CCE application form
This concerns a critical issue faced by candidates participating in the Combined Competitive Examination (CCE) 2023, conducted by the SPSC. The inability to rectify errors in the online application form, particularly concerning the selection of optional subjects, has caused significant distress to numerous aspirants, including myself.
During the online application process, I inadvertently selected an incorrect optional subject. Upon realising the mistake, I immediately sought guidance from SPSC officials, only to be informed that no amendments could be made at that stage and that I would first need to clear the screening test. Despite this setback, I persevered in my preparation and successfully passed the screening test. However, despite multiple visits to the SPSC office to request a correction to my optional subject, my appeals were repeatedly denied.
This issue is further compounded by the fact that other esteemed institutions, such as the FPSC, allow candidates to modify their application details post-submission. This situation is particularly distressing as this examination represents my final opportunity to appear for the CCE, and my future prospects are contingent upon its outcome.
While I fully understand the importance of adhering to established rules and procedures to ensure transparency and fairness, there should also be a mechanism to address genuine errors made during the application process. Denying candidates the opportunity to correct such mistakes not only undermines their hard work but also raises concerns about the fairness of the system.
The SPSC should take immediate and compassionate action to resolve this issue. A simple correction to the optional subject could have a profound and positive impact on the lives of countless candidates who have dedicated years to their preparation. I trust that the relevant authorities will take steps to ensure a more equitable and candidate-friendly process in the future.
Farhan Ali Sarki
Thul, Jacobabad
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
6 days ago
- Express Tribune
Tarar for avoiding conflict of interests
Listen to article Law Minister Azam Nazir Tarar has advised the newly appointed members of appellate tribunals dealing with billions of rupees worth of tax matters to recuse themselves from hearing cases where the conflict of interests arises because of their past professional affiliations. The minister spoke to The Express Tribune after questions were posed about the conflict of interests in the case of some of the appellate tribunal members. "When the question of conflict of interests arises, the newly appointed members will choose the option of 'not before me'," Tarar said. Instead of appointing new members of the Inland Revenue appellate tribunal through the Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC), the government in January this year constituted a three-member selection committee. Among the committee members were Justice (Retired) Mushir Alam, Major General (Retired) Naveed Ahmad, who is a member of the FPSC, and Asim Zulfiqar, a senior partner of AF Ferguson chartered accountancy firm. On the recommendation of the committee, the federal cabinet has so far appointed 15 members from March to May this year. The newly appointed members have been given salaries equal to judges but they are not independent like the judges, said Dr Ikramul Haq, a senior lawyer at the Supreme Court of Pakistan. He also questioned the selection process, saying there were questions about some of the members' competency and conflict of interests. The members should either work under high courts or the Supreme Court instead of working under the executive branch, he suggested. To a question about bypassing the FPSC, the law minister said the selection process had been outsourced to management consulting firm AT Kearney "for ensuring independence" in the process. To another question how to ensure transparency and objectivity in deciding the cases if some of the tribunal members have worked with tax advisory firms, Tarar replied "we believe that these are mature people and will take care of the conflict of interests". The minister said that whenever such a situation arises, the members should exercise the "not before me" right to avoid hearing cases being pleaded by tax firms where they have worked in the past. The Ministry of Law has made these appointments under Section 130 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. The law states that a person shall be eligible to be appointed as a member of the Appellate Tribunal, if he is an advocate of a High Court for not less than 15 years and possesses such other qualifications as may be prescribed by rules under this section; has for a period not less than 10 years practiced professionally as a chartered accountant and has for a period not less than 10 years practiced professionally as a cost and management accountant. An officer of the Inland Revenue in BS-21 or above; or an officer of the Inland Revenue in BS-20, having served in such a grade for three years or more, is also eligible for these appointments. The prime minister decided to appoint all these members from the private sector to address the issue of conflict of interests. There had also been incidents in the past where the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) used to influence the outcome of cases, although the members were working under the administrative control of the law ministry. About Rs4 trillion in revenues are stuck at various levels – most of which before the commissioners appeal of the FBR and the appellate tribunals. The FBR and the office of the Attorney General of Pakistan had assured the PM to at least recover about Rs400 billion before June. Similar assurances had also been given to the IMF. However, so far no major breakthrough has been achieved, except in the case of windfall tax. A recent IMF report stated that the Pakistani authorities were actively pursuing the resolution of outstanding cases. It said efforts were being made to recover Rs367 billion out of a total of Rs770 billion under dispute. These included cases pending before the Supreme Court involving Rs43 billion, high courts in Islamabad, Sindh and Lahore involving Rs217 billion and the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue Rs104 billion. The report disclosed that the IMF had been assured that the Supreme Court had completed its initial hearing, with a final decision expected by mid-April. A favourable ruling could effectively resolve related cases worth an estimated Rs120 billion, according to the report. The IMF's view was that resolving the cases would help clarify the legality of the disputed claims, thereby supporting future revenue by reducing uncertainty and discouraging future litigation. The appointments of the new members have already been challenged in courts for the lack of transparency. According to media reports, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) has issued an interim order on the appointment of members in the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue, stating that all appointments would be subject to the final outcome of a writ petition. Earlier, the IHC issued notices to the Ministry of Law secretary, FPSC chairman and Attorney General of Pakistan following a constitutional petition challenging the appointment process of tribunal members. The petition challenges the unadvertised process of "head hunting" and the lack of transparency. It alleges that the appointment process did not follow the established rules and procedures.
