Oklahoma hires Latham team for US Supreme Court religious rights case
April 3 (Reuters) - (Billable Hours is Reuters' weekly report on lawyers and money. Please send tips or suggestions to D.Thomas@thomsonreuters.com, opens new tab)
Oklahoma has hired one of Washington's top appellate lawyers for a coming clash over First Amendment religious rights and charter schools at the U.S. Supreme Court.
The state turned to Latham's Gregory Garre, a former Republican-appointed U.S. solicitor general, to lead the team for Oklahoma's Republican Attorney General Gentner Drummond.
Latham will bill up to $250,000 for the work at the high court, according to a contract obtained by Reuters through a public records request.
Drummond in 2023 sued to block St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School from becoming the first taxpayer-funded religious charter school in the country. Drummond argued his office was bound to "prevent the type of state-funded religion that Oklahoma's constitutional framers and the founders of our country sought to prevent."
Garre is facing off against conservative legal group Alliance Defending Freedom, representing Oklahoma's Statewide Charter School Board. Dechert represents St. Isidore. The state's high court in June ruled against the board and organizers of the proposed school.
Garre, who is asking the justices to uphold restrictions on funding for religious education, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In a statement, the Oklahoma attorney general's office called Garre a "brilliant legal mind."
The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments in the case on April 30.
In 2008, Garre served as the Senate-confirmed U.S. solicitor general, the nation's highest government appellate lawyer. He has argued 49 cases at the Supreme Court.
Five Latham associates appeared with Garre on the Supreme Court brief he filed, opens new tab on Monday for Drummond. They said a ruling for the board would cause "chaos and confusion for thousands of charter schools and millions of schoolchildren nationwide."
Latham's flat fee includes $100,000 for consulting with the U.S. Justice Department to encourage it to file an amicus brief, and another $100,000 for filing the state's brief. The firm will be paid $50,000 after oral arguments.
Garre has billed corporate clients at least $2,035 an hour, according to a Reuters review of U.S. bankruptcy records, but he is likely not charging that amount to Oklahoma, which said the firm had provided a discount.
Oklahoma in other cases has brought on U.S. Supreme Court veterans, including Paul Clement, who also was a U.S. solicitor general during the George W. Bush administration, and Kannon Shanmugam, who leads the Washington, D.C. office of law firm Paul Weiss.
-- New U.S. ethics disclosures from some of President Donald Trump's top legal nominees offered a glimpse at compensation at some of the country's most prestigious law firms.
Jay Clayton of Sullivan & Cromwell, nominated as the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, reported receiving more than $6.7 million from the law firm since the start of 2024, according to his disclosure.
Other financial disclosures showed attorney pay at law firms Jones Day, Sidley Austin and Skadden Arps.
-- A lawyer who is suing Northwestern University's law school over its hiring practices is fighting the school's request for attorney fees after his client dropped its lawsuit and refiled a new one minutes later.
Jonathan Mitchell, a lawyer for Faculty, Alumni, & Students Opposed to Racial Preferences (FASORP), said in a Tuesday filing, opens new tab that Northwestern's misconduct allegations, including that they dismissed and refiled their lawsuit to "gain a tactical advantage," are false and defamatory.
"It is neither 'bad faith' nor 'vexatious' for a lawyer to dismiss and refile if he sincerely believes that this is the least expensive and least burdensome way of effectuating an amendment to his pleading — even if that belief turns out to be mistaken," Mitchell wrote.
FASORP sued Northwestern in July, claiming its law school discriminates against white men in faculty hiring and other practices. FASORP dismissed its own lawsuit on January 31, and then refiled it minutes later, according to Northwestern.
Northwestern accused FASORP of trying to dodge a potentially adverse ruling on its bid to add a Title VII claim to its original lawsuit. Mitchell denied the allegations.
