Final preparations, discussions underway before conclave begins
The cardinals voted to meet again the afternoon of May 5 and the morning of May 6 because many were on the waiting list to speak May 06, 2025
Mass Mourning At St. Peter's Basilica Ahead Of Papal Conclave For New Pope. (Photo: Youtube)
By Cindy Wooden, Catholic News Service
As members of the College of Cardinals met May 5, all 133 cardinals who plan to enter the conclave to elect a new pope had arrived in Rome, the Vatican press office said.
However, only 132 of them participated in the morning general congregation, a meeting that gives all the cardinals -- those under the age of 80 and eligible to enter a conclave as well as those over 80 -- a chance to discuss priorities, challenges facing the church and the qualities needed in the next pope.
The cardinals voted to meet again the afternoon of May 5 and the morning of May 6 because so many cardinals were on the waiting list to speak.
Matteo Bruni, director of the Vatican press office, said 26 cardinals spoke at the morning session May 5. The topics, he said, included canon law; the importance of Catholic charities "in advocating for the poor"; and the need for a pope who "should be a person present and close, a door of access to communion, to unity in a world where the world order is in crisis, a pastor, a shepherd close to the people."
They also spoke about evangelization, the challenges of climate change and war, and "they spoke with concern about divisions within the church," Bruni said. Others spoke of a lack of vocations to priesthood and religious life in some regions, and the importance of the family.
U.S. Cardinal Kevin J. Farrell, who as chamberlain of the Holy Roman Church is in charge of dealing with practical matters, drew lots May 3 to assign the cardinals their rooms for the conclave, which begins May 7, Bruni said.
Some of the cardinals will stay in the Domus Sanctae Marthae, the guesthouse St. John Paul II had built precisely to house cardinals in a conclave. It ended up being where Pope Francis chose to live after he was elected in 2013.
Because Pope Francis' rooms were sealed with his death and because the late pope named so many cardinals, some of them are staying next door at the "old Santa Marta," which shares a courtyard with the guesthouse.
Bruni said he did not know how many of the cardinals would be at the guesthouse and how many would be next door.
The dozens of priests and bishops who live at the Domus Sanctae Marthae were asked to leave by April 30, one priest told Catholic News Service. "I had to free up the bedroom, bathroom and desk in my study. I didn't have to pack up everything in my study, but what I leave gets sealed in the shelves and closets there by the gendarmerie after inspection."
"Once the rooms are certified, they are locked, and each cardinal has to break the seal as he enters and takes possession," the priest said.
The cardinals were informed at the general congregation that they could move into the guesthouse between the evening of May 6 and the morning of May 7 before the Mass "Pro Eligendo Romano Pontifice" ("for the election of the Roman Pontiff"). They are scheduled to process into the Sistine Chapel the afternoon of May 7 and, probably, cast their first votes.
In the early evening of May 5, two archbishops and dozens of priests and laypeople, both men and women, were to swear an oath of secrecy about anything and everything having to do with the conclave.
Bruni said he did not know the exact number of people directly assisting the cardinals and therefore required to swear the oath, but they included: Archbishop Ilson Montanari, secretary of the College of Cardinals; Archbishop Diego Ravelli, master of liturgical ceremonies; and a priest chosen by Cardinal Pietro Parolin, who is presiding over the conclave, "to assist him in his office."
