The seaside spot crowned Britain's most obese town
Obesity. An epidemic. A modern scourge. A complex, painful subject wrapped in layers of shame, judgment and defensiveness. So how does it feel to live in Hartlepool, the town with the highest proportion of adults and children who are so overweight their health is at risk?
'Everybody round here is fat and getting fatter, and I feel really, really sad about it,' says John Betey, a moustached 64-year-old, leaning on the mobility scooter he needs to get around Hartlepool town centre. 'I'm embarrassed that I'm 19st – but I don't want to be. I got made redundant 12 years ago from my job as a machine operator, but now I'm too overweight to get a new job.'
This seaside town in County Durham carries the unenviable crown of Britain's most obese town. Numbers crunched by The Telegraph show that the combined obesity figures for adults and children is 33.5 per cent of the population. In England as a whole it is 23.8 per cent.
Obesity, of course, is at the extreme end of the scale. Across England as a whole, 64.5 per cent of the adult population is overweight and/or obese. In Hartlepool the damning figure is 77.2 per cent.
But sobering statistics only tell part of the story; they don't reflect the lives blighted, the life chances curtailed, the increased risk of multiple diseases including coronary heart disease, stroke, Type 2 diabetes, asthma and cancer.
Dig a little deeper elsewhere into statistics from the Department of Heath and Social Care and the data becomes even more troubling: 27.9 per cent of reception pupils in Hartlepool are classed as overweight, according to the latest available statistics from 2023/24, with 13.9 per cent obese. In England as a whole, 22.1 per cent are overweight and 9.6 per cent are classed as obese.
By year six, more than a quarter (26.7 per cent) of 10 and 11-year-olds in Hartlepool are living with obesity; above the national average of 22.1 per cent for that age group.
I freely admit that before I visit Hartlepool I am full of trepidation. How to even begin a conversation about such an emotive issue with strangers in the street? Is there any way to avoid causing offence? Astonishingly, everyone is more than happy to talk – and what they have to say is deeply depressing.
Take Betey, a father-of-four with seven grandchildren, who suffers from arthritis and had a pacemaker fitted earlier this year. He doesn't know for sure if his health problems are related to his size, but it seems highly likely. According to the Arthritis Foundation, every pound of extra weight adds 4lb of force on a person's joints. Moreover, fat is chemically active and releases inflammation-causing proteins.
'I can walk but not very far, which is why I need the scooter. And I can't go up the stairs at home, so I have to get help from my son. It's not a good feeling but if I have the money I'll order a Chinese – chicken curry, chips and fried rice – two nights a week,' he says with a shrug.
'Then I come out into town and when I look around me I feel the people of Hartlepool could do so much better, I could do so much better – but we need help.'
His views are echoed by Carol Bickerdyke, 70, out walking her poodle, Archie, with her husband, Desmond. They moved here after a lifetime working in Portugal, because property was cheap. She's a fan of the town, with its unexpectedly grand – if largely neglected and run-down – Victorian architecture, but is unsurprised that Hartlepool is an obesity black spot.
Time and again, statistics show that the North East and the Midlands have the highest numbers of people living with obesity, which is linked to social deprivation, stress, highly processed junk food and a lack of exercise.
'My daughter is 43 and she is always on a diet because she's quite big,' confides Bickerdyke.
'The problem is the availability of cheap fast food. If you have two or three kids to feed and not much money, it's cheaper to buy a frozen ready-made lasagne or frozen chips and fish fingers than to serve up a healthy meal every day. These are processed foods full of salt and fat and sugar, but people have no idea – there needs to be greater education.'
Far beyond Hartlepool, the UK at large is in crisis, with higher rates of obesity than other G7 nations such as Germany, France, Italy and Japan. Internationally, it languishes below Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Armenia. Junk food advertising, the prevalence of takeaways and the volume of inexpensive processed foods available in supermarkets have all been blamed for fuelling the crisis, along with sedentary, screen-based lifestyles.
'Despite countless policy initiatives aimed at improving the situation, obesity levels among children in England remain at harmfully elevated levels,' says Dr Liz Fisher, a senior fellow and the children and young person lead at the Nuffield Trust. 'Obese children today are developing health problems that once only affected adults, including Type 2 diabetes.
