logo
Manitoba regulator proposes fast-track for U.S. physicians

Manitoba regulator proposes fast-track for U.S. physicians

Facing the second-largest doctor shortage in Canada, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Manitoba has launched a review to make it easier for American-certified physicians to become licensed in Manitoba.
'We understand the pressures in Manitoba to get more physicians into practice. So we are constantly looking for ways that we can cut down on red tape or facilitate safe changes to a process that might have worked historically, but doesn't meet our modern demand,' said Dr. Ainslie Mihalchuk, registrar for the Manitoba physician watchdog.
The proposed changes would allow physicians from the U.S. to apply for Manitoba licences if they have completed an accredited residency program and hold certification from the American Board of Medical Specialists and have an independent or full licence to practice with a U.S. state medical board.
NIC ADAM / FREE PRESS FILES
Dr. Ainslie Mihalchuk said the restrictions are costly, time-consuming and a disincentive to doctors applying to practise in Manitoba.
NIC ADAM / FREE PRESS FILES
Dr. Ainslie Mihalchuk said the restrictions are costly, time-consuming and a disincentive to doctors applying to practise in Manitoba.
If all goes to plan, internationally trained doctors could be working in Manitoba by June.
Similar policies are in place in several other Canadian provinces, including British Columbia, which changed regulations in February.
Mihalchuk and the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Manitoba looked east and west of Manitoba and, to remain competitive in the market, began the process to loosen regulations.
'If Manitoba is an outlier, that's not good for us,' Mihalchuk said.
Current regulations dictate that individuals must first apply for provisional registration, which places limitations on their ability to practise medicine (such as requiring supervisors, assessments, and practice location restrictions).
Mihalchuk said the restrictions are costly, time-consuming and a disincentive to doctors applying to practise in Manitoba.
'We went to them and said we think that this is a safe thing to do (and) it would make us attractive to physicians from the States that we know are interested in potentially practising in Manitoba,' Mihalchuk said.
The regulator said it is generally accepted among Canadian medical boards that American physicians are as competent and safe as their Canadian counterparts.
Doctors Manitoba applauds the proposed changes.
After launching recruitment efforts late last year, the doctor advocacy organization said there was interest from physicians south of the border but Manitoba's restrictive licensing requirements for internationally trained doctors was a barrier.
'We want to make sure that every physician practising in Manitoba is practising of the highest standard,' said Doctors Manitoba CEO Theresa Oswald. 'But there are ways to do this that have proven to be more accessible and more rapid than has been the case in Manitoba.'
Wednesdays
A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom.
In December, the group took the unusual step of launching its own campaign to target health-care providers in North Dakota, Florida and other states where providers could find their practice in jeopardy under U.S. President Donald Trump's policies targeting the health-care system.
Since taking office, Trump has signed off on ending federal support for gender-affirming care, exiting the World Health Organization and no longer recognizing transgender and non-binary identities.
'We know here in Manitoba that that (doctor-patient) sanctity is respected and that evidence and science have to be at the forefront,' Oswald said.
Oswald estimates between 40 and 50 doctors have expressed interest in coming to Manitoba, which the organization has referred to the province's recruitment and retention office.
Health Minister Uzoma Asagwara said Thursday the province is actively engaged with about a dozen foreign doctors to receive their Manitoba certification.
MIKAELA MACKENZIE / FREE PRESS FILES
The province has hired more than 1,600 net-new health-care workers since April 2024, including 600 nurses, Health Minister Uzoma Asagwara said.
MIKAELA MACKENZIE / FREE PRESS FILES
The province has hired more than 1,600 net-new health-care workers since April 2024, including 600 nurses, Health Minister Uzoma Asagwara said.
Asagwara accused the previous Progressive Conservative government of not taking the necessary steps to improve patient care or use a patient-centred approach.
'Our government is laser-focused on making health care better for Manitobans, and that means making sure that we have the health-care professionals and experts in our province to provide that care,' the minister said.
In March, Shared Health launched a similar recruitment campaign south of the border in an effort to bring American nurses to Manitoba.
The initiative was to offer asylum to working nurses worried about their ability to care for patients, while addressing the province's nurse shortage.
At the time, Asagwara said the recruitment and retention office had worked to make transferring U.S. nursing licences to Manitoba easier.
The province has hired more than 1,600 net-new health-care workers since April 2024, including 600 nurses, Asagwara said.
Provincial figures on nurses hired through the recruitment campaign were not made available before press time.
The NDP campaigned on a promise to hire 400 new doctors within five years prior to winning the 2023 election. No update was provided Thursday on the status of that objective.
nicole.buffie@freepress.mb.ca
Nicole BuffieMultimedia producer
Nicole Buffie is a multimedia producer who reports for the Free Press city desk. Born and bred in Winnipeg, Nicole graduated from Red River College's Creative Communications program in 2020 and worked as a reporter throughout Manitoba before joining the Free Press newsroom in 2023. Read more about Nicole.
Every piece of reporting Nicole produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘It's destroyed a lot of lives': Families attend authorization hearings in Montreal for brainwashing class-action suit
‘It's destroyed a lot of lives': Families attend authorization hearings in Montreal for brainwashing class-action suit

