logo
Stockard on the Stump: Williamson Republican vote could foreshadow 2026 state Senate race

Stockard on the Stump: Williamson Republican vote could foreshadow 2026 state Senate race

Yahoo07-03-2025

A faction supported by Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson of Franklin narrowly lost a bid for control of the Williamson County Republican Party to one spearheaded by his former opponent, Gary Humble. (Photo: John Partipilo)
In a potential preview of Williamson County's 2026 state Senate race, 'Elevate 2025' candidates eased past 'Williamson County Conservatives' this week in a battle to run the Republican Party from the right.
Though they weren't on the ballot, the contest pitted Gary Humble of Tennessee Stands against Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson, whose candidate, Brian Clifford, fell short of the Humble group's Steve Hickey for the party chairmanship despite heavy spending.
Williamson County residents Gov. Bill Lee and his wife were among those sitting next to Johnson, who has spent the last two years burnishing his conservative bona fides after a close contest with Humble.
The atmosphere at the Franklin Marriott Cool Springs, an appropriate setting for wealth, was described as tense as Hickey captured 796 votes to Clifford's 751. The rest of the candidate slate proved to be a replay of 2023, setting up a possible race of Johnson vs. Humble as the Senate leader seeks re-election and the post of Senate speaker, which would make him lieutenant governor and one of the state's most powerful politicians.
Stockard on the Stump: Humble backer files election complaint against Leader Johnson
Humble, who was ill and couldn't attend the event, said he was 'blown away' by the turnout which brought more than 1,500 votes for the chairmanship.
Opponents cast his group as backers of a Republican Party caucus, instead of a primary, something they apparently broached but that he denied. Humble said they're more interested in closing Republican primaries statewide to keep Democrats from watering down outcomes. A bill by Republican Rep. Chris Todd of Jackson would do the trick.
The win for 'Elevate 2025' marks a continuation from the last two years and sounds hauntingly similar to Project 2025, the national movement to reshape the federal government and give the president more power.
Humble wouldn't say whether the group's win gives him a victory over Johnson, though he acknowledged some people might categorize it that way. 'That's not what we were trying to accomplish here,' he said.
Johnson, though, spearheaded the Williamson County Conservatives PAC and asked the first few donors to give money in an effort to remove the Williamson County Republican Party board, according to Humble.
'It's sad that Jack stole all those people's money and pissed it down the drain,' Humble said.
Nashville businessman Baxter Lee gave $5,000 to the group in December 2024, and former congressional candidate Kurt Winstead kicked in $1,000 in January. The rest of the financials haven't been filed.
State Rep. Todd Warner, a Chapel Hill Republican whose district includes part of Williamson, said it was clear Johnson was backing the Williamson County Conservatives.
'It was very interesting to see the governor and the first lady there … in Williamson County,' Warner said.
Republican Rep. Jake McCalmon of Franklin called the outcome 'tremendous' but said he would never support caucuses to select party candidates. He said he tried to stay out of the chairman race.
Johnson acknowledged he voted for Clifford, director of outdoor recreation for the Tennessee Department of Economic and Community Development, because he has 'grave concerns' about moving to a caucus selection for local races. (Oddly enough, an effort to require primaries in local elections fell flat last year.)
'I'm just happy we set a new record for a county party convention. It was a huge turnout, and it was great,' Johnson said.
The Senate leader scoffed at the notion he's concerned that the outcome could be seen as a victory for Humble over him, though he is starting to run for another four years already. Humble isn't willing to commit to a state Senate campaign just yet.
But you can feel a collision coming, one way or another.
Opponents of the bill allowing Tennessee school districts to turn away immigrant students without legal documentation packed the hallway outside the Senate's main meeting room Wednesday after the Education Committee approved the bill 5-4. Three Republicans voted against the bill.
It was the biggest and loudest crowd in memory at the Cordell Hull Building as tiny children with parents and screaming teens vented their frustration with lawmakers.
Amid the claustrophobia, a moment of clarity arose: Tennessee is preparing to block immigrant children from going to K-12 public schools (because of the expense?) but pay for kids to go to private schools, including those already enrolled.
Is this a conundrum? Or is it a hypocritical hypothetical? Maybe it's both.
Either way, this was far from one of Tennessee's shining moments.