'Local areas with more childhood poverty, lower breastfeeding rates and poor access to green spaces have higher child obesity levels. Much of the evidence informing obesity policy to date has focused on the choices of individuals, but to get a grip on this issue, approaches with more emphasis on wider social and economic factors are desperately needed, at both a national and local level.'
The annual cost to the NHS of treating obesity-related ill health is estimated at £6.5 billion by the Department of Health and Social Care. Meanwhile, the cost to the wider economy is £100 billion a year, according to a 2024 report from the Institute of Public Policy Research (IPPR), with those who are obese but still work less mobile, less productive and more likely to take time off due to ill health.
'Poor public health is holding back the UK economy, and obesity is playing a significant role. The poorest regions across England are feeling this epidemic the worst,' Jamie O'Halloran, a senior research fellow at the think tank, said last year.
The IPPR clearly pinpointed those very regions; four out of five of the parliamentary constituencies with the highest levels of obesity and economic inactivity were in the North.
But what is the solution? For those of us reared on the mantra of 'five a day', it seems unbelievable that entire generations remain ignorant about the importance of fruit and vegetables and of how to cook nutritious meals from scratch.
The demise of both decent school dinners and domestic science as a subject has had an impact – and no matter how hard Jamie Oliver tries to convey the speed and ease of cooking on a budget in Channel 4 shows such as £1 Wonders, that message seemingly still has not spread to communities across Britain in general and Hartlepool in particular. Or if it has, local people are none the less still making poor food choices.
'People judge you as lazy and stupid and lacking in self-control,' says a 27-year-old mother-of-two who declined to be named. 'I just can't lose the baby weight, and being treated as a second-class citizen is really hurtful – so then you find yourself comfort eating.
'I can buy a multipack of crisps for £1, but an apple costs the best part of 50p, which seems crazy. It's a vicious circle. There's no point just telling a fat person they're fat; what we really need is help to break that cycle as well as access to better food that's affordable.'
Is she aware that adults who become overweight before 30 are almost doubling their risk of an early death? That's the grim conclusion from this month's European Congress on Obesity, held in Malaga. And if she were – would it alter anything?
'The perception persists that 'these people did it themselves and they should live with the consequences',' says Prof Paul Gately, who specialises in exercise and obesity at Leeds Beckett University and is the chief executive of Obesity UK.
'But obesity is incredibly complex and the solution isn't just exercising more and eating less – if it was that simple we wouldn't have a global health problem. Politicians try to tackle it, but their efforts, however well-intended, are far too piecemeal. Between six and 18 months later they see their strategy isn't working as intended, so they back off.'
There have been more than 700 policies aimed at tackling obesity introduced in the past 30 years and yet the problem is getting bigger every year. The rising number of children now affected has ratcheted up a sense of urgency among medical experts, yet successive governments have failed to grasp the nettle and pump proper investment into early prevention and treatment. Just what will it take to tip the scales?
'We don't just need one good idea. We need hundreds of them all connected, all moving things in the same direction,' says Prof Gately. 'There's rightly a conversation now around weight-loss jabs, but the NHS is already on its knees and can't afford it. Britain needs cross-party agreement, a department dedicated to tackling obesity and a 15-year plan that is fully funded.'
As I walk past Kwicksnax café, Cash Generator and Betfred, the one word repeated to me again and again is 'help'. The people of Hartlepool want help.
On the walkway from Middleton Grange shopping mall, I meet young chefs Luke Peterson, 19, and Conor Wilson, 20, laden down with Primark bags full of holiday gear. Both are studying hospitality and catering at college and are about to travel to Greece for a placement, where they will learn how to prepare international food.
'I work part-time in a takeaway and we have customers who order burgers or pizza every single day of the week,' says Peterson. 'And because it's delivered they don't even need to leave the house. I know I have a tendency to eat junk, so I am very strict with myself and I go to the gym. But here people feel it's too late or too much effort and they just let themselves go; the worst bit is seeing how overweight their kids are.'
