logo
CPS narrows interim CEO search as negligence allegations surface in top candidate's record

CPS narrows interim CEO search as negligence allegations surface in top candidate's record

The Chicago Board of Education has narrowed its list for the interim schools' chief down to three candidates in recent days, one of whom has a history of alleged negligence as a principal, according to documents obtained by the Tribune through the Freedom of Information Act.
The people in consideration are: Macquline King, the city's senior director of educational policy; Alfonso Carmona, CPS chief portfolio officer and Nicole Milberg, the school district's chief of teaching and learning.
All of the candidates have backgrounds as educators and principals, working their way up to administrative roles. Carmona and Milberg both hold ranks within CPS. King is the only person being considered who works with the city. They all have a professional educator license with a superintendent endorsement.
Managing the nation's fourth-largest school district requires a specific, narrow managerial skill set and focus, several board members and a former district official told the Tribune. The incoming interim superintendent will need both the financial expertise to pass the budget and the school-level understanding to successfully start the school year, they said.
The new 21-person board, which is split between mayoral-appointed and elected members, will decide on the short-term schools leader later this month. It will also conduct a search for the permanent replacement later this fall, according to Che Rhymefest Smith of District 10 on the South Side. A simple majority — or 11 out of 21 members — is required to vote the candidate in.
'The one thing we don't need is any more shameful representations of leadership that were not properly vetted,' Smith said, referring to the abrupt resignation of former school board president the Rev. Mitchell Ikenna Johnson last October for his social media posts deemed antisemitic and conspiratorial.
Other board members emphasized the importance of conducting the interim CEO search with integrity.
'And we are trying to depoliticize it, because it shouldn't be a political process, right?' said Anusha Thotakura, a board member from District 6, spanning neighborhoods from Streeterville to Englewood. 'We want the best candidate for the job.'
Whether outgoing schools chief Pedro Martinez's temporary replacement comes from CPS or the Johnson administration could affect potential borrowing scenarios adopted by the school board to balance a tight fiscal budget for 2026, which begins on July 1. Board members are reconciling with decades of financial mismanagement while balancing CPS' books.
Macquline King, a former principal at Mary E. Courtenay Language Arts Center in Uptown and the now-closed Alexandre Dumas School in Woodlawn, currently serves as the city's senior director of educational policy. She holds a Doctor of Education degree from National Louis University, according to her LinkedIn profile.
As senior director of educational policy for the city, she gets paid by CPS but technically works for the city. King disclosed in CPS documents in 2022 that she is exempt from living in Chicago, as employees hired before 1996 are not required to live within city limits. Public records show she owns property on the Near West Side.
King helped manage the fallout of the 2013 Stockton Elementary merger with Courtenay, a turbulent time marked by staff tensions and student fights, according to district officials who requested anonymity due to the ongoing CEO search.
But her employee record shows she didn't act with urgency on several occasions, according to CPS documents obtained by the Tribune under the Freedom of Information Act. While never formally disciplined beyond warnings, King was cited in multiple internal investigations between 2015 and 2019. Several of the allegations were later dismissed due to insufficient evidence.
In April 2015, she waited several weeks before calling the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services over the alleged physical abuse of a student, according to a CPS memo signed by her supervisor. Under CPS policy, employees are required to report suspected abuse to DCFS within 48 hours. Without enough credible evidence, an investigative report dismissed the finding.
In October that year, a CPS investigative report shows, she failed to implement the school safety plan after two students were found in a bathroom stall together, pulling their pants down and 'looking at each other's private parts and butt,' without staff supervision. The school's policy was changed to require staff members to accompany students to the bathroom before and after school. The reports state, however, that the school's staff didn't take any action to ensure it was enforced.
According to an interview included in the reports, King stated that the assistant principal was in charge of overseeing the afterschool program at that time, as she was on leave.
King was also cited for negligent supervision for failing to properly notify emergency contacts after a student broke their arm in December, according to CPS investigative reports. The assistant principal at the time informed the student's guardian that the reason for the lack of notification was that a nurse on duty that day was absent, according to the reports. The allegation was dismissed due to a lack of credible evidence.
A CPS memo indicates that four years later, King allowed a volunteer to work at the school without requiring a background check. A memorandum of understanding later showed that the person had criminal charges.
King did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request from the district for the other two candidates didn't contain any citations of negligence or misconduct.
Alfonso Carmona, originally from Colombia, is CPS's Chief Portfolio Officer, a role he has held for three years. He oversees enrollment, new program development, and school accountability.
Before that, he worked as a bilingual teacher at Inter-American Magnet School in Lakeview, principal at Healy Elementary School in Bridgeport, and superintendent of St. Augustine Prep in Milwaukee, Wis. He joined CPS administration as a network chief.
Carmona recently led presentations to the school board on options for absorbing seven of 15 Acero charter schools slated for closure. He holds a bachelor's in economics from the University of Cartagena, two master's degrees and a Doctorate in School Administration from Western Illinois University.
Nicole Milberg, CPS's chief of teaching and learning since fall 2023, oversees the district's academic strategy, including curriculum and teacher training. She previously served as a network chief, supporting diverse school models and leading the shift to remote learning.
Milberg began her CPS career as a resident principal at John Fiske Elementary School in Woodlawn, later leading Ellen Mitchell Elementary School in West Town. She has also worked in Newark, N.J. and Washington, D.C. She holds a Master of Business Administration from the Yale School of Management and a Master of Education from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, according to LinkedIn.
District officials are counting on at least $300 million in additional funding from the city and state to balance the upcoming budget.
However, the state budget was passed at the final hour late last Saturday, with several spending cuts, including to K-12 school districts across the state. In 2017, state lawmakers pledged to increase funding by $350 million annually for ten years to fund schools adequately. This year's budget is $43 million below that target.
And the city will face its own challenges this budget season, with President Donald Trump threatening to cut billions in funding.
Without additional cash, layoffs of as many as 1,700 district employees could be on the horizon, a suggestion floated to board members in mid-April.
To get through the last fiscal school year and meet its growing pension obligations, city officials proposed several borrowing scenarios for the district. CPS CEO Martinez called them a short-term fix that wouldn't help the ongoing financial crisis.
The financial disagreement in part cost him his job last December. His last day with the district is June 18.
Martinez argued for months that while large debt issuances are a fairly routine practice for the large school district, a budget that relies on borrowed revenue for regular expenses wouldn't be sustainable and could hurt CPS' credit rating.
The incoming interim pick will face the same questions and challenges.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard does not have document demanded in FOIA lawsuit, attorney says
Former Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard does not have document demanded in FOIA lawsuit, attorney says