Now that Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti doesn't have to spend resources fighting President Joe Biden's policies, he can turn that team of attorneys toward defending President Donald Trump's Tennessee policies
Republican Sen. Ferrell Haile of Gallatin was among the four who voted against the measure. He said Thursday he didn't believe the state should punish children for the mistakes of their parents or the government's poor immigration policies.
The bill by Sen. Bo Watson, a Hixson Republican who chairs the finance committee, and House Majority Leader William Lamberth of Portland, puts the onus on school districts to determine whether they'll require kids to show documentation before allowing them into classrooms.
They make no bones about wanting a legal case that will go to the U.S. Supreme Court and overturn Plyler v. Doe, the 1982 decision requiring public schools to take all children regardless of immigration status.
So gear up for another legal battle.
On the semi-bright side, now that Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti doesn't have to spend resources fighting President Joe Biden's policies, he can turn that team of attorneys toward defending President Donald Trump's Tennessee policies.
It could be a wash.
The House Public Service Subcommittee this week killed Rep. Bob Freeman's bill that would have required lobbyists to identify each bill and legislature measure they're being paid to oppose or support.
Freeman, a Nashville Democrat, said afterward it's 'disappointing' that lobbyists and special interest groups have more power than the public or lawmakers.
'In Tennessee, I believe we have an uneven advantage for lobbyists,' Freeman said. That's mainly because lawmakers have little, if any, staff to research bills.
Lawmakers rely on lobbyists to provide them with information, but sometimes they take advantage of that and hide the bill's benefactor, he said.
'I think the people of Tennessee should know who is paying people to fight for bills and to propose bills and fight to have them passed,' Freeman said.
Lobbyists are required to disclose whom they're working for but not where they stand on those matters. Freeman rejects the notion that disclosing that type of information would be too difficult.
I think the people of Tennessee should know who is paying people to fight for bills and to propose bills and fight to have them passed.
– Rep. Bob Freeman, D-Nashville
Lobbyist Mark Greene, who represents lobbyists, said afterward the bill would increase workloads dramatically. Other lobbyists said they would have to disclose the legislature's entire slate of bills because they move from one to another.
'We think it represents quite a bit more paperwork, quite a bit more exposure in terms of the potential for making an error,' said Greene, who shouldn't be confused with U.S. Rep. Mark Green. 'We're going faster and faster every year, and we think providing this is of marginal utility.'
The only question for Freeman in committee came from Rep. Warner, who asked whether government-paid lobbyists would be included in the bill, meaning those who work for the governor and state departments. The committee's attorney told him those people don't qualify as lobbyists.
Regardless, this matter reminds me of something former Rep. Bob Ramsey used to say when referring to the lobbyist for lobbyists. 'That makes you the mayor of rock bottom.' He probably softened the blow by handing out candy.
A group of 12 Democratic lawmakers who walked out of the governor's State of the State address in February say they're being blocked from passing any bills this session.
With only 24 members in the House, Democrats usually don't pass many bills anyway. But this year, things appear to be worse.
Democratic Rep. Yusuf Hakeem of Chattanooga said it became clear to him this week when Republican lawmakers killed his bill that would have had security workers statewide wear matching patches to let people know they're security, not law enforcement. He said it was backed by the Peace Officer Standards & Training Commission, in addition to Hamilton County law enforcement.
Hakeem said afterward he has the feeling it would be 'extremely difficult for those of us who walked out to get a bill through. It's very unfortunate.'
Democratic Rep. Sam McKenzie of Knoxville said he's getting the same idea about repercussions against boycotters. He walked out of the State of the State in protest of Lee's private-school voucher bill that passed in a February special session.
'We're all here representing 70,000 people, and what I would say to (Republican leadership) is members of their party do things I find very inflammatory, very disrespectful,' McKenzie said.
Asked about the matter Thursday, House Republican Caucus Chairman Jeremy Faison said he wasn't aware of any concerted effort to block those members' bills, but he added if they were going to act like 'knuckleheads,' then they deserve it.
'I got a Nikon camera / I love to take a photograph / So mama don't take my Kodachome away.' *
*'Kodachrome,' Paul Simon
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk's public dispute sparks interest in Tesla from short sellers
Elon Musk's public dispute sparks interest in Tesla from short sellers

