Cole Palmer admits Champions League winners' medal means nothing to him and he ‘doesn't feel like he won it'
COLE PALMER is already a Champions League winner.
But to the ambitious young star, the medal he picked up as a non-playing substitute in Manchester City 's 2023 triumph over Inter Milan doesn't mean a lot.
7
During what turned out to be his final season at City, he made his only start in the competition in a dead rubber group game against Sevilla.
For the rest of the campaign, including the final in Istanbul, he sat on the bench as a no doubt frustrated observer.
Palmer, now 23, said: 'I always say, I don't feel like a Champions League winner, if I'm being honest.
'It doesn't really mean anything to me.
'People say it, but I weren't involved.
'Obviously I played in the group stage and stuff like that, but it's not the same, is it?
'I've not threw the medal away! I've still got it, but it's not like I feel like I've won it.'
Palmer thoroughly earned the winner's medal he received for Chelsea's Conference League triumph last month.
7
7
He gave a second-half masterclass as the Blues came from a goal down to beat Real Betis 4-1 and become the first club to complete a full set of Uefa trophies.
But it's a competition that Palmer and Chelsea hope to have left behind for good.
'To do what-' - Cole Palmer left confused as he's asked to name his Premier League Mount Rushmore
For the club's status and bank balance, the victory over Nottingham Forest that guaranteed a return to the Champions League after a two-year absence, was far more important.
Palmer said: 'Everyone at Chelsea wanted to be in the Champions League.
'No disrespect to the Conference League or whatever, but Champions League is the biggest competition.
'We finished well. We had some tough games
'We had that little spell in the season where we weren't too great.
"Everyone was saying they're not gonna get Champions League and that.
'So to get it was good. Getting that at Forest was a relief'
7
But Palmer's display against Betis will have been something of a relief to him, even if he would not put in quite those terms.
It was a timely return of the Cole Palmer who had made himself into one of the world's biggest young stars
Because after picking up where he had left off in his stunning debut season for the Blues, scoring and creating goals for fun, the second half of the 2024/5 campaign was a tough one.
As the run of games without a goal or even an assist grew longer and longer, it looked like Palmer was feeling the pressure.
His spectacular transformation from City youth player to Chelsea' main man created expectation, and he was not living up to it.
Even the famously cool young man was just a little concerned.
Palmer said: "I know myself players will go through it. I'm not stupid.
'But then you go into Chelsea and you do that from a jump, and then you go into a dip, you just think, 'What's going on?'.
'I don't mind. Obviously I did mind, but I didn't think it was the end of the world.
'I just think it was one of them things when things weren't happening for me.
'I went on a bit longer than I thought it would go on. But I spoke to people about it and they explained it was going to happen.
'But they said that when I get out of it, I'll be an even better player than what I was before I went in it.'
Which would be great news for Chelsea and for England.
Although Palmer is very much the Blues' key man, at international level he has a fight on his hands to be the creative hub of the team.
Which feels even stranger because he is one of only four England players to have scored a goal in a major final.
For most of Euro 2024, Three Lions fans were crying out for Palmer to be given more of a chance to inject some life into Gareth Southgate's struggling team.
And when he was brought on in the final against Spain, he grabbed a brilliant equaliser.
Palmer recalled: 'An occasion like that if you think about it, it might get the better of you. So I just try not to.
'I was just getting ready to come on like all the other games I came on, try and make an impact.
'I thought, 'It's the final, the last game, we're losing, I've got nothing to lose'. Well, we did, the biggest game of our career, but you know what I mean.
'So yeah, that's what I was trying to do.
'At the time, I didn't really realise how big that goal was. It was only when the tournament finished and I went home and looked back.'
But it's about looking forward now, for Palmer, Chelsea and England.
Real Madrid star and Champions League winner Jude Bellingham is the man in possession of the No 10 role for England.
If both he and Palmer start Saturday's World Cup qualifier against Andorra, the Chelsea man could find himself out wide.
But at least next season, he will be playing in the same European competition as Bellingham and the biggest stars of the game.
And trying to earn a medal for real.
7
DELAP BREAKOUT
COLE Palmer is delighted that former Manchester City team-mate Liam Delap has opted to join the Blues.
The pair, who grew up together in the City Academy, will be reunited at Stamford Bridge after the Blues confirmed they had completed a £30m deal with Ipswich for centre forward Delap.
