&w=3840&q=100)
Elon Musk's Starship fails again: Can his Mars dream survive another setback?
SpaceX's ninth Starship test flight ended in failure, with the spacecraft spinning out of control and disintegrating during reentry. The mission aimed to demonstrate critical capabilities for future Moon and Mars missions, but both the Starship and its Super Heavy booster were lost. What does this mean for Elon Musk's bold timeline to colonise Mars? read more
SpaceX's next-generation Starship spacecraft atop its Super Heavy booster is launched on its ninth test at the company's launch pad in Starbase, Texas, US, May 27, 2025. File Image/Reuters
SpaceX's latest attempt to demonstrate the viability of its massive Starship rocket — a crucial step in Elon Musk's vision of sending humans to Mars — ended in failure once again.
The launch, which took place from the company's Starbase facility in Texas, marked the ninth integrated flight test of the Starship-Super Heavy system.
While it managed to surpass the distance achieved in earlier attempts, the mission failed to accomplish several critical objectives.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The mission's objectives included deploying eight Starlink satellite simulators, performing an in-space engine relight and achieving a controlled reentry and splashdown in the Indian Ocean.
Shortly after liftoff, signs of trouble began to emerge. The Super Heavy booster, tasked with propelling the upper-stage spacecraft out of Earth's atmosphere, failed to complete its planned splashdown in the Gulf of Mexico and instead broke apart mid-descent.
Meanwhile, the upper-stage Starship vehicle continued coasting into suborbital space but experienced fuel leaks and began spiralling out of control before communication was lost entirely.
'Not looking great with a lot of our on-orbit objectives for today,' said SpaceX broadcaster Dan Huot during the company's livestream.
One of the key failures occurred 18 minutes after launch when the rocket's mechanism designed to deploy a batch of Starlink satellite simulators malfunctioned.
The payload bay door failed to open, cancelling the planned demonstration. 'Starship experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly,' SpaceX later confirmed, using the company's typical euphemism for in-flight explosions.
As if the flight test was not exciting enough, Starship experienced a rapid unscheduled disassembly. Teams will continue to review data and work toward our next flight test.
With a test like this, success comes from what we learn, and today's test will help us improve Starship's… — SpaceX (@SpaceX) May 28, 2025
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Why Starship is crucial to Musk's Mars plan
Elon Musk's goal of making humanity a 'multi-planetary species' heavily relies on the success of Starship — the most powerful rocket ever constructed.
The vehicle is designed to be fully reusable and capable of transporting both crew and cargo to the Moon, Mars and beyond. However, despite extensive redesigns and system upgrades across recent test flights, the latest mission's failure adds to a string of mishaps.
The latest rocket was also the first to fly using a previously flown Super Heavy booster, highlighting SpaceX's long-term goal of achieving low-cost, rapid reusability.
However, the booster's steep descent angle and intentional engine shutdown, meant to stress-test performance, ultimately led to its destruction. Starship's flight continued further than previous tests but still fell short of reaching its designated splashdown zone off the western coast of Australia.
Fuel venting procedures were activated before the vehicle disintegrated roughly 45 minutes into what was supposed to be a 66-minute mission.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Musk noted on X that the rocket's failure was due to a leak in the primary fuel tank, while also touting 'a lot of good data to review' and vowing to accelerate the launch cadence to one every 3–4 weeks.
Starship made it to the scheduled ship engine cutoff, so big improvement over last flight! Also, no significant loss of heat shield tiles during ascent.
Leaks caused loss of main tank pressure during the coast and re-entry phase. Lot of good data to review.
Launch cadence for… — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 28, 2025
Still, delays and technical issues raise concerns about SpaceX's ability to meet future deadlines, including those set by Nasa.
SpaceX's broader vision includes establishing a human presence on Mars. The company has outlined plans to launch uncrewed missions to Mars as early as 2026, with the goal of building a self-sustaining colony.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
These missions would rely on the successful development and operation of the Starship system.