Business Recorder
24-05-2025
- Business Recorder
ACCA releases budget proposal for FY 2025–26
KARACHI: ACCA Pakistan has released its Budget Proposal for FY 2025–26, offering a strategic, reform-driven roadmap to modernize Pakistan's tax system and stimulate sustainable economic growth. Developed through a decade-long engagement with the country's fiscal processes, the proposal integrates feedback from ACCA's Members' Network Panel (MNP) and global insights from ACCA's Professional Insights reports. The proposal is rooted in ACCA's 12 Tenets of Taxation - simplicity, certainty, efficiency, and fairness - and aims to foster a more transparent, predictable, and inclusive tax regime. Key highlights include the formation of an independent Tax Law Simplification Commission, the introduction of 3–5 years Tax Policy Roadmap and the establishment of a Taxpayer Engagement & Transparency Portal modelled after global best practices. Other major recommendations include harmonized tax rates for salaried and non-salaried individuals, a 35% marginal tax rate for high-income earners, and targeted incentives for IT and AI R&D, green investments, and documented trade. To promote digital enablement, the proposal calls for mandatory e-filing and POS integration, inspired by models in Estonia and India. A significant reform in tax dispute resolution is also suggested through reinstating judicial neutrality via FPSC-appointed tribunal members. Additionally, the proposal advocates for an Independent Tax Oversight Body, referencing successful oversight models from the US and Australia. Top priorities identified in the proposal are tax law simplification, policy certainty, and real estate valuation reform. The document positions ACCA not only as a technical advisor but also as a partner in national development, expressing readiness to collaborate with government and civil society for fiscal sustainability and investment growth. The proposal, grounded in international best practices and local realities, will be shared with key stakeholders and is available on request. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
12-04-2025
- Express Tribune
Government jobs for sale
Unemployment, poverty and social distress have plagued Sindh for years. In a province where people are driven to the brink — selling their children, facing hunger, and even resorting to suicide — the dream of a stable government job is a distant hope for many. Unfortunately, this hope is crushed not by a lack of ability but by the deep-rooted corruption within the Sindh Public Service Commission (SPSC). According to the Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) 2023, around 39.3% of Pakistan's population lives in multidimensional poverty, with Sindh being one of the worst-affected provinces. Coupled with this, Pakistan ranked 133 out of 180 countries in Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index 2023, highlighting the magnitude of institutional decay. The recruitment process in Sindh has become nothing more than a money-making enterprise. The so-called merit-based system has been replaced with a marketplace where jobs are sold to the highest bidder. Demanding hefty bribes in exchange for government positions is now the norm. There are even fixed rates — higher for 16th and 17th grade posts, lower for junior positions. The SPSC, which should be upholding integrity and fairness, has turned into a symbol of exploitation and deceit. It no longer conducts genuine recruitment tests; instead, it plays with the sentiments of thousands of deserving candidates. Rather than continuing the façade of open competition, it would be more honest for the Sindh government to shut down the SPSC altogether and open a shop to sell jobs openly, complete with price tags. The sale of government jobs in Sindh is not just a betrayal of merit, but a crime against the very citizens the state is meant to serve. As long as jobs remain for sale, the cycle of poverty, hopelessness and injustice will continue. Urgent reforms, transparency and accountability are needed to restore the credibility of public institutions. Only then can the youth of Sindh be given a fair chance at a dignified, merit-based future. Basit Muhammad Islamabad
