
Analysis: Trump is creating a new universe of people to deport
The full scope of the Trump administration's mass deportation plan – which has been evident in theory – is only just starting to come together in practice, and its scale has come as a surprise to many Americans.
This week, the Supreme Court blessed, for now, the administration's effort to deport people from countries such as Cuba and Venezuela to places other than their homeland, including nations halfway around the world in Africa.
In Florida, construction began on a migrant detention center intended to be a sort of Alcatraz in the Everglades.
And CNN reported exclusively that the administration will soon make a large universe of people who had been working legally after seeking asylum eligible for deportation.
I went to the author of that report, CNN's Priscilla Alvarez, and asked her to explain what we know and what we're learning about how the different stories are coming together.
One thing that stuck out to me is how the totality of the administration's actions is turning people who had been working legally in the US into undocumented immigrants now facing deportation.
Our conversation, edited for length, is below:
WOLF: You have this exclusive report about a large universe of new people the Trump administration might be trying to deport. What did you find out?
ALVAREZ: The plans that the administration has been working on are targeting people who came into the US unlawfully and then applied for asylum while in the country.
The plan here is to dismiss those asylum claims, which could affect potentially hundreds of thousands of people and then make them immediately deportable.
It also puts the US Citizenship and Immigration Services, the federal agency responsible for managing federal immigration benefits, at the center of the president's deportation campaign, because not only are they the ones that manage these benefits, but they have also been delegated the authority by the Department of Homeland Security to place these individuals in fast-track deportation proceedings and to take actions to enforce immigration laws.
This is a shift that is prompting a lot of concern. As one advocate with the ACLU put it – and I'll just quote her – 'They're turning the agency that we think of as providing immigration benefits as an enforcement arm for ICE.'
WOLF: This is certainly not the criminal population that President Donald Trump and border czar Tom Homan said during the campaign that they would target first for deportation, right?
ALVAREZ: You're right to say that coming into this administration, Trump officials repeatedly said their plans were to target people with criminal records.
That is a hard thing to do. It requires a lot of legwork, and their numbers in terms of arrests were relatively low compared to where they wanted to be.
The White House wants to meet at least 3,000 arrests a day, and you just cannot do that if you are only going after people with criminal records.
Now we've seen that aperture widen to include anyone who's in the United States illegally.
The administration's perspective on this is that these are individuals who crossed the border unlawfully, therefore they are eligible for deportation.
But there has been consternation even among the president's allies about who exactly they're going after.
In fact, there was recently a letter from Republican lawmakers to the administration asking for a breakdown of who they were arresting.
WOLF: It's hard to keep track of the different buckets of people the Trump administration has targeted, like those with temporary protected status (TPS) versus asylum-seekers. How should we distinguish between them?
ALVAREZ: Temporary protected status only applies to people who are currently residing in the US. It's a form of humanitarian relief. The United States acknowledges that the conditions in your country are not ones that they could send you back to.
The Trump administration has started to peel that back and said that the conditions are sufficient, therefore we can send you back.
There's certainly a debate for many of these countries as to whether or not that is true, but that has been a long criticism of temporary protected status. What is supposed to be temporary for some countries has been extended so many times that it is no longer temporary.
Parole is another existing legal authority. The United States has frosty relations, for example, with Cuba and Venezuela, and it's very hard to deport people to those countries because they might not accept repatriation flights.
The Biden administration argued that creating a parole program would give people the opportunity to legally migrate to the United States without coming to the US-Mexico border. Hundreds of thousands of people took advantage of that opportunity, and it was very specific to certain nationalities, particularly Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans.
There are two more buckets I'll mention: Refugees are people who seek protection in the United States from abroad. Asylum-seekers are those who do it from the United States.
All those buckets have been targeted under the Trump administration, and there have been moves to strip those protections from the people who have them.
A lot of this is still working its way through litigation. But the effect is that people who perhaps had protection in the United States – could work here legally, could live here, even if temporarily – don't have them anymore and are now eligible for deportation.
WOLF: So the Trump administration essentially created a large new population of undocumented people who were previously here with some sort of blessing from the government?