What this means for Nasa's Moon missions
Nasa has bet heavily on a modified version of the Starship upper stage for its Artemis programme, which aims to return astronauts to the lunar surface. The agency plans to use its Space Launch System and Orion capsule to transport astronauts to lunar orbit, where a waiting Starship will ferry them to and from the Moon.
The first landing mission, Artemis 3, is scheduled for 2027 at the earliest, but that timeline now faces increasing uncertainty.
Complicating matters further is political tension surrounding the Artemis programme itself. The Trump administration has pushed for a reevaluation of Nasa's current plans, including potential cancellation of the Space Launch System and Orion capsule.
Musk himself has previously argued that lunar missions are a 'distraction' and that resources would be better directed straight toward Mars.
Regardless of the destination, successful demonstration flights are essential before Starship can carry astronauts or large cargo payloads into deep space.
The continued failures in test launches indicate SpaceX has considerable ground to cover before it can safely support such missions.
How SpaceX is still on track
While the latest test flight ended with yet another fiery breakup, SpaceX remains committed to its fast-paced, trial-by-fire development philosophy.
The company embraces a 'fail fast, learn fast' approach that has helped it dominate commercial spaceflight, and Musk's confidence in the program appears unshaken — at least publicly.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Fans and enthusiasts gathered at nearby Isla Blanca Park and other vantage points to witness the launch. One tourist from Australia, who travelled with his family to witness the event, described it as 'super exciting to see' despite the failure, echoing the sentiment that even unsuccessful missions can yield valuable data, reported AFP.
SpaceX has also made progress on other fronts. The company has successfully caught the Super Heavy booster using giant robotic arms on the launch tower during other recent tests — a feat critical to rapid rocket turnaround and cost reduction, although no such catch attempt was made during this flight.
Regulatory authorities, including the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), have recently cleared SpaceX to increase its Starship launch frequency from five to 25 flights annually, even as environmental groups raise concerns about potential harm to local wildlife such as sea turtles and shorebirds.
On another front, Musk is attempting to juggle SpaceX's technical challenges alongside his broader business and political engagements, including his outspoken support for US President Donald Trump.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Also Watch:
With inputs from agencies
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
18 minutes ago
- India Today
From peace talks to asylum, Russia has a laugh as Trump and Elon Musk feud
Senior Russian official Dmitry Medvedev on Friday poked fun at the increasingly bitter public feud between US President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk with an offer to mediate peace between the two."We are ready to facilitate the conclusion of a peace deal between D and E for a reasonable fee and to accept Starlink shares as payment," Medvedev, a former Russian president and prime minister, posted on fight, guys!" he added, tongue firmly in cheek. Medvedev's quip scored a laughing face emoji from Musk, who owns satellite internet service Starlink. The Russian leader's post was aimed at the spiralling war of words between the political allies-turned-foes. A close ally of Vladimir Putin, Medvedev currently serves as deputy chair of Russia's Security Council. His remarks came amid glee and schadenfreude among the Russian leadership at the public fallout between the two American currently trying to broker peace between Russia and Ukraine, has clashed with Musk over criticism of his administration's "big, beautiful" tax and spending Tesla and SpaceX CEO, once a Trump backer and head of the newly minted Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), termed the legislation a "disgusting abomination". After his White House exit, he escalated the feud by accusing the two-time President of being tied to the Jeffrey Epstein Novikov, first deputy chairman of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs, said Russia is willing to offer Musk political asylum if needed."I think that Musk has a completely different game, [so] he will not need any political asylum, although if he did, Russia, of course, could provide it," Novikov told state news agency senator Dmitry Rogozin echoed the sentiment."Elon, don't be upset! If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us and become one of us," Rogozin tweeted. "Here you will find reliable comrades and complete freedom of technical creativity." The Trump-Musk rift has grown steadily in recent days. Just days ago, the US President gifted Musk a golden key during a White House event honouring his work at DOGE. But relations soured quickly following Musk's public rebuke and has since said he has no plans to speak to Musk and indicated that a review of the billionaire's substantial government contracts is in the offing."We'll take a look at everything," the President said. "It's a lot of money."Tune InMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
