
The Svedberg show
A path to pursue
Born on August 30, 1884 at Flerang in the parish of Valbo near Gavle, Sweden, Theodor (The) Svedberg was the only child of Elias Svedberg and Augusta Alstermark. The fact that his father was a works manager at different ironworks in Sweden and Norway meant that the family lived at a number of places in Scandinavia during his childhood. His father made it a point to take him out for excursions often, allowing him to develop a love for nature and a keen interest in botany.
Svedberg attended the Koping School, the Orebro High School and Gothenburg Modern School and had the privilege of being taught by some prominent teachers. These teachers were also understanding, allowing Svedberg to study on his own. This gained him access to laboratories after ordinary classes and Svedberg spent time in the afternoons at the physical and chemical labs of the school.
Stoked by the advent of new discoveries and inventions in both physics and chemistry, Svedberg went about building stuff on his own. He created a Marconi-transmitter and a Tesla-transformer this way and even arranged public demonstrations that included wireless telegraphy between two blocks of his school.
Even though he had a passionate interest in botany, he decided to study chemistry following his hands-on efforts in his school laboratories. This experience also put him in good stead when he went on to experiment with colloids later on.
A lifelong association
After matriculating from school, Svedberg began a lifelong association with Uppsala University in January 1904. It was here that he received his Bachelor of Arts degree in 1905, his Master's degree in 1907 and Doctor of Philosophy in 1908.
While still studying, Svedberg accepted a post as assistant in the Chemical Institute at Uppsala. This means that Svedberg's scientific career set off in 1905, while he was still in his early 20s. By 1907, he was given the added responsibility of serving as lecturer in chemistry in the university. It wasn't long before a special appointment as lecturer and demonstrator of physical chemistry came through in 1909. In 1912, he was elected Professor of Physical Chemistry, Uppsala University – a position he held onto until 1949, when he was made emeritus.
It was in 1949 that Svedberg took on the role of director of the Gustaf Werner Institute for Nuclear Chemistry at the University. He remained at this post until 1967 and the institute was renamed The Svedberg Laboratory in 1986, about 15 years after his death in 1971. The facility was permanently shut down in 2016, following a decision a year earlier to implement decommissioning.
It is worth mentioning that a Nature article in 1944 speaks of a volume 'compiled by colleagues, friends and pupils to celebrate the sixtieth birthday of The Svedberg.' Even though by title he was a Professor of Physical Chemistry, 31 of the 56 communications in that volume can be termed as biophysics – both a nod to Svedberg's passion towards biological systems, and the fact that he had wide-ranging interests and activities. British physical chemist Eric Keightley Rideal, to whom the Nature article is attributed, also makes it clear that if it hadn't been for the limitations imposed on this compilation by World War II, the 'contributions would certainly have come in from all parts of the world.'
A lifetime with science
Primarily interested in colloids, Svedberg's work mainly concerned with these particles with a size of between 1 and 100 nanometres. His 1908 doctoral thesis – Studien zur Lehre von den kolloiden Lösungen – is now considered a classic and he described a new method of producing colloidal particles. Svedberg also gave convincing evidence of the validity of the theory on Brownian movements founded by renowned theoretical physicist Albert Einstein and Polish physicist Marian Smoluchowski. In this way, Svedberg provided conclusive proof of the physical existence of molecules.
One of Svedberg's early patents was filed on June 1, 1909. In this patent, titled 'Process of Producing Colloidal Sols or Gels.' Svedberg speaks of an invention relating to the process of producing colloidal sols or gels. The patent was accepted and granted in Great Britain on May 26, 1910. It is interesting to note that Svedberg applied for this patent in four countries. What's more, he made the applications in Denmark, Switzerland, and Austria also on June 1, 1909.
Working with a number of collaborators, Svedberg continued to study the physical properties of colloids, be it diffusion, light absorption, or sedimentation. His studies enabled him to conclude that the gas laws could be applied to disperse systems.
Svedberg invented the ultracentrifuge for the study of sedimentation. Using this, he could study large molecules in solution, such as proteins, carbohydrates, and high polymers. Svedberg employed centrifugal forces to better mimic the effects of gravity on particles and the first ultracentrifuge, which was constructed in 1924, could generate a centrifugal force up to 5,000 times the force of gravity.
With an ultracentrifuge, Svedberg came up with findings relating to molecular size and shape, and also used it to prove that proteins were a kind of macromolecules, paving the way for molecular biology. For his discoveries regarding disperse systems, Svedberg was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1926.
