logo
Southern Baptist public policy arm survives challenge to its conservative credentials

Southern Baptist public policy arm survives challenge to its conservative credentials

DALLAS (AP) — Southern Baptist representatives on Wednesday fended off two efforts to move the staunchly conservative body even more sharply to the right, giving a vote of confidence to its public-policy agency and defeating a proposed constitutional ban on churches with women pastors.
The votes came just before the adjournment of the two-day annual meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation's largest Protestant denomination.
Church 'messengers' voted 3,744-2,819 to retain their public policy agency, rejecting calls for its abolition from those who allege the entity is tainted by liberal affiliations on immigration issues and who want it to be even more conservative than it already is.
The bid to enshrine a ban on churches with women pastors in the SBC constitution received a 3,421-2,191 vote, but that 61% majority fell short of the two-thirds support needed to initiate a constitutional ban.
The measures reflect debate only on the degree of conservatism in the SBC. It comes just a day after messengers overwhelmingly endorsed a call to overturn the Supreme Court's Obergefell v. Hodges decision legalizing same-sex marriage , and any other court and legislative actions with similar results. And it comes in a denomination that officially opposes women pastors, and where the debate is over whether that applies to women in subordinate pastoral roles.
The action affirming the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission amounted to a vote of confidence in the public advocacy voice of the nation's largest evangelical body, coming at a time when Christian conservatives have unprecedented influence in Washington.
Willy Rice, senior pastor of Calvary Baptist Church in Clearwater, Florida, said he filed the motion to abolish the ERLC with the aim of making it heed member criticisms. Had the measure passed, he argued, it would have given the agency time to enact changes by next year's annual meeting, when its fate would have come up for a final vote.
'But make no mistake, this motion is a wake-up call,' he said.
But Richard Land, a former longtime president of the commission, said it would be 'tragic' to silence Baptists' voice in Washington.
'We have more opportunity right now to influence public policy in our nation's capital than we have had in my lifetime,' Land said. 'We have a president who is more sympathetic. … We have more congressmen and senators who are sympathetic to what we as Southern Baptists are trying to do, and to turn back the barbarians at the gate in our culture.'
President Donald Trump has created at least three religion-focused entities with a strong evangelical Christian influence, reflecting the overwhelming support he's received from that demographic.
Brent Leatherwood, president of the ERLC, presented a slideshow in defense of the organization. It included a photo of him with House Speaker Mike Johnson, a fellow Southern Baptist. A day before the vote, an ERLC event championed a Tennessee ban on certain medical treatments for transgender minors that faces a Supreme Court challenge.
Abolishing the organization 'means the public square would be abandoned by the SBC, losing a powerful voice for the truth of the Gospel and in effect, rewarding secular efforts to push religion out,' Leatherwood said. What does the ERLC do?
While not a lobbying organization, the ERLC has advocated against abortion and transgender rights. It has promoted a strongly pro-Israel stance, a longtime evangelical priority. The commission has also provided ultrasound machines for organizations that seek to dissuade women from having abortions.
Leatherwood credited the ERLC with advocating for the repeal of Roe v. Wade, which was realized in a 2022 Supreme Court decision ending the nationwide right to an abortion. That was followed by abortion bans in several states. Leatherwood also touted ERLC advocacy for a pending congressional move to defund Planned Parenthood .
But some criticism focused on the ERLC's opposition to criminal penalties for women who seek abortions.
'Time after time, they've opposed righteous pro-life legislation that seeks equal justice for the unborn, arguing that those who choose abortion should face no legal consequences,' Ethan Jago, pastor of Five Bridges Church in Panama City, Florida, said in calling for the vote to abolish the commission.
Rice contended that 'outside progressive advocacy organizations have financially supported' the commission. But Leatherwood said more than 98% of commission funding comes from the SBC, with the remaining coming Baptist state conventions and individuals.
While the ERLC has been criticized for its advocacy on immigration reform, the commission says it has promoted only stances in keeping with official SBC resolutions calling for both the rule of law and respect for human dignity. Women in pastoral roles debated
The proposal on women pastors was a rerun of recent years' meetings. A similar proposal received two-thirds of votes in 2023, but fell just short of the necessary supermajority in 2024.
Wednesday's vote sought to restart the process.
The denomination's official statement of belief, the Baptist Faith and Message, reserves the role of pastor to men.
Southern Baptist churches are self-governing. But the convention can kick them out if deemed not in 'friendly cooperation,' based in part on how closely they adhere to the Baptist Faith and Message on issues such as women pastors.
But there remain disagreements over whether the faith statement applies only to women as a senior pastor or similar role, or whether it applies to ministry assistants with the title of pastor.
In recent years, the convention began purging churches that either had women as lead pastors or asserted that they could serve that role. That included one of its largest congregations, California's Saddleback Church.
But when an SBC committee this year retained a South Carolina megachurch with a woman on its pastoral staff, some argued this proved the need for a constitutional amendment. The church later quit the denomination of its own accord. Other ERLC-related controversies
Criticism has long dogged the ERLC. After Leatherwood last year commended former President Joe Biden — who is deeply unpopular among religious conservatives — for withdrawing his reelection bid, the then-chairman of the commission announced his firing. However, the commission retracted that announcement and the chairman resigned when it became clear that its board's executive committee hadn't agreed to that. Instead, the board gave Leatherwood a strong vote of confidence along with a warning against stirring unnecessary controversy.
A previous commission president drew fire for his harsh criticisms of pro-Trump pastors in 2016.
___
Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House approves cuts package
House approves cuts package

