Required moment of silence proposed for Ohio schools
[WATCH: In the video player above, learn how Ohio schools are graded.]
(WJW) — A new effort by Ohio lawmakers would require schools to provide a moment of silence each day for students.
If passed, House Bill 187 would amend Ohio Revised Code to require school districts to provide a moment of silence for 'prayer, reflection, or meditation upon a moral, philosophical or patriotic theme.'
Person struck by multiple vehicles on I-271: Coroner
Under current law, districts 'may' offer a moment of silence. The amendment instead says districts 'shall' offer it. The bill would not require students to participate.
Lawmakers in other states have recently proposed similar legislation.
Last week in Texas, lawmakers advanced bills that would not only allow districts to provide students with time to pray during school hours but would also require public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments, The Associated Press reported.
In West Virginia, a proposed bill calls for 1 minute of silence at the beginning of each school day. Ohio's proposal does not specify how long the moment of silence must last.
7 pets suspected dead after barricaded man starts fire: Police
Opponents of similar measures have argued it promotes prayer in school.
Ohio's proposal has bipartisan support, and is sponsored by state Reps. Gary Click (R-Vickery) and Eric Synenberg (D-Beachwood).
Click here to follow the bill's status on the Ohio House website.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
16 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Families file suit challenging Arkansas law that requires Ten Commandments be posted in classrooms
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — Seven Arkansas families filed a lawsuit Wednesday challenging an upcoming state requirement that public school classrooms have posted copies of the Ten Commandments, saying the new law will violate their constitutional rights. The federal lawsuit challenges a measure Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed into law earlier this year, similar to a requirement enacted by Louisiana and one that Texas' governor has said he'll sign. The Arkansas law takes effect in August and requires the Ten Commandments to be prominently displayed in public school classrooms and libraries. 'Permanently posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom and library — rendering them unavoidable — unconstitutionally pressures students into religious observance, veneration, and adoption of the state's favored religious scripture,' the lawsuit said. The suit was filed on behalf of the families by the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State and the Freedom from Religion Foundation. The lawsuit names four school districts in northwest Arkansas — Fayetteville, Bentonville, Siloam Springs and Springdale — as defendants. A spokesperson for Fayetteville schools said the district would not comment on pending litigation, while the other three districts did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A spokesperson for Attorney General Tim Griffin said his office was reviewing the lawsuit and considering options. Attorneys for the families, who are Jewish, Unitarian Universalist or nonreligious, said they planned to ask the federal judge in Fayetteville for a preliminary injunction blocking the law's enforcement. The attorneys say the law violates longstanding Supreme Court precedent and the families' First Amendment rights. 'By imposing a Christian-centric translation of the Ten Commandments on our children for nearly every hour of every day of their public-school education, this law will infringe on our rights as parents and create an unwelcoming and religiously coercive school environment for our children,' Samantha Stinson, one of the plaintiffs, said in a news release. Louisiana was the first state to enact such a requirement, and a federal judge blocked the measure before it was to take effect Jan 1. Proponents of Louisiana's law say that ruling only applies to the five school boards listed in the suit, but The Associated Press is unaware of any posters being displayed in schools as the litigation continues. ___ Associated Press Writer Sara Cline in Baton Rouge, Louisiana contributed to this report
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump is expected to sign a measure blocking California's nation-leading vehicle emissions rules
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump is expected to sign a measure Thursday that blocks California's first-in-the-nation rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035, a White House official told The Associated Press. The resolution Trump plans to sign, which Congress approved last month, aims to quash the country's most aggressive attempt to phase out gas-powered cars. He also plans to approve measures to overturn state policies curbing tailpipe emissions in certain vehicles and smog-forming nitrogen oxide pollution from trucks. The timing of the signing was confirmed Wednesday by a White House official who spoke on condition of anonymity to share plans not yet public. The development comes as the Republican president is mired in a clash with California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, over Trump's move to deploy troops to Los Angeles in response to immigration protests. It's the latest in an ongoing battle between the Trump administration and heavily Democratic California over everything from tariffs to the rights of LGBTQ+ youth and funding for electric vehicle chargers. According to the official, Trump is expected to sign resolutions that block California's rule phasing out gas-powered cars and ending the sale of new ones by 2035. He will also kill rules that phase out the sale of medium- and heavy-duty diesel vehicles and cut tailpipe emissions from trucks. The president is scheduled to sign the measures and make remarks during an event at the White House on Thursday morning. Newsom, who is considered a likely 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, and California officials contend that what the federal government is doing is illegal and said the state plans to sue. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin are expected to attend, along with members of Congress and representatives from the energy, trucking and gas station industries. California, which has some of the nation's worst air pollution, has been able to seek waivers for decades from the EPA allowing it to adopt stricter emissions standards than the federal government. In his first term, Trump revoked California's ability to enforce its standards, but President Joe Biden reinstated it in 2022. Trump has not yet sought to revoke it again. Republicans have long criticized those waivers and earlier this year opted to use the Congressional Review Act, a law aimed at improving congressional oversight of actions by federal agencies, to try to block the rules. That's despite a finding from the U.S. Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan congressional watchdog, that California's standards cannot legally be blocked using the Congressional Review Act. The Senate parliamentarian agreed with that finding. California, which makes up roughly 11% of the U.S. car market, has significant power to sway trends in the auto industry. About a dozen states signed on to adopt California's rule phasing out the sale of new gas-powered cars. The National Automobile Dealers Association supported the federal government's move to block California's ban on gas-powered cars, saying Congress should decide on such a national issue, not the state. The American Trucking Associations said the rules were not feasible and celebrated Congress' move to block them. Chris Spear, the CEO of the American Trucking Associations, said in a statement Wednesday: 'This is not the United States of California.' ___ Austin reported from Sacramento, Calif.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Group sues to remove Ten Commandments monument from southern Illinois courthouse lawn
JEFFERSON COUNTY, Ill. – A group of Jefferson County, Illinois taxpayers have filed a lawsuit in a push to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the lawn of the county's courthouse, citing concerns over religious neutrality and constitutional violations. The lawsuit, filed Monday in Illinois' 2nd Judicial Circuit Court, targets Jefferson County, the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners and several Jefferson County board members. It also references county sheriff Jeff Bullard, not explicitly as a defendant, but as an individual who allegedly had a role in moving the monument from its original location inside the courthouse to the lawn outside. Police: Suspect tracked obituaries, stole from dead St. Louis County residents According to the lawsuit, Bullard commissioned the monument last year with help of private donations, and the monument was initially installed inside the courthouse lobby. The lawsuit contends, later that year, after legal counsel warned the display could raise constitutional concerns, the monument was relocated to an outdoor lawn near the courthouse entrance. The lawsuit claims that the sheriff used around $4,800 from a county-controlled account known a 'Chirper Fund' to cover relocation costs not fully covered by the original private contributions for the monument. The lawsuit alleges, around September 2024, the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners voted to retain the monument on county property, despite legal warnings from the Freedom From Religion Foundation and an attorney who informed the county that the monument could raise 'serious legal concerns.' The lawsuit, however, notes the board's decision followed public comments with mixed reactions. The monument, which stands nearly seven feet tall, features a Protestant version of the Ten Commandments, according to the lawsuit. Now several months since it was moved outside, the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois filed a lawsuit on behalf of eight Jefferson County taxpayers of various religious and non-religious backgrounds. The ACLU argues that the monument signals a government endorsement of a particular religious perspective. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now 'In Illinois, we do not permit local politicians to use the power and authority of their office to promote their religious views,' said Kevin Fee, legal director for the ACLU of Illinois, via a news release. 'Our organization has always worked to ensure that everyone's religious freedom is respected. This monument – which must be removed immediately – attempts to undermine that freedom for many residents. We are pleased to represent these clients in seeking fairness in Jefferson County.' 'This Ten Commandments monument represents an intrusion of civil authority into matters of faith,' said lead plaintiff and Pastor Lynn Neal. 'As a minister, I object to my government co-opting my religious beliefs for improper political purposes, usurping my role as a religious leader by promoting an officially preferred version of the Ten Commandments and presenting it outside of its biblical context.' The lawsuit is seeking 'declaratory relief' through a court order that would require the removal of the monument from public property and prohibit further use of public resources to support religious displays. FOX 2 has reached out to the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners and Sheriff Jeff Bullard for comment. Our requests for comment have not been returned as of this story's publication. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