Palmer said: 'I'm excited to play with him. I was messaging him asking If he was coming and that.
'I played with him at Under 18s, 21s. We went to the first team together.
'He's a great striker, one of the best in the Premier League. You can see from last season.
'So I think he'll help us a lot and hopefully score lots of goals.'
7
7
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
India's Rahul signals top-order readiness with warm-up hundred
LONDON, June 7 (Reuters) - KL Rahul's composed hundred in the ongoing second unofficial test against England Lions will bring much relief to the India team management ahead of the five-test series in England. Partnering with Yashasvi Jaiswal at the top of the batting order, Rahul produced a chanceless knock of 116 in Northampton on a lively track in overcast conditions on Friday. India, under new captain Shubman Gill, have been left with gaping holes in their top order after opener Rohit Sharma and stalwart Virat Kohli quit test cricket last month. While Rahul, who can bat practically anywhere in the lineup, is likely to succeed Rohit as Jaiswal's opening partner, either Gill or Karun Nair is likely to fill the void of Kohli at number four. Nair, who played the last of his six tests in 2017, smashed a double hundred in the first unofficial test in Canterbury. "We haven't really decided on the (batting order), we still have some time," Gill had said in his pre-departure press conference in Mumbai. "We will be playing an intra-squad match and we will be having a 10-day camp in London. So we still have a little bit of time and I think we can decide on the batting order once we go there." The five-test series begins in Leeds on June 20.
BBC News
43 minutes ago
- BBC News
East of England news quiz of the week 31 May to 6 June
From unusual food bank donations to angry parents after a school rule change, how much East of England news can you remember from the past seven days? Follow East of England news on X, Instagram and Facebook: BBC Beds, Herts & Bucks, BBC Cambridgeshire, BBC Essex, BBC Norfolk, BBC Northamptonshire or BBC Suffolk.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Why Harry's hopes for reconciliation with the King are doomed
For Elizabeth II, it was the final straw in the Megxit saga – and it happened four years ago this week. The monarch, then 95, had successfully defended her family against the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's explosive Oprah Winfrey interview with the pithy royal response that ' some recollections may vary '. She had more than enough reason to be angry. As the couple accused two unnamed royals of being racist towards their as-yet-unborn son, Archie, before a global audience of millions on March 7 2021, Prince Philip was dying in hospital. He died less than a month later, on April 9, aged 99. Astonishingly, though, it wasn't that extraordinary prime-time salvo that ended any hope of a royal rapprochement between the Sussexes and the late Queen. The fatal blow came three months later on June 4, when the Sussexes announced their newborn daughter would be named Lilibet after her great-grandmother's childhood nickname. The couple celebrated the moment on Wednesday by releasing an eye-popping video of themselves 'twerking' in their hospital delivery suite. When the couple insisted that the late Queen was 'supportive' of them using the name, the normally imperturbable monarch did something she had rarely done before. Angered by the false assertion that she had given her blessing, she instructed the Buckingham Palace powers-that-be to make it clear that her permission had not, in fact, been sought. So when the US-based couple fired off a legal letter to the BBC for an article reporting that the late Queen had not been properly consulted, the palace refused to back up their version of events. Lilibet, the pet name given to Her Majesty by her parents King George VI and the Queen Mother and used only by them, her sister Princess Margaret, Prince Philip and her closest confidantes, was one of the only things the late Queen had to herself – and Harry and Meghan had purloined it. Not only did the legal threats against BBC fail to materialise, but the incident was conspicuous by its absence from the Duke's tell-all autobiography Spare, published in January 2023, four months after Her Majesty's death. This week marks the fourth anniversary of that unedifying episode and it remains an important reminder of just how difficult it will be for the Royals to reconcile with a couple whose 'truth' has often seemed to collide with royal reality. Talk of whether relations will ever be restored between the Sussexes and the Windsors is not just a media obsession. It remains a topic of intense discussion behind palace gates where aides have been trying to map a way forward as the King, 76, continues to recover from cancer. In yet another bombshell interview, recorded after he had lost an appeal in court over his security last month, the Duke told the BBC that he wanted to heal family wounds. Some interpreted it as a 'dead cat' strategy to distract from the fact he had failed to persuade the judge that the Home Office should have maintained his taxpayer funded royalty protection. He said: 'There have been so many disagreements, differences between me and some of my family. This current situation that has been now ongoing for five years with regards to human life and safety is the sticking point; it is the only thing that's left. Of course, some members of my family will never forgive me for writing a book, of course they will never forgive me for lots of things. But you know there is…I would love reconciliation with my family. 