Montreal Gazette

time30 minutes ago

  • Montreal Gazette

‘It's destroyed a lot of lives': Families attend authorization hearings in Montreal for brainwashing class-action suit

News By Lana Ponting was only 15 years old when she was admitted to the Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal. As a rebellious teenager, it was believed the psychiatric hospital could address her 'stubbornness and disobedience.' Instead, she says, she was subjected to severe physical and mental abuse, along with psychiatric experimentation that would later become infamously known as the Montreal experiments. Now 83, frail and requiring a walker, Ponting travelled from Winnipeg to be at the Montreal courthouse Monday as authorization hearings in a class-action lawsuit over the alleged abuse began. 'It's destroyed a lot of lives,' Ponting said outside the courtroom, anger in her voice. '(I want them) to see us, to feel us. I'm alive. I will not stop. I will fight until the end.' Filed in 2019, the class-action request alleges the Canadian government funded psychiatric treatments by Dr. Donald Ewen Cameron at the institute between 1948 and 1964. The experiments were allegedly part of the CIA's MK-ULTRA program of covert mind-control. In addition to the government, the lawsuit also targets McGill University, which was affiliated to the psychiatric hospital, and Montreal's Royal Victoria Hospital. 'This is not a medical or professional malpractice case. ... This is a case of systemic abuse,' lawyer Jeff Orenstein told the court on Monday. 'When people went to the Allan Memorial, they were told they would be receiving legitimate treatment,' he added. 'Instead they were human guinea pigs.' The defendants are contesting the class-action request, partly arguing the families waited too long to file their claims according to the law. The Canadian government also contends that some families accepted $100,000 payments from the federal government in the 1990s, which then barred them from pursuing further legal action. They will plead their case on Tuesday. Orenstein, for his part, argues the victims were unable to act earlier because of the trauma and psychological pain they endured. He believes the suit could grow to include several hundred people. The lawsuit had tried to include the U.S. government as a defendant, but Quebec's Court of Appeal ruled that the U.S. cannot be sued in Canada for its alleged role in the experiments; the Supreme Court of Canada refused to review the case. Julie Tanny, the lead plaintiff in the case, said she spent years not speaking about what happened to her father, Charles, because of the stigma attached. The few times she did, she added, she was met with disbelief. Present for the hearing, Tanny said she still can't accept the way her father changed after his stay at the institute in 1957 to treat facial pain. She described the warm and engaged father she once knew as having completely 'evaporated' after his treatment. He grew distant and barely recognized his children. 'For a kid, it's very traumatizing to have that relationship go away and not really understand why,' said Tanny, 71. 'It was the beginning of a nightmare for hundreds and hundreds of families.' In court on Monday, Orenstein detailed the experiments Cameron carried out on patients, noting how they were all well-documented at the time. Rather than scientific efforts, he compared them to acts of psychological torture. He described how patients were allegedly subjected to sensory deprivation and drug-induced comas, forced to listen to repeated audio messages on loop and to undergo extensive electroshock treatment. In some cases, he said, people were reduced to a childlike state. Others left the hospital as 'robots with no human emotions.' Lisa Moore, whose mother Hélène was sent to the hospital in the early 1960s, left the courtroom in tears as the alleged abuse was described, her emotions too difficult to contain. Now 54, Moore grew up in foster care and spent decades resenting her mother for how she treated her. But hearing the extent of what she went through laid bare in court on Monday provided a new perspective. 'It wasn't her fault. They took away her ability for compassion,' said Moore, who reconciled with her mother in recent years. 'It's very overwhelming,' she added. 'I just keep imagining what it was like for her.'

