Stockard on the Stump: Williamson Republican vote could foreshadow 2026 state Senate race
A faction supported by Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson of Franklin narrowly lost a bid for control of the Williamson County Republican Party to one spearheaded by his former opponent, Gary Humble. (Photo: John Partipilo)
In a potential preview of Williamson County's 2026 state Senate race, 'Elevate 2025' candidates eased past 'Williamson County Conservatives' this week in a battle to run the Republican Party from the right.
Though they weren't on the ballot, the contest pitted Gary Humble of Tennessee Stands against Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson, whose candidate, Brian Clifford, fell short of the Humble group's Steve Hickey for the party chairmanship despite heavy spending.
Williamson County residents Gov. Bill Lee and his wife were among those sitting next to Johnson, who has spent the last two years burnishing his conservative bona fides after a close contest with Humble.
The atmosphere at the Franklin Marriott Cool Springs, an appropriate setting for wealth, was described as tense as Hickey captured 796 votes to Clifford's 751. The rest of the candidate slate proved to be a replay of 2023, setting up a possible race of Johnson vs. Humble as the Senate leader seeks re-election and the post of Senate speaker, which would make him lieutenant governor and one of the state's most powerful politicians.
Stockard on the Stump: Humble backer files election complaint against Leader Johnson
Humble, who was ill and couldn't attend the event, said he was 'blown away' by the turnout which brought more than 1,500 votes for the chairmanship.
Opponents cast his group as backers of a Republican Party caucus, instead of a primary, something they apparently broached but that he denied. Humble said they're more interested in closing Republican primaries statewide to keep Democrats from watering down outcomes. A bill by Republican Rep. Chris Todd of Jackson would do the trick.
The win for 'Elevate 2025' marks a continuation from the last two years and sounds hauntingly similar to Project 2025, the national movement to reshape the federal government and give the president more power.
Humble wouldn't say whether the group's win gives him a victory over Johnson, though he acknowledged some people might categorize it that way. 'That's not what we were trying to accomplish here,' he said.
Johnson, though, spearheaded the Williamson County Conservatives PAC and asked the first few donors to give money in an effort to remove the Williamson County Republican Party board, according to Humble.
'It's sad that Jack stole all those people's money and pissed it down the drain,' Humble said.
Nashville businessman Baxter Lee gave $5,000 to the group in December 2024, and former congressional candidate Kurt Winstead kicked in $1,000 in January. The rest of the financials haven't been filed.
State Rep. Todd Warner, a Chapel Hill Republican whose district includes part of Williamson, said it was clear Johnson was backing the Williamson County Conservatives.
'It was very interesting to see the governor and the first lady there … in Williamson County,' Warner said.
Republican Rep. Jake McCalmon of Franklin called the outcome 'tremendous' but said he would never support caucuses to select party candidates. He said he tried to stay out of the chairman race.
Johnson acknowledged he voted for Clifford, director of outdoor recreation for the Tennessee Department of Economic and Community Development, because he has 'grave concerns' about moving to a caucus selection for local races. (Oddly enough, an effort to require primaries in local elections fell flat last year.)
'I'm just happy we set a new record for a county party convention. It was a huge turnout, and it was great,' Johnson said.
The Senate leader scoffed at the notion he's concerned that the outcome could be seen as a victory for Humble over him, though he is starting to run for another four years already. Humble isn't willing to commit to a state Senate campaign just yet.
But you can feel a collision coming, one way or another.
Opponents of the bill allowing Tennessee school districts to turn away immigrant students without legal documentation packed the hallway outside the Senate's main meeting room Wednesday after the Education Committee approved the bill 5-4. Three Republicans voted against the bill.
It was the biggest and loudest crowd in memory at the Cordell Hull Building as tiny children with parents and screaming teens vented their frustration with lawmakers.
Amid the claustrophobia, a moment of clarity arose: Tennessee is preparing to block immigrant children from going to K-12 public schools (because of the expense?) but pay for kids to go to private schools, including those already enrolled.
Is this a conundrum? Or is it a hypocritical hypothetical? Maybe it's both.
Either way, this was far from one of Tennessee's shining moments.
Now that Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti doesn't have to spend resources fighting President Joe Biden's policies, he can turn that team of attorneys toward defending President Donald Trump's Tennessee policies
Republican Sen. Ferrell Haile of Gallatin was among the four who voted against the measure. He said Thursday he didn't believe the state should punish children for the mistakes of their parents or the government's poor immigration policies.
