
New Zealanders Back Action On Preventing Alcohol Harm
New Zealanders are calling time on the alcohol industry's influence and supporting stronger safeguards to protect health-especially for children.
A new independent poll shows overwhelming support for tighter safeguards on how alcohol is sold and marketed. Clear majorities support firm limits on key problems such as the price of cheap alcohol, online deliveries, and industry involvement in policy making. Nearly 80% back a ban on alcohol ads seen by children.
"Alcohol is the most harmful drug in Aotearoa, but it's marketed like a harmless treat," says Karen Wright, Health Coalition Aotearoa. "Our legislation is outdated and is maintaining large inequities in harm. People are saying enough is enough. They back action to protect children, whānau and communities from alcohol harm."
The majority support making alcohol less available
81% agree online alcohol deliveries should have to follow the same checks as bars and stores
76% agreed with neighbourhood limits on the number of places selling alcohol
58% support returning the alcohol purchase age to 20 years old
The majority support removing industry from policymaking and telling the truth about alcohol harms
71% agree the alcohol industry should stay out of policymaking
66% support cancer warning labels on alcohol products
The majority support safeguards against alcohol advertising
80% back a ban on alcohol ads seen by children
62% support a ban on all alcohol advertising and sponsorship
68% agree sporting organisations should be supported to move away from alcohol sponsorship
Support for making alcohol less affordable
58% agree cheap alcohol should not be sold below a certain price
47% agree the Government should increase the price of alcohol by 10% and use that money for alcohol treatment services and harm prevention. A further 11% were unsure.
The poll shows strong support for the three areas known to reduce alcohol consumption and harm for communities - safeguards for affordability, availability and advertising. Successive New Zealand Governments have not implemented long-standing recommendations to address these issues. Instead they have made disappointing, minor tweaks to the law governing alcohol.
"The people of Aotearoa are ready for change. Now it's up to the Government to act," says Steve Randerson, Health Coalition Aotearoa. "As a country we have done this before with tobacco, when the Government brought in sensible safeguards around tobacco marketing. The public supports similar action for alcohol marketing, which would benefit young people and those trying to cut down or stop drinking."
Alcohol causes a broad range of harms to the consumer, whānau and communities. Alcohol fuels violence and causes at least seven types of cancer. It also causes lifelong brain injury to babies exposed during pregnancy - and many other harms to health and society. It's also deeply woven into everyday life, from rugby matches to music festivals-thanks to relentless industry marketing.
"Alcohol companies spend millions telling us drinking is fun, sexy and essential. But the ads don't tell us it causes cancer," says Steve Randerson. "Our children deserve better. So do we."
The cost of replacing alcohol sponsorship in sport is relatively low-just $10-12 million per year, or 5-6% of total sponsorship revenue.
"This is a fixable problem," says Karen Wright. "New Zealanders want politicians to put people before profits. Solutions to reduce harms must not be influenced by an industry motivated by sales and profit. It's time to overhaul our alcohol laws to protect our children and those most impacted by harm."
Health Coalition Aotearoa is calling time and urges the Government to act on the clear public mandate and introduce evidence-based reforms to reduce alcohol harm across Aotearoa.
Poll details
This poll provides the most up to date data on current public opinion on alcohol policies of New Zealand adults.
Results are based upon questions asked in a Talbot Mills Research nationwide online survey of a sample of 1161 nationally representative respondents in NZ 18 years of age and over. The questions were asked in March 2025.
Participants were asked 'To reduce the problems associated with alcohol use, how strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statements (%)' followed by a range of alcohol policy measure statements.
The last public opinion survey was the 2023 University of Otago/Cancer Society survey. Our PHCC Briefing includes 2023 results for comparison where relevant, but we caution comparing results too closely as the methodology and question and response options differed between the two surveys.
