is Hartenstein Over 6.5 rebounds in Game 2. BEST BET: Isaiah Hartenstein Over 6.5 rebounds (-165, BetMGM) Why Trust New York Post Betting Doug Kezirian is a New York Post contributor who has over two decades of experience in the betting space, including spending 11 years at ESPN as a host, columnist and betting analyst. He's also the rare personality who has documented success – 14th place in 2023 Circa Million and Las Vegas SuperContest ($37K), two top-10 finishes in 2022 William Hill College Football Challenge ($58K) and also grabbed headlines with a $297K win on the 2021 NFL Draft.