41 minutes ago
- Business Standard
US Supreme Court gives DOGE access to sensitive social security data
The decision allows DOGE, once led by Elon Musk, full access to personal data in the Social Security database while the case moves forward on appeal Bloomberg By Greg Stohr and Zoe Tillman The US Supreme Court gave the Department of Government Efficiency access to sensitive Social Security information, lifting restrictions a judge said were needed to protect the privacy of millions of Americans. Over three dissents, the high court on Friday granted a Trump administration request to put US District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander's order on hold. The decision lets DOGE, the office once led by Elon Musk, have full access to personally identifiable information in the Social Security Administration database while the case proceeds on appeal. 'Under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work,' the court said in a three-paragraph order, which didn't lay out the majority's reasoning. The court's three liberals — Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson — dissented. In an opinion joined by Sotomayor, Jackson said the court was 'creating grave privacy risks for millions of Americans.' In a separate decision, the high court said a different judge went too far by requiring DOGE officials to testify and produce records to a watchdog group. The order came in a case about whether the DOGE office is covered by US public records laws. The Supreme Court liberals dissented from that decision as well. The cases are the first Supreme Court clashes involving DOGE, the office set up by President Donald Trump to weed out what he says is wasteful spending across the federal government. Sensitive Data Musk recently left his formal government position within the administration and is now publicly feuding with Trump. In the SSA case, US Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the Supreme Court that 'the government cannot eliminate waste and fraud if district courts bar the very agency personnel with expertise and the designated mission of curtailing such waste and fraud from performing their jobs.' The disputed data includes Social Security numbers, addresses, birth and marriage certificates, tax and earnings records, employment history, and bank and credit card information. Hollander said two labor unions and an advocacy group for retired people were likely to succeed on their claims that unfettered access would violate the 1974 Privacy Act. 'For some 90 years, SSA has been guided by the foundational principle of an expectation of privacy with respect to its records,' the Baltimore-based judge wrote. 'This case exposes a wide fissure in the foundation.' Hollander's order allowed DOGE team members access to anonymized data only after completing the type of training and background checks required for SSA employees. She said DOGE employees could get 'discrete, particularized and non-anonymized' information if they submitted a written statement explaining why the information was needed and why anonymous data was insufficient. Hollander also ordered people affiliated with DOGE to delete data they've already acquired. The 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals kept Hollander's order in place on a 9-6 vote. In her dissent, Jackson said the lower courts had crafted an order 'tailored to the needs of the moment.' She said the Supreme Court had 'truly lost its moorings' by granting the government's request without requiring it to show that it was suffering any harm. 'The 'urgency' underlying the government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes,' she wrote. Democracy Forward, the legal-advocacy group that represented the challengers, said it was a 'sad day for our democracy and a scary day for millions of people.' White House spokesperson Liz Huston hailed the decision. 'The Supreme Court allowing the Trump administration to carry out commonsense efforts to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse and modernize government information systems is a huge victory for the rule of law,' she said in an email. The case is Social Security Administration v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, 24A1063. DOGE Records The Supreme Court's action in the records case blocks a Washington federal judge's order for the administration to answer questions, produce documents and make DOGE administrator Amy Gleason available to testify at a deposition. US District Judge Christopher Cooper had authorized the group that brought the public records case, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, or CREW, to gather evidence about DOGE's activities as it fights with the Justice Department over the office's legal status. The Supreme Court majority faulted Cooper for requiring the government to disclose internal DOGE recommendations and to say whether those suggestions were followed. 'Separation of powers concerns counsel judicial deference and restraint in the context of discovery regarding internal executive branch communications,' the Supreme Court said in its two-page order. Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson didn't explain their reasons for dissenting. CREW has argued that the DOGE Service should be considered an agency under the federal Freedom of Information Act, which empowers the public to see a wide range of government records. The Trump administration disagrees, arguing that DOGE plays a purely advisory role within the White House and is exempt from the law. Musk served as the public face of DOGE, but government lawyers stressed in court that Gleason is the formal head of the DOGE office. CREW's underlying public records request seeks to pry loose new information about the Tesla Inc. chief executive's role in dramatic cuts to federal spending and the workforce. The lawsuit also aims to reveal more broadly what DOGE-affiliated staff have been doing and the structure of that effort across US agencies. The case is US DOGE Service v. CREW, 24A1122.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