A spokesperson for Northwestern declined to comment. Mitchell and FASORP's other attorneys did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Read more:
Latham, Northwestern seek fees from conservative group in bias case
Purdue Pharma fees surpass $250 million for Davis Polk amid new bankruptcy plan
Oracle lawyers' $58 million fee award on the line in Rimini Street appeal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
'There is no Plan B': Republicans make a daring bet on the debt limit
WASHINGTON — As Republicans barrel toward a critical deadline this summer to lift the debt ceiling, they say there's no 'Plan B' to avert an economically disastrous default if they fail to pass the massive bill for President Donald Trump's agenda in time. Congressional Republicans are eyeing increasing the debt limit by $4 trillion to $5 trillion so the government can keep borrowing to meet the country's obligations. It's part of their broader domestic policy package, which the Senate needs to pass before it can go back through the House and ultimately to Trump's desk for his signature. And the GOP only has three votes to spare in both chambers. 'There is no Plan B,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said Tuesday when asked by NBC News if he has a backup plan for the debt limit. 'It's Plan A. We have to get it done. Failure is not an option.' It's a risky gamble by GOP leaders, who are putting all their chips on passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act by the debt ceiling deadline. 'We're going to get reconciliation done,' Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., said when asked what the party's fallback plan is on the debt ceiling. (Reconciliation refers to the budget process Republicans are using to pass their bill, which allows them to bypass the 60-vote threshold in the Senate and cut Democrats out of the process.) The Treasury Department has urged Congress to raise the debt ceiling "by mid-July" to safely avoid default. The Congressional Budget Office projected this week that the deadline may be later, 'between mid-August and the end of September,' although that won't be official unless the Treasury Department agrees. If Republicans fail to pass their sprawling bill in time, they would need to negotiate with Democrats to pass a standalone debt limit extension through the 60-vote process in the Se nate. But there have been no negotiations between party leaders on that front, according to Republican and Democratic aides with knowledge of the dynamics. One GOP aide said the party is 'full steam ahead on Plan A' and suggested there may still be time to consider a fallback if they absolutely need to. Some Republicans say it's a deliberate tactic to drive up the urgency of passing their filibuster-proof bill. 'We should be set an expectation that we're getting this done in July, and it includes the debt ceiling,' said Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C. 'I think the minute you start talking about a backup plan, you're going to have a backup plan.' If Republican leaders eventually decide they want to cut a bipartisan deal on the debt ceiling, it's unclear what — if anything — Democrats would demand. Some, like Sen. Elizabeth Warren, of Massachusetts, and Rep. Brendan Boyle, of Pennsylvania., have insisted on abolishing the debt limit entirely in order to prevent the full faith and credit of the United States from being used as leverage in policy negotiations. That's an idea Trump recently endorsed. 'I am very pleased to announce that, after all of these years, I agree with Senator Elizabeth Warren on SOMETHING,' Trump wrote on Truth Social last week. 'The Debt Limit should be entirely scrapped to prevent an Economic catastrophe.' But there's scant support within the GOP for it, as Republicans have found success using it to extract concessions from Democratic presidents in the past. There's no indication that Democrats would respond in kind this year if Republicans came to them and asked for their votes on the debt ceiling. 'I'm not debating hypotheticals,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said when asked what he'd want in exchange.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Hegseth jokes about US allies doing nothing in Afghanistan – despite hundreds losing their lives
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared to make light of the contributions made by America's NATO allies during the war in Afghanistan at a Capitol Hill hearing on Wednesday. Speaking before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Hegseth attempted to make a point that the White House and President Donald Trump himself have frequently made: that other NATO member-states should increase their defensive capabilities to match the benchmarks laid out in the defense pact's charter. Instead, the secretary harked back to a remark he told Sen. Chris Coons (D-Conn.) was commonly made by US service members on the ground in Afghanistan during his time in the service. Hegseth said his fellow Army National Guardsmen would often joke that the ISAF acronym on their shoulder patches — which stood for International Security Assistance Force — really stood for, 'I saw Americans fighting.' 'Ultimately it was a lotta flags. Lotta flags. [But it] was not a lot of on-the-ground capability,' Hegseth continued in disparaging the NATO troops. 'You're not a real coalition, you're not a real alliance, unless you have real defense capability, and real armies that can bring those to bear.' His remark drew immediate rebuke from Coons, who noted the military and human contributions that America's allies made after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, when NATO's Article 5 was invoked for the first time. The Democratic senator launched into an explanation about how Denmark, with a population of just six million, suffered some of the highest losses per capita of any coalition ally, only closely trailing the United States. 'Let's just make clear for the record that our military partners in Afghanistan included many who served and died,' said the senator. But Hegseth wasn't finished. 'Don't try and make it look like I don't care about the investments of our partners,' said the secretary. 