'There's no point in continuing to fight anymore, as I said life is precious. I don't know how much longer my father has, he won't speak to me because of this security stuff but it would be nice to reconcile.' Coming just days after the King had given a poignant update on his illness, describing the experience as 'daunting' and 'frightening', the Duke's outburst understandably caused huge upset. The palace had been very careful not to discuss the details of the King's condition, stressing only that his recovery continues in a 'very positive direction, as reflected with the very full national and international diary programme'. It was an unhelpful intervention ahead of the King and Queen's very positively received trip to Canada, and some felt it set back efforts to reassure the public that he was faring well – so well in fact, that very tentative planning had begun on his 80th birthday celebrations in 2028. The talk now is that he may die 'with' cancer, but not 'of' cancer following a rigorous treatment programme. One concession to his health and advancing years that has been made, however, is that it appears unlikely he will ever move from Clarence House to Buckingham Palace after the restoration is completed in three year's time although it will remain the household's office for the rest of his reign. Equally exploratory have been discussions about if or when father and son could ever be reunited, with some mooting that the next Invictus Games could provide an opportunity when it is held in Birmingham in 2027. Mindful of the Duke's recent televised olive branch, the palace has even carried out discrete polling to find out how many people were aware of the BBC interview (over 80 per cent of Brits weren't). Yet there is an awareness that the impasse cannot continue forever, not least if it starts to reflect badly on the King. Serious concerns remain, however, about the intimate contents of any meeting ending up in the public domain, which is the main reason the King is no longer taking his youngest son's calls. The irony of the palace's predicament has not been lost on aides who had grown used to the Duke regularly complaining about stories ending up in the press he claimed had been leaked by royal staff. Eyebrows were raised when the Sussexes' spokesman briefed that they had not been invited to the King's 75th birthday celebrations in 2023 amid reports they had snubbed the event. Were there to be a public reconciliation at the Invictus Games, it is hoped it would also involve Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet who will be eight and six by then. The King last saw his youngest grandchildren during the Platinum Jubilee in 2022. The Duchess's presence remains a known unknown, with some questioning whether she will ever return to the UK for fear of a hostile reception from the public. The couple were booed on arrival at St Paul's Cathedral in London for a ceremony marking jubilee three years ago and a great deal more has been said and done since then. As ever, security remains a barrier with the Duke continuing to insist that he and his family aren't safe returning to Britain without the armed Metropolitan police bodyguards who used to protect them when they were working royals. While exasperated by the Duke's insistence that his father could have stepped in and prevented the Royal and VIP Executive Committee from downgrading his son's security, aides are believed to be looking at ways the family could be enveloped into King's security arrangements were he to make an official royal visit to the games. The Prince of Wales's involvement remains unlikely after the Duke revealed the gory details of a brotherly brawl over a dog bowl and accused his sister-in-law of questioning what the Sussexes' firstborn might look like along with the King. (Although the Duke did not name them in Spare, they were outed in Endgame, a book by the Sussexes' hagiographer Omid Scobie.) Although the heir to the throne is no longer as angry as he was, those who know him best believe there is 'no way back'. The prevailing attitude is to let sleeping dogs lie. As far as the wider Royal family are concerned, they believe they did everything in their power to make the Duchess feel welcome, and view the Duke – once nicknamed ' The Hostage ' by palace staff – to be enthralled by his wife. Some had questioned whether the marriage would go the distance but are now resigned to the fact that the Duke will never return to Britain now his children, who have US passports and accents, are being brought up in America. After it was announced in January that the Princess of Wales is in remission following abdominal surgery and chemotherapy, the Waleses are under growing pressure to increase their workload amid concerns they may be spending too much time with their immediate family instead of supporting the Firm. Alive to the need to be as visible as possible, while remaining hands on parents to Prince George, 11, Princess Charlotte, 10, and seven-year-old Prince Louis, brokering a reunion with the Duke (let alone the Duchess) would appear to be low down their list of priorities. Like the King, they are also worried about the contents of any conversations making yet more lurid headlines. As far as the Crown is concerned, the institution will never reconcile with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. But the Royals are also a family and as the Prince joked this week: 'Some of them [relatives] might not want to see you that much. It's a mixed bag.'