In his later years, Svedberg switched to nuclear chemistry and radiation biology. He made contributions to improve the cyclotron and helped his doctoral student – Swedish biochemist Arne Tiselius – as he went about researching electrophoresis to separate and analyse proteins. Tiselius himself went on to win the Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1948 'for his research on electrophoresis and adsorption analysis, especially for his discoveries concerning the complex nature of the serum proteins.'
An Indian connection
Svedberg has a couple of Indian connections – one that can be refuted, and another based on solid fact.
The picture shown here is from The Hindu's archives. This image's caption mention both Svedberg and Indian physicist C. V. Raman. While there's no doubt that Raman is the one seated second from left, the same cannot be said about Svedberg. Even though he could be the one standing behind Raman, it can't be proven beyond doubt.
Image searches on the web and AI-based results throw into question the possibility of Raman and Svedberg being in the same frame. Barring the caption in the archives, there's no known recorded mention online where the two scientists have been in the same gathering. In such a situation, it is impossible to conclude that the two men might have ever met.
What we do know, however, is that Svedberg was a fellow of the Indian Academy of Sciences. He was elected into the honorary fellowship in 1935, a year after the society was founded in 1934. This is an irrefutable fact that finds mention both in Svedberg's biographical entry on the Nobel Prize website and in the Fellows' portal of the Indian Academy of Sciences.
This does hint that there might be a working relationship between Svedberg and Raman as the Indian Academy of Sciences was the brainchild of the latter. Raman founded the society in Bengaluru 'with the main objective of promoting the progress and upholding the cause of science.' When the Academy began functioning with 65 Founding Fellows in 1934, it elected Raman as its president in its first general meeting. Considering that Svedberg was elected an honorary fellow the very next year, the two men might well have known each other.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
21 hours ago
- Time of India
Why is Elon Musk obsessed with settling on Mars? SpaceX founder reveals his 'civilizational resilience' plan
Elon Musk has never been one for small dreams. But his vision for humanity's future is as cosmic as it gets: colonizing Mars to ensure the survival of civilization itself . The billionaire entrepreneur and SpaceX founder has once again reignited conversation around his interplanetary ambitions, offering fresh insights into why he sees Mars not as science fiction—but as life insurance for humanity. Why Mars? Musk's Survival Blueprint for Civilization Speaking earlier this week from Starbase , SpaceX's rapidly evolving headquarters in Texas, Musk made a compelling case for turning Mars into a second home for humankind. He believes that expanding human life beyond Earth is not just exciting—it's essential. 'The fundamental fork in the road for human destiny is where Mars can continue to grow even if the supply ships from Earth stop coming,' Musk said. 'At that point, we've achieved civilizational resilience .' For Musk, the idea is clear: if anything were to go catastrophically wrong on Earth—be it climate change, war, or natural disaster—humanity could fall back on Mars. 'Having two planets that are both self-sustaining and strong, I think, is going to be incredibly important for the long-term survival of civilization,' he added. — SpaceX (@SpaceX) Starbase: A City for the Future Musk's plan isn't just conceptual. He's laying bricks for it—literally. In a recent development, SpaceX won the vote to officially turn its Texas site into a city named Starbase . The purpose? To support and house the people working on building 'the future of humanity's place in space.' You Might Also Like: Was Elon Musk really a Tesla co-founder? How he became synonymous with the brand The city, Musk envisions, will serve as the launchpad—both figuratively and literally—for the journey to Mars. With SpaceX's ambitious Starship program already testing spacecrafts capable of carrying cargo and crew, the countdown to interplanetary living has begun. 'Yes, But Not on Impact' In a quirky but revealing moment during a joint interview with Donald Trump earlier this year, Musk was asked if he really wanted to die on Mars. With his trademark dry wit, he responded, 'Yes, but not on impact.' It's a comment that walks the line between humor and philosophy, showcasing Musk's commitment to the cause—even if it costs him his life. The Million-Person Mars Plan Musk envisions Starship eventually ferrying 'hundreds of thousands or maybe even millions' of people to the Red Planet. His goal? A self-sustaining civilization, complete with the tools, infrastructure, and autonomy to thrive without Earth's help. 'Ideally we can take anyone who wants to go to Mars,' he said. 'And bring all of the equipment necessary to make Mars self-sustaining so that Mars can grow by itself.' You Might Also Like: Elon Musk's dancing robot Optimus impresses Shopify CEO but internet's worried about dish-washing A Life Raft for Earth—or a Second Chance? Elon Musk has long spoken of his fears that Earth could eventually become uninhabitable—whether due to internal collapse or external threats like solar destruction. His message is stark: relying solely on Earth is a risky bet. 'Any given civilization is likely to last maybe, I don't know, 10 times longer, maybe much longer, if it is a multi-planet civilization than if it is a single-planet civilization,' he said. In other words, for Musk, Mars is not an escape—it's a continuation . A way to ensure that the stories, innovations, and dreams of humankind don't end abruptly. In his view, building a new world isn't abandoning the old one—it's giving humanity another shot. As SpaceX edges closer to making its Mars dreams a reality, the world watches with a mix of awe, skepticism, and hope. Because if Musk has his way, the next great chapter in human history may not be written on Earth at all.


