
Israel killed at least 14 scientists in an unprecedented attack on Iran's nuclear know-how
Israel
's tally of the war damage it wrought on
Iran
includes the targeted killings of at least 14 scientists, an unprecedented attack on the brains behind Iran's nuclear program that outside experts say can only set it back, not stop it.
In an interview with The Associated Press, Israel's ambassador to France said the killings will make it "almost" impossible for Iran to build weapons from whatever nuclear infrastructure and material may have survived nearly two weeks of Israeli airstrikes and massive bunker-busting bombs dropped by U.S. stealth bombers.
"The fact that the whole group disappeared is basically throwing back the program by a number of years, by quite a number of years," Ambassador Joshua Zarka said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Monitor Temperature Easily [Get Started]
Warehouse Temperature | Search Ads
Read More
Undo
But nuclear analysts say Iran has other scientists who can take their place. European governments say that military force alone cannot eradicate Iran's nuclear know-how, which is why they want a negotiated solution to put concerns about the Iranian program to rest.
"Strikes cannot destroy the knowledge Iran has acquired over several decades, nor any regime ambition to deploy that knowledge to build a nuclear weapon," U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy told lawmakers in the
House of Commons
.
Live Events
Here's a closer look at the killings:
Chemists, physicists, engineers among those killed Zarka told AP that Israeli strikes killed at least 14 physicists and nuclear engineers, top Iranian scientific leaders who "basically had everything in their mind."
They were killed "not because of the fact that they knew physics, but because of the fight that they were personally involved in, the creation and the fabrication and the production of (a) nuclear weapon," he said.
Nine of them were killed in Israel's opening wave of attacks on June 13, the Israeli military said. It said they "possessed decades of accumulated experience in the development of nuclear weapons" and included specialists in chemistry, materials and explosives as well as physicists.
Targeted killings meant to discourage would-be successors Experts say that decades of Iranian work on nuclear energy - and, Western powers allege, nuclear weapons - has given the country reserves of know-how and scientists who could continue any work toward building warheads to fit on Iran's ballistic missiles.
"Blueprints will be around and, you know, the next generation of Ph.D. students will be able to figure it out," said Mark Fitzpatrick, who specialized in nuclear non-proliferation as a former U.S. diplomat. Bombing nuclear facilities "or killing the people will set it back some period of time. Doing both will set it back further, but it will be reconstituted."
"They have substitutes in maybe the next league down, and they're not as highly qualified, but they will get the job done eventually," said Fitzpatrick, now an analyst at the
International Institute for Strategic Studies
, a London think tank.
How quickly nuclear work could resume will in part depend on whether Israeli and U.S. strikes destroyed Iran's stock of enriched uranium and equipment needed to make it sufficiently potent for possible weapons use.
"The key element is the material. So once you have the material, then the rest is reasonably well-known," said Pavel Podvig, a Geneva-based analyst who specializes in Russia's nuclear arsenal. He said killing scientists may have been intended "to scare people so they don't go work on these programs."
"Then the questions are, 'Where do you stop?' I mean you start killing, like, students who study physics?" he asked. "This is a very slippery slope."
The Israeli ambassador said: "I do think that people that will be asked to be part of a future nuclear weapon program in Iran will think twice about it."
Previous attacks on scientists Israel has previously long been suspected of killing Iranian nuclear scientists but didn't claim responsibility as it did this time.
In 2020, Iran blamed Israel for killing its top nuclear scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, with a remote-controlled machine gun.
"It delayed the program but they still have a program. So it doesn't work," said Paris-based analyst Lova Rinel, with the Foundation for Strategic Research think tank. "It's more symbolic than strategic."
Without saying that Israel killed Fakhrizadeh, the Israeli ambassador said "Iran would have had a bomb a long time ago" were it not for repeated setbacks to its nuclear program - some of which Iran attributed to Israeli sabotage.
"They have not reached the bomb yet," Zarka said. "Every one of these accidents has postponed a little bit the program."
A legally grey area International humanitarian law bans the intentional killing of civilians and non-combatants. But legal scholars say those restrictions might not apply to nuclear scientists if they were part of the Iranian armed forces or directly participating in hostilities.
"My own take: These scientists were working for a rogue regime that has consistently called for the elimination of Israel, helping it to develop weapons that will allow that threat to take place. As such, they are legitimate targets," said Steven R. David, a professor of political science at
Johns Hopkins University
.
