Virginia Way underground utility district formed in South Laguna
The Laguna Beach City Council this month gave the go ahead for the formation of a new utility undergrounding project, this time upon a key stretch of roadway in South Laguna.
The project will remove six utility poles and associated overhead wires along Virginia Way between 3rd Avenue and 5th Avenue, which city officials identified as a key evacuation route.
Just over an hour after it was presented with a comprehensive update on the current and future plans for wildfire mitigation and fire safety on May 6, the City Council adopted a resolution to establish the district.
The project will qualify for credits under the California Public Utilities Commission Rule 20A program, according to a city staff report. The CPUC states such work must be in the public interest and may eliminate a heavy concentration of overhead lines, involve a street with a high volume of traffic, or benefit a civic or public recreation area or area of unusual scenic interest.
Pierre Sawaya, the city's capital program manager, said the Rule 20A program has been proposed to sunset, although the city had a balance of $857,979 in program credits from San Diego Gas & Electric.
'While the city had previously accrued credits on an annual basis, from SDG&E in this case, there are no additional credit accruals moving forward for such projects,' Sawaya added.
The program credits will fund land survey, design engineering and construction work tied to cabling and the removal of utility poles, according to a staff report. An SDG&E estimate for the work came in at $854,507.
'The impacted utilities are SDG&E, the electrical provider, Cox, Frontier, and also Crown Castle has a system running through Virginia Way in that area,' Sawaya said. 'The project would provide underground connections to private properties that are currently fed overhead from the system out there today, and that connection would be provided at no cost to the property owners, which is consistent with 20A projects.'
At a glance, the city's preliminary cost for the project is approximately $1.28 million, although city staff said another estimate would be provided after construction drawings were submitted. Funding for the city's portion of the project would be set aside in the capital improvement program budget.
Staff projected the date of completion for the work to be August 2027. During the 27-month period, the steps will include design process, entitlements, the bidding for and completion of construction, and the removal of overhead facilities.
Resident Ann Christoph called on the council to close a two-block gap between 3rd Avenue and Eagle Rock Way along Virginia Way, noting the nearby West Street underground utility district.
'It is an evacuation route, … and it doesn't seem fruitful to leave that undone when you're going to be doing this portion,' Christoph said.
Sawaya said that adding blocks to the project could be possible, but it would necessitate more funding. When asked for an estimate to add the other two blocks by Councilman Bob Whalen, Sawaya responded the city could be looking at 'possibly another $2 million.'
The council unanimously approved the engineer's report and the use of the Rule 20A credits, adding direction to staff to investigate possibilities to underground utility lines for the additional two blocks along Virginia Way to the north.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lodi's budget up 8.35% on rising costs
Jun. 7—The Lodi City Council approved the 2025-26 budget on Wednesday, and staff said the $291 million spending plan reflects an 8.35% increase over last year. The increase was primarily driven by rising staff costs, supplies and materials, staff said. Despite a slowing economy, general fund revenues are expected to see a modest 4.1% increase. "Our budget and finance team has done a great job managing our resources," Mayor Cameron Bregman said. "Because of smart planning and solid reserves, we're in a good spot to handle an uncertain economy without cutting essential services. We'll keep focusing on what matters most — supporting public safety, growing our local economy, and taking care of our proud community." The projected increase in revenues comes from recently approved Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services facility rental rate hikes, as well as an anticipated $560,000 in annual rental income from a new power plant on the south west side of Lodi Lake and $1.7 million of interest income. Reserves will continue to support park improvements, information technology upgrades and vehicle and equipment replacements, staff said. The budget also includes investments in capital infrastructure, deferred maintenance and addressing the city's underfunded pension liabilities. For example, $16.9 million has been allocated to infrastructure projects that include water main rehabilitation, signal improvements at the Ham Lane and Turner Road intersection, security cameras at city parks, the Ham Lane widening project, and transit facility repairs and upgrades. "Operating within a constrained fiscal environment, particularly within the general fund, required deliberate reflection and thoughtful choices to ensure a balanced and responsive plan to sustain our core services," Acting City Manager James Lindsay said. "To align our resources with current market conditions, we implemented a series of mitigations totaling $7.4 million to balance revenue assumptions and expenses." In addition, the budget includes allocating $2.23 million from existing reserves to cover worker's compensation, general liability, and property liability coverage; cutting a proposed $154,000 increase in the Lodi Police Department's part-time budget for pay raises to retired annuitants; reducing department budget requests by about $952,000; and eliminating a proposed $2 million budget for a new facility internal service fund. The 2025-26 draft budget is available online at and the adopted budget book will be available in the coming weeks after approved updates have been completed.