His friend used to work at The Green Bean Cafe in Sunderland, and loved it. 'It was a really nice feeling knowing you were preparing great food from fresh ingredients and giving your customers the very best,' says Wilson. 'I'd love to open something like that here, but it would probably have to be subsidised in some way so people could afford it.'
For its part, Hartlepool borough council is aware of the health emergency it faces and last month revealed it was working on a childhood obesity action plan, to include cooking lessons and providing cooking equipment, while noting it is 'a very complex subject to deal with'.
Its director of public health, Craig Blundred, announced: 'What we're hoping to do through the action plan is work much more closely with children's services and with partners in the health service to try to understand why we're seeing increases [in obesity].
'We understand some of the causes but we don't fully understand why Hartlepool has a much higher level for children that are actually experiencing that.'
Out on the streets of Hartlepool, the mood remains sombre. Students Grace Haran, 21, and her boyfriend, Jack Maiden, 20, are both doing college access courses to study nursing and physiotherapy respectively at university.
'I feel so sad for the kids you see who are overweight and obese,' says Haran. 'They don't have any choice about what they are given to eat and it's having a hugely detrimental effect on their health.'
The couple agree that widespread use of weigh-loss drugs is not ideal but could be a useful means to an end. Maiden believes they should be taken in conjunction with an exercise and healthy eating plan.
'Quick results can be a real incentive,' he says. 'But there needs to be hard work as well or a course of jabs will only ever be a temporary fix that changes nothing in the long run.'
The same could be said of local action plans without serious backup from central government. From its wrecking ball impact on the NHS to its £100 billion drain on the economy, obesity is a long-term, society-wide issue. It needs a long-term, society-wide solution.
The people of Hartlepool are in crisis and in desperate need of hope as well as help. Will they get it any time soon? Right now, I fear there's fat chance.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Maine won't require medical cannabis to be tested for contaminants -- this year
Jun. 11—Maine's medical cannabis providers have once again fought off a controversial requirement to start testing their products — at least for now. A legislative committee killed one bill and carried over another that would have instituted testing and tracking requirements that industry members have said for years would put them out of business or force price increases. While Maine's recreational cannabis market requires testing for contaminants and potency and includes potency limits, the medical market requires neither. Maine is the only state that doesn't mandate medical cannabis to be tested. LD 104, proposed by the state's Office of Cannabis Policy and sponsored by Rep. Marc Malon, D-Biddeford, would have required seed-to-sale plant tracking and standardized chemical, mold and heavy metal testing between recreational and medical cannabis. LD 1847, sponsored by Rep. Anne Graham, D-North Yarmouth, sought to do the same while also adding potency caps on edibles. The latter will be taken up again next year. "I have listened and I've read testimony and I've worked with public health advocates to make sure that the medical cannabis industry survives, thrives and (can) be regulated so that when patients buy cannabis, they know that they have a safe product and they know what the potency is," Graham said. " ... Clearly our regulations and how we look at (testing), it needs work, a lot of work." But it's also "hugely complicated," she said, and needs more time. Jennifer Belcher, president of the Maine Cannabis Union, said there's a "sense of relief now that we know that nothing is going through this year. If either bill passed as written, she said "the medical program would be done." Belcher was encouraged by how receptive the committee was to the industry's concerns, and while "it is nerve-racking that we are going to face this next session," there's also an exciting opportunity for collaboration. "(LD) 1847 gives us an opportunity to focus on the facts, the research, the science," she said. AN ONGOING FIGHT John Hudak, director of the office, has been clear that implementing a testing program is a top priority, but this session was the first time since he was appointed to the office in late 2022 that an official proposal has been before the committee. Following a 2022 law, any major substantive rule-making from the department must be approved by the Legislature. "If a business model is one in which producing clean cannabis is too costly, there's something wrong with the