The bill by Sen. Bo Watson, a Hixson Republican who chairs the finance committee, and House Majority Leader William Lamberth of Portland, puts the onus on school districts to determine whether they'll require kids to show documentation before allowing them into classrooms.
They make no bones about wanting a legal case that will go to the U.S. Supreme Court and overturn Plyler v. Doe, the 1982 decision requiring public schools to take all children regardless of immigration status.
So gear up for another legal battle.
On the semi-bright side, now that Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti doesn't have to spend resources fighting President Joe Biden's policies, he can turn that team of attorneys toward defending President Donald Trump's Tennessee policies.
It could be a wash.
The House Public Service Subcommittee this week killed Rep. Bob Freeman's bill that would have required lobbyists to identify each bill and legislature measure they're being paid to oppose or support.
Freeman, a Nashville Democrat, said afterward it's 'disappointing' that lobbyists and special interest groups have more power than the public or lawmakers.
'In Tennessee, I believe we have an uneven advantage for lobbyists,' Freeman said. That's mainly because lawmakers have little, if any, staff to research bills.
Lawmakers rely on lobbyists to provide them with information, but sometimes they take advantage of that and hide the bill's benefactor, he said.
'I think the people of Tennessee should know who is paying people to fight for bills and to propose bills and fight to have them passed,' Freeman said.
Lobbyists are required to disclose whom they're working for but not where they stand on those matters. Freeman rejects the notion that disclosing that type of information would be too difficult.
I think the people of Tennessee should know who is paying people to fight for bills and to propose bills and fight to have them passed.
– Rep. Bob Freeman, D-Nashville
Lobbyist Mark Greene, who represents lobbyists, said afterward the bill would increase workloads dramatically. Other lobbyists said they would have to disclose the legislature's entire slate of bills because they move from one to another.
'We think it represents quite a bit more paperwork, quite a bit more exposure in terms of the potential for making an error,' said Greene, who shouldn't be confused with U.S. Rep. Mark Green. 'We're going faster and faster every year, and we think providing this is of marginal utility.'
The only question for Freeman in committee came from Rep. Warner, who asked whether government-paid lobbyists would be included in the bill, meaning those who work for the governor and state departments. The committee's attorney told him those people don't qualify as lobbyists.
Regardless, this matter reminds me of something former Rep. Bob Ramsey used to say when referring to the lobbyist for lobbyists. 'That makes you the mayor of rock bottom.' He probably softened the blow by handing out candy.
A group of 12 Democratic lawmakers who walked out of the governor's State of the State address in February say they're being blocked from passing any bills this session.
With only 24 members in the House, Democrats usually don't pass many bills anyway. But this year, things appear to be worse.
Democratic Rep. Yusuf Hakeem of Chattanooga said it became clear to him this week when Republican lawmakers killed his bill that would have had security workers statewide wear matching patches to let people know they're security, not law enforcement. He said it was backed by the Peace Officer Standards & Training Commission, in addition to Hamilton County law enforcement.
Hakeem said afterward he has the feeling it would be 'extremely difficult for those of us who walked out to get a bill through. It's very unfortunate.'
Democratic Rep. Sam McKenzie of Knoxville said he's getting the same idea about repercussions against boycotters. He walked out of the State of the State in protest of Lee's private-school voucher bill that passed in a February special session.
'We're all here representing 70,000 people, and what I would say to (Republican leadership) is members of their party do things I find very inflammatory, very disrespectful,' McKenzie said.
Asked about the matter Thursday, House Republican Caucus Chairman Jeremy Faison said he wasn't aware of any concerted effort to block those members' bills, but he added if they were going to act like 'knuckleheads,' then they deserve it.