He said Nazi German and Japanese leaders who fought Allied nations during World War II "would not have hesitated to kill the scientists working on the Manhattan Project" that fathered the world's first atomic weapons.
Laurie Blank, a specialist in humanitarian law at Emory Law School, said it's too early to say whether Israel's decapitation campaign was legal.
"As external observers, we don't have all the relevant facts about the nature of the scientists' role and activities or the intelligence that Israel has," she said by email to AP. "As a result, it is not possible to make any definitive conclusions."
Zarka, the ambassador, distinguished between civilian nuclear research and the scientists targeted by Israel.
"It's one thing to learn physics and to know exactly how a nucleus of an atom works and what is uranium," he said.
But turning uranium into warheads that fit onto missiles is "not that simple," he said. "These people had the know-how of doing it, and were developing the know-how of doing it further. And this is why they were eliminated."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US airstrikes failed to fully destroy Iran's nuclear sites, intelligence report claims; White House responds
US airstrikes failed to fully destroy Iran's nuclear sites, intelligence report claims This handout satellite photo obtained from Planet Labs PBC and dated May 20, 2025, shows a view of the Natanz nuclear enrichment facility in central Iran.(AFP) The military strikes by the United States on three Iranian facilities earlier this week did not fully destroy them and likely set the Middle Eastern country's nuclear program back by months, an early assessment report by US intelligence said. The assessment, first reported by CNN, was produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon's intelligence arm. The United States over the weekend attacked three nuclear facilities – Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan – in Iran that Israel and the United States say were being used to build an atomic bomb in secret. US President Donald Trump had claimed that the strikes 'completely and totally obliterated' Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities. US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth had also said on Sunday that Iran's nuclear ambitions 'have been obliterated.' Two of the people familiar with the assessment of the strikes, however, told CNN that Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium was not destroyed. One of the people said the centrifuges are largely 'intact.' 'So the (DIA) assessment is that the US set them back maybe a few months, tops,' the person said. The assessment also found that at least some of Iran's highly enriched uranium was moved out of multiple sites before the US strikes and survived, reported Reuters. White House says assessment 'flat-out wrong' The White House strongly responded to reports of the assessment, calling it 'flat-out wrong.' 'The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.'


Mint
41 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Baffles With Sudden U-Turn on China Buying Iranian Oil
President Donald Trump on Tuesday appeared to undermine years of US sanctions on Iran, giving its biggest customer China the green light to carry on buying its oil as he seeks to bolster a ceasefire with Israel. The announcement on social media — which surprised both oil traders and officials in his own government — could undermine the central element of Washington's Iran policy under multiple administrations, which have sought to cut the regime's main source of revenue by making its top export off limits. 'China can now continue to purchase oil from Iran,' the president said on Truth Social, amid a flurry of posts demanding Israel and Iran cease hostilities. The statement landed only hours after Trump declared the Middle East rivals had agreed to a ceasefire, which got off to a shaky start with early breaches by both sides. It follows massive US airstrikes on several of the Islamic Republic's nuclear facilities Sunday, an offensive aimed at stopping Tehran from obtaining an atomic weapon. Oil prices extended losses after Trump's comments, with West Texas Intermediate futures sinking 6% to settle near $64 a barrel in New York. The market had already plunged in recent days as the threat to oil flows from the Israel-Iran conflict faded. US Treasury and State department officials handling Iranian oil sanctions were surprised by Trump's statement and uncertain how to immediately interpret it, according to people familiar with the situation. In the meantime, however, Treasury will continue to strictly enforce related sanctions, said one of the people, who asked not to be identified given the political and market sensitivity of the issue. The White House and Treasury Department didn't immediately respond to requests for comment, while the State Department referred questions to the White House. Tammy Bruce, State Department spokeswoman, declined to provide further specifics during a briefing Tuesday. 'I'm not going to get ahead of the president or try to guess what his strategy will be,' she said when asked about the comment. 'Things happen quickly and I think we'll find out sooner than later.' The apparent shift also comes as the Trump administration seeks to hammer out a new trade framework with China and climb down from a tariff war that saw duties reach levels high enough to cut all trade between the world's two biggest economies. The comments appeared to be Trump 'throwing a bone' to China and Iran for cooperating in their respective talks with the US, said Mark Malek, chief investment officer at Siebert. 