Chicago Tribune
5 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Batavia joins other local municipalities in restricting purchase of hemp-derived THC products
Batavia is joining other suburban communities in restricting access to hemp-derived THC products and Kratom, in a move officials say is meant to restrict access to the products in a similar way to restrictions on recreational marijuana. Without strong state and federal regulations, stores selling hemp products that can get users high do not face restrictions on the age of their customers, nor are they required to test and report on their products' potency or impurities they contain, according to past reporting on the topic. As a result, numerous Chicago suburbs have taken to issuing bans or regulations on the products. Now, Batavia is implementing restrictions of its own, focused on limiting access to customers 21 years old and older and instituting storage and packaging limitations meant to curb young people's access to the products. The idea of restricting access to hemp-derived products and Kratom has been months in the making, Batavia Police Chief Eric Blowers explained at a City Council Committee of the Whole meeting in May. Originally, there was a proposal to restrict the types of hemp-derived products that could be sold in Batavia, said City Administrator Laura Newman, but that idea was sent back to the drawing board. Blowers said he worked with Cheryl Cryer, the owner of Urban Apothecary in Batavia, to work up a new ordinance imposing restrictions on hemp-derived THC product and Kratom sales. The ordinance brought to the City Council in June did not include restrictions on the types of products that can be sold in the city, Newman explained, but focused on limiting who can buy the products and how. After getting approval from the City Council on June 2, the ordinance will establish a new chapter in the city's code as part of its business and license regulations. Here's what it includes: First, the ordinance defines what constitutes a hemp-derived product, and defines Kratom as 'any part of the plant Mitragyna speciosa, whether growing or not, and any compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of that plant, including, but not limited to, mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine.' Then, it outlines the new rules governing the sale and display of the products. Per the new restrictions, businesses must check that a person buying any of these products is 21 years old or older by requiring them to show identification. Additionally, displays of 'intoxicating products' must be behind a sales or service counter or in a locked case so that a buyer requires an employee's assistance to get it, or it must be in a section of the business where other age-restricted products are kept. Or, a business can restrict access to customers 21 and older unless accompanied by a parent or legal guardian who is at least 21. The business must check for written proof of identity upon entry and post a sign at the entrance of the business that indicates access is restricted to those 21 and older. Businesses that opt not to restrict entry to those 21 and older unless they're accompanied by a parent or guardian must post a sign near every display of such products informing customers that buying these products is illegal if you are under 21. Lastly, the ordinance prohibits packaging that 'resembles trademarked, characteristic or product-specialized packaging' or commercially available candy, snacks, baked goods and beverages. It also states that hemp-derived THC products and Kratom products cannot contain images of food, candy, baked goods, cereal, fruit, beverages or the words 'candy' or 'candies,' nor can the packaging include images or graphics like those typically used to advertise to children, like cartoons, neon colors and celebrities. The age restriction is meant to mirror existing limitations on recreational marijuana purchases, Blowers previously told the City Council. And, the regulations on how the products are packaged are intended to 'limit the appeal of those products to kids, but also to prevent accidental ingestion by young children who may find an adult's hemp-derived THC and then mistake it for candy,' he noted. The restrictions passed recently apply to smoke and vape shops in the area, or other stores selling hemp-derived THC or Kratom products, according to Newman. It wouldn't apply to marijuana dispensaries, Blowers told The Beacon-News, because they're regulated by the state. Although more than 60% of Batavia voters came out in support of allowing recreational weed to be sold in 2020, no dispensaries currently operate in the city. But that's set to change soon, as a recreational marijuana dispensary is preparing to open in the near future at 144 S. Randall Road, according to past reporting. Despite some debate among residents as the proposal came before the City Council, it ultimately voted to approve the dispensary's plans in January, allowing the project by Rubino Ventures to move forward with getting the necessary city permits to open a Dutchess Cannabis location in the city. It would be their fifth location in the region. Following their passage by the City Council, the hemp and Kratom restrictions will take effect immediately, Blowers said. But they're taking an 'educational stance,' he said, as businesses get into compliance with the new rules. Blowers said they've informed businesses they know are selling these products of the new ordinance, and they will begin doing compliance checks in the near future.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sanitation fee passes, begins July 1