business model," he said previously. "We're not going to focus on profits at the expense of patients' health." Supporters of the bill have referenced a 2023 report by the Office of Cannabis Policy that found about 45% of the cannabis in Maine's medical market would fail the standards set for the recreational market. They also pointed to the influx of suspected illegal growers allegedly tied to Chinese organized crime who have been selling bulk cannabis at "rock bottom" prices to legal dispensaries. However, in a public hearing last month, dozens of medical cannabis caregivers and consumers testified in opposition to the bills and the committee received roughly 1,000 pieces of written testimony. They criticized the state's testing program, citing several recalls in the recreational program last year that have brought the science behind the tests and the state's standards into question. The recent recalls, they argue, prove the testing doesn't work and shouldn't be forced on the medical program. The fight is just the latest in a series of uphill battles for Maine's medical cannabis providers. Oversaturation, competition with recreational cannabis and high costs have caused revenue to plummet and people to leave the industry in droves. Unlike many other states, Maine's medical cannabis market has always outperformed its recreational counterpart. But the gap between the two is narrowing, and last year the medical market brought in about $280 million (down from $371 in 2021), while the recreational market brought in $217 million. The number of providers, known in the industry as caregivers, has been cleaved in half from its 2016 peak of 3,257 to 1,627 in May, according to state data. "We are literally fighting for our lives at this point," Belcher said. OTHER BILLS The committee carried over several other bills, including one that would require the director of the Office of Cannabis Policy be confirmed by the Legislature rather than appointed by the commissioner of the Department of Administrative and Financial Services, which oversees the office. Sen. Craig Hickman, D-Winthrop, who drafted the bill, said the committee needed time to investigate whether there are other directors, like the heads of the state's alcohol and gambling control agencies, that should also be subject to legislative approval. Lawmakers also carried over a proposal to allow cannabis "social clubs" or public consumption, based off recommendations in a task force report this winter. Earlier this session, the committee killed two bills that would have implemented revenue sharing across Maine's cannabis industry, meaning towns and cities that allow recreational businesses could receive a portion of the tax revenue they generate. Legislators hoped the bills would encourage more towns and cities to allow cannabis shops and help them recoup the costs of overseeing the recreational program. Copy the Story Link We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others. We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion. You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs. Show less

Epoch Times
5 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Why Bitters May Be the Key to Better Digestion and Blood Sugar
Bitter foods and digestive bitters might not be the first thing you crave at mealtime, but science—and centuries of traditional wisdom—suggest they're a missing foundation to your healthy lifestyle routine. From supporting digestion to balancing blood sugar and even influencing hormones that can help you lose weight, these pungent plants are making a comeback. Digestive bitters are concentrated herbal extracts made from bitter-tasting plants—many of which you can find at your local health food store or online. Just a few drops before a meal can 'wake up' your digestive system. However, what's behind that distinctive bitter taste? Activate the 'Bitter Reflex' When you taste something bitter, you activate special receptors not just on your tongue, but throughout your digestive tract. These receptors, called type-2 taste receptors (TAS2Rs), trigger what's commonly termed the 'bitter reflex,' which helps your digestion by breaking down food molecules more efficiently. The bitter reflex can also aid gut motility, a response of the parasympathetic or 'rest-and-digest' arm of the nervous system. While bitter herbs have been used for thousands of years in traditional Chinese medicine and other traditional healing systems to support the digestive system, modern science is now uncovering how they work. The bitter reflex stimulates the production of saliva, stomach acid, bile, and digestive enzymes. Strong stomach acid (hydrochloric acid) secretion, which declines naturally with age, is particularly important for the digestion of proteins. Altogether, these secretions prepare the body for incoming foods, allowing for more efficient breakdown and absorption.