This poll was funded by Health Coalition Aotearoa and the Cancer Society of New Zealand.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
30 minutes ago
- Scoop
Manawatū Tararua Highway Should Open As A Toll Road
Press Release – Infrastructure New Zealand New infrastructure such as the Manawat Tararua Highway comes with significant ongoing costs. Choosing not to use tolling doesnt make those costs disappear, it simply shifts the burden onto all New Zealand road users, including those who … The opening of Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway is a significant milestone for the lower North Island, with safety and travel times both set to improve. However, the decision not to toll the route is disappointing, says Infrastructure New Zealand. 'Not tolling the Manawatū Tararua Highway is a missed opportunity to help fund the ongoing maintenance and future resilience of this critical transport route through a 'user pays' approach,' says Chief Executive Nick Leggett. 'Tolling a new highway isn't about penalising the users of that road or the communities in the area. It's about being honest about the ongoing costs required to ensure the responsible management of the asset and ensuring that those who benefit from the road are making a direct contribution to its delivery and maintenance.' 'New Zealand's problem is that nobody thinks about maintaining a new road when it's nice and new, other than those who are responsible for building it. Those people don't control the money, though.' 'New infrastructure such as the Manawatū Tararua Highway comes with significant ongoing costs. Choosing not to use tolling doesn't make those costs disappear, it simply shifts the burden onto all New Zealand road users, including those who will never use the road,' Leggett says. 'If we want high-quality, modern infrastructure that is well maintained and resilient, we need to be smarter in how we manage and fund it. Having an annual amount of money generated from the road, means that New Zealanders can transparently follow that the money goes back into maintaining the road which generates it.' 'Tolling is one of the few tools we have that can directly link use with funding. It also helps protect the sustainability of the National Land Transport Fund so further investments can be made in critical transport projects into the future.' 'We need to be more inventive with how we fund and maintain infrastructure. Nothing should get off the ground without pricing road usage properly,' Leggett says. 'If New Zealand wants better infrastructure, it's going to need to do things differently at every stage of design, build and operations. That includes funding through tolls.'


Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Manawatū Tararua Highway Should Open As A Toll Road
The opening of Te Ahu a Turanga: Manawatū Tararua Highway is a significant milestone for the lower North Island, with safety and travel times both set to improve. However, the decision not to toll the route is disappointing, says Infrastructure New Zealand. 'Not tolling the Manawatū Tararua Highway is a missed opportunity to help fund the ongoing maintenance and future resilience of this critical transport route through a 'user pays' approach,' says Chief Executive Nick Leggett. 'Tolling a new highway isn't about penalising the users of that road or the communities in the area. It's about being honest about the ongoing costs required to ensure the responsible management of the asset and ensuring that those who benefit from the road are making a direct contribution to its delivery and maintenance.' 'New Zealand's problem is that nobody thinks about maintaining a new road when it's nice and new, other than those who are responsible for building it. Those people don't control the money, though.' 'New infrastructure such as the Manawatū Tararua Highway comes with significant ongoing costs. Choosing not to use tolling doesn't make those costs disappear, it simply shifts the burden onto all New Zealand road users, including those who will never use the road,' Leggett says. 'If we want high-quality, modern infrastructure that is well maintained and resilient, we need to be smarter in how we manage and fund it. Having an annual amount of money generated from the road, means that New Zealanders can transparently follow that the money goes back into maintaining the road which generates it.' 'Tolling is one of the few tools we have that can directly link use with funding. It also helps protect the sustainability of the National Land Transport Fund so further investments can be made in critical transport projects into the future.' 'We need to be more inventive with how we fund and maintain infrastructure. Nothing should get off the ground without pricing road usage properly,' Leggett says. 'If New Zealand wants better infrastructure, it's going to need to do things differently at every stage of design, build and operations. That includes funding through tolls.'


The Spinoff
9 hours ago
- The Spinoff
The Spinoff Essay: A bit of pain
'I'm lucky; I've had it for only five years or so.' David Hill on living with chronic pain. The Spinoff Essay showcases the best essayists in Aotearoa, on topics big and small. Made possible by the generous support of our members. I ache. I'm sore, nearly all the time. I'm one of the estimated 900,000 New Zealanders who suffer from chronic pain. Chronic or neuropathic pain is usually defined as pain that's lasted for more than three months. I'm lucky; I've had it for only five years or so. Multiple thousands of Kiwis have suffered for decades, or their entire life. More statistics. Over 40% of people in the UK are thought to suffer, at various times and to various degrees. (The US estimates almost 50%.) For over-75s in Britain, the figure lifts to 65%. About 80% of this is back and neck pain. In Aotearoa, a 2018 report from research group Sapere suggested that chronic pain costs our health system some $2 billion annually, plus another $15 billion in lost production and benefit costs. Utterly predictably (think housing, working conditions, $60 for a GP