Keir Starmer urged to listen to voters amid Labour anger over by-election loss to Reform
Keir Starmer said Labour understood people's frustrations and vowed to go 'further and faster' to bring about change after a bruising local election night saw Reform make gains
Keir Starmer has been urged to listen to voters after Reform UK seized control of a Labour stronghold in a dramatic by-election win.
Nigel Farage 's party won Runcorn and Helsby by just six votes after a recount, overturning Labour's 14,696 majority to elect Sarah Pochin as their fifth MP.
The right-wing outfit also swept to victory in local elections across England, winning hundreds of seats off the Tories who saw their vote squeezed by Reform on the right and the Liberal Democrats on the left.
Reform also took control of Durham Council in a bitter blow to Labour's hopes of winning back the local authority, which it lost control of in 2021 for the first time in a century.
The area, which elected six Labour MPs at the General Election, was at the centre of the Miners' Strike of the 1980s and is home to the annual Miners' Gala.
Labour held onto a trio of mayoralties in Doncaster, the West of England and North Tyneside. But Doncaster's Labour Mayor Ros Jones - whose majority was slashed to just 698 after a battle with Reform - slammed the PM over cuts to the winter fuel allowance, rise in employers' national insurance contributions and benefit cuts.
She said Labour 'need to be listening to the man, woman and businesses on the street, and actually deliver for the people, with the people.'
The Prime Minister said Labour understood people's frustrations and vowed to go "further and faster" to bring about change. He said: "What I want to say is, my response is we get it. We were elected last year to bring about change."
He added Labour have "started that work" with changes such as reductions in NHS waiting lists. "I am determined that we will go further and faster on the change that people want to see," he added.
"The reason that we took the tough but right decisions in the budget was because we inherited a broken economy. Maybe other prime ministers would have walked past that, pretended it wasn't there... I took the choice to make sure our economy was stable."
TUC leader Paul Nowak urged Mr Starmer not to respond to the results by swinging to the right. He told the Mirror: 'Labour has nothing to gain from trying to out-Reform Reform.
"It will just bleed votes in both directions. But this Government will be rewarded if it delivers the change working people are crying out for.'
The results triggered a furious backlash from Labour MPs, who urged the Government to change course.
Ian Byrne, MP for Liverpool West Derby, said: "If we do not improve the situation that millions of working class people find themselves in after 14 yrs of austerity, we will be rolling the red carpet out to Reform at the next General Election.
"I urge the Labour leadership to now truly reflect and change course. If they do not, I genuinely fear the country will face the consequences of a far right government in four years' time.
One senior Labour MP told The Mirror: 'Welfare and winter fuel absolutely dominated and I'd say it proves the NHS wedge issue doesn't work.'
Another backbencher said: "Runcorn is a warning we can't ignore, doing nothing is not an option, we will end up with an extreme right wing government. The leadership needs to take their head out of the sand."
And at the Trident Park shopping centre in Runcorn people spoke of their disappointment. Kerry Sutcliffe, 32, was visiting the shops after finishing the school run. She said: 'It's just been more of the same hasn't it? I think people were expecting more from them, for them to make some strong decisions.
'But nothing's changed. Bills are going up, everything is still really expensive. And they seem to be going after the easy targets. The winter fuel allowance cut made a lot of people very angry. Taking money from people who are struggling.'
Pensioner Kath Lee, 72, said: 'The cut to the fuel allowance was a bad move. They need to listen to what people are saying. I feel worse off now than I did a year ago.'
'Labour is meant to be the party for all the people, but they just seem to be making more cuts. It's just like the Tories, nothing's changed. It's always been Labour around here, this shows how disappointed everyone is.'
The biggest losers from Reform's march were the Tories, who shed hundreds of seats and lost Staffordshire, Lincolnshire, Kent, Nottinghamshire, Lancashire and Derbyshire councils to Mr Farage.
Mr Farage declared: "[These elections] mark the beginning of the end of the Conservative Party."
Humiliated Tory leader Kemi Badenoch apologised to ousted councillors, saying: "We have a big job to do to rebuild trust with the public." However there was one bright spot for the party as ex-MP Paul Bristow was elected mayor in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough.
Elections expert Professor Sir John Curtice said Reform would have won 30% of the vote if the results were replicated in a general election. His projected vote share analysis for the BBC put Labour on 20%, the Liberal Democrats on 17% and the Tories languishing on 15%.
Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey said: 'Lifelong Conservative voters have put their faith in the Liberal Democrats because they are appalled by the Conservatives lurching to the extremes and cosying up to Nigel Farage.
'Kemi Badenoch sneered at the Liberal Democrats for being the party that will fix your church roof. Today voters across the country have chosen our community politics over the Conservative Party's neglect and disdain.'
Reform also elected its first two mayors with former boxer and Olympic medallist Luke Campbell winning the new Hull & East Yorkshire post and Tory defector Dame Andrea Jenkyns was victorious in Greater Lincolnshire.