Miami Herald

time7 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Elon Musk's public dispute sparks interest in Tesla from short sellers

Last week, a social media post from Elon Musk caused many people to stop what they were doing and look down at their phones. Even for the Tesla (TSLA) CEO, known for his controversial and bold opinions, what they saw seemed surprising. Musk had previously announced plans to cease his political spending. But only a few days later, he accused Trump of having direct ties to notorious criminal Jeffrey Epstein and alleged that without his help, the Republican president would not have won last year's election. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Since then, Tesla has been in the spotlight, as the dispute between two of the world's most powerful men continues. While TSLA stock initially plunged on news of the argument, it has since regained some of its momentum. Even as shares slowly trend upward, though, experts speculate that short sellers may regard the Musk-Trump fallout as an opportunity to bet against the stock. Over the past few months, Musk's behavior has sparked a global backlash against Tesla's brand, causing sales to fall across the U.S. and Europe. This clear indication of consumer sentiment toward him has caused some financial experts, including Tesla shareholder and fund manager Ross Gerber, to call for him to step down. Related: Elon Musk company reveals major leap forward When Musk announced that he would be stepping back from his role with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), TSLA stock surged, and some investors speculated that the company's troubles were over. But now his falling out with Trump has generated further uncertainty. When a prominent company starts showing signs of weakness or instability, short sellers are likely to start closing in. So far, Tesla's recent declines have been highly profitable for those willing to bet against it. The Wall Street Journal reports that as TSLA stock plunged last week, short sellers pocketed up to $4 billion, noting: Betting against an industry-leading company like Tesla will always carry some risk, regardless of how bleak its prospects may appear. But experts see a case for shorting TSLA stock, provided investors understand its volatile nature, which includes surging unexpectedly. "I think Musk dragged Tesla into a political spectacle," Galileo FX CEO David Materazzi tells TheStreet. "That creates perceived instability. Short sellers don't need real damage, just the illusion of it. Volatility invites them in. When the CEO becomes the story, the stock turns into a target." Financial education platform First Information's CEO Vince Stanzione holds a short position in TSLA. He says his reasons are "business not personal," however, citing the company's high valuation and questionable market share over the feud between Musk and Trump. More Tesla News: The 'anti-Tesla' gives American buyers more good newsAnalyst sets eye-popping Tesla stock price targetElon Musk's feud with Trump is hurting an unexpected investment "The P/E ratio is over 100 and growth the last few years has been near zero," he says of Tesla. "The bulls will say you're paying for the future and Elon Musk's brilliance, and I am not disputing that Tesla could have some future hits in the pipeline, but Elon Must is very good at promising "jam tomorrow" which never seems to materialize, or if and when it does, it's not the flavour he promised." Stanzione also raises a concern regarding Tesla's foray into robotics, something on which Musk has hinged a lot of the company's prospects. This part of Tesla's business just became more complicated due to the abrupt departure of one of its leaders. Related: Heavily shorted AI stock is rapidly climbing the Fortune 500 "Unless robotaxis start showing up en masse by the end of this year, then investors will keep selling," states Stanzione. "I am very bullish on robotics. It's something I have been investing in for over a decade, especially in medical and military uses, however, Tesla is not the only game in town." He names rivals such as Hyundai Motor Group and Boston Dynamics, both of which are making notable advances in the robotics field that could threaten Tesla's progress. Chief Analyst Dan Buckley also highlights the potential valuation problem, stating "Tesla short sellers may see their edge in the long-term mismatch between its ~$1 trillion valuation and the current reality of its business – i.e., nearly all auto-based revenue – and the uncertain viability of its highly speculative emerging tech bets." That said, Buckley advises investors considering a Tesla short to "treat political feuds as a volatility amplifier rather than a directional signal" and highlights the importance of caution when betting against such an unpredictable stock. Related: Billionaire fund manager, skeptical of AI, backs shocking stock The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