ALVAREZ: Yes. I've been talking to experts in industries that depend on migrant workers and there have been situations where someone had hired a migrant worker who had a work permit to legally work here while their applications are being adjudicated, while they went through their immigration proceedings, and they don't have that anymore. Those protections and benefits have been stripped.
That person who was hired legally is now suddenly undocumented. That can create an issue for industries that depend on the migrant workforce.
Someone mentioned that to me as an example earlier this week, as we were talking through how it can affect agriculture, construction and manufacturing.
We don't have a good sense of the numbers yet, but all indications are that by stripping protections consistently through various ways, the number of people who are undocumented in the United States is growing.
WOLF: The other thing that happened this week is the Supreme Court allowed, for now, the Trump administration to carry on with deporting people from countries that we've just discussed – Cubans or Venezuelans – to third-party countries such as South Sudan. What do we know about those people?
ALVAREZ: The people you're talking about are a group of migrants who were being sent to South Sudan. They're in Djibouti because of litigation, and they are now being interviewed to see if they have grounds for what we call 'reasonable fear.'
But just to broaden out from that group, this decision from the Supreme Court was a very big deal.
Being able to send people to a country that is not their own, but that is willing to take others – that's a huge deal for the administration to ramp up how many people that they are deporting at any one time.
There is the question of due process, which has sort of been a theme in this administration.
How much time do you have to provide notice to an individual that they are not going to be deported to their home country – they're going to be deported elsewhere?
How much time, if any, do you give for them to contest their removal to that specific country?
The overarching point here is that this decision gives the administration so much more runway to execute on their deportation plan.
WOLF: The thing that was interesting this week is the so-called Alligator Alcatraz and these efforts to create new detention facilities. How would those be used?
ALVAREZ: Let me actually tie these two points together, from your previous question to now. What we are seeing currently is the Trump administration trying to solve for existing hurdles in the immigration system for arresting and deporting people in large numbers.
ICE only has a limited number of detention beds. They're only funded for an average of 41,500 beds, but they work with local jails. They have community partners to detain people. Currently, there are more than 58,000 people in ICE custody. They are completely over capacity.
That means that they have to look for new ways to detain people, and 'Alligator Alcatraz' is an example of that, which is essentially building a facility very quickly to hold up to 5,000 people and using some FEMA funds so that the state can erect this facility.
It's called 'Alligator Alcatraz' because it is located in the Everglades, Florida. The idea is that it would be low-cost because they don't have to worry much about security, given that the surroundings are marshes and swamps full of alligators and pythons. So essentially, if one were to escape, they wouldn't make it very far.
It is perhaps a clue or the beginning of how we might see the administration strike more agreements with consenting states or with private companies or military bases to house detainees.
The White House imposed a goal of arresting 3,000 people a day. Well, there comes the next question of where do you put them, especially if you've maxed out ICE detention beds.
Now we're holding more than 58,000 people and deportations can't keep up. And so there comes the Supreme Court decision of allowing the administration to deport people to other countries.
You can start to see how the puzzle pieces are slowly coming together for the administration as they try to execute on this lofty campaign promise.
WOLF: You used two interesting words there – clues and puzzle pieces. Do you feel like we have a grasp of everything that the Trump administration is doing right now on the immigration and deportation front?
ALVAREZ: They've had four years to think about this. Stephen Miller (who is White House deputy chief of staff) knows the immigration system, there's no question about that, and is the architect when it comes to many of these policies.
I would say that over the last six months the administration has been quietly doing a lot behind the scenes that the average person was probably not paying attention to. It may have come in the form of regulations, or it may have come in the form of policy guidance, or diplomatic talks that are happening with countries to eventually take other nationalities. What's been interesting about this particular moment is that everything that they were quietly working on is starting to come to light.