AURORA CANNABIS CHS CLASS ACTION CERTIFIED
AURORA CANNABIS CHS CLASS ACTION CERTIFIED

Cision Canada

timean hour ago

  • Cision Canada

AURORA CANNABIS CHS CLASS ACTION CERTIFIED

TORONTO, June 9, 2025 /CNW/ - Thousands of Canadian cannabis users are hospitalized and diagnosed with Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome ("CHS") every year. CHS is a dangerous side effect that can develop from the regular use of cannabis products. CHS involves cyclical bouts of severe nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain, which can persist for days and can occur as often as once every five minutes. In extreme cases, CHS can result in organ failure and even death. On May 14, 2025, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice certified a national class action which alleges that Aurora Cannabis Inc, and Aurora Cannabis Enterprises Inc. negligently failed to warn consumers of the risk of developing CHS posed by the regular use of their cannabis products. This means that the action can now proceed as a class action. No findings of liability have been made against the defendants. The action was commenced by V.T., a Canadian Forces veteran who was prescribed cannabis to treat medical conditions. V.T. purchased medicinal cannabis from the Defendants, and used it as prescribed, until they suffered two extreme bouts of nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain that were so severe V.T. had to be hospitalized. On the second E.R. visit, V.T. was diagnosed as suffering from CHS. The only certain cure for CHS is to stop consuming cannabis, which V.T. did, and is now symptom-free. None of the cannabis products that V.T. consumed contained any warning about CHS, nor is there any warning in the product monograph, or on Aurora's website. The claim alleges that the Defendants knew, or should have known, of the risk of CHS arising from the regular use of their cannabis products, but negligently failed to provide any warning to consumers or prescribing physicians about the risk that they could develop CHS. The class action seeks to recover damages for the Class Members who developed CHS. The class action is brought on behalf of all persons in Canada who purchased a Cannabis Product from Aurora Cannabis Inc. or Aurora Cannabis Enterprises Inc. (which includes MedReleaf) on or after February 1, 2014 to May 14, 2025 (the "Class Period") who were diagnosed or differentially diagnosed with CHS during the Class Period after consuming one or more Cannabis Products. Cannabis Products are the cannabis and/or synthetic cannabinoid resins, pills, lozenges, concentrates, oils, edibles, beverages, vapours, and raw and adulterated plant material cultivated, designed, manufactured, packaged, labeled, distributed, marketed, and/or sold by the Defendants. The allegations contained in the Fresh as Amended Statement of Claim have not been proven in court, and the Defendants deny the Plaintiff's claims. . Sotos Class Actions 55 University Avenue, Suite 600 Toronto, ON M5J 2H7 [email protected] 1-877-294-9747 (toll free) For media inquiries, please contact Margaret Waddell by phone at 416.977.2413 or by email at [email protected].

Opinion: What does it mean to be Albertan in Canada? Lessons from refugee resettlement
Opinion: What does it mean to be Albertan in Canada? Lessons from refugee resettlement

Calgary Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Calgary Herald

Opinion: What does it mean to be Albertan in Canada? Lessons from refugee resettlement

In uncertain times, it's easy to become consumed by anxiety, anger and division. But these moments are precisely when we must reflect on our core values and ask: What does it mean to be Albertan or Canadian? For us, as physicians at the Calgary Refugee Health Clinic, the answers lie not in the loudest voices but in our patients' quiet resilience. Since 2011, our clinic has cared for over 15,000 refugees. Their stories and Alberta's welcome reveal the best of who we are. Article content Article content Calgary serves as Canada's western hub for refugee resettlement thanks to effective settlement and clinical programs developed over decades of inter-jurisdictional collaboration. Since the 2021 Afghan Resettlement Initiative, thousands of Afghan and other displaced families have arrived. Working with settlement agencies like CCIS, we often received only 24 to 48 hours' notice. We would meet at the airport with urgent medical care, warmth, and services. This reflects a rare but effective partnership between federally funded settlement agencies and provincially funded health services. Article content Article content This partnership isn't just functional, it's exemplary. Alberta leads Canada in refugee resettlement. And no municipality in Canada – among the 55 we examined – resettles more refugees per capita than Brook, a prairie town an hour from Medicine Hat. Article content Article content When we share these stories in academic and international circles through our work with the World Health Organization and UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR), we're often met with disbelief. Canada's 'most conservative province' is also its most welcoming? We've just returned from Geneva, co-organizing a high-level side event for the WHO's 78th World Health Assembly. From this global perspective, we've learned what sounds like a most un-Canadian boast: Canada is exceptionally good at refugee resettlement and multicultural integration. Few Canadians know we are the only nation awarded the UNHCR's Nansen Refugee Award, for our response to the 1970s and 80s Indochinese refugee crisis, when Canada invented the Private Refugee Sponsorship Program, now emulated worldwide. Canada has since pioneered multiple resettlement programs, including Ugandan Ismailis, Central and South Americans, South Sudanese, Kosovars, Syrians, Afghans and Ukrainians.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store