visit, $75 for a physio session), it affects lower socio-economic groups more. Oh, and (think trad Kiwi male stereotypes this time), women are more likely to report it than men. In my case, it's cervical spondylosis with foraminal narrowing and radiculopathy. I like to roll out the phrase so I can watch listeners' eyes cross as they wonder how much time I've got left. English translation: my neck is stuffed. Age, plus bad posture at the keyboard, means the cushioning discs between cervical vertebrae have worn thin. Bone spurs have formed. My mobility is limited; I get deep pain in the neck and between shoulder blades, plus intermittent giddiness. I've gone into detail because, like most sufferers – and I dislike that word – I usually don't say much about it. People with chronic pain get little sympathy. Who wants to hear about an ailment that goes on and on, especially when it usually comes with no bandages, slings, plaster, other visible signs of affliction? Like Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Long Covid, it's easily seen, even by some health professionals, as self-pitying, even malingering. ' Whatever happened to 'pull yourself together'?' I heard one sceptic sniff, after an acquaintance had vented over his months of continuing hip and leg discomfort. It's the least telegenic of ailments; if we do appear on screen, we're usually caricatured as boring old whingers who need to snap out of it. ' It's all in your head,' is another common dismissal. True. Also stupid. Of course it's in the head, because that's where the brain's pain receptors are. We don't register any injury or discomfort till those receptors fire. Trouble is, if the pain continues for more than a few hours, your pre-frontal cortex starts assessing the sensation in terms of what it may mean long-term, and begins reinforcing the synapses associated with stress and discomfort. The brain's 'pain switch' gets stuck in the ON position, and your body becomes convinced of its distress. Neurologist William Davies notes that 'pain carves a path directly between the realms of mind and body'. It's called Control Sensitisation: just as Pavlov's dogs slobbered when a bell rang, almost any tug or tension for a chronic pain sufferer sends those brain receptors into power drive. It means that pain can become a habit, and like many unpleasant habits, it's hard to get rid of. A cycle of discomfort – sleep deprivation – stress – more discomfort and more stress can become established. Withdrawal and depression may follow, with the symbolic Black Dog liable to squat and crap on any of your days. So yes, it is all in the head, and it's utterly genuine. There have been some curious associated discoveries. Women's limbic system responds to pain more than men's, so women often experience greater emotional distress, while the fact that men's pre-frontal cortex is more affected means they may see the issue primarily as a problem to be analysed. And chronic pain may be exacerbated by apparently unassociated events; Brexit, the Covid pandemic, even the Trump presidency saw a rise in reported cases. You're right: the Orange Roughy can indeed become a pain in the arse. Bad news for the next few years. Chronic pain victims make unrewarding patients, even to sympathetic doctors – and not all are. Symptoms are frequently vague and diverse. We're the unwell who can sometimes seem well. Our GPs ask questions, refer us to specialists who ask more questions, at $2 per syllable, rule out nastier possibilities if you're lucky (and that is indeed a help), and usually intone variations on the theme of 'y ou'll have to live with it'. I sympathise with them, actually: as with Chronic Fatigue or Long Covid, we seldom give them the satisfaction of finding a specific cause. So chronic pain is a formless and often unresponsive condition. It can take a long time to get a diagnosis, and it seldom comes with any clear path of action. It can be treated, but seldom cured – whatever that last word may mean. What are the treatments? Painkillers, anti-inflammatories of course, though all of them, except perhaps paracetamol, come with potential side effects. A TROUP (Trends and Risks of Opioid Use for Pain) study in the US found that 22-26% of people prescribed opioids for non-malignant chronic pain ended up misusing their drugs. Distraction, meditation, exercise, diet, therapy, physio and chiropractic, the analytical and shared talk of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy are other courses of action – and action is an early step to taking some degree of control. The New Zealand Pain Society (you'll find them online) offers sensible, practical programmes and resources. Complex Chronic Illness Support, also online, can help as well. Our local hospital used to run chronic pain workshops, where physio, dietitian, psychiatrist, counsellor would reassure attendees that they weren't malingerers; it was a genuine ailment, and here was a list of things that might help. They're the only workshops I've ever attended where some participants stood up every 10 minutes and lay down in the aisle for a bit. They were enormously valuable for their collegial quality, finding that you weren't the only sufferer. They've been discontinued – more funding cuts at Whatu Ora, I gather. Alan Gordon in his book The Way Out estimated that in 2021, there were 1.2 billion chronic pain sufferers worldwide. The number is rising: we're living longer and hurting for longer periods. Other contributing factors include people expecting to be pain-lite and becoming more inclined to seek help when we're not, plus our living in an increasingly isolated society, where loneliness aggravates almost any condition. The outlook isn't great. The future, for me at any rate? Keep learning – in the most positive sense of the verb – to live with it. Take unexpected solace from the fact that on good days, the world can seem brighter and more rewarding than it did before my neck started to pack up. And wonder if assault with the nearest deadly weapon might be a pretty reasonable response to anyone who tells me that it's all in my head.