'I got a Nikon camera / I love to take a photograph / So mama don't take my Kodachome away.' *
*'Kodachrome,' Paul Simon
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hogg forgoes reelection for DNC vice chair
Democratic National Committee (DNC) vice chair David Hogg announced Wednesday that he would be forgoing reelection for his spot in the committee after DNC members voted to redo the vice chair election of Hogg and Pennsylvania state Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta. 'I came into this role to play a positive role in creating the change our party needs. It is clear that there is a fundamental disagreement about the role of a Vice Chair — and it's okay to have disagreements. What isn't okay is allowing this to remain our focus when there is so much more we need to be focused on,' he said in a statement shared through his Leaders We Deserve group. 'Ultimately, I have decided to not run in this upcoming election so the party can focus on what really matters. I need to do this work with Leaders We Deserve, and it is going to remain my number one mission to build the strongest party possible,' he added. Earlier on Wednesday, DNC committee members voted 294 to 99 to redo the election of both vice chairs after Oklahoma DNC member Kalyn Free challenged the way the election was conducted in February, alleging in her letter that it unfairly gave the male candidates an advantage over the female vice chair candidates. The challenge was issued far before Hogg announced his group would be getting involved in primarying safe Democratic incumbents. But the two began to run in tandem as Hogg's decision to wade into Democratic contests drew the ire and disapproval from members of the party, including DNC Chair Ken Martin, who believed he shouldn't be doing so as an officer of the national party. Tensions between the DNC leadership and Hogg came to a head earlier this week when audio was leaked of a Zoom call with DNC officers that happened last month and was published over the weekend, indicating Martin was frustrated with Hogg. Some members indicated that they were reconsidering how they would vote over whether the DNC should redo its vice chair election in light of the leaked reporting. Martin responded to Hogg's announcement in a statement saying, 'I commend David for his years of activism, organizing, and fighting for his generation, and while I continue to believe he is a powerful voice for this party, I respect his decision to step back from his post as Vice Chair.' 'I have no doubt that he will remain an important advocate for Democrats across the map. I appreciate his service as an officer, his hard work, and his dedication to the party,' Martin added. The DNC is set to vote on its vice chair elections this week and next week.


CNBC
13 minutes ago
- CNBC
PBS, NPR funding on the line as House nears final vote on $9.4 billion in DOGE-backed cuts
The House on Wednesday moved a step closer to approving President Donald Trump's $9.4 billion spending cut package, which would codify some cuts originally proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency. The package would grant permission to the White House not to spend billions of dollars that had already been approved by Congress. The money would be clawed back from specific agencies like the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which distributes federally appropriated grants to National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS). Although the Wednesday procedural vote passed largely along party lines, a final vote expected Thursday could see some resistance from House Republicans who are uneasy about the popular programs that are being targeted, like PBS and National Public Radio. Given House Speaker Mike Johnson's narrow Republican majority, he can only afford to lose a handful of votes and still push the package over the finish line on a party-line vote. Johnson said earlier this week that he was "working on" getting enough Republicans on board to pass the DOGE package, CNN reported. Wednesday's vote also finalized changes to Republicans' "big, beautiful bill" that were required by the Senate before the measure was allowed to pass with a simple majority, rather than the typical 60-vote Senate threshold. Budget measures like the "big, beautiful bill" can be considered under a special set of rules known as reconciliation. The Senate's parliamentarian, who acts as a sort of referee in disputes over Senate rules, had flagged some provisions in the package earlier that she said were incompatible with the chamber's reconciliation rules.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Thune on protests: LA ‘needed some outside help'
WASHINGTON, DC (KELO) — Senate Majority Leader John Thune is defending President Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard and send in Marines to put a stop to clashes between demonstrators and law enforcement in Los Angeles. Cheyenne River Reservation authorities investigating 2 deaths The South Dakota Republican fielded reporters' questions on a range of topics Wednesday on Capitol Hill, including the ongoing protests over immigration raids. The City of Los Angeles reported fewer clashes overnight as a curfew went into effect. Yet tensions remain high as members of the military are on standby in case of more violence. Thune says the military presence was needed because local officials in California didn't have a handle on the situation. Thune called public safety a 'political imperative' while discussing the protests taking place this week in Los Angeles. 'Because one of the most fundamental questions most people, or most voters ask is my family safe? Is my neighborhood safe? Is my community safe? And when you can't answer that in the affirmative, then you've got a problem and I think that's what they ran into in Los Angeles which is why they needed some outside help,' Thune said. But House Democrats say Los Angeles didn't need outside help from the military to keep the violence in check. 'And state and local law enforcement officials are prepared to do that. At the same time, we respect the right and should embrace the right for any American to peacefully protest,' (D) House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said. Thune wouldn't directly answer one reporter's question about President Trump's pardons of January 6th rioters. Manu Raju: 'Do you see any inconsistency when a president criticizes and condemns the violent LA protests but then pardons the violent January 6th protestors?' 'I think the issue that's in front of us right now is the chaos in Los Angeles. And clearly, the local officials there, for whatever reason, didn't seem up to the task,' Thune said. Critics say President Trump's deployment of troops to Los Angeles will only provoke more violence. But Thune and other Republicans on Capitol Hill say it was a move that needed to be made. 'At the end of the day, it's about preventing chaos and preserving law and order,' Thune said. A federal judge will hold a hearing Thursday on California Governor Gavin Newsom's request to stop President Trump from using troops in Los Angeles. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.