E&E News

time42 minutes ago

  • E&E News

House approves cuts package

The House approved a $9.4 billion rescissions package Thursday, a White House priority that would claw back more than half a billion dollars for international disaster aid and clean energy programs. The 'Rescissions Act of 2025,' H.R. 4, now heads across the Capitol, where senators say they want to amend it before voting on it later this summer. The upper chamber must act on the bill by July 18, or the funds in question will have to be spent. House leaders were able to pass the package Thursday despite reluctance from some moderate Republicans, who had expressed concerns about proposed cuts to the public broadcasting budget and a popular AIDS prevention program. The bill passed 214-212. Advertisement 'Today's House passage of this initial rescissions package marks a critical step toward a more responsible and transparent government that puts the interests of the American taxpayers first,' said House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). The rescissions, requested by White House budget chief Russ Vought, are based on recommendations from the so-called Department of Government Efficiency. They target $8.3 billion in current funding for the State Department and $1.1 billion for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which would mainly impact local PBS and NPR stations. 'Every dollar spent on woke foreign policy is not only a dollar wasted but is a dollar devoted to tarnish our own nation's image,' said Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-Ala.), a senior appropriator, during a hearing on the bill earlier this week. Among the State Department cuts is a $496 million clawback for various international disaster assistance initiatives. The White House has said it would leave intact programs that the administration believes are 'life-saving or have a clear, direct nexus to U.S. national interests.' Officials have not specified which programs would be cut or spared. Additionally, the bill would repeal the United States' entire $125 million contribution to the international Clean Technology Fund for fiscal 2025. The White House Office of Management and Budget has said that the rescissions would cancel $6 million for 'net zero cities' in Mexico, $5 million for 'green transportation and logistics in Eurasia,' $2.1 million for 'climate resilience in Southeast Asia, Latin America [and] East Africa' and $500,000 for 'electric buses in Rwanda.' It's not clear how the rescissions request would target those specific initiatives. They are not explicitly named in Congress' explanatory statement for the fiscal 2024 State-Foreign Operations funding law, which was extended through fiscal 2025. And investments that countries receive for projects under the Clean Technology Fund are not directly tied to donor countries' contributions. A spokesperson for OMB did not respond to emailed questions before publication. OMB said in its rescission request to Congress that the repeal would be in line with President Donald Trump's executive order pulling the U.S. out of international climate agreements. It said the Clean Technology Fund 'invests in Green New Deal projects in developing countries that do not reflect America's values or put the American people first.' Other cuts would go after funding for programs meant to support democracy, global nutrition, LGBTQ people, AIDS prevention and contraception access, as well as the World Health Organization, the U.S. Institute of Peace and public radio broadcasters. More to come The package of cuts could be the first of multiple efforts by the White House and congressional Republicans to rescind funding that was already appropriated with bipartisan support in order to save taxpayer dollars and target Democratic priorities. Democrats say the effort could harm or kill people across the country and around the world. They have blasted it as a dangerous precedent and part of a broader effort to illegally impound, or withhold, funding approved by Congress. OMB said in a statement of administration policy this week that Trump has 'exercised his authority' under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to request the rescissions in the bill. The White House is claiming those same authorities to unilaterally freeze appropriated funds and may send Congress a spending deferral notice before the end of this Congress. 'These rescissions would eliminate programs that are antithetical to American interests and values, such as funding radical gender ideology, 'equity' programs, and policies that threaten our energy security,' the White House said in the statement. The public broadcasting cuts would mostly impact locally owned radio and television stations, which many Americans rely on for emergency alerts during and after natural disasters. Rep. Teresa Leger Fernandez (D-N.M.) noted during the bill's Rules Committee hearing this week that when Hurricane Helene hit the Southeast last year, 'people were relying on public radio because that's all that existed.' House Appropriations ranking member Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) said the cuts to international disaster aid would hurt farmers in Republican-led states whose crops help feed people around the world following extreme weather events.

Judge Questions Trump's Authority to Deploy National Guard to Los Angeles
Judge Questions Trump's Authority to Deploy National Guard to Los Angeles

Wall Street Journal

time43 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Judge Questions Trump's Authority to Deploy National Guard to Los Angeles

SAN FRANCISCO—A federal judge on Thursday sharply questioned the Trump administration's justifications for mobilizing troops in Los Angeles in response to protests that have swept the city, promising to issue a decision soon in California's bid to stop the deployments. During the hourlong hearing before U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco, a lawyer for the Justice Department argued that courts have no power to second-guess the president's decisions regarding the National Guard troops and Marines that President Trump has sent over the objections of state and local officials.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store