The sanitation fee resolution, which caused many conversations and criticisms within Lebanon, was passed by the City Council in a 4-2 vote during Tuesday's meeting. The structure of the fee will be $20 for residential customers and $40 for business customers. The city's sanitation department does not pick up dumpsters used by businesses, only bins specifically used for the city service. Geri Ashley and Camille Burdine, Councilors for Ward 2 and 3 respectively, stuck to their votes against the fee for the second reading. Both raised concerns of how residents at or below the poverty line or seniors on fixed incomes may be impacted by the $20 per month fee. Questions regarding how the sanitation department is funded were asked as confusion rippled through the community. 'This was an unadvertised discussion in a work session. It was a 15-minute discussion,' Ashley said. 'I still don't have all my questions answered. I don't feel like I have the economic information.' 'I think that we should, as a City Council, have spent more time talking about it and seeing if we could come up with any other solutions,' Ashley added. 'If in fact we are paying for garbage in our city's taxes, and now we're incorporating a fee, then what happens next year when we get our taxes? Are our taxes going to be reduced at that point, because that is a double dip.' On Wednesday, Burdine reiterated her thoughts that the city should be more proactive in studying the impact on the citizens before a fee was implemented. She said the response to rising costs caused the city to be 'reactive instead of proactive.' Burdine said she is not opposed to a sanitation fee, but feels that more time should have been spent researching it. Also on Wednesday, Ashley called the fee a 'knee-jerk reaction' and likewise felt that not enough research was done. She also said instead of a flat fee, a property tax increase would take into account the property values and Wards 1, 2 and 3 would not have to deal with a monthly fee which might be a burden. Ashley said she wants to see if the sanitation fee will disappear from the property taxes. Ward 1 Councilor Joey Carmack said he supported the fee because it's a flat fee that all residents pay, which doesn't fluctuate. 'I do not feel it's fair for the sanitation fee to be a property tax,' Carmack said. 'A property tax would be unfair, because for example, person one has a $1 million house, and [may] only have one can of trash. They would pay more taxes than person two [who has] a $350,000 home.' 'We dump the trash from the city at Walter Hill (in Murfreesboro), which has been in the news about closing soon,' Carmack added. 'When that does happen, we will be paying even more to dump trash.' Middle Point Landfill has been working with Rutherford County to increase fees for 'out-of-county' tipping fees, as well as downsizing the number of counties allowed to dump there. During a meeting earlier this year, it was proposed to double the fees for non-Rutherford County clients from $1.20 per ton to $2.50 per ton to generate more revenue for that county. The town meeting hall had more residents in attendance than usual, which was commented on by the Councilors, who expressed gratitude for the increased attendance. Burdine, Chris Crowell, Councilor for Ward 4 and Phil Morehead, Councilor for Ward 6, particularly welcomed the attendance and interest in city business. During the public comment period, nearly a dozen people spoke to the City Council. One resident, Stephen Lawson, said he and others should have the option to opt out of the fee, and that he would rather pay a private company $30 to support that business than give the city $20. He also asked if there were other landfills which could be used. 'I thought there was a landfill in Wilson County. Is that one full?' Lawson asked. 'That's owned by the Wilson County government, and it's just open to construction materials,' Mayor Bell responded. 'It's not open to us.' Alex Buhler, former Ward 1 Councilor who stepped-down in 2012, also spoke. 'They should have that option to opt out,' Buhler said. 'If a thousand people opt out, that's a thousand houses you don't have to go to.' Bell responded by saying that wouldn't save as much money as people think because the sanitation trucks will still be driving by those houses anyway. Some of the Councilors said they don't know if private companies would have the same quality of work that the city does, as officials believe sanitation is a public health matter which the Council 'takes seriously.' Another resident wondered if the sanitation fee would lead to the start of 'nickel and diming' the residents of the city. Glenn Denton, County Commissioner for District 20, which covers the downtown Lebanon region of the county, criticized the growth of the city, which he thinks sparked the need for growing services and the fees to pay for them. 'Enough is enough. We have overbuilt in our city beyond what our infrastructure can handle,' Denton said. 'When do we stop building to where we cannot service and when we cannot pay for the infrastructure around it?' Nearly an hour and a half was spent discussing the sanitation fee and budget for the next year. With the passing of the resolution, the sanitation fee goes into effect July 1.