'Do YOUR job': Newsom clashes with JD Vance, other GOP officials over LA protests
'Do YOUR job': Newsom clashes with JD Vance, other GOP officials over LA protests

USA Today

time11 minutes ago

  • USA Today

'Do YOUR job': Newsom clashes with JD Vance, other GOP officials over LA protests

'Do YOUR job': Newsom clashes with JD Vance, other GOP officials over LA protests Show Caption Hide Caption Demonstrations critical of ICE near Twentynine Palms Marine base The protesters gathered along Highway 64 along the route between the Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms and Los Angeles. California Gov. Gavin Newsom is not holding back as top Republican officials criticize his handling of the increasingly hostile protests over President Donald Trump's immigration policies. In addition to his ongoing feud with Trump, who suggested the Democrat be arrested, Newsom has responded to sweeping criticism by Vice President JD Vance, U.S. Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas and other GOP officials. The tension between the Golden State and federal regulators comes after the Trump Administration deployed National Guard troops to crack down on violent protests against immigration raids in LA. Around 700 U.S. Marines and 2,000 National Guardsmen have been ordered to mobilize protestors in the area after the president already authorized the deployment of 2,000 guardsmen. The San Francisco native criticized the president's comment Monday, June 9 that "it would be a great thing" for border czar Tom Homan to arrest him. "The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America," he wrote on X. "I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." Newsom for most of the day fired back with all tools in his arsenal, including 800 additional police officers, a lawsuit and invectives warning Trump is acting like a 'dictator.' 'Los Angeles: don't take Trump's bait. Trump wants chaos and he's instigated violence,' Newsom said in a post on X. 'Stay peaceful. Stay focused. Don't give him the excuse he's looking for.' White House Communications director Stephen Cheung took to social media to accuse Newsom of being "the biggest cuck in American politics," a centuries-old insult that the Merriam-Webster dictionary defines in a few different ways, none of them flattering. Cheung accused Newsom of allowing "domestic terrorists to desecrate and defile communities across CA." Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said the Marines are being sent "due to increased threats to federal law enforcement officers and federal buildings, approximately 700 active-duty... are being deployed to Los Angeles to restore order." "We have an obligation to defend federal law enforcement officers - even if Gavin Newsom will not," Hegseth said. The post was viewed more than 3 million times within four hours. Trump and Newsom have often clashed but the showdown over Los Angeles marks a new low in their heated relationship. In a lawsuit, Newsom says the Trump administration is violating California's sovereignty. 'One of the cornerstones of our Nation and our democracy is that our people are governed by civil, not military, rule,' the lawsuit says. Trump 'used a protest that local authorities had under control to make another unprecedented power grab." Newsom used the official governor of California website to skewer the president over sending federal troops to the state without the governor's consent, saying he would send 800 state and police officers "to clean up President Trump's mess." Here's a breakdown of who Newsom has clashed with on social media. Vice President Vance urged the California governor control the chaos that escalated in the state himself before blaming Trump or the White House's action. "Do your job. That's all we're asking," Vance wrote. Less than two hours later Newsom replied "Do YOUR job. We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. Rescind the order. Return control to California." Vance later responded to a video shared by Homeland Security's official X account of a masked demonstrator holding a Mexico flag while standing on top of a graffitied vehicle as burning cars line the street. "This administration will not be intimidated by lawlessness," he wrote. "We will stand by the FBI agents tracking down violent criminals, by the guardsmen, local police, and Marines restoring order, and by the ICE agents enforcing our immigration laws. President Trump will not back down." Tom Cotton Senator Cotton blamed the Democratic party for violence that escalated in LA Sunday. "They demand open borders, or they will riot. And Dem politicians like Newsom will back them," the U.S. Senator from Arkansas wrote on X. "It won't work. We must never tolerate this lawlessness." Newsom replied on X writing: "The only one supporting lawlessness is you and every one of Trump's minions who are allowing him to illegally militarize our city and incite violence." Cotton replied with a photo of the demonstrator holding the Mexico flag writing "What kind of governor blames police officers and the National Guard for 'inciting' this violence? Your policies created this mess. And California deserves a lot better." Jim Jordan Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio indirectly addressed LA protestors waving flags for Mexico or other countries writing: "We fly the American flag in America. Newsom later quoted the X post with pictures rioters from the Jan. 6 insurrection storming the US Capitol in 2021 holding American flags. "Like this?" Newsom quipped. While Jordan did not reply to the governor's comment, he continued to address the situation in LA writing "President Trump is deporting CRIMINAL illegal aliens. And the Left is burning down Los Angeles." "Republicans back law enforcement. Leftist rioters throw rocks at them," he later wrote. Tommy Tuberville Newsom later responded to a Florida's Voice report of U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville from Alabama echoing Trump's call to arrest the California governor. "Lock him up," Tuberville told Florida's Voice. "LA looks like a third world country — anarchists are in charge, law enforcement is being attacked, and the rule of law is nonexistent." Newsom replied to the retired college football coach citing that Alabama has three times the higher homicide rate of California. According to most recent CDC data, in 2022 Alabama had a homicide rate of 14.9 with over 700 deaths while California had a rate of 5.9% with over 2,300 deaths. "Its murder rate is ranked third in the entire country," Newsom wrote. "Stick to football, bro." Contributing: Dinah Voyles Pulver