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Former Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard does not have document demanded in FOIA lawsuit, attorney says

Attorneys for former Dolton Mayor Tiffany Henyard say they will file an affidavit explaining she does not have records required as part of an ongoing lawsuit. Henyard was required to appear in court Friday at the Daley Center in Chicago to produce documents requested last year by the nonprofit Edgar County Watchdogs that are public via the Freedom of Information Act. Cook County Judge Kate Moreland filed an order holding her in contempt May 23 for repeated violations of court orders. Though Henyard was called to testify, Henyard's attorney, Beau Brindley, told Moreland she would not take the stand due to an ongoing federal investigation into possible misconduct during her tenure as Dolton's mayor. Brindley confirmed after the hearing he is representing Henyard in the federal investigation. 'She does not have these documents,' Brindley said. 'The one document they're asking for, she doesn't remember what it is. She doesn't possess it.' The Edgar County Watchdogs sued Dolton in February 2024 after failing to receive documents requested the month prior. The lawsuit claims the groups made two separate requests Jan. 5, 2024, neither of which received a response from Henyard's office. Attorneys for the Edgar County Watchdogs said Friday the village helped fulfill the first request, copies of all credit card statements since Oct. 1, 2023. However, they still not received copy of a document Henyard showed at a January public meeting while stating trustees canceled the credit card, stating the document was proof. 'We don't believe that someone can just burn a piece of paper or get rid of … the document, and the Watchdogs aren't going to stop until they get it,' attorney Edward Coach Winehouse said after the hearing. Judge Moreland affirmed Friday that Henyard would be fined $1,000 per day as of May 30 until she produced the records responsive to the group's request or filed the affidavit. Brindley said the affidavit would be filed by Monday. After the hearing, Brindley told the Daily Southtown the case represents a 'pretty unfair focus on Mayor Henyard, who has been out of office for awhile now.' 'This is about one piece of paper at a board meeting that she had like a year ago, and they seem to suggest that she's going to still have it,' Brindley said. 'She doesn't even know what it is, and the fact that they've gone to all this trouble and a contempt hearing and everything else is just silly.' Edgar County Watchdogs claim in the lawsuit the only response to their Jan. 5 FOIA requests came from Village Clerk Alison Key, informing them the village administrator at the time, Keith Freeman, instructed staff not to reply to requests that she entered. 'Hopefully, you will get what you are requesting,' Key wrote the day the request was received. Henyard's tenure as mayor, which ended last month, showed a pattern of ignored or denied public records requests. The Daily Southtown reported last year the Illinois attorney general's office received more than 50 related complaints between January 2021 and April 2024 regarding ignored or denied FOIA requests. The attorney general's office also received more than 30 similar complaints from Thornton Township from January 2022 and August 2024, when Henyard was supervisor. The Daily Southtown sought records from Dolton in May 2023, and followed up again in August of that year. While the Freedom of Information Act requests were acknowledged as received, there was no response. In May 2024, lawyers for the Daily Southtown sent a letter to Dolton officials, including Henyard, outlining the lack of response and requesting the village adhere to the law and turn over records. It too was ignored. In February 2024, the attorney general's office issued a binding opinion ordering Dolton to produce records requested by WGN. The village did not, and WGN eventually won a court ruling demanding the documents be turned over. ostevens@

