Berlin justice minister: Debate on banning far-right AfD premature
Public debate over a ban on the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party is premature in the view of Felor Badenberg, justice minister in the city of Berlin and a former vice-president of Germany's federal domestic intelligence agency (BfV).
Badenberg said she expected the AfD, which was on Friday designated as "confirmed right-wing extremist" by the intelligence agency, to take legal action against the designation. The classification has implications for how the party is monitored by the intelligence services.
Speaking to national public radio Deutschlandfunk, she noted that this could drag on for years. Politicians should start considering the issue only after the courts had ruled on the designation, Badenberg said.
On Friday, the BfV said in a lengthy report that there was now concrete evidence that the anti-immigrant party pursued efforts that threaten Germany's democratic order and that its understanding of the German nation as based on ethnicity and descent was incompatible with Germany's free democratic order.
The AfD has charged that the decision is not based on evidence.
Badenberg rejected criticism of the BfV decision from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who said on Friday: "Germany just gave its spy agency new powers to surveil the opposition. That's not democracy - it's tyranny in disguise."
She told Deutschlandfunk that she could see nothing anti-democratic in the BfV designation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stymied French politicians turn to the sins of the past
On Thursday, two years after France's controversial retirement age increase, the National Assembly voted to withdraw the reform. While the news was politically explosive because the far-right National Rally helped the left-wing opposition gain a majority in the vote, the decision hasn't yielded any actual legal results. The situation reflects the country's ongoing failure to address structural reforms since the parliamentary elections last summer, which left the government won without an absolute majority. But in the area of remembrance policy there has been significant movement. In the same week as the toothless retirement resolution, parliamentarians adopted three texts that reclassify historical events or offer the prospect of reparations. On June 2, the French parliament voted unanimously to posthumously appoint Alfred Dreyfus to the rank of brigadier general. The Jewish officer was wrongly accused of high treason in 1894, based on falsified evidence that he revealed military secrets to the German embassy in Paris. Dreyfus subsequently spent four years in the notorious Devil's Island penal colony off the coast of French Guiana. The Franco-German dimension of the case had explosive foreign policy implications even then. The suspect's Jewish origins and his family background in the Alsace-Lorraine region, which came under German rule after the Franco-Prussian War, and strained relations with Germany, made him an ideal target for the nationalist mistrust many French people harbored at the time. Writer Émile Zola famously sided with Dreyfus in his essay "J'accuse…!", which played a critical role in the officer's exoneration and military rehabilitation in 1906. Nevertheless, after serving in the First World War as a lieutenant colonel, Dreyfus was only reinstated at a lower rank. This posthumous promotion for Dreyfus still has to pass the Senate. Alsatian MP Charles Sitzenstuhl, a member of French President Emmanuel Macron's center-right Renaissance Party, who introduced the initiative, offered a link to the present as a warning: "The anti-Semitism that plagued Alfred Dreyfus is not a thing of the distant past," he said. Just one day after the Dreyfus vote, the National Assembly also passed a law to recognize and compensate former returnees from French Indochina after the colonial rule of territories including Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia ended in 1954. Around 44,000 people were repatriated to France, among them colonial officials, soldiers and their families, the descendants of French colonizers and local women, as well as local collaborators. Between 4,000 to 6,000 returnees ended up in temporary camps, which were often outfitted with wooden barracks that lacked heating and plumbing. Returnees were also subject to degrading policies that included bans on going out and owning cars or other luxury goods. The new law introduced by the left-wing Socialist Party now provides for financial support based on someone's length of stay in the camps. It is estimated that up to 1,600 people could claim compensation. On June 5, the Assembly adopted a resolution addressing a "double debt" to Haiti that goes back to 1825. That was the year that France forced Haiti, which had declared independence in 1804, to pay compensation of 150 million gold francs. This was intended as a recognition of independence that would also compensate for the loss of French colonial possessions, including income from slaves. Haiti was forced to settle this "independence debt" over decades — a considerable economic burden that contributed to long-term poverty and instability on the island. The resolution, initiated by the Communist Party, calls for recognition, repayment and reparations for Haiti. But the text does not include concrete political steps or financial agreements. Nevertheless, the far-right National Rally voted against it. Remembrance politics have some tradition in France. In 2001, the "Taubira" law, named after the parliamentarian who introduced it, recognized the slave trade and practice of slavery as crimes against humanity. The topic has been a part of school curricula in France ever since. In October 2006, the National Assembly passed a bill to criminalize the denial of the Armenian genocide of 1915 in the Ottoman Empire with a year in prison or fine of €45,000 ($51,300). The bill never came into force after it failed to pass in the Senate, and was followed by a similarly doomed initiative introduced under President Nicolas Sarkozy. That draft law passed both chambers of parliament, but was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Council in February 2012, which said that it amounted to unlawful interference with freedom of expression and research. Another example is the treatment of the so-called "Senegalese riflemen," the colonial soldiers from Africa who fought for France in the two world wars. For decades, many received significantly lower pensions than their French comrades, especially if they lived outside of France after decolonization. It was not until 2009 that President Sarkozy decreed an equalization of pension benefits, a step that held great symbolic significance. The latest spike in such initiatives has been met with mixed interpretations by political scientists. Some experts see the willingness to take historical responsibility as a form of social maturity. But others point out that in a politically paralyzed legislature, symbolic initiatives are easier to pass than structural reforms in areas such as pensions, education or the budget. This article was originally written in German.