Lefty lawmakers' war on cows is another senseless progressive beef with upstate farmers
Lefty lawmakers' war on cows is another senseless progressive beef with upstate farmers

New York Post

time11 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Lefty lawmakers' war on cows is another senseless progressive beef with upstate farmers

Progressive legislators want to dictate Upstate cow populations, because of course they know better than anyone who actually lives anywhere near a dairy farm. Is it any wonder why Upstaters hate New York City, at least the jerks we elect? Animal-rights obsessive Manhattan Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal has teamed-up with Brooklyn Democratic Socialist state Sen. Jabari Brisport to push a limit of 700 cows per farm — a move that would slam an important industry and not help the environment one whit. Advertisement The barns for younger cows and calves on Stein Farm in Le Roy, New York, outside of Rochester pictured on November 2, 2022. Annie Wermiel/NY Post The two Democrats claim that their bill protects the environment and preserves small, family-owned farms from becoming corporate 'factory farms.' Except upstate farmers face no such threat and want nothing to do with these lawmakers and the big-city condescension. Advertisement 'Placing a cap on the number of cows on a dairy farm means placing a cap on growth and success,' argues the New York Farm Bureau. Nor did Rosenthal or Brisport visit any actual farming communities before moving to 'fix' them: Their measure relies on a 2024 report from Food & Water Watch, an offshoot of Ralph Nader's lefty Public Citizen funded by a slew of progressive charities. The lefty legislators plainly also know nothing of the state Department of Environmental Conservation's work in ensuring dairy farms adhere to the nation's most stringent standards and land-management practices. Sign at North Harbor Dairy farm reading 'Make Milk Great Again,' featuring a cow designed in the style of the American flag. Spectrum News 1 Advertisement But they surely do know that countless urban 'environmentalists' are convinced that cow flatulence is a prime cause of global warming. Gov. Kathy Hochul reportedly calls the measure 'insane' and no doubt annoyed that the Rosenthal-Brisport fantasy comes as Great Lakes Cheese, Fairlife and Chobani are investing billions in upstate dairy communities. So the bill won't become law this year — but if progressives keep growing their majorities in the Legislature, anything goes: Knowing nothing never stops the progs from imposing their ideas whenever they have the power. Advertisement The result, of course, would simply be forcing consumers to get more milk from producers in Midwest states without such nutty laws — continuing the long hollowing-out of Upstate. Hmm: That population loss would further boost progressives' power in the Legislature; they'll be running everything by the time they completely destroy the entire state.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store