News18
a day ago
- News18
After Musk's DOGE Exit, Trump Withdraws His Ally's NASA Nomination; Will Announce New Pick Soon
Shortly after Elon Musk's exit from the administration, Trump withdrew the nomination of the former DOGE chief's ally as the NASA administrator. Amid reports of disagreements between Donald Trump and Elon Musk and shortly after the Tesla boss's exit from DOGE, the White House on Saturday (local time) abruptly withdrew the nomination of Tesla CEO's close ally, Jared Isaacman, for NASA administrator. President Trump said that he took this decision after a 'thorough review of prior associations", adding that he would announce a new candidate soon. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head NASA. I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be Mission aligned, and put America First in Space," Trump wrote on Truth Social. Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut and Musk's choice to lead NASA, was scheduled for a long-delayed confirmation vote in the U.S. Senate next week. His sudden removal from consideration surprised many in the space industry. However, neither Trump nor the White House gave any explanation for the reasons that led them to this decision. Isaacman's removal comes just days after Elon Musk officially left the White House. As a 'special government employee" leading the Department of Government Efficiency, Musk's role had caused disruption within the administration and frustration among some of Trump's aides. According to a person familiar with his reaction, Musk was disappointed by his ally's removal from the nomination. Since the January 20 inauguration, Musk has been working closely with Trump to cut government spending. However, last month, he had some public disagreements with Trump — one of them over a proposed law that Trump called a 'big beautiful bill." 'I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful. But I don't know if it could be both," Musk had said. First Published: June 01, 2025, 09:26 IST


The Hindu
a day ago
- The Hindu
Musk retains plan to fly Starship to Mars in 2026 despite setbacks
Two days after the latest in a string of test-flight setbacks for his big new Mars spacecraft, Starship, Elon Musk said on May 29 he foresees the futuristic vehicle making its first uncrewed voyage to the red planet at the end of next year. Musk presented a detailed Starship development timeline in a video posted online by his Los Angeles area-based rocket company, SpaceX, a day after saying he was departing the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump as head of a tumultuous campaign to slash government bureaucracy. The billionaire entrepreneur had said earlier that he was planning to scale back his role in government to focus greater attention on his various businesses, including SpaceX and electric car and battery maker Tesla. Musk acknowledged that his latest timeline for reaching Mars hinged on whether Starship can accomplish a number of challenging technical feats during its flight-test development, particularly a post-launch refueling manoeuvre in earth orbit. The end of 2026 would coincide with a slim window that occurs once every two years when Mars and the earth align around the sun for the closest trip between the two planets, which would take seven to nine months to transit by spacecraft. Musk gave his company a 50% chance of meeting that deadline. If Starship were not ready by that time, SpaceX will wait another two years before trying again, Musk suggested in the video. The first flight to Mars would carry a simulated crew consisting of one or more robots of the Tesla-built humanoid Optimus design, with the first human crews following in the second or third landings. Musk said he envisioned eventually launching 1,000 to 2,000 ships to Mars every two years to quickly establish a self-sustaining permanent human settlement. NASA is currently aiming to return humans to the surface of the moon aboard Starship around 2027, more than 50 years after its last manned lunar landings of the Apollo era, as a stepping stone to ultimately launching astronauts to Mars sometime in the 2030s. Musk has previously said he was aiming to send an uncrewed SpaceX vehicle to the red planet by 2018 and was targeting 2024 to launch a first crewed mission there. The SpaceX founder was scheduled to deliver a livestream from the company's Texas launch site on May 27 night, following a ninth test flight of Starship that evening. But the webcast was canceled without notice after Starship spun out of control and disintegrated in a fireball about 30 minutes after launch without achieving some of its most important test goals. Two test flights in January and March failed in more spectacular fashion, with the spacecraft blowing to pieces on ascent moments after liftoff. Musk shrugged off the latest mishap saying it produced a lot of 'good data to review' and promised a faster launch cadence for the next several test flights.