Also taking the oath are sacristans, priests who will be available to hear the cardinals' confessions, doctors, nurses, elevator operators, technical services staff, the colonel and major of the Pontifical Swiss Guard, as well as the director of security services for Vatican City State and some of his assistants.--ucanews.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
21 hours ago
- The Star
Women who survived Spain's Franco-era centres disrupt Catholic apology
Dozens of women, among them survivors, activists, and family members, shout "True, justice and reparation," as many of them hold a sign reading "No" during a ceremony by the Spanish Confederation of Religious Entities (CONFER) to apologise to the survivors of Catholic moral rehabilitation institutes in Spain, where thousands of women and girls suffered harsh treatment during Franco's dictatorship, in Madrid, Spain, June 9, 2025. REUTERS/Juan Medina MADRID (Reuters) -Spanish women who were forced into rehabilitation centres during the dictatorship of Francisco Franco broke up a Catholic meeting held to offer them a apology and demanded more concrete reparation from the church and state. Protesters - including survivors in their 60s and 70s, activists and relatives - held up banners marked "No" during the event on Monday night, threw the signs into the audience and forced organisers to suspend the meeting. Thousands of girls and young women who were accused of perceived moral failings - from pregnancies outside marriage to left-wing activism - were put into state-run Catholic rehabilitation institutions for periods during Franco's rule, from the 1940s up to a decade after his death into the 1980s. A Catholic body that includes most of the communities of nuns that helped operate some of the centres held a ceremony to ask the women for forgiveness in the Pablo VI Foundation auditorium in Madrid, the first event of its kind in Spain. The President of the Spanish Confederation of Religious Entities (CONFER) read out an apology then invited survivors to come to the stage as a video of them describing their experiences was shown. After the film, which was often drowned out by cheers and cries of "Yes, we can", people in the crowd jumped to their feet and started shouting "truth, justice and reparation," and "neither forget nor forgive". CONFER officials turned on the lights, abruptly ended the event and later said they may issue a statement in response on Tuesday. The confrontation underlined the depth of feeling over the Patronato de Proteccion a la Mujer (Board for the Protection of Women) institutes - part of the legacy of Franco's rule that is still haunting Spain almost 50 years after his death in November 1975. 'ACT OF JUSTICE' Campaigners, including individual survivors and organisations such as the Banished Daughters of Eve, are demanding a response from the state, along the lines of Ireland's 2013 apology and reparations for the abuses in its Magdalene Laundries. Some are also asking for financial compensation to cover costs, including psychological support, and the work that they say they were made to do without pay in the centres. At the event, before it was disrupted, CONFER chairman Jesus Diaz Sariego described the statement as one step towards a broader process of recognition and that the organisation would collaborate in the search for the truth. "We are here to do what we consider necessary and right: to ask for forgiveness ... because this act is not just a formality, but a necessary act of justice. It is an exercise in historical and moral responsibility," he said. After the event, Consuelo Garcia del Cid, 66, a survivor, dismissed that apology as a "facelift" and accused CONFER of removing some of the recorded testimonies and stopping women talking about babies that campaigners say were taken from unwed mothers at the centres. Garcia del Cid, who championed the cause with several books and founded Banished Daughters of Eve, had earlier told the audience the Spanish government owed them, particularly for the 10 years the boards were kept running after Franco. Spain's Democratic Memory Ministry - set up to tackle the legacy of Spain's civil war and Franco's regime - said last week it applauded CONFER's action and planned to hold its own ceremony later this year. It declined to comment further on Monday. Equality minister Ana Redondo attended the event but did not make any comment. (Reporting by Emma Pinedo, editing by Inti Landauro cand Andrew Heavens)
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
YouTube loosens rules guiding the moderation of videos
SAN FRANCISCO: For years, YouTube has removed videos with derogatory slurs, misinformation about Covid-19 vaccines and election falsehoods, saying the content violated the platform's rules. But since US President Donald Trump's return to the White House, YouTube has encouraged its content moderators to leave up videos with content that may break the platform's rules rather than remove them, as long as the videos are considered to be in the public interest. Those would include discussions of political, social and cultural issues. The policy shift, which hasn't been publicly disclosed, made YouTube the latest social media platform to back off efforts to police online speech in the wake of Republican pressure to stop moderating content. In January, Meta made a similar move, ending a fact-checking program on social media posts. Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, followed in the footsteps of X, Elon Musk's social platform, and turned responsibility for policing content over to users. But unlike Meta and X, YouTube has not made public statements about relaxing its content moderation. The online video service introduced its new policy in mid-December in training material that was reviewed by The New York Times . For videos considered to be in the public interest, YouTube raised the threshold for the amount of offending content permitted to half a video, from a quarter of a video. The platform also encouraged moderators to leave up those videos, which would include City Council meetings, campaign rallies and political conversations. The policy distances the platform from some of its pandemic practices, such as when it removed videos of local council meetings and a discussion between Florida's governor, Ron DeSantis, and a panel of scientists, citing medical misinformation. The expanded exemptions could benefit political commentators whose lengthy videos blend news coverage with opinions and claims on a variety of topics, particularly as YouTube takes on a more prominent role as a leading distributor of podcasts. The policy also helps the video platform avoid attacks by politicians and activists frustrated by its treatment of content about the origins of Covid, the 2020 election and Hunter Biden, former President Joe Biden's son. YouTube continuously updates its guidance for content moderators on topics surfacing in the public discourse, said Nicole Bell, a company spokesperson. It retires policies that no longer make sense, as it did in 2023 for some Covid misinformation, and strengthens policies when warranted, as it did this year to prohibit content directing people to gambling websites, according to Bell. In the first three months of this year, YouTube removed 192,586 videos because of hateful and abusive content, a 22% increase from a year earlier. 'Recognising that the definition of 'public interest' is always evolving, we update our guidance for these exceptions to reflect the new types of discussion we see on the platform today,' Bell said in a statement. She added, 'Our goal remains the same: to protect free expression on YouTube while mitigating egregious harm.' Critics say the changes by social media platforms have contributed to the rapid spread of false assertions and have the potential to increase digital hate speech. Last year on X, a post inaccurately said, 'Welfare offices in 49 states are handing out voter registration applications to illegal aliens,' according to the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which studies misinformation and hate speech. The post, which would have been removed before recent policy changes, was seen 74.8 million times. For years, Meta has removed about 277 million pieces of content annually, but under the new policies, much of that content could stay up, including comments like 'Black people are more violent than whites,' said Imran Ahmed, the center's CEO. 'What we're seeing is a rapid race to the bottom,' he said. The changes benefit the companies by reducing the costs of content moderation, while keeping more content online for user engagement, he added. 'This is not about free speech. It's about advertising, amplification and ultimately profits.' YouTube has in the past put a priority on policing content to keep the platform safe for advertisers. It has long forbidden nudity, graphic violence and hate speech. But the company has always given itself latitude for interpreting the rules. The policies allow videos that violate YouTube's rules, generally a small set, to remain on the platform if there is sufficient educational, documentary, scientific or artistic merit. The new policies, which were outlined in the training materials, are an expansion of YouTube's exceptions. They build on changes made before the 2024 election, when the company began permitting clips of electoral candidates on the platform even if the candidates violated its policies, the training material said. Previously, YouTube removed a so-called public interest video if a quarter of the content broke the platform's rules. As of Dec. 18, YouTube's trust and safety officials told content moderators that half a video could break YouTube's rules and stay online. Other content that mentions political, social and cultural issues has also been exempted from YouTube's usual content guidelines. The platform determined that videos are in the public interest if creators discuss or debate elections, ideologies, movements, race, gender, sexuality, abortion, immigration, censorship and other issues. Megan A. Brown, a doctoral student at the University of Michigan who researches the online information ecosystem, said YouTube's looser policies were a reversal from a time when it and other platforms 'decided people could share political speech but they would maintain some decorum'. She fears that YouTube's new policy 'is not a way to achieve that'. During training on the new policy, the trust and safety team said content moderators should err against restricting content when 'freedom of expression value may outweigh harm risk.' If employees had doubts about a video's suitability, they were encouraged to take it to their superiors rather than remove it. YouTube employees were presented with real examples of how the new policies had already been applied. The platform gave a pass to a user-created video titled, 'RFK Jr. Delivers SLEDGEHAMMER Blows to Gene-Altering JABS,' which violated YouTube's policy against medical misinformation by incorrectly claiming that Covid vaccines alter people's genes. The company's trust and safety team decided the video shouldn't be removed because public interest in the video 'outweighs the harm risk,' the training material said. The video was deemed newsworthy because it presented contemporary news coverage of recent actions on Covid vaccines by the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The video also mentioned political figures such as Vice President JD Vance, Elon Musk