The X factor is: Do they get the billions and billions of dollars from the massive package that's working its way through Congress? Because if they do that, it will be a game-changer for them, and it will eliminate so many resource issues, and we could really see this plan take off.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House pushes Israeli assessment of damage to Iran's nuclear sites
The White House on Wednesday pushed the Israeli assessment of the U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, as part of its ongoing effort to argue the hits destroyed Iran's nuclear program. The White House asked the press pool traveling with the president to send out the statement on behalf of the Israel Atomic Energy Commission, just after President Trump publicly hit back at reporting that Iran's nuclear program was only set back a matter of months. 'The devastating US strike on Fordo destroyed the site's critical infrastructure and rendered the enrichment facility inoperable. We assess that the American strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, combined with Israeli strikes on other elements of Iran's military nuclear program, has set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years,' the commission statement said. 'This achievement can continue indefinitely if Iran does not get access to nuclear material,' it added. The president was asked at a press conference if the U.S. is relying on Israeli intelligence, after he read the statement, and he denied it, saying the Iranians have had the same assessment. The administration's internal assessment found Saturday's strikes of the three facilities delayed Iran's nuclear program by only a few months, despite initial assertions from Trump administration officials that those sites had been destroyed. The report also said Iran had moved much of its enriched uranium before the strikes, according to multiple outlets. Trump, while speaking at the NATO summit in The Hague, called media outlets that reported on the internal assessment, including CNN, The New York Times and NBC, 'scum' and insisted the U.S. attack led to 'total obliteration' of Iran's nuclear sites. Other top officials also pushed back, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who said an investigation was underway into leaks of a preliminary classified report, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who told Politico 'very significant, substantial damage was done.' Updated 10:19 a.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Leavitt attacks CNN reporter for Iran intel leak story
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt attacked CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand in response to her reporting on leaked intelligence relating to U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities last weekend. 'This reporter wrote a lie from the intelligence community to seek a narrative she wanted to prove,' Leavitt said of Bertrand, calling her out by name during a briefing with reporters Thursday. 'This is a reporter who has been used by people who dislike Donald Trump in this government to push fake and false narratives.' Leavitt's criticism of the reporter came a day after President Trump called for her firing and accused her of 'attempting to destroy our Patriot Pilots by making them look bad.' CNN issued a statement Wednesday defending Bertrand and saying it 'does not believe it is reasonable to criticize CNN reporters for accurately reporting the existence of the assessment and accurately characterizing its findings, which are in the public interest.' Jake Tapper, a top anchor at the network, also defended Bertrand. 'President Trump and his administration are going after shooting the messengers in an increasingly ugly way,' he said. The White House has sought discredit the leaked intelligence, which suggested the Saturday strikes only set Iran's nuclear program back by a few months. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump knocks ‘sleazebag' journalists over Iran strikes: ‘Everyone knows' sites ‘totally destroyed'
President Trump lashed out at the media Monday as journalists reported uncertainty around the extent of destruction at Iranian nuclear facilities targeted by U.S. strikes over the weekend. Trump blasted reporters and executives at CNN, ABC News and NBC News in the aftermath of the U.S. strikes. Multiple news outlets have reported on the damage to the Iranian facilities and the question of whether the sites were completely destroyed, as the president had previously claimed. 'The sites that we hit in Iran were totally destroyed, and everyone knows it. Only the Fake News would say anything different in order to try and demean, as much as possible — And even they say they were 'pretty well destroyed!'' Trump posted. 'It never ends with the sleazebags in the Media, and that's why their Ratings are at an ALL TIME LOW — ZERO CREDIBILITY!' he added. Trump's post came as he met in the Situation Room with members of his national security team after Iran fired missiles at a U.S. base in Qatar. The U.S. on Saturday struck three Iranian nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Trump described the targets in an address to the nation as 'completely and totally obliterated,' something he reiterated in a social media post late Sunday. But experts have acknowledged it would take time to determine the extent of the damage from U.S. strikes, and some reports raised the possibility that Iran moved some of its enriched uranium away from those sites ahead of the attack. 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction,' Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said Sunday. The New York Times reported there was evidence Iran had moved equipment and uranium from the Fordow site in recent days, citing two Israeli officials. The Times also cited text messages from the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency indicating Iran had moved its uranium stockpile. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.