What's Happening Inside This ICE Facility in Texas Should Shock Your Conscience
What's Happening Inside This ICE Facility in Texas Should Shock Your Conscience

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

What's Happening Inside This ICE Facility in Texas Should Shock Your Conscience

Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily. Last month 31 men at Bluebonnet Detention Center in Anson, Texas, positioned their bodies in the shape of the letters 'SOS,' a cry for help, as journalists flew overhead. Much has been written about the state of deportations under the Trump administration and the flouting of the Supreme Court's orders, as well as the court's temporary blocking of removals of Venezuelan migrants to a notorious prison complex in El Salvador. However, less has been said about how human rights violations are pervasive at detention centers all over the United States, including Bluebonnet. Nearly nine years after its construction to house state prisoners, Bluebonnet Detention Center, operated by the Management and Training Corporation, signed a $145 million contract with Immigration and Customs Enforcement in 2019 to house a maximum of 1,000 detainees on any given day. Located approximately 200 miles west of Dallas-Fort Worth, Bluebonnet provides a strategic site for discreet detention, nestled in a remote area yet accessible for transport to the airport. Despite its newer status with ICE, Bluebonnet had one of the largest COVID-19 outbreaks among ICE detention centers in the U.S. in 2021, and the American Civil Liberties Union listed the facility among 38 recommended for shut down because of its dangerous operations. It is no surprise that Bluebonnet's detention conditions continue the practices of gross human rights violations that plague the entirety of ICE operations. The conditions inside ICE detention centers are so untenable that people are self-deporting to avoid being detained. This is not an accident. ICE's poor conditions are adapted tactics of the 'Prevention Through Deterrence' policy implemented in 1994 that makes it more difficult for immigrants to fight their deportation orders. This is exactly what the Trump administration desires. At the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, Bluebonnet was inspected at least seven times by ICE's Office of Detention Oversight and by Nakamoto Group, a private independent company that has since lost its contract with the federal government. Notably, inspections by Nakamoto Group relied heavily on telemonitoring and planned visits, asking detention facilities before monitoring them for a list of preapproved detained individuals to interview. This raised many ethical issues that were reported by the ACLU. Even despite offering this advance opportunity for detention officials to clean up their acts before inspection, our data (which we obtained via the Freedom of Information Act) shows Nakamoto still found dangerous environments at Bluebonnet. All Bluebonnet detention inspections occurring between 2020 and 2024 documented recurring concerns regarding medical treatment, extended isolation, detainee reports of sexual violence, recorded instances of force, and problematic approaches to suicide prevention and interventions. Although 45 percent of detainee statements in Bluebonnet inspections reported issues with medical care, facility detention inspectors rarely found detainees trustworthy about their complaints. For example, in 2021, Bluebonnet detainees stated that medication requests were rarely followed up on, while another detainee who had received medical attention was placed in solitary confinement that had unsanitary conditions without explanation. The inspectors in each case failed to believe detainees because they were unable to verify their claims. In our analysis of Bluebonnet inspections, we discovered dangerous practices that placed detainee well-being at risk. During February 2021, the Office of Detention Oversight found that Bluebonnet staff did not follow proper procedures to calculate use-of-force incidents and video documentation of incidents was not properly assessed by ICE. That same document also revealed hunger strikes and issues with medical care that captured a troubling environment at Bluebonnet for detainees. The most recent Bluebonnet inspections also harbor a similar sense of turmoil. In 2024, the Office of Detention Oversight revealed that detainees were exhibiting suicidal behavior because of long wait times and delays at Bluebonnet. These ruminations on suicide due to the escalating deportation procedures and extended court delays are not unplanned, but rather an indicator of how ICE operates as a whole. For those in the know, violence is as synonymous with ICE as the Big Mac is with McDonald's. ICE provides financial backing and branding to correctional institutions—we would call them franchises—that are notoriously dangerous to incarcerated individuals. These prisons and jails lack motivation for reform because ICE rarely withdraws funds or ends contracts. Make no mistake, the SOS is not an isolated event but a symptom of a greater problem. Right now, Cuban detainees at Krome detention center in the Miami-Dade area in Florida are protesting under similar conditions to those at the Bluebonnet ICE facility. Across these ICE detention centers, detainees are resisting prolonged detention, inadequate food, a lack of medical care, and recurring abuse. The violence experienced in these facilities is slow violence, and slow violence leads to 'undue process.' For example, at Bluebonnet, people's limited access to correspondence and other mail has inhibited their ability to correspond with their families and legal teams to defend themselves. Slow violence is intentional, diminishing individuals' ability to defend themselves and receive legal due process. It results—predictably and intentionally—in undue process and self-deportation. Notably, the level of violence in ICE detention facilities is higher than in jails or prisons. U.S. citizens who commit crimes and are convicted of them are protected by law from experiencing violence during their incarceration. That is not to say that violence doesn't still occur in prisons, but that there are constitutional protections to guard against it. These same protections do not seem to exist for individuals in immigrant detention. Our collective level of outrage does not match the gross human rights violations happening daily to immigrant detainees—persons who have not been convicted of a crime but who are in the process of being removed from the country. While we pretend that we are protecting the sanctity of America, we are undermining our core values by denigrating 'the huddled masses' that have come to our shores seeking freedom. Instead, we place them in peril in our ICE detention centers. We know this is the America that some have fought hard to create. Is this the America that we will accept?