US Supreme Court grants DOGE access to social security data amid legal battle
The US Supreme Court on Friday permitted the Department of Government Efficiency, a key player in President Donald Trump's drive to slash the federal workforce, broad access to personal information on millions of Americans in Social Security Administration data systems while a legal challenge plays the request of the Justice Department, the justices put on hold Maryland-based US District Judge Ellen Hollander's order that had largely blocked DOGE's access to "personally identifiable information" in data such as medical and financial records while litigation proceeds in a lower court. Hollander found that allowing DOGE unfettered access likely would violate a federal privacy court's brief, unsigned order did not provide a rationale for siding with DOGE. The court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Its three liberal justices dissented from the order. Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a dissent that was joined by fellow liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, criticized the court's majority for granting DOGE "unfettered data access" despite the administration's "failure to show any need or any interest in complying with existing privacy safeguards."In a separate order on Friday, the Supreme Court extended its block on judicial orders requiring DOGE to turn over records to a government watchdog group that sought details on the entity established by Trump and swept through federal agencies as part of the Republican president's effort, spearheaded by billionaire Elon Musk, to eliminate federal jobs, downsize and reshape the US government and root out what they see as wasteful spending. Musk formally ended his government work on May labor unions and an advocacy group sued to stop DOGE from accessing sensitive data at the Social Security Administration, or SSA, including Social Security numbers, bank account data, tax information, earnings history and immigration agency is a major provider of government benefits, sending checks each month to more than 70 million recipients including retirees and disabled Forward, a liberal legal group that represented the plaintiffs, said Friday's order would put millions of Americans' data at risk."Elon Musk may have left Washington, DC, but his impact continues to harm millions of people," the group said in a statement. "We will continue to use every legal tool at our disposal to keep unelected bureaucrats from misusing the public's most sensitive data as this case moves forward."In their lawsuit, the plaintiffs argued that the Social Security Administration had been "ransacked" and that DOGE members had been installed without proper vetting or training and demanded access to some of the agency's most sensitive data in an April 17 ruling found that DOGE had failed to explain why its stated mission required "unprecedented, unfettered access to virtually SSA's entire data systems.""For some 90 years, SSA has been guided by the foundational principle of an expectation of privacy with respect to its records," Hollander wrote. "This case exposes a wide fissure in the foundation."advertisementHollander issued a preliminary injunction that prohibited DOGE staffers and anyone working with them from accessing data containing personal information, with only narrow exceptions. The judge's ruling did allow DOGE affiliates to access data that had been stripped of private information as long as those seeking access had gone through the proper training and passed background also ordered DOGE affiliates to "disgorge and delete" any personal information already in their Richmond, Virginia-based 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals in a 9-6 vote declined on April 30 to pause Hollander's block on DOGE's unlimited access to Social Security Administration Department lawyers in their Supreme Court filing characterized Hollander's order as judicial overreach."The district court is forcing the executive branch to stop employees charged with modernizing government information systems from accessing the data in those systems because, in the court's judgment, those employees do not 'need' such access," they six dissenting judges wrote that the case should have been treated the same as one in which 4th Circuit panel ruled 2-1 to allow DOGE to access data at the UTreasury and Education Departments and the Office of Personnel a concurring opinion, seven judges who ruled against DOGE wrote that the case involving Social Security data was "substantially stronger" with "vastly greater stakes," citing "detailed and profoundly sensitive Social Security records," such as family court and school records of children, mental health treatment records and credit card InMust Watch