Miami Herald
6 hours ago
- Miami Herald
The CDC says guns are the No. 1 killer of children. Here's what's really true
With Robert F. Kennedy's Make Children Healthy Again report under attack for questionable science, imaginary research and other 'formatting errors,' as the White House calls them, Democrats are worrying about a politicized public health system selling snake oil to the American public. You don't have to look far back in time for examples of the government public health system and the private sector experts who influence it and spearhead its research efforts selling snake oil. The coronavirus pandemic was rife with them. There was the time public health officials simply made up the claim that staying 6 feet apart would help stop the spread of COVID-19. And the time top officials and scientists conspired to falsely 'debunk' concerns that the coronavirus was released from a Chinese lab. And then there were times when public health advice was politicized, like when public health officials said gathering in groups was unsafe, except if it was to protest the death of George Floyd. They're not just about COVID, either. Remember the great kerfuffle over Flint, Michigan's lead problem? The people who were telling you that Black kids were poisoned forgot to tell you that there own data showed blood lead levels of lead in 'poisoned' kids were much lower than just a decade earlier when nobody was talking about poisoned kids. This weekend, you'll be treated to another misinformation campaign that comes with the imprimatur of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health. It's time for the annual 'Gun Violence Awareness Week.' This weekend, buildings all over the country will light up orange in solidarity with those who have lost their lives in what has become a daily bloodbath we spend most of the year ignoring. Among the claims you'll be hearing is one I received from a local Kansas City backer of Moms Demand Action, a gun control group. 'Gun deaths are the number one cause of deaths of American children and adolescents,' her email said. Others say the facts are even more stark. California Gov. Gavin Newsom took out ads on social media saying, 'Guns are the number one killer of kids.' In a speech to mayors, Vice President Kamala Harris said, 'Gun violence is the leading cause of death of the children of America — leading cause of death — not car accidents, not some form of cancer — gun violence.' Facts trigger truth The facts tell a different story. Guns are not the number one killer of children at any age between 0 and 12. They never have been. Cars are the biggest killer. Who says? The CDC database called WONDER that tracks the cause of death in most U.S. deaths indexed by race, sex and age among other characteristics. For a number of kids' years of life, drowning or falls are a greater threat than guns. I asked the Kansas City activist who sent that claim to me why she was spreading such a lie. She didn't respond, but the national press person for Everytown for Gun Safety did reply, citing the CDC and the National Institute of Health as her sources. She sent links. And she's right. Here's what the CDC says: 'Taking into account all types of firearm injuries, including homicides, suicides, and unintentional injuries, firearm injuries were the leading cause of death among children and teens ages one to 19 in 2020 and 2021.' What they mean is if you lump all the dead children and teens in one pile and count how they died, for the whole gruesome pile, the No. 1 killer was guns. But that is only because guns kill so many teens — a large number of them 18- and 19-year-old adult teens. It has nothing to do with children's deaths. Elsewhere on its website, the CDC admits this difference, giving the cause of death for different groups of children as 'accidents.' Why would the CDC do something so misleading? Well, it goes back many decades in which reporting what the leading killer of children and teens was made perfect sense. The killer was the same for them all — accidents, mostly car accidents. So naturally, they reported the number all together. When guns overtook car accidents during the Biden administration, they just kept doing the same thing they had always done. Gun control groups loved it because that let them make the claim that children were dying left and right from guns. That scared concerned parents into backing their agenda and coughing up donations. The Biden administration CDC didn't seem to mind. But there's more to this story that is misleading. Remember guns are the No. 1 killer of teens, but are guns a threat to your kids? Probably not. Which teens? The CDC's WONDER(ful) database reveals that: Guns are not the number one killer of female are not the number one killer of white are not the number one killer of Hispanic are not the number one killer of Asian are not the number one killer of Native American only group for whom this claim is true is Black teens, which is statistically troubling in itself. It isn't like these facts are a shock. I found many of them in the Journal of the American Medical Association. But they do reveal the politicization of our public health experts. When I asked the author of the article, Dr. Elizabeth Wolf, about the gun control groups' claim and the fact that it wasn't actually true that children, female teens, white teens, Hispanic teens, Asian teens and Native American teens were so threatened by guns, she replied that the claim is perfectly accurate and then stopped responding to my emails. That's nuts. So if there is an annual bloodbath of gun violence in the United States, why does the slicing and dicing of dry statistics matter? If your goal is to raise campaign donations and build a national political movement to restrict gun rights, it doesn't matter. Scaring parents whose kids are not at much risk by fudging the issue works great. If your goal is to get Congress to fork over millions in research grants on the problem of gun violence, it works great to make Congress think the bullets are flying everywhere and that the blood is flowing on rural, suburban and urban congressional district streets alike. But if your goal is to actually solve the problem, well, then it really does matter just who is dying and why. Only when we face the answer to that question can we focus resources where the problem is and come up with ways to do something about it. It would be nice if the CDC made that a priority.