DOGE employees can search Social Security records, Supreme Court says
DOGE employees can search Social Security records, Supreme Court says

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

DOGE employees can search Social Security records, Supreme Court says

The Supreme Court cleared the way Friday for the DOGE team that had been led by Elon Musk to examine Social Security records that include personal information on most Americans. Acting by a 6-3 vote, the justices granted an appeal from President Trump's lawyers and lifted a court order that had barred a team of DOGE employees of freely examining Social Security records. "We conclude that, under the present circumstances," the Social Security Administration, or SSA, "may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work," the court said in an unsigned order. In a second order, the justices blocked the disclosure of DOGE operations as agency records that could be subject to the Freedom of Information Act. The court's three liberals — Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan — dissented in both cases Read more: Trump administration asks Supreme Court to let DOGE access Social Security systems "Today, the court grants 'emergency' relief that allows the Social Security Administration (SSA) to hand DOGE staffers the highly sensitive data of millions of Americans," Jackson wrote. "The Government wants to give DOGE unfettered access to this personal, non-anonymized information right now—before the courts have time to assess whether DOGE's access is lawful." The legal fight turned on the unusual status of the newly created Department of Governmental Efficiency. This was a not true department, but the name given to the team of aggressive outside advisors led by Musk. Were the DOGE team members presidential advisors or outsiders who should be not given access to personal data? While Social Security employees are entrusted with the records containing personal information, it was disputed whether the 11 DOGE team members could be trusted with same material. Musk had said the goal was to find evidence of fraud or misuse of government funds. He and DOGE were sued by labor unions who said the outside analysts were sifting through records with personal information which was protected by the privacy laws. Unless checked, the DOGE team could create highly personal computer profiles of every person, they said. A federal judge in Maryland agreed and issued an order restricting the work of DOGE. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander, Obama appointee, barred DOGE staffers from have accessing to the sensitive personal information of millions of Americans. But her order did not restrict the Social Security staff or DOGE employees from using data that did not identify persons or sensitive personal information. In late April, the divided 4th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to set aside the judge's order by a 9-6 vote. Judge Robert King said the "government has sought to accord the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) immediate and unfettered access to all records of the Social Security Administration ('SSA') — records that include the highly sensitive personal information of essentially everyone in our country." Read more: Trump administration asks Supreme Court to leave mass layoffs at Education Department in place But Trump Solicitor Gen. D. John Sauer appealed to the Supreme Court and said a judge should not "second guess" how the administration manages the government. He said the district judge had "enjoined particular agency employees — the 11 members of the Social Security Administration (SSA) DOGE team—from accessing data that other agency employees can unquestionably access, and that the SSA DOGE team will use for purposes that are unquestionably lawful. ... The Executive Branch, not district courts, sets government employees' job responsibilities." Sauer said the DOGE team were seeking to "modernize SSA systems and identify improper payments, for instance by reviewing swaths of records and flagging unusual payment patterns or other signs of fraud. The DOGE employees "are subject to the same strict confidentiality standards as other SSA employees," he said. Moreover, the plaintiffs "make no allegation that the SSA DOGE team's access will increase the risk of public disclosure." He said checking the personal data is crucial. "For instance, a birth date of 1900 can be telltale evidence that an individual is probably deceased and should not still receive Social Security payments, while 15 names using the same Social Security number may also point to a problem," he said. Get the L.A. Times Politics newsletter. Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond, in your inbox twice per week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store