EARTH DAY 2025: HHS' KENNEDY Jr., DoD's HEGSETH, EPA's ZELDIN Combine Talents to Reduce Military Harm to Ecology, Health
After years of adverse US Defense ecological practice reports, HHS' KENNEDY Jr. DoD's HEGSETH, EPA's ZELDIN to Combine Talents, 'Tackle Ignored Pollution'
'..decades of Military (DoD) resistance to follow binding U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Final Clean Up Orders, putting soldiers and communities at risk.'— RUQAIYAH ZAROOK, Mother Jones
WASHINGTON, DC, UNITED STATES, April 22, 2025 / EINPresswire.com / -- As the world celebrates the 55th Earth Day, there are growing concerns of U.S. federal authorities inducing environmental degradation of public properties, according to STEVE SPACEK, Director of The AMERICAN STATE LITTER SCORECARD. In the last 25 years, one federal authority group--the U.S. Military and its membership--have come under scrutiny as contributors to this conundrum.
Now, newly appointed leaders for the Trump Administration-- HHS Secretary ROBERT F. KENNEDY, Defense Secretary PETE HEGSETH and Environmental Protection Secretary LEE ZELDIN-- are joining forces, combining their talents to reduce, even eliminate, glaring ecological and health harms from military bases and adjacent public lands.
Since the 2000's MOTHER JONES journalist Ruqaiyah Zarook, THE WASHINGTON POST Lyndsey Layton, NBC NEWS and THE SPOKANE SPOKESMAN-REVIEW have reported on adverse Department of Defense 's (DoD) environmental practices by Active Duty personnel. Zarook wrote of 'decades of Military resistance' to follow binding U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 'Final Clean Up Orders,'' putting 'soldiers and communities at risk.' Layton disclosed congressional hearing findings released by the late John Dingell, then-chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, investigating DoD non-compliance with environmental regulation, Dingell said then, the U.S. Military 'evaded the law through political maneuvers.' Additionally, NBC NEWS and THE SPOKESMAN-REVIEW exposed several Army and Air Force bases across the United States found to 'have high levels of toxic Forever Chemicals in their drinking water, …posing as an imminent, substantial danger to the health of personnel and civilians.'
KENNEDY Jr. has been an outspoken observer of Armed Forces comportment in regards to America's public health and the environment. In a 2003 article published in the CHICAGO TRIBUNE, Kennedy, then only a non-governmental public figure, alleged that the U.S. Federal Government was 'America's Biggest Polluter,' with the Pentagon (DoD) being 'its worst offender.' Kennedy purported Defense for 'contaminating over 15 million acres of public land and water with unexploded ordinance waste, possibly containing biological or chemical weapons.'
Last November 14, CBS EVENING NEWS reported on Kennedy's HHS nomination and his intent to work alongside Hegseth--to be later confirmed as Defense Secretary. Kennedy and Hegseth shared their plan to implement a new operational mantra for the Military. Together they dubbed the plan "#MakeThePentagonCleanAgain.' Both told of their 'readiness to work' with Zeldin, a newly confirmed EPA Secretary, 'to tackle ignored pollution.'
The following month, Spacek reached out to Kennedy and Hegseth for their thoughts on these developments, using phone calls and emails. Within 48 hours Kennedy and Hegseth responded personally to Spacek, with written feedback, acknowledging the accuracy of their publicized comments, including the created Pentagon operational slogan. In return, Spacek sent a post from his X.com account [@litterscorecard], congratulating both and wishing the officials the very best for the Trump Administration and the Department of Defense.
The AMERICAN STATE LITTER SCORECARD is 'The Best at Reporting Where, Whose Is Littering and Dumping Waste in the USA,,' said Spacek. Waste Littering and Dumping does assist in ending the lives of over 800 People EACH YEAR; on average three Americans A DAY. 'These incidents can occur anytime, under all types of weather,' said Spacek. He also mentioned The SCORECARD timely reports on these matters and from all 50 States and major US Cities and Counties.