and Megyn Kelly, boosting its 'newsworthiness.' The video's creator also discussed a university medical study and presented news headlines about people experiencing adverse effects from Covid vaccines, 'signaling this is a highly debated topic (and a sensitive political topic),' according to the materials. Because the creator didn't explicitly recommend against vaccination, YouTube decided that the video had a low risk of harm. Currently, the video is no longer available on YouTube. It is unclear why. Another video shared with the staff contained a slur about a transgender person. YouTube's trust and safety team said the 43-minute video, which discussed hearings for Trump administration Cabinet appointees, should stay online because the description had only a single violation of the platform's harassment rule forbidding a 'malicious expression against an identifiable individual.' A video from South Korea featured two commentators talking about the country's former President Yoon Suk Yeol. About halfway through the more-than-three-hour video, one of the commentators said he imagined seeing Yoon turned upside down in a guillotine so that the politician 'can see the knife is going down.' The video was approved because most of it discussed Yoon's impeachment and arrest. In its training material, YouTube said it had also considered the risk for harm low because 'the wish for execution by guillotine is not feasible.' – ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Herald Malaysia
2 days ago
- Herald Malaysia
Filipinos mourn priest-turned-peace negotiator
Luis Gamboa Jalandoni is credited with several landmark peace deals between govt and communists Jun 09, 2025 Luis Gamboa Jalandoni is seen in this file image. (Courtesy: MANILA: People in the Catholic-majority Philippines have paid tributes to Luis Gamboa Jalandoni, a former Catholic priest turned peace negotiator between the government and communist rebels, who passed away on June 7. Jalandoni, former chairman of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP), a peace negotiating body of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), died in Utrecht, the Netherlands, at the age of 90, his family members confirmed. He had been living in the European country in self-imposed exile after the administration of former President Rodrigo Duterte labelled him a terrorist in 2022 after the breakdown of peace talks between the government and communists. 'We express our condolences to Ka Louie's family, whose love, strength, and support accompanied him through decades of service to the Filipino people's revolutionary cause,' the NDFP and CPP said in a joint statement on June 7. Ka stands for 'elder brother' in Filipino. The statement hailed Jalandoni as a person 'beloved by the masses, a true internationalist, revolutionary leader and stalwart of peace.' Jalandoni was born in 1935 to a wealthy landowning family in Negros Occidental province. He joined priestly formation and was ordained a priest. He served as the head of Social Action Committee of Diocese of Bacolod in Negros Occidental and in 1972, he established Christians for National Liberation, a faith-based underground revolutionary movement that supported the communist's armed struggle during the martial law regime of President Ferdinand Marcos Sr. He was arrested in 1973 along with Catholic nun Coni Ledesma, also a member of the revolutionary group. Both were released in 1974 and sought the Vatican's dispensation to leave religious life. They married the same year, and their marriage was solemnized by Cardinal Jaime Sin of Manila, who is hailed for being a central figure in the 1986 People Power Revolution that toppled the iron-fisted Marcos regime. Jalandoni joined NDFP, and in 1977, he became the group's international representative. From 1989 to 2016, he served as the chief peace negotiator on behalf of the communists. The CPP has been infamously waging one of the world's longest insurgencies for nearly five decades, which claimed an estimated 40,000 lives in conflicts. Its armed wing, the National People's Army (NPA), is designated as a terrorist outfit by the Philippine government. Jalandoni is credited with several landmark peace deals between the government and the communists over the years. Progressive group, Bayan Muna, in its June 7 statement, said Jalandoni's death is 'a big loss to the quest for a just and lasting peace in our country.' The group's vice president and former parliamentarian, Carlos Isagani Zarate, hailed him for 'decades-long dedication to the pursuit of just and lasting peace.' 'From a wealthy landowning family in Negros Occidental to a Catholic priest and eventually becoming a revolutionary – Ka Louie's journey reflects his genuine conversion to the cause of the poor and marginalized. He literally gave up his inheritance to landless workers and dedicated his life to their liberation,' Zarate said. He continued to represent the NDFP for peace talks with the current government of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr despite being in exile. In a statement, Pilgrims for Peace, an interfaith alliance promoting peace and harmony, paid tributes to Jalandoni, calling him 'a gentle warrior for just peace in the Philippines.' Among the alliance members are top Christian leaders including Bishop Gerardo Alminaza of San Carlos City in Negros Occidental. The state's main anti-insurgency body, the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict, said Jalandoni's efforts earned him respect despite differences of opinion. 'Even as we hold firm to truth and accountability, we acknowledge this deep loss for those who shared their lives with Jalandoni,' Ernesto Torres Jr., the task force's executive director, said in a statement on June