'Of course I do. I recognize that there were lives lost from other countries. But the bulk of the effort was Americans.' Alongside the US, 31 other countries participated in the war in Afghanistan and saw soldiers killed in combat and due to other circumstances. The U.S. lost 2,461 troops over the course of the longest military engagement in U.S. history, followed by the UK, which lost 457 service members. The final deaths of the war occurred during a chaotic withdrawal from the country in 2021, following the fall of large tracts of territory to Taliban militants the U.S .and its allies failed to dislodge over the course of 20 years. A blast attributed to Islamic State militants killed more than a dozen US service members outside of Kabul's airport during the evacuation, while thousands of desperate Afghans crowded the facility and sought exit on American planes. America's participation in the war grew unpopular as it dragged on, and the withdrawal of forces was ordered by Donald Trump during his first presidency. Completed under Joe Biden, the chaotic nature of the pullout and the speed of the collapse of Afghanistan's democratic government were points of soreness and contention in Washington, with defense hawks fretting that the Taliban takeover amounted to the country turning into a breeding ground for al Qaeda, the Islamic State and other terror groups once again. Britain's House of Commons library reports that the total cost of UK contributions to the war topped 32.8 billion pounds, adjusted for 2024-25 price levels. Tens of thousands of Afghan refugees were also resettled by the UK and other US partners. In 2021 and the two years following, Afghan refugees were the most common nationality accepted by the Home Office, according to the government's figures. The Trump administration in January froze a program allowing Afghan citizens who helped the US during the war against the Taliban, Islamic State and Al Qaeda to resettle in America.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Leavitt knocks reporter for asking a 'stupid question' about protests
By White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt knocked a reporter for asking a 'stupid question' when being queried Wednesday over potential protests at President Donald Trump's military parade on Saturday. NOTUS' Jasmine Wright called attention to the warning Trump gave Tuesday in the Oval Office as he heralded the upcoming parade, which is to mark the Army's 250th anniversary - and takes place on the president's 79th birthday. 'By the way, for those people who want to protest, they are going to be met with very big force,' Trump said. 'And I haven't even heard about a protest, but you know this is people that hate our country, but they will be met with very heavy force.' Wright asked Leavitt to 'clarify what kind of protest President Trump does support or find acceptable.' 'The president absolutely supports peaceful protests. He supports the First Amendment. He supports the right of Americans to make their voices heard,' the press secretary answered. 'He does not support violence of any kind, he does not support assaulting law enforcement officers who are simply trying to do their jobs.' 'It's very clear for the president what he supports and what he does not,' Leavitt continued. 'Unfortunately for Democrats that line has not been made clear, and they've allowed this unrest and violence to continue and the president has had to step in.' Wright then asked 'if there were peaceful protests on Saturday' would they be allowed to go forward. 'Of course the president supports peaceful protests. What a stupid question,' Leavitt snapped. She then moved on to the next reporter during a quick, 26-minute briefing. Organizers with the 'No Kings' movement are planning demonstrations across the country to coincide with Saturday's military parade and concert, to take place alongside Constitution Avenue and then at the Ellipse. 'No Kings' planners have pushed potential demonstrators to not take to the streets in D.C. - where there is already a robust security response. The White House, Capitol and certain roadways have been outlined with fencing ahead of Saturday's events. Instead 'No Kings' organizers have encouraged people to protest in Philadelphia or in suburban Maryland and Virginia, instead of D.C. proper. During Tuesday's briefing, Leavitt was also asked if the president sees himself as a 'king.' 'The president views himself as the president of the United States of America,' Leavitt said. 'This is a constitutional republic and we want to see all of our citizens be proud of the country in which they are given the privilege and the blessing to live.' Tuesday's briefing was dominated by questions about ongoing protests in Los Angeles - with demonstrations also popping up in major cities including New York and Chicago - all over Trump's 'mass deportation' plan. Leavitt tried to justify Trump federalizing California's National Guard members and U.S. Marines to deal with the LA unrest by pointing to 'those images of foreign flags being waved by illegal criminals and by violent rioters in the face of cars blowing up and flames in the city.' She showed a number of photos of burning cars at the top of the briefing. 'President Trump saw these images and he said that is not going to be accepted or tolerated,' Leavitt said. 'And hence why he deployed the National Guard and United States Marines who have helped quell the violence.' California Gov. Gavin Newsom has sued over the National Guard use arguing that Trump lacked that authority to do so over the wishes of the governor. Leavitt was asked Tuesday whether other Democratic governors would be asked ahead of a similar National Guard deployment. 'Well, President Trump was in contact with Gov. Gavin Newsom despite some of the claims he's made in the last couple of days,' Leavitt said, noting that Trump called the California Democrat Friday evening. Leavitt said Trump gave Newsom 24 hours to 'get it together' before making the decision to federalize California's National Guard. She didn't commit to Trump getting Democratic governors' permission if a similar thing happened again. Leavitt instead argued that law enforcement officers have been 'kneecapped by incompetent Democrat policies and Democrat politicians,' using incorrect grammar to disparage the rival party. She concluded the briefing after being asked why Trump hasn't made more clear his support for 'First Amendment protection.' 'Why is he not out saying all peaceful protesters will be protected?' asked David Sanger of The New York Times. Leavitt answered that 'two things can be important at the same time.' 'And the president, as I just answered, supports the right of Americans to peacefully protest. He supports the First Amendment. But that is not the majority of the behavior that we have seen taking place in Los Angeles,' she continued.