Stephen 'Steve' Spacek
American State Litter Scorecard/Spacek Public Service
email us here
Visit us on social media:
Facebook
X
Other
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
How drones & AI are changing the defense sector & warfare
The growing frequency of wartime drone attacks is causing a shift in the nature of both the defense sector and modern warfare. Tony Bancroft, Gabelli Funds portfolio manager, joins Asking for a Trend with Josh Lipton to discuss the outlook for the use of drone technology, artificial intelligence (AI), and automation in warfare. Bancroft also shares some of his top stock picks in the defense sector, including parts-makers like Textron (TXT), Honeywell (HON), L3Harris (LHX), and Ducommun (DCO). To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend here. There's a shift on the horizon in modern warfare. Ukraine recently dealt a blow to several Russian air bases with the use of drone attacks. As of February 2025, tactical unmanned aerial vehicles account for 60 to 70% of damaged and destroyed Russian systems. That's according to the Royal United Services Institute. For more on the changes to modern warfare and ripple effects for the defense sector, we have Gubelli Funds portfolio manager Tony Bancroft. Tony, it is always good to see you and the reason, of course, Tony, you are the perfect guest for this segment, is not only are you well-known analyst, you are in fact Lieutenant Colonel, uh, Tony Bancroft, United States Marine Corps. So, we we are lucky to have you. And I want to start, Tony, with those reports we saw, uh, Ukraine's really unprecedented drone operation striking deep inside Russian territory. When you saw that, Tony, when you saw those reports, what was your reaction? Thanks, Josh. Always great to be back. And you know, I think, you know, Ukraine, uh, one-upped, um, Israel on on next, uh, next level next generation, uh, warfare and you know, the US Department of Defense has taken notes, uh, and this is how things are going to be going, uh, going forward. Uh, you're going to see a lot of, uh, asymmetric warfare, obviously a lot of use of of drones and and, uh, you know, artificial intelligence and, um, cyber, you know, cyber attacks, uh, you name it. Uh, however you can imagine it is going to be how it's going to be done. And you know, that was just sort of a case in point the fact that, you know, 117, you know, how many or $1,000 drones took out a third of the, uh, third, second or third largest air forces' um, uh, strategic bomber capability is is legitimate. So, you're going to see drones, you know, be be a lot of DOD and European spending going forward. I think right now it's about 15 billion in the US DOD budget, um, and it's probably going to go to 25 billion as expected about by 2030 and and doubling that almost in 2035. So I think we we we like the industry, we like the, uh, companies that are going to supply parts to them and, uh, we're we're definitely, you know, bullish on it. What are some of those companies, Tony? Yeah, you know, we we sort of like the the parts maker. I mean, you know, I know there's a lot of drone suppliers out there but, uh, you know, companies like, um, Textron and Honeywell and L3 Harris, um, Ducommun, uh, all make, you know, all sort of make these parts that go into all these, you know, these systems that are obviously, you know, they're pretty, you know, they're pretty, uh, intricate, uh, high technology systems that need certain structures and certain, uh, electronics in them and we sort of like those those guys. And they're diversified as well because they're on multiple programs and they're also on the commercial side. And, uh, they're they're good cash flow businesses with, you know, long secular tailwinds. I have to ask you a broader question, maybe, you know, as as you talk about how you you think maybe the the future battlefield changes and yes, it'll still involve tanks and fighter jets and battleships that more increasingly rely on AI and autonomous systems. Is the US well prepared for that shift, Tony, in your opinion? You know, I think they are. I think the US is actually, um, I I I I I think sometimes, you know, the the narrative is that the US is is fighting the last battle and and and and it's somewhat true. And that's somewhat true always when you talk about, you know, warfare. I'm sure all the way back to to Sun Tzu and and you name it. Uh, but the US is pretty capable and the weapon systems we have are are are lethal and you know, we're still by far the largest drone builder in the world. I mean there's, you know, as far as for military drones. Um, you know, uh, the US is is the most dominant. Always have been and I think will we will continue to be. And we'll we'll we'll sort of we'll pair that with, uh, you know, with our with our manned systems that are able to control it. You know, a lot of this is going to come down to as as we go further into it, you know, who is going to be able to essentially out hack who or who is going to be able to jam out jam who. And at some point you're probably going to need, you are going to need some type of, uh, manned manned system that can be closest, you know, the node they would they would call it, be closest to, uh, you know, the the autonomous systems or or things that are are capable of being jammed. And you're you're going to need the systems that the US has like the F-35 along with our, you know, the collaborative, uh, collaborative combat aircraft and other and other systems. There's a lot that we have and our long-range fires are by far dominant, you know, when when it comes to, um, being able to reach out and touch somebody. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Admin Calls In National Guard Against LA Protestors
For months during the 2024 campaign, Donald Trump promised to use the military domestically. His campaign telegraphed it via news coverage and reports from friendly nonprofits; Trump mused about using soldiers against protests. After he defeated Kamala Harris, the then-President-elect reminded everyone that he wanted to see 'military assets' used as an adjunct to mass deportations. Now, the administration has taken the first serious step towards turning these lurid fantasies into reality. On Saturday, Trump issued an order purporting to federalize the California National Guard, with Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth carrying out the instruction to send at least 2,000 troops to Los Angeles. Per the order, the Guard will escort and support Department of Homeland Security officials as they carry out immigration enforcement. It's the first time since the civil rights era that a President has federalized a state National Guard unit absent a request from the state's governor. Though the troops cannot serve as law enforcement under Trump's order — he'd need to invoke the Insurrection Act to do that — it's a serious escalation: the President is now deploying the military in response to protests. Los Angeles has become a focal point of protests against the Trump administration's increasingly aggressive immigration detention operations. Over the past few days, protestors have converged in the city on targets of ICE raids. Those, in turns, have at times morphed into confrontations with federal immigration enforcement. At no point have state or local officials indicated that the situation required federal aid. The LAPD issued a statement on the day that Trump federalized the Guard calling the protests 'peaceful.' Some senior White House officials, including Stephen Miller, have enjoyed publicly toying with more extreme uses of the military over the past few days, including invoking the Insurrection Act. We'll follow along below as the situation develops.
Washington Post
3 hours ago
- Washington Post
Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce US defense reliance, Carney says
TORONTO — Canada will meet NATO's military spending guideline by early next year and diversify defense spending away from the United States, which he says no longer plays a predominant role on the world stage, Prime Minister Mark Carney said Monday. Carney said Canada will achieve NATO's spending target of 2% of gross domestic product five years earlier than it had previously planned.