Other candidates walked out of her victory speech as she said asylum seekers should be forced to live in tents.
Dame Andrea complained about being accused of being "parachuted in" to the seat by a rival with a South African accent - and then stormed out of a Sky News interview when asked why her opponent's accent was relevant.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why did Starmer and Reeves change tack on winter fuel payments? Every Labour U-turn explained
Sir Keir Starmer appears to be heading for a number of major U-turns amid growing concern from MPs about the direction of government and following a devastating performance at the local elections. The prime minister last month announced plans to reverse his controversial cuts to winter fuel payments, saying he wants more pensioners to be eligible for the benefit - a move that has now been confirmed. There is also a growing expectation he will lift the two-child benefit cap. While nothing has been announced yet, the prime minister is privately said to be in favour of lifting the cap – but has refused to commit to anything until the child poverty strategy is published in the autumn. Below, The Independent looks at all the times Sir Keir has U-turned on his promises or let voters down on the journey from Labour leader to prime minister. Winter fuel payments In July, the chancellor announced that pensioners not in receipt of pension credits or other means-tested benefits would no longer receive winter fuel payments - a £300 payment to help with energy costs in the colder months. After spending months ruling out a U-turn, the prime minister in May told MPs he now wants to ensure more pensioners are eligible for the payment – something he claimed has come as a result of an improving economic picture. After weeks of speculation over what the changes would look like, it has now been confirmed that 9 million pensioners will be eligible for the payment - a huge uplift from the 1.5 million pensioners who received the payment in winter 2024-25. Two-child benefit cap Promising in 2020 to create a social security system fit for the 21st century, Sir Keir said: 'We must scrap the inhuman Work Capability Assessments and private provision of disability assessments... scrap punitive sanctions, two-child limit and benefits cap.' But before the election, Sir Keir said Labour was 'not changing' the Tory policy if Labour were to win power. He has stuck to his guns, even suspending seven Labour MPs for rebelling against his King's Speech in a bid to have the policy scrapped. And now, it looks like the prime minister is gearing up to row back on the position. While nothing has been announced, the prime minister is privately said to be in favour of lifting the cap. He has refused to commit to anything until the child poverty strategy is published in the autumn but has insisted he is 'absolutely determined' to 'drive down' child poverty and has repeatedly sidestepped questions on the issue when pressed on it. Waspi women In a 2022 interview, Sir Keir said: 'All your working life you've got in mind the date on which you can retire and get your pension, and just as you get towards it, the goalposts are moved and you don't get it, and it's a real injustice. 'We need to do something about it. That wasn't the basis on which you paid in or the basis on which you were working.' But, in a familiar change of tune since becoming prime minister, Sir Keir last year sent his work and pensions secretary out to tell Women Against State Pension Inequality, Waspi women, they would not be getting any compensation. £28bn green investment pledge As shadow chancellor, Rachel Reeves announced the party's plans for an extra £28bn a year in green investment at Labour's conference in September 2021. But before the election, Sir Keir ditched the £28bn a year target and said instead that he would spend a far smaller sum on Great British Energy, a national wealth fund for clean investment and pledges on energy efficiency. National insurance Labour's pre-election manifesto promised not to increase national insurance. It stated: 'Labour will not increase taxes on working people, which is why we will not increase National Insurance, the basic, higher, or additional rates of Income Tax, or VAT.' But, Sir Keir and Chancellor Ms Reeves used the ambiguity around whether they meant employer or employee national insurance contributions to steamroll the pledge at Labour's first Budget in power. The pair argue that they only promised to keep employee contributions frozen and instead landed firms with a 2 per cent increase to employer national insurance contributions. Tractor tax Farmers have also said they feel betrayed by the PM, after a 2023 National Farmers Union (NFU) speech in which he promised to have 'a new relationship with the countryside and farmers'. Sir Keir claimed to be concerned that 'each day brings a new existential risk to British farming. He added: 'Losing a farm is not like losing any other business, it can't come back.' Going even further, then shadow environment secretary Steve Reed said it was 'desperate nonsense' to suggest he would scrap tax breaks for farmers, just weeks before the July 4 poll. But, in another hugely unpopular Budget bombshell, Sir Keir slashed agricultural property relief, meaning previously exempt farms will be his with a 20 per cent levy on farming assets worth more than £1m. Critics have said it will see family farmers forced to sell up, ripping the heart out of countryside communities. Bankers' bonuses Strict regulations on bonuses, which limit annual payouts to twice a banker's salary, were introduced by the EU in 2014 in a bid to avoid excessive risk-taking after the 2008 financial crisis. Former prime minister Liz Truss and chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng scrapped the cap in 2022, in a bid to encourage more investment in the UK. Sir Keir had previously vowed to reinstate the cap, saying in 2022 that lifting it 'shows the Tories are absolutely tone deaf to what so many people are going through'. But in another major U-turn, Ms Reeves announced before the election that the party 'does not have any intention of bringing that back'. 10 pledges Sir Keir's bid to become leader of the Labour Party was based on 10 pledges, now infamous for having almost all been summarily dumped since. They included promises to increase income tax for top earners, abolish tuition fees, support public ownership of energy and water firms, give voting rights to EU nationals and defend freedom of movement. He has said a tougher economic backdrop means the promises are now no longer deliverable. But many Labour members who backed Sir Keir's leadership bid feel betrayed, arguing that he posed as a left-winger to win over Corbynistas before pivoting sharply to the right. After figures showed an exodus of millionaires from the UK had accelerated since Labour took office, chancellor Ms Reeves offered a concession to the super-rich and hinted Labour would row back on its non-dom tax raid. The planned changes will see Labour expand the temporary repatriation facility, which lets non-doms bring income and capital gains into the UK with a minimal tax bill.
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Two-child benefit cap: How much is it worth and what will families get if Labour scrap it?
Scrapping the two-child benefit cap could lift up to 470,000 children out of poverty, according to the latest estimates, by allowing low-income families to claim an extra £3,513 per year in universal credit for every extra child. After months of firm support for maintaining the limit, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has appeared to leave the door open to the possibility of lifting the limit, put in place by the Conservative government in 2017. 'We'll look at all options of driving down child poverty,' Sir Keir said last week, in response to questions on whether he would scrap it. It came after mounting pressure from his own MPs and Reform leader Nigel Farage, who committed to scrapping the limit if he were PM. What is the two-child benefit cap - and who loses out? There are 1.2 million families with three or more children in the UK and around 370,000 of these are households on universal credit (UC). Families receiving UC - who are on low or no income - receive an extra £339 each month for their first child born before 2017, and £292.81 for first or second children born after 2017. This amounts to £7,581 per year for families with two children. But in most cases, parents are unable to claim UC benefits for any further children. There are rare exemptions, for example, in the case of twins, or adopted children. Most families can still claim general child benefit payments for more than two children, which amounts to £897 per child per year. But if the government scrapped the two-child benefit cap, families on UC could claim a further £3,513 per year for every extra child. However, there is an upper limit to how much families can claim in benefits with an overall cap of £22,020 a year, or £25,323 for households in London. How many children would scrapping it help lift out of poverty? The number of children living in poor households has been steadily increasing over the past decade, with 4.5 million children - around 1 in 3 - now living in poverty. Poverty can be defined in several ways but the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) uses 'relative low income' as a marker, referring to people in households which earn below 60 per cent of the median income of £36,700 in 2024, or £14,680. Some of these children are going without essentials, according to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, such as food, heating, clothing or basic toiletries. Removing the two-child benefit cap could lift 350,000 out of poverty, according to analysis from researchers at the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG). A further 700,000 children could see their lives improved with the extra cash, their research has found. Meanwhile, the Resolution Foundation has estimated that around 470,000 children could be taken out of poverty by lifting the cap, or 280,000 if the limit was extended to three children. Since the Labour government came into power in July last year, some 37,000 more children have been pushed into poverty by the two-child limit, according to CPAG estimates. 'No road to better living standards, economic growth and wider opportunities starts with record child poverty. The policy must go - and sooner rather than later,' said CPAG's CEO Alison Garnham. Since the cap applies to families receiving UC, the children affected are in low-income households. And 6 in 10 families affected by the two-child limit have at least one parent in work, CPAG found. What would scrapping it cost the government? The estimated cost of removing the two-child limit, extending it to three children, or removing a household cap varies. Getting rid of the cap could cost the government £3.5bn in 2029/30, according to estimates from think tank the Resolution Foundation earlier this year. Meanwhile, CPAG suggests that the move would cost £2bn. The Independent's own calculations suggest that extending the limit to three children could cost at least £1.3 bn a year; assuming that 370,000 households claim an extra £3,513 of UC each year. Consecutive governments have refused to commit to removing the cap, despite its unpopularity with voters. Last year, Sir Keir enforced the whip on seven Labour MPs who voted against their party to oppose the two-child benefit cap. The current Labour government had consistently maintained that they would not take action to remove the cap, due to tight resources in the budget; yet Sir Keir's statements last week appeared to open up the possibility of a U-turn.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Spending review live updates: Rachel Reeves to reveal how Britain will splash the cash with NHS, defence and schools in line for windfalls
Chancellor Rachel Reeves will today unveil her spending review in Parliament. The review, which will set out day-to-day spending plans for the next three years and capital spending plans for the next four, is expected to see boosts for the NHS, defence and schools. But it is also likely to involve squeezes for other departments as the Chancellor seeks to keep within the fiscal rules she has set for herself. Her room for manoeuvre has also been further constrained by the Government's U-turn on winter fuel payments, which will see the benefit paid to pensioners receiving up to £35,000 per year at a cost of around £1.25 billion to the Treasury.