'Most of us are thinking that it's just rhetoric at this point. But it definitely took me by surprise.' Allowing a specific carve out for China may be an effort by Trump to send positive signals to Beijing as he seeks a new tariff deal, said a person familiar with the president's thinking, also asking not to be identified. While the potential shift may ease some legal risks around China's buying of Iranian oil, it's unclear what impact the change would have on actual flows. China, the world's biggest importer, gets about 14% of its crude from Iran. But that figure is likely higher as some imports are masked as shipments from Malaysia, as well as the United Arab Emirates and Oman, in order to circumvent US sanctions, which Beijing doesn't recognize. Iran's oil, often purchased at a discount, is vital for China's substantial private refining sector, a crucial source of energy for its economy, which has struggled under the weight of a slumping property sector. 'The Iranian oil sanctions have been so significant for so long, but also with relatively muted enforcement,' said Daniel Tannebaum, former Treasury official and partner at Oliver Wyman. 'It would be premature to think that this policy — which would benefit both China and Iran — would go ahead without a longer term view of ensuring stability in the region, before just literally opening up the spigots to allow legal trade of Iranian oil by China.' Trump as recently as last month insisted all purchases of Iranian oil or petrochemical products 'must stop, NOW!' and that buyers would be subject to secondary sanctions and prevented from engaging in any business with the US. That threat built on previous warnings from his administration. In February, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Washington intended to squeeze Iran's oil exports to less than 10% of current levels, as it renewed the 'maximum pressure' campaign deployed during Trump's first term. As part of that effort, the US has sanctioned hundreds of oil tankers for their role in handling Tehran's petroleum and, absent an easing in those measures, some buyers may still take a more-cautious approach. The White House has also targeted Chinese entities that bought Iranian oil, something that could make other buyers wary. Likewise, secondary sanctions on Iran's sales remain in place and its not clear where the president's remarks will leave those. The sanctions were intended to force Iran to voluntarily give up uranium enrichment so that it would never be in a position to obtain a nuclear weapon. It's still unclear if US airstrikes over the weekend seriously damaged the country's nuclear facilities, while the International Atomic Energy Agency still doesn't know what happened to Tehran's stockpiled of 409 kilograms of highly-enriched uranium — potentially enough for 10 nuclear warheads. With assistance from Alaric Nightingale, Julian Lee, Jordan Fabian, Alexander Pearson and Kate Sullivan. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Full circle: Gujarat government revives third ring road plan for Ahmedabad
Gandhinagar: Fast-paced growth and the ambition to host the 2036 Olympics are pushing Ahmedabad to rethink its infrastructure. The state govt has, in principle, decided to revive the long-dormant third ring road project, proposing more than 100 TP schemes for speedy land acquisition. Officials say the corridor is essential to easing pressure on existing roads. The plan may be finalised by the end of next year. Originally outlined in a draft development plan 19 years ago, the third ring road had seen no movement in terms of land acquisition or groundwork, until now. You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad "Given the rising pressure on the existing 132-ft Ring Road and Sardar Patel Ring Road, as well as a growing need for enhanced connectivity, the state govt has decided to accelerate the third ring road project. The potential for hosting the Olympics, has prompted us to reprioritize this long-delayed plan," said a senior official. Officials said that the Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (Auda), Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC), and the urban development department (UDD) are now jointly working to fast-track this initiative. Sources involved in the planning process said the new development plan will include the third ring road with possible route refinements. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Wittmund: Nur 700 Plätze. Werden Sie Testhörer für die neuen Hörgeräte ohne Zuzahlung. Gutes Hören Undo "Keeping the Olympics and long-term growth in mind, the govt has decided to give the third ring road top priority in the new development plan. Experts have broadly agreed to proceed with the previously proposed alignment, with small modifications if necessary," a source said. Officials pointed out that the traditional method of road development through revenue rules can trigger legal complications and result in years of delay. Instead, the govt is opting for TP schemes, which are more structured and efficient. "This method ensures both quicker land acquisition and planned growth along the corridor," a source added. The proposed third ring road will likely be one of the largest town-planning undertakings ever seen in Gujarat. "By the end of 2025, the new draft development plan, along with a new action plan for the third ring land acquisition using over 100 TPs, is likely to be ready," sources added.