American Military News
2 hours ago
- American Military News
‘Have a nice day, DJT!': Trump's breakup with Musk devolves into a war of insults
President Donald Trump's friendship and political alliance with Elon Musk, the world's richest man, who fueled Trump's campaign with record amounts of cash before working at the White House by his side until last week, appears to be over, with both men leveling searing criticism against one another in a sharp public row. Musk had been criticizing the Trump administration over its signature legislation, the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' for its projected impact on the national debt throughout last week. But his calls to 'kill the bill' on Wednesday prompted Trump, speaking to media from the Oval Office, to respond in kind. 'Elon and I had a great relationship, I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said Thursday. 'And he hasn't said bad things about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm very disappointed in Elon.' Musk, responding on his social media platform, X, took credit for Trump's election victory. The billionaire entrepreneur, whose companies also include SpaceX and Tesla, contributed over $280 million to Trump and other Republicans during the 2024 presidential campaign. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk wrote. 'Such ingratitude.' Matters only deteriorated as the day progressed. After meeting with the German chancellor, Trump wrote on social media that the 'easiest way' to save billions in federal spending would be to 'terminate Elon's government subsidies and contracts.' 'Make my day,' Musk shot back, before claiming in a subsequent post that Trump had withheld the full release of FBI files on Jeffrey Epstein, the late child sex offender, because they would implicate the president himself. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Trump is in the Epstein files,' Musk wrote. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' The exchange broke open a feud that had been simmering for weeks out of public view. In private, Musk had relayed concerns over the bill to the president, while expressing disagreement with several other policies, including the establishment of an artificial intelligence campus in the Middle East and Trump's announcement of global tariffs. 'I agree with much of what the administration does, but we have differences of opinion,' Musk said in a more muted tone last week, speaking in an interview with CBS. 'You know, there are things that I don't entirely agree with. But it's difficult for me to bring that up in an interview because then it creates a bone of contention,' he added. 'So then, I'm a little stuck in a bind, where I'm like, well, I don't wanna, you know, speak up against the administration, but I also don't wanna take responsibility for everything this administration's doing.' In the Oval Office, Trump said he believed that Musk had turned on him after he rejected Musk's recommendation for the head of NASA, a position that could benefit SpaceX, Musk's spaceship company. He also said that Musk opposed provisions of Trump's megabill that would phase out tax credits for electric vehicles. 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. Better than you people. He knew everything about it — he had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate, because that's billions and billions of dollars,' Trump said. 'People leave my administration and they love us, and at some point, they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some of them actually become hostile,' Trump added. 'I don't know what it is.' But Musk denied he had been shown the bill, responding on X that he wouldn't mind if the EV provisions remain in the text so long as others, which he said would balloon annual deficits, are cut. 'This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Musk wrote. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office released an assessment on Wednesday estimating that the 'big, beautiful bill,' which has passed the House and is under consideration in the Senate, would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade, and result in 10.9 million Americans losing health insurance coverage over the same period. At the beginning of the administration, Trump put Musk in charge of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, a White House program that intended on cutting federal spending and reducing the deficit. Musk's tenure in the role, designated as a special government employee, ended last week. On X, Musk posted a collection of past remarks from Trump warning against growing deficits and congressional actions increasing the debt ceiling, adding, 'where is this guy today?' 'Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill,' Musk added. 'Slim and beautiful is the way.' ___ © 2025 Los Angeles Times. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance says it's a 'huge mistake' for Musk to 'go after' Trump
Vice President JD Vance has shared his thoughts on the public fallout between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Speaking to podcaster Theo Von, Vance said it was a "huge mistake" for Musk to "go after the president." Musk and Trump have been trading jabs this week after the Tesla CEO criticized Trump's spending bill. Now entering the ring: Vice President JD Vance. Appearing on an episode of "This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von," the vice president weighed in on the public feud that erupted this week between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Musk and Trump became embroiled in the spat after the Tesla CEO called Trump's "big, beautiful" spending bill a "disgusting abomination" on Tuesday. "I think it's a huge mistake for him to go after the president like that," Vance told podcast host Theo Von in the interview, which was recorded Thursday and released Saturday. Vance had posted to X about recording the podcast on Thursday, as the pair's row was escalating, saying, "Slow news day, what are we even going to talk about?" "Elon's entitled to his opinion," Vance told Von in the episode. "I'm not saying he has to agree with the bill or agree with everything that I'm saying, I just think it's a huge mistake for the world's wealthiest man, I think one of the most transformational entrepreneurs ever — that's Elon — to be at this war with the world's most powerful man," he continued. Vance, who said Trump had been getting "a little frustrated" with Musk's recent criticism of him, added that he believed a feud between the pair would be "bad for the country" and that he hoped Musk "figures it out" and "comes back into the fold." While Trump appeared to be holding his tongue about Musk's criticisms at first, he hit back Thursday during a White House event to welcome German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. "I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot," Trump said. "He knew every aspect of this bill — better than almost anybody —and he never had a problem until right after he left," he added, referencing Musk's recent announcement that he was stepping back from his role in the president's administration. Musk then unleashed a whirlwind of X posts directed at the president, saying Trump would have lost the election without his help and accusing him of "ingratitude." The fallout grew progressively uglier, with Trump threatening to cut Musk's government contracts. The pair, who became close allies after Musk endorsed Trump's reelection last year, continued to trade barbs until Friday evening, when their tones appeared to soften. The White House rapid response account posted a clip on X of Trump speaking on Air Force One, saying he wished Musk well. "Likewise," Musk replied late Friday